Reasons Homosexuality Is Wrong.
scott

UK

#227 Sep 10, 2010
homosexuals are pointless in society, they do not stimulate the economy by reproducing. plus would homosexuals be patriotic in war and fight on the frontlines or would they be at home and protest against war? if this was a different era and the fight for survival was imminant and natural selection took form, would homosexuals survive?? No its because the only manual labour have to do is lift up shopping bags for there new shoes!
Real Chicagoan

Plainfield, IL

#228 Sep 11, 2010
scott wrote:
homosexuals are pointless in society, they do not stimulate the economy by reproducing.
Homosexuals don't randomly get knocked up or knock their partners up and then live off of welfare, section 8, food stamps, and medicaid for the rest of their lives.
awesome person

Hillsboro, OR

#230 Nov 26, 2010
Lil Roo wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, honor killing, hello. You wouldn't honestly suggest that they do anything else that might potentially embarass the family, would you?
Look there is nothing wrong with being homosexual, nobody cares what the bible says. People should be free to express themselves sexually however they please without people like you telling them that that makes them a bad person.
Davey

Prospect Heights, IL

#231 Nov 26, 2010
If they just minded their own business, who cares. What they do behind closed doors doesn't bother me.

But what they do in public often does.
Tx_freedom

United States

#232 Nov 26, 2010
scott wrote:
would homosexuals be patriotic in war and fight on the frontlines or would they be at home and protest against war? No its because the only manual labour have to do is lift up shopping bags for there new shoes!
Scott: in the USA gay people want to openly serve in the armed forces. Your old stereotype of gays isn't even funny because we know gays to be football players, car mechanics, doctors, lawyers, police officers, Mayors, Senators, etc etc etc.
You're just making a fool of yourself by putting down a class of people that you know nothing about. Shame on you.
Atheist Liberal

United States

#233 Nov 26, 2010
I have nothing against homosexuals. But I do not believe that homosexuality is normal either.

I do not believe that gays choose to be gay...but I also do not believe that heterosexuals choose to reject homosexuality. In both cases it is in our DNA.

Gays should no more expect the general population to accept homosexuality as normal, than the general population should expect gays to decide to be straight.

“A Programmer is not in IT!”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me! Charlie

#234 Nov 26, 2010
Flamer gays have to go, but normal gays are cool.
Coincidentally

Bloomingdale, IL

#235 Nov 26, 2010
RACE wrote:
Flamer gays have to go, but normal gays are cool.
You're cool!
Atheist Liberal

United States

#236 Nov 27, 2010
If one were to think logically and avoid the emotional thought processes so prevalent on the left and in the "gay is normal" camp, then one would see that I am in fact, correct.

Early human groups probably rejected homosexual behavior because it put the entire group at risk. Limited resources were being consumed without the possibility of producing off spring. Diseases were needlessly spread as well. 

It is in mankind's nature to reject homosexuality. The tenets of our evolutionary development dictate that homosexuality was viewed as a threat to the very survival of the group. This explains modern human society's strong discomfort with the issue. 

I think modern man has come a long way inspite of his evolutionary baggage. Evolution dictates that gay is not normal. It's time to give society some credit for the vast majority who is comfortable with live and let live attitudes. Why push them on the gay is normal issue? Isn't enough to live together in peace?

“Snow days!”

Since: Nov 08

A winter wonderland

#237 Nov 27, 2010
Tx_freedom wrote:
<quoted text>Scott: in the USA gay people want to openly serve in the armed forces. Your old stereotype of gays isn't even funny because we know gays to be football players, car mechanics, doctors, lawyers, police officers, Mayors, Senators, etc etc etc.
You're just making a fool of yourself by putting down a class of people that you know nothing about. Shame on you.
Oh, but that's what Scott is really good at. You ought to read some of his diatribes against atheists. Very entertaining.

“Snow days!”

Since: Nov 08

A winter wonderland

#238 Nov 27, 2010
Atheist Liberal wrote:
If one were to think logically and avoid the emotional thought processes so prevalent on the left and in the "gay is normal" camp, then one would see that I am in fact, correct.
Early human groups probably rejected homosexual behavior because it put the entire group at risk. Limited resources were being consumed without the possibility of producing off spring. Diseases were needlessly spread as well. 
It is in mankind's nature to reject homosexuality. The tenets of our evolutionary development dictate that homosexuality was viewed as a threat to the very survival of the group. This explains modern human society's strong discomfort with the issue. 
I think modern man has come a long way inspite of his evolutionary baggage. Evolution dictates that gay is not normal. It's time to give society some credit for the vast majority who is comfortable with live and let live attitudes. Why push them on the gay is normal issue? Isn't enough to live together in peace?
And one would also think that the human race has progressed a bit from their Neanderthal roots.
Atheist Liberal

Los Gatos, CA

#239 Nov 27, 2010
Andie J wrote:
<quoted text>
And one would also think that the human race has progressed a bit from their Neanderthal roots.
I subscrbe to the theory that Neanderthals did not go extinct Andie. I think they were "absorbed" by homosapiens.

“Snow days!”

Since: Nov 08

A winter wonderland

#240 Nov 27, 2010
Atheist Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
I subscrbe to the theory that Neanderthals did not go extinct Andie. I think they were "absorbed" by homosapiens.
I think they evolved into homosapiens.
Atheist Liberal

Los Gatos, CA

#241 Nov 27, 2010
Partly true Andie. But the artifacts and physical remains show that Neanderthals and homosapiens existed at the same time - 2 different species.

“Snow days!”

Since: Nov 08

A winter wonderland

#242 Nov 27, 2010
Atheist Liberal wrote:
Partly true Andie. But the artifacts and physical remains show that Neanderthals and homosapiens existed at the same time - 2 different species.
And the smarter one prevailed, I guess. My point is that humanity's ways of thinking must have grown in the past couple of million years.
Attorney

Phoenix, AZ

#243 Nov 27, 2010
Poster 52 wrote:
Reasons homosexuality both male and female human same sex-sex is wrong are:-Their are two human genders male and female not only one human gender thus males and females are naturally intended for each other.-It's because of heterosexuality the human race has become not homosexuality.-All kids whenever possible deserve both a dad and a mom not two or three moms.-The great Saint Paul informed same sex-sex is not natural and unGodly.Thus the same sex-sex act is not natural also morally and Spiritually wrong.Of course not to hate nor dislike homosexual people but the same sex-sex act is wrong!.
More reasons why homosexuals are wrong:

1. The catholic priests are homosexual pedophiles and we all have heard how many victims they have molested.

2. The catholic nuns are homosexuals and we all have heard how angry they are at children and how they abuse children with tortures.

3. The pope is a homosexual who protected homosexual priests by moving them around to molest more children, instead of reporting the gay pedophile priests to the authorities.

4. The homosexuals (Gaetan Dugas) have spread the disease HIV-AIDS around the world to kill millions of people.

5. The homosexuals are fifty times more likely to be carriers of infectious diseases than the average person.

6. Homosexual animals fail to reproduce and they go extinct. The same with human homosexuals. The survival of the fittest tells us that homosexuality is the path to extinction.

7. Most serial killers have been homosexual men - Jeffrey Dahmer, John Gacy, Henry Lee Lucas, and many others were homosexuals who molested and then murdered their victims.

There you have Seven Reasons to Ban Homosexuality and not one bible verse is needed to support these Seven Reasons!
Atheist Liberal

San Jose, CA

#244 Nov 27, 2010
Andie J wrote:
<quoted text>
And the smarter one prevailed, I guess. My point is that humanity's ways of thinking must have grown in the past couple of million years.
Agreed Andie.

To a large extent, I think they have. But again, the I suspect we're talking about ingrained views. People are 'designed' to reject homosexuality...just as others are designed homosexual.

“Snow days!”

Since: Nov 08

A winter wonderland

#245 Nov 28, 2010
Atheist Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed Andie.
To a large extent, I think they have. But again, the I suspect we're talking about ingrained views. People are 'designed' to reject homosexuality...just as others are designed homosexual.
Let's quantify that- some people are designed (or ingrained or brainwashed) to reject homosexuality. I don't think prejudice is something someone is born with. Our "tribe" mentality has been evolved out of us. JMO
Atheist Liberal

Hilmar, CA

#246 Nov 28, 2010
I think it boils down to whether you view anti-homosexual sentiments as prejudice, or evolutionary characteristics. Homosexuals wish to call their homosexuality genetic. Why then do we assume that heterosexual rejection of homosexuality is "prejudice" - not also genetic?

The physical evidence suggests they are both genetic. Prejudice has little to nothing to do with it in my opinion. Prejudice is learned behavior. An evolved characteristic is not taught. Do gays learn to be gay? I don't think so.

“Snow days!”

Since: Nov 08

A winter wonderland

#247 Nov 28, 2010
Atheist Liberal wrote:
I think it boils down to whether you view anti-homosexual sentiments as prejudice, or evolutionary characteristics. Homosexuals wish to call their homosexuality genetic. Why then do we assume that heterosexual rejection of homosexuality is "prejudice" - not also genetic?
The physical evidence suggests they are both genetic. Prejudice has little to nothing to do with it in my opinion. Prejudice is learned behavior. An evolved characteristic is not taught. Do gays learn to be gay? I don't think so.
I'm in agreement here. I think that prejudice is a learned behavior, homosexuality is intrinsic.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min the deplorable Jo... 1,433,265
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 22 min Hill4me 225,416
last post wins! (Dec '10) 52 min honeymylove 2,559
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr VN Vet 61,509
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr Wolverine33 9,546
Word (Dec '08) 3 hr PEllen 6,755
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 4 hr PEllen 3,198
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr Go Blue Forever 103,641

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages