Obama promises more than 600,000 stim...

Obama promises more than 600,000 stimulus jobs

There are 109535 comments on the Newsday story from Jun 8, 2009, titled Obama promises more than 600,000 stimulus jobs. In it, Newsday reports that:

President Barack Obama promised Monday to deliver more than 600,000 jobs through his $787 billion stimulus plan this summer, with federal agencies pumping billions into public works projects, schools and summer youth programs.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118678 Apr 8, 2013
So, you've explained yourself quite "nicely". I pointed out an incredibly foul racist statement and you're good with that.

I was quite mistaken about you. You're just another right wing low-life. Peddle your "non-partisan" crap somewhere else,'kay?
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118679 Apr 8, 2013
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
joe -
Since you're all so non-partisan about calling out extremist ideological idiocy, how about letting us know where you come down on this lib prog collectivist/statist view:
"MSNBC Host: Your Kids Belong to the Collective"
"... college professor and MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry says your children are not yours – they are owned by the community."
"“We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families,” says the professor of political science at Tulane University, where she is founding director of the Anna Julia Cooper Project on Gender, Race, and Politics in the South. Kids belong to whole communities, she insists, and once we realize this we’ll make “better investments” in government indoctrination of children."
http://www.infowars.com/your-kids-belong-to-t...
Insane and dangerous socialist claptrap, I hope you will agree.
Yeah, she's right.

And you should pay better attention to who you use to quote from. Alec Jones (like most far-right slugs) is notorious for re-writing and mis-quoting what people say.

we’ll make “better investments”.

not

we’ll make “better investments” in government indoctrination of children."

More drivel from the Good 'Ole Goobers (GOP).
nac

Southold, NY

#118680 Apr 8, 2013
joe wrote:
So, you've explained yourself quite "nicely". I pointed out an incredibly foul racist statement and you're good with that.
I was quite mistaken about you. You're just another right wing low-life. Peddle your "non-partisan" crap somewhere else,'kay?
I'm not "good" with racism from the left or the right.

In the posts above, there is a foul racist statement from a left wing moron and another foul racist statement from a right wing moron.

You didn't comment on the lefty racism, but felt the need to be "offended" by the same nonsense from the right wing dolt.

If you think I'm a "right wing low-life," you obviously haven't understood anything I've written. The main theme of my posts is that the republican and democrat parties are both bought and paid for by the same global bankers and international special interests.

Explain to me how exposing the criminality of both parties is right wing please.
nac

Southold, NY

#118681 Apr 8, 2013
Hey joe, since reading the books I suggested to you is way above your pay grade, how about reading this article about how BOTH parties (yes even the one you worship) serve only the rich and care not about useful idiots like yourself...

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2013/04/poverty-...

Joe... Comment?
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118682 Apr 9, 2013
nac wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not "good" with racism from the left or the right.
In the posts above, there is a foul racist statement from a left wing moron and another foul racist statement from a right wing moron.
You didn't comment on the lefty racism, but felt the need to be "offended" by the same nonsense from the right wing dolt.
If you think I'm a "right wing low-life," you obviously haven't understood anything I've written. The main theme of my posts is that the republican and democrat parties are both bought and paid for by the same global bankers and international special interests.
Explain to me how exposing the criminality of both parties is right wing please.
Do you actually think that anybody on this thread thinks you are merely pointing out that "republican and democrat parties are both bought and paid for..."? You're kidding, right?

I know, why not tell us who you think speaks for your ideas in the political realm.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118683 Apr 9, 2013
nac wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not "good" with racism from the left or the right.
In the posts above, there is a foul racist statement from a left wing moron and another foul racist statement from a right wing moron.
You didn't comment on the lefty racism, but felt the need to be "offended" by the same nonsense from the right wing dolt.
If you think I'm a "right wing low-life," you obviously haven't understood anything I've written. The main theme of my posts is that the republican and democrat parties are both bought and paid for by the same global bankers and international special interests.
Explain to me how exposing the criminality of both parties is right wing please.
Further, I didn't comment on your reference to a left wing racist statement because Rev Al Sharpton didn't make a racist statement. He merely pointed out a political reality. One, the nimrods on the right, know is true but won't admit it. They just leave it to guys like "Neal Caffrey" and "Guinness Drinker" to make the ststement and then make sorry-assed comments like: "So... Racism from the left is ok, racism from the right is wrong... And this isn't about sides or parties.
Yeah... You're going to have to explain that to me."

Consider it explained, Mr. Non-Partisan, hack.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118684 Apr 9, 2013
nac wrote:
Hey joe, since reading the books I suggested to you is way above your pay grade, how about reading this article about how BOTH parties (yes even the one you worship) serve only the rich and care not about useful idiots like yourself...
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2013/04/poverty-...
Joe... Comment?
BTW, point out someplace where I've been "worshiping" any party.
nac

Southold, NY

#118687 Apr 9, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW, point out someplace where I've been "worshiping" any party.
Several posts ago where you agreed with the msnbc host that our children don't belong to us, they instead belong to the collective.

I don't expect you to understand why that is so dangerous and counter to fundamental American principles, it is insanity from the left - so you blindly agree.

I thought there was hope for you joe, but you've regressed back to your "anyone that doesn't agree with me is a right wing hack" mindset.

Maybe some day you'll grow up, but I doubt it.

“Lovely year for a Guinness”

Since: Dec 07

Daytona Beach

#118688 Apr 9, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Further, I didn't comment on your reference to a left wing racist statement because Rev Al Sharpton didn't make a racist statement. He merely pointed out a political reality. One, the nimrods on the right, know is true but won't admit it. They just leave it to guys like "Neal Caffrey" and "Guinness Drinker" to make the ststement and then make sorry-assed comments like: "So... Racism from the left is ok, racism from the right is wrong... And this isn't about sides or parties.
Yeah... You're going to have to explain that to me."
Consider it explained, Mr. Non-Partisan, hack.
ok, so Mr. Thin Skinned...... since your spending about 12-16 hours a day with your cable box hooked up to your cerebrum; it's unfortunate for you, you think every crack about Obama is racism. If I state that his Healthcare Bill is dung and provide the proof, then what do you come back with ? a fair debate ? highly unlikely
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118689 Apr 9, 2013
Guinness Drinker wrote:
<quoted text>
ok, so Mr. Thin Skinned...... since your spending about 12-16 hours a day with your cable box hooked up to your cerebrum; it's unfortunate for you, you think every crack about Obama is racism. If I state that his Healthcare Bill is dung and provide the proof, then what do you come back with ? a fair debate ? highly unlikely
Anyone who uses the racist term "spook" is a lowlife pig. That would be you.
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118690 Apr 9, 2013
nac wrote:
<quoted text>
Several posts ago where you agreed with the msnbc host that our children don't belong to us, they instead belong to the collective.
I don't expect you to understand why that is so dangerous and counter to fundamental American principles, it is insanity from the left - so you blindly agree.
I thought there was hope for you joe, but you've regressed back to your "anyone that doesn't agree with me is a right wing hack" mindset.
Maybe some day you'll grow up, but I doubt it.
I see, it turns out you're actually the one who thinks EVERYTHING revolves around politics. I agree with something a pundit says and I'm worshiping the left. You are not only an uncomprehending idiot but you're also full of hypocritical bs.

And maybe you'll grow up and broaden your views. I doubt it.
Teddy R

Houston, TX

#118691 Apr 9, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, she's right.
I thought I had seen the limit of your idiocy, but this puts you in a new league. You are one truly twisted and dangerous fool, joe.

Here's a little light reading about where your sick infatuation with the Collective over the Free Individual leads, with particular reference to the State asserting a superior right to the minds of our children:

http://www.amazon.com/The-Hitler-Youth-Develo...

joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118692 Apr 9, 2013
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought I had seen the limit of your idiocy, but this puts you in a new league. You are one truly twisted and dangerous fool, joe.
Here's a little light reading about where your sick infatuation with the Collective over the Free Individual leads, with particular reference to the State asserting a superior right to the minds of our children:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Hitler-Youth-Develo...
Grow up you idiot. Read her quote again. Better yet ask an educated person to explain it to you. She wasn't referring to any State Collective, jerk. She was referring to the implied collective of any community that shares community wide goals. Such as education.

You live in the United States. Which is a collective.

You guys are so far over the edge you can't even see your paranoid idiocy anymore.

None of you suckers are really worth the effort. So I'll try to minimize engagement. I'll just continue to bring interesting facts for "the collective" to ruminate over get hysterical over. While rational visitors of this forum can be entertained. Ta.
nac

Piscataway, NJ

#118693 Apr 9, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
I see, it turns out you're actually the one who thinks EVERYTHING revolves around politics. I agree with something a pundit says and I'm worshiping the left. You are not only an uncomprehending idiot but you're also full of hypocritical bs.
And maybe you'll grow up and broaden your views. I doubt it.
That's the exact opposite of my message. Are you really this dumb, or is it an act?
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118694 Apr 9, 2013
nac wrote:
<quoted text>
That's the exact opposite of my message. Are you really this dumb, or is it an act?
Oh, so you agreed with Melissa Harris Perry? You're very confused and don't seem too certain of what you believe. I think you're becoming too "non-partisan", what do you "think"?
nac

Piscataway, NJ

#118695 Apr 9, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, so you agreed with Melissa Harris Perry? You're very confused and don't seem too certain of what you believe. I think you're becoming too "non-partisan", what do you "think"?
I've already stated that our kids belong to us, not to a socialist collective state.

I think you're embarrassed by your own idiocy (rightfully so), and you're now vomiting nonsense.

By the way, what was your opinion of this column?

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2013/04/poverty-...

We're still waiting for your response...
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118696 Apr 10, 2013
From Melissa Harris-Perry:

“I believe wholeheartedly, and without apology, that we have a collective responsibility to the children of our communities even if we did not conceive and bear them,” she wrote, saying that her belief in these shared responsibilities reaches across all lines of class, race and politics.

“Of course, parents can and should raise their children with their own values,” she continued.“But they should be able to do so in a community that provides safe places to play, quality food to eat, terrific schools to attend, and economic opportunities to support them. No individual household can do that alone. We have to build that world together.”

Harris-Perry’s essay concluded,“I venture to say that anyone and everyone should know full well that my message in that ad was a call to see ourselves as connected to a larger whole. I don’t want your kids, but I want them to live in safe neighborhoods. I want them to learn in enriching and dynamic classrooms. I want them to be healthy and well and free from fear. I want them to grow up to agree or disagree with me or with you and to have all the freedom and tools they need to express what they believe. And no hateful thing that you say to me or about me will ever change that I want those things for your children.”
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118697 Apr 10, 2013
And this is why right wing dupes keep posting garbage. Garbage in, garbage out.

On his show Tuesday night, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly falsely claimed that the California-based Tesla Motors was $523 million in the hole.

The conservative Fox News host was discussing the alleged failure of the Energy Department’s clean-energy loan program, which invested billions of dollars in green companies and start-ups.

“Tesla Motors, alright, they got net losses — and this is another electric car, right?—$523 million in losses,” O’Reilly said with a chuckle.“In losses, and they got $465 million bucks from the government!”

However, Tesla Motors said in February in a letter to shareholders that the company had a net loss of $89.9 million — far lower than O’Reilly’s figure.

Tesla Motors also said it was on track to be profitable in the first quarter of 2013.

“Lovely year for a Guinness”

Since: Dec 07

Daytona Beach

#118699 Apr 10, 2013
joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyone who uses the racist term "spook" is a lowlife pig. That would be you.
point to the post where I used it you dunce; anyone who can't get their own way and uses racism as a tool to get it, is a "gutless" lowlife pig. Is that you ?
joe

San Anselmo, CA

#118700 Apr 10, 2013
Neal Caffery:
http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/T50ESI...

Guiness Drinker:
not totally; apparently, there's a reason why he loves going on so many "campaign stops". He's putting the old 'one-eye to tuna-town' with California AG, Kamala Harris. Now that Michelle has a caboose that rivals with Oprah, Obama's "white" blood is taking the full effect here.

What an wonderful addition to the human race you two are. And the fact that none of your right wing cohorts has the decency to call you out makes them just as guilty.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min Snowball the Elep... 1,275,886
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 10 min Dr Guru 197,021
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr Pennie Lane 6,418
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr IB DaMann 54,513
DONALD TRUMP REVEALED as NIGERIAN PRINCE ! ..bi... 5 hr TRUMP ADMENSTRUATION 1
Loan shark, loan lender, Apply for loan offer 5 hr MonicaJ 1
Fast loan needed for urgent purpose?. Apply now. (Apr '14) 5 hr MonicaJ 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages