Obama promises more than 600,000 stimulus jobs

Full story: Newsday 109,590
President Barack Obama promised Monday to deliver more than 600,000 jobs through his $787 billion stimulus plan this summer, with federal agencies pumping billions into public works projects, schools and summer youth programs. Full Story
nac

Southold, NY

#118753 Apr 19, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, azzhole, great. So you don't believe in any of these primary right-wing beliefs:
Man-made global warming is a hoax.
Corporations don't need to be regulated.
The economy is driven by investors not by demand.
God wrote the Bible.
The rich deserve lower tax rates than the non-rich.
Anyone who is poor is so because they're lazy.
President Obama is a: socialist, nazi, communist, Muslim, going to take your gun, wants to won your children, is satan, etc., etc., etc., ad nauseam.
Voter fraud is rampant.
Sex education causes pregnancy.
Women SHOULD be paid 77% of men.
Women should not have rights over their bodies.
Money is more important than people.
The planet is 6,000 years old.
Right? So what do you beleive?
Ok fine, I'll address your childish nonsense.

I don't know if Man-made global warming is a hoax or not.

Corporations need to be regulated, the extent of regulation is what an adult would discuss about it.

The economy is more complex than you have described, and cannot be summarized in a useful way in one sentence.

I'm pretty sure that the bible is the work of man, but I don't have one handy - so I cant check for an author credit.

I do not believe that "The rich deserve lower tax rates than the non-rich."

I do not believe that "Anyone who is poor is so because they're lazy."

Your nonsense about the President is too idiotic to address.

I don't know if "Voter fraud is rampant" or not. I voted once, I don't know what anyone else did.

Sex causes pregnancy.

I do not believe that "Women SHOULD be paid 77% of men."

I do not believe that "Women should not have rights over their bodies."

Money more important than people? Depends on the person.

I don't know how old the earth is. It was here when I arrived, all I can definitively say is that its older than me.

Satisfied?
TrollBot

Mclean, VA

#118755 Apr 20, 2013
angry joe the lib prog turd wrote:
<quoted text>

(Another tediously juvenile troll of complete horseshit strawmen snipped)
Troll. Ignore.

"Flagging trolls until Topix lets you killfile the scum."
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118756 Apr 20, 2013
TrollBot wrote:
<quoted text>
Troll. Ignore.
"Flagging trolls until Topix lets you killfile the scum."
Oh, poor teddy. Can't stand not being the center of attention can 'ya?
Teddy R

Mclean, VA

#118757 Apr 21, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, poor teddy. Can't stand not being the center of attention can 'ya?
Poor joe. Still oblivious to the dramatic irony of the crap he posts.

But don't stop, dude - we're all busting a gut.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118758 Apr 22, 2013
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor joe. Still oblivious to the dramatic irony of the crap he posts.
But don't stop, dude - we're all busting a gut.
Jeez, is that all you've got? You're sounding pretty consistently pathetic lately.
Teddy R

Houston, TX

#118760 Apr 22, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Jeez, is that all you've got? You're sounding pretty consistently pathetic lately.
For you? Yeah - it doesn't take much. You're a long-running joke with no punchline.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118761 Apr 22, 2013
Another in the series "What's Wrong with Righty"

A strong belief in a hands off approach to economics (laissez-faire free markets) is tightly linked to the rejection of scientific facts such as climate change, according to research published in Psychological Science in late March.

Those who rejected climate change appeared to be more accepting of conspiracy theories in general. Belief that the moon landing was actually staged on Earth, that the government allowed the 9/11 terrorist attacks occur so they could invade the Middle East, and other conspiracy theories predicted rejection of climate change.

“This finding suggests that a general propensity to endorse any of a number of conspiracy theories predisposes people to reject entirely unrelated scientific facts,” Lewandowsky and his colleagues said.

http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/03/...
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118763 Apr 23, 2013
Another in the series "What's Wrong with Righty"

New Hampshire state Rep. Stella Tremblay (R-Auburn) believes that Alex Jones’ website Infowars has revealed the truth behind the Boston Marathon bombings.

The New Hampshire Democratic Party on Tuesday highlighted a Facebook message Tremblay left on Glenn Beck’s fan page last Friday.

The message claimed the U.S. government secretly carried out the Boston attack and that the suspect who was arrested was merely a patsy. The post linked to an Alex Jones video.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118764 Apr 23, 2013
Does it surprise you that the U.S. is both the third least taxed developed country and the fourth highest in wealth inequality among all nations? With so little revenue going to the general public, it's not surprising either that our country is the fourth worst in the overall well-being of its children.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118765 Apr 23, 2013
Recipients of 'entitlements' are accused by the uninformed of getting something for nothing. The opposite is true. According to the Urban Institute, the typical two-earner couple making average wages throughout their lifetimes will receive LESS in Social Security benefits than they paid in. Same for single males. Almost the same for single females.

Getting something for nothing? Yes, the rich are. Tax expenditures, which are deductions and exemptions that primarily benefit the highest-earning individuals, cost about 8 percent of the GDP, the same percentage that goes to Social Security and Medicare.

If just one of the tax breaks for the rich, the $113,700 cap on Payroll Tax, were eliminated, Social Security would be almost entirely funded for the next 75 years.
Proud to be a britisher

Ashburn, VA

#118766 Apr 24, 2013
Ha..ha,.ha,.ha,.ha,.hæ,.hæ.... OMG! 9.4%!!! That's great!! Ha ha ha!! All the bleady americans think that america is a super power!! Ha!! Soon u r gonna realise the truth when u will be begging from britain and other wealthier countries like china, russia, etc.... Beggers!! Ohhh! Don't cry baby!! LOL!! Come to europe am sure our country will give u some compensation!! Other wise send ur chicks to our country,,we would try to employ them at the job of getting fucked by our dicks!! Ha.ha.ha.....
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118767 Apr 24, 2013
Another conservative shibboleth debunked:

It's been a very bad week for the austerity movement.

Austerity has been discredited as a path to economic prosperity for awhile. But a real breakthrough came last week, when a paper written by a graduate student (UMass Amherst's Thomas Herndon) debunked the famous Reinhart & Rogoff study, which had claimed that growth slows precipitously when a country's debt rises above 90% of GDP.

Since then, more dominos have tumbled...

http://www.businessinsider.com/stephen-colber...

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/stephen-colber...
nac

Piscataway, NJ

#118768 Apr 24, 2013
Great work joe! Stick it to "righty"

“Liberal Source for Cop Killers”

Since: Dec 07

Daytona Beach

#118769 Apr 25, 2013
joe wrote:
Recipients of 'entitlements' are accused by the uninformed of getting something for nothing. The opposite is true. According to the Urban Institute, the typical two-earner couple making average wages throughout their lifetimes will receive LESS in Social Security benefits than they paid in. Same for single males. Almost the same for single females.
Getting something for nothing? Yes, the rich are. Tax expenditures, which are deductions and exemptions that primarily benefit the highest-earning individuals, cost about 8 percent of the GDP, the same percentage that goes to Social Security and Medicare.
If just one of the tax breaks for the rich, the $113,700 cap on Payroll Tax, were eliminated, Social Security would be almost entirely funded for the next 75 years.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022741...

'Cut & Paste'
Teddy R

Mclean, VA

#118770 Apr 25, 2013
Guinness Drinker wrote:
That's a charitable term for joe's spew.

A more precise term would be "plagiarism."

“Liberal Source for Cop Killers”

Since: Dec 07

Daytona Beach

#118771 Apr 25, 2013
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a charitable term for joe's spew.
A more precise term would be "plagiarism."
well, here's another way to interpret it. People Magazine just named Gwyneth Paltrow "The World's Most Beautiful Woman". Today, the 'Media Bullshit Meter' is at an all time high.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118772 Apr 25, 2013
Typical right-wing responses. Can't refute the facts so attack the bearer. That's why you thugs are dying off and rapidly becoming irrelevant. You're too stupid to present cogent ideas, arguments, discussion, facts, etc.

I notice you fools don't post ANYTHING except attacks on me. I guess I should feel complimented. And you should be grateful; without my posts you'd have NOTHING TO SAY!

“Liberal Source for Cop Killers”

Since: Dec 07

Daytona Beach

#118773 Apr 25, 2013
joe wrote:
Typical right-wing responses. Can't refute the facts so attack the bearer. That's why you thugs are dying off and rapidly becoming irrelevant. You're too stupid to present cogent ideas, arguments, discussion, facts, etc.
I notice you fools don't post ANYTHING except attacks on me. I guess I should feel complimented. And you should be grateful; without my posts you'd have NOTHING TO SAY!
what's to refute from collecting facts from media bias ? and where's the daily 'Racism' rant ? Liberals get a fee everytime that word is used for marketing their causes
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118774 Apr 25, 2013
Like I said, you're so stupid that if anything is posted that doesn't come from your right-wing fringe sources you call it media bias.

I guess that works for the dumb and lazy; you never have to read anything, just listen to fox, they'll tell you what to think.

The daily racism rant will come shortly after you make one of your low-life racist statements. Duh!
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118775 Apr 25, 2013
Recipients of 'entitlements' are accused by the uninformed of getting something for nothing. The opposite is true. According to the Urban Institute, the typical two-earner couple making average wages throughout their lifetimes will receive LESS in Social Security benefits than they paid in. Same for single males. Almost the same for single females.

Getting something for nothing? Yes, the rich are. Tax expenditures, which are deductions and exemptions that primarily benefit the highest-earning individuals, cost about 8 percent of the GDP, the same percentage that goes to Social Security and Medicare.

If just one of the tax breaks for the rich, the $113,700 cap on Payroll Tax, were eliminated, Social Security would be almost entirely funded for the next 75 years.

-Paul Buchheit

So, what would you refute? Anything? I didn't think so.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 10 min L Morales 71,271
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 18 min wojar 182,180
last post wins! (Apr '13) 23 min L Morales 411
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 38 min Mandela 68,913
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 49 min IBdaMann 49,363
Holiday Greetings 2 hr Ebeneizer Scrooge 3
Fight at Navy Pier 2 hr Negras all 3
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 hr Yeah 1,156,210
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:03 am PST

NBC Sports 6:03AM
Jim Caldwell: No concerns about starting a rookie center
Bleacher Report 8:46 AM
What Are Experts Saying About Vikings?
NBC Sports11:28 AM
Bears extend Roberto Garza through 2015
NBC Sports 7:32 AM
Full-blown Bears house-cleaning could be coming
Bleacher Report 6:10 PM
Could Cutler, Shanahan Reunion Work for Jets?