The graph contains citations. The flaw with your position is elementary - you are starting with a presupposition and then look for supportive scholars and data, and are dismissive of any science which is contrary. There is no doubt at all that we are pumping CO2 into the atmosphere. If someone hands you a gun and tells you its loaded, will you look for the 1 in 100 gunsmiths that will agree with you that the bullets might be duds before you aim at your stomach and fire?<quoted text>
First, if you are going to provide proof you should find something a little more reliable than wikipedia. So many of wikipedia's entries on the subject of climate change was more fiction than fact. Wikipedia is so bad that many teachers and professors refuse to accept as a valid source. Of course it could be worse like skepticalscience web site.
As for Dr Grey, who was a professor at Colorado University a leading research institute for climate change with a far better reputation than NASA or the IPCC seems to agree with thier former professor. Not to mention that many orginal climatologist started out in meteorolgy.
Maybe you should research those scientist and their opinion. What is there track record. Have there opinions changed in the past and if so what were they then. Who funds there research?
Political avarice is not science.