Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 60994 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Amor patriae.”

Since: Feb 08

Eastern Oregon

#48912 Jul 15, 2014
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
I see a sleepy sleazy slimy steenking reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig & toxic topix AGW denier liar with no science chemistry astronomy physics algebra or pre-calc in a poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.
You're more reliable but just as predictable as your so called scientists. Sing away. LOL!
Washington DC

Chatsworth, CA

#48913 Jul 15, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem to be good at name calling. Perhaps you could be so kind to explain how you came to such a conclusion! I was a staunch Republican before the Reagan years and the subsequent destruction of the middle class. Of course the teabags believe that anyone left of Limbaugh is a liberal. I am really an independent but no other party can get any traction. Big money and cronyism seem to control the political process today. The Reps buy into that today.
Sounds like you believe in a secure border while we admit about 1 million people per year, right?

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#48914 Jul 16, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Explain this, whackadoodle.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/F...
Where is the cooling?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...
This shows the trend over decades. Where is the cooling?
Well, I suppose that those evil scientists throughout the entire world have spiked the data and only Anthony Watts knows the real facts. LOL, This reeks of a colossal conspiracy to do what???? Just another place for the teabag mentality to polarize and hate those who are smarter than them.
Yawn, the old NASA bogus numbers huh......so tired of the same old crap from you children.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#48915 Jul 16, 2014
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
I see a sleepy sleazy slimy steenking reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig & toxic topix AGW denier liar with no science chemistry astronomy physics algebra or pre-calc in a poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.
JOHN KERRY: I Get 'A Little Uptight When I Hear Politicians Say How Exceptional We Are'... Especially when you marry bizillionaire women eh John John.......

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48916 Jul 16, 2014
mdbuilder wrote:
<quoted text>
I call 'em as I see 'em. I see a liar. You see the party line. An honest person would join the party best suited to his principles. Not its popularity. You're a dyed in the wool liberal/progressive/democrat trying to wear the mantle of a moderate.
As usual, you are blind as well as wackadoodle.You are just another angry RW radical watching your credibility dribble away..

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48917 Jul 16, 2014
No Warming wrote:
<quoted text>
If you believe you're entitled to someone else's money find another method, this hand it over or we are all going to die routine is tiresome. Breaking into homes and businesses might be a start, people with money are crooks in your book.
You are weird. Why would I believe that I am entitled to anyone else's money? I have enough of my own. Sounds like you are just jealous because you have none and too cowardly to break into homes and businesses........

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48918 Jul 16, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Yawn, the old NASA bogus numbers huh......so tired of the same old crap from you children.
You are humorous. Just where do you get your numbers? Surely not from a valid scientific study. Limpbaugh? Watts? Spencer? Ball? Soon? Mockton? We have heard it all and they have failed miserably. When you `dis science, then it can probably be found that you are a Radical RWer, perhaps a Teabag.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#48919 Jul 16, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are humorous. Just where do you get your numbers? Surely not from a valid scientific study. Limpbaugh? Watts? Spencer? Ball? Soon? Mockton? We have heard it all and they have failed miserably. When you `dis science, then it can probably be found that you are a Radical RWer, perhaps a Teabag.
Yes, your childish name calling adds to their credibility more than to yours. You are welcome to try and spread bogus manipulated information, that's your right I guess, but we don't have to believe it. Besides, it wouldn't matter what we did in America, when you look at the skies of Mexico, China, and other countries there is no change at controlling anything.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#48920 Jul 16, 2014
Can any "believer" prove that science "believes" as much as "believers" do and beyond science's 32 years of 95% certainty?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48921 Jul 16, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, your childish name calling adds to their credibility more than to yours. You are welcome to try and spread bogus manipulated information, that's your right I guess, but we don't have to believe it. Besides, it wouldn't matter what we did in America, when you look at the skies of Mexico, China, and other countries there is no change at controlling anything.
I see, another whackadoodle who believes science is a great world wide conspiracy to .....

A good bit of rationalization. Mommy everybody else is doing it, why cant't I???
USA

Kapolei, HI

#48922 Jul 16, 2014

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#48923 Jul 16, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Al Gore is a climate populist with crony deals against every taxpayer and energy consumer in the Western World. Tom Steyer and the left's billionaires are speculating on higher energy and fuel prices but have been squeezed in a vice by cheap oil and gas from fracking.
Let the markets decide, not Washington. People can make their own decisions about fuel and energy production and use, we don't need government market controls to save our climate.
A free market allows Fox (aka Murdoch) to want to takeover Time Warner but media laws means he has to ditch CNN in doing so. In a real free market such as your right wing cronies dream about he could have CNN & Fox and any other media out let he could lay his hands on. Where would democracy be then ? People would be jumping off buildings with the likes of Hannity etc on their tv's every night. Governments always need to be in the mix with business as it plays a vital part in national interest. Climate change would not be even on the radar if it were left to the markets to decide.
truth-facts

Chillicothe, OH

#48924 Jul 16, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
A free market allows Fox (aka Murdoch) to want to takeover Time Warner but media laws means he has to ditch CNN in doing so. In a real free market such as your right wing cronies dream about he could have CNN & Fox and any other media out let he could lay his hands on. Where would democracy be then ? People would be jumping off buildings with the likes of Hannity etc on their tv's every night. Governments always need to be in the mix with business as it plays a vital part in national interest. Climate change would not be even on the radar if it were left to the markets to decide.
"Climate change would not even be on the radar if it were left to the markets to decide,no,climate change is a blip on the radar kept alive by you GW kooks.
No Warming

Newark, OH

#48925 Jul 16, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are weird. Why would I believe that I am entitled to anyone else's money? I have enough of my own. Sounds like you are just jealous because you have none and too cowardly to break into homes and businesses........
Finally got you to reply with something other than whackadoodle, this forum already has spaceblues and litesong repeating the same thing over and over.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48926 Jul 16, 2014
No Warming wrote:
<quoted text>
Finally got you to reply with something other than whackadoodle, this forum already has spaceblues and litesong repeating the same thing over and over.
I call 'em like I see 'em!
No Warming

Newark, OH

#48927 Jul 16, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
I call 'em like I see 'em!
You can call me a denier and I'll proudly say yes I am. That's the label they gave to scientists that said from the beginning this thing was a hoax, now even people like yourself are saying its the sun. Keeps me laughing.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48928 Jul 17, 2014
No Warming wrote:
<quoted text>
You can call me a denier and I'll proudly say yes I am. That's the label they gave to scientists that said from the beginning this thing was a hoax, now even people like yourself are saying its the sun. Keeps me laughing.
Whacko! Don't include me in your delusions.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#48929 Jul 17, 2014
An opportunity for the climate clowns to chill: http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/mi...
LOL
Did you "models" see this coming? Not likely.
SpaceBlues

Cypress, TX

#48931 Jul 17, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
An opportunity for the climate clowns to chill: http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/mi...
LOL
Did you "models" see this coming? Not likely.
Admit it, you are w/o a clue.

“Headline already in use”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#48932 Jul 17, 2014
OzRitz wrote:
A free market allows Fox (aka Murdoch) to want to takeover Time Warner but media laws means he has to ditch CNN in doing so. In a real free market such as your right wing cronies dream about he could have CNN & Fox and any other media out let he could lay his hands on. Where would democracy be then ? People would be jumping off buildings with the likes of Hannity etc on their tv's every night. Governments always need to be in the mix with business as it plays a vital part in national interest. Climate change would not be even on the radar if it were left to the markets to decide.
Don't blame me, everyone knows climate change mitigation is a hoax perpetrated by populist politicians willing to sell stable climate and fears of catastrophe with data from a vocal minority of government funded scientists. Let the market pick the winners, customers and vendors together; not government.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 10 min Dr Guru 222,274
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 41 min Grey Ghost 1,417,194
Chicago has the Worst Women 3 hr Worst Woman 50
Social Security 3 hr Try No1 2
Marxiosocialist Double Speak 4 hr Click on IT 11
last post wins! (Dec '10) 6 hr honeymylove 2,404
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 9 hr GEORGIA 1,924
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 15 hr Go Blue Forever 103,417

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages