Scientists say they have proved clima...

Scientists say they have proved climate change is real, now mus...

There are 8137 comments on the Hartford Courant story from Dec 9, 2008, titled Scientists say they have proved climate change is real, now mus.... In it, Hartford Courant reports that:

Scientists studying the changing nature of the Earth's climate say they have completed one crucial task - proving beyond a doubt that global warming is real.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hartford Courant.

litesong

Everett, WA

#7416 Dec 21, 2012
tina anne wrote:
orginally(sic)
artic (sic)
Artic (sic)
Artic(sic)
You did better than your worst spellings. But you've always had troubles with Arctic & Antarctica. One of the few times, Antarctica would be spelled your way, correctly, is in Ralph Vaughn Williams, Symphony No. 7, Sinfonia Antartica.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#7417 Dec 21, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Winter time, ice freezes, Artic ice cap expands this time of year.
Otherwise, do you have anything to prove me wrong.
You aren't tasking me with proving ordinary observations as incorrect, are you? The real task is not to disprove your facts, but to understand how and why you hold the opinion that over a century's worth of industrialization is incapable of global impact.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#7418 Dec 21, 2012
litesout wrote:
<quoted text>
You did better than your worst spellings. But you've always had troubles with Arctic & Antarctica. One of the few times, Antarctica would be spelled your way, correctly, is in Ralph Vaughn Williams, Symphony No. 7, Sinfonia Antartica.
Bet you stayed up all knight to respond to tina. Yet the only thing you have is pointing out spelling errors.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#7419 Dec 23, 2012
Real, really boring.
litesong

Everett, WA

#7420 Dec 23, 2012
tina anne wrote:
Winter time, ice freezes, Artic(sic) ice cap expands this time of year.
Otherwise, do you have anything to prove me wrong.
Of course, I prove you wrong. You still can't spell Arctic, correctly.

Also,
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2009/02/

Warm fronts from the south can move hard into the Arctic, & sometimes bring sea ice freezing to a stop. The warm fronts can even melt some of the ice.

These aren't just minor Arctic meltings. The actual AVERAGE Arctic sea ice coverage can come to a stop & reverse to meltings.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#7421 Dec 23, 2012
litesout wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course, I prove you wrong. You still can't spell Arctic, correctly.
Also,
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2009/02/
Warm fronts from the south can move hard into the Arctic, & sometimes bring sea ice freezing to a stop. The warm fronts can even melt some of the ice.
These aren't just minor Arctic meltings. The actual AVERAGE Arctic sea ice coverage can come to a stop & reverse to meltings.
More useless babble from the pin head.The avaerage pin head litesout can come to a stop with its useless babble any time now.
litesong

Everett, WA

#7422 Dec 24, 2012
litesong wrote:
Warm fronts from the south can move hard into the Arctic, & sometimes bring sea ice freezing to a stop. The warm fronts can even melt some of the ice.
These aren't just minor Arctic meltings. The actual AVERAGE Arctic sea ice coverage can come to a stop & reverse to meltings.
/////////
phdudd wrote:
More useless babble .......
/////////
litesong wrote:
puhdudd attacks what he does NOT scientifically understand. Since he attacks everything, he understands nothing, because he has no background in mathematics & science.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#7423 Dec 24, 2012
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
A lie.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/ctl/10k.html
<quoted text>
True.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/HistSumm...
And they prove you are a liar.
Actually the NOAA link proves me right and the second, well, that is the link of a well known propaganda site run by a person who could not get a job as a scientist and had to resort to running a web site for people like you to make a living.

Looks like game over for Fair Game.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#7424 Dec 24, 2012
litesout wrote:
litesout wrote:
Warm fronts from the south can move hard into the Arctic, & sometimes bring sea ice freezing to a stop. The warm fronts can even melt some of the ice.
These aren't just minor Arctic meltings. The actual AVERAGE Arctic sea ice coverage can come to a stop & reverse to meltings.
/////////
phdudd wrote:
More useless babble .......
/////////
litesout wrote:
puhdudd attacks what he does NOT scientifically understand. Since he attacks everything, he understands nothing, because he has no background in mathematics & science.
More useless babble from the pin head.The average pin head litesout can come to a stop with its useless babble any time now.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#7425 Dec 25, 2012
Climate changes all the time; there's nothing we can do to stop or change it.
SpaceBlues

United States

#7426 Dec 25, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
.. there's nothing we can do to stop or change it.
Wake up!

It's a done deal. After years in this forum, you play innocence. Guilty as charged.

P.S. Are you still getting paid to post?

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#7427 Dec 25, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
Climate changes all the time; there's nothing we can do to stop or change it.
Defeatism was the wrong attitude 70 years ago and it's the wrong attitude today.
litesong

Everett, WA

#7428 Dec 25, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
P.S. Are you still getting paid to post?
Oh....... you didn't know.'steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' has a 2-bit oil can job, where he gets to post lots of toxic topix AGW denier propaganda from his work site.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#7429 Dec 26, 2012
Fair Game wrote:
Defeatism was the wrong attitude 70 years ago and it's the wrong attitude today.
Not defeatism; realism. There's never been an experimental test of climate change mitigation, that's how you can tell it's a hoax.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#7430 Dec 26, 2012
pinheadlitesout wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh....... you didn't know.'steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' has a 2-bit oil can job, where he gets to post lots of toxic topix AGW denier propaganda from his work site.
Yes..... "pinheadlitesout" that would be your strong point. Useless babble cut and paste propaganda.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#7431 Dec 26, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Not defeatism; realism. There's never been an experimental test of climate change mitigation, that's how you can tell it's a hoax.
Realism requires the ability to recognise reality- not your strong point.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#7432 Dec 26, 2012
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Realism requires the ability to recognise reality- not your strong point.
Well that would leave the "pinheadlitesout" in the cold.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#7433 Dec 26, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Not defeatism; realism. There's never been an experimental test of climate change mitigation, that's how you can tell it's a hoax.
That makes no sense. By your logic, this Christian country has a higher crime rate than (largely) atheistic Sweden does because Christian morality is a hoax.

Okay, I see your point...
litesong

Everett, WA

#7434 Dec 26, 2012
ChromiuMan wrote:
......this Christian country has a higher crime rate than (largely) atheistic Sweden does because Christian morality is a hoax.
Defining the Death of Christ on the Cross, by the ways of conduct of sinning people, in this case, euros & transplanted euros, explains your own decision NOT to be Christian.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#7435 Dec 26, 2012
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Defining the Death of Christ on the Cross, by the ways of conduct of sinning people, in this case, euros & transplanted euros, explains your own decision NOT to be Christian.
My decision to be Christian or not is beside the point and it can be debated elsewhere. Since you missed it, my post was an analogy of the flawed and meaningless logic that Brian persists in reciting over and over.
The absence of "global warming mitigation" experimentation does not in any way indicate that global warming is a hoax..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Injudgement 1,535,915
Trump Just Sux 44 min Old Yellow Dog 5
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 59 min Steve Hayes 240,957
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr SweLL GirL 10,710
Bottomless wife? 2 hr Earl 8
GOP: Kids should be financially independent soo... 3 hr Earl 13
Jonny's Towing is Chicagoland's Most Crooked Co... 4 hr Well Duh 53

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages