Data? Like the CO2 you emit with every post, while bytching there should be less CO2 emissions? Data like that?<quoted text>
Nice try, but when you base all your arguments on vapor instead of data, like you do, you are pretty ineffective. So you cherry pick a few renegade scientists who hardly ever do their own work or are sponsored by industry and disregard those who have done the real work. The radical RW's denigration of science is dangerous and will take us to darker times if allowed to prevail. When agenda is put before reality it is not healthy. Global warming is not partisan. The Earth is warming. CO2 is a GHG. Burning fossil fuels is increasing the CO2 in the atmosphere. What don't you understand?
Do go on... hypocrite.
You foil yourself with every post.
And do tell us of the "agenda" of "settled science". When is 'science' ever settled in advance?
Were you capable of admitting error it would be a simple search to find all your posts regarding the 'politics' of global warming. But I'd have better luck convincing spaceballs that Mann didn't win a Nobel, that litesong is a goofball, and that captain what's his name is relevant.