Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 63930 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#48712 Jul 11, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>Global; Adj. pertaining to the whole world; worldwide; universal:
Thanks for the morning laugh. I had coffee shooting out my nose. I think it caused the climate in my kitchen to jump 2 degrees too!
So it is not uniform..

Look up uniform, LOL.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#48713 Jul 11, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>DUDE! You deny science!
Is energy conserved or is that no longer the case with you?
hahaha you deniers know no science.

Look up thermodynamics.. laws... energy conservation..

“Amor patriae.”

Since: Feb 08

Eastern Oregon

#48715 Jul 11, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>hahaha you deniers know no science.
Look up thermodynamics.. laws... energy conservation..
Science, as late as two years ago, said it was virtually impossible that Neanderthas cross bred with Homo-sapiens. Now we know they were wrong, and you're living proof.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48716 Jul 11, 2014
mdbuilder wrote:
<quoted text>
Science, as late as two years ago, said it was virtually impossible that Neanderthas cross bred with Homo-sapiens. Now we know they were wrong, and you're living proof.
Science is self correcting. The theories were changed by scientist, not whackadoodles mouthing denials.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#48717 Jul 11, 2014
SpaceBalls wrote:
<quoted text>hahaha you deniers know no science.
Look up thermodynamics.. laws... energy conservation..
You best do that because you are clueless and probably just a liberal artist anyways.
Simply put; The climate models that predict catastrophic global warming also result in a net heat flow from atmospheric greenhouse gasses to the warmer ground, which is in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. If heat were "trapped" from the sun an exponential heating rate would occur. It doesn't

Essentially, any machine which transfers heat from a low temperature reservoir to a high temperature reservoir without external work applied cannot exist. If it did it would be a “perpetual motion machine”– the realm of pure sci-fi.

Don't be afraid of science. Embrace it and learn from it. Don't profit off it like a cheap whore.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#48718 Jul 11, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Science is self correcting. The theories were changed by scientist, not whackadoodles mouthing denials.
How about an example, Bozo?

“Amor patriae.”

Since: Feb 08

Eastern Oregon

#48720 Jul 11, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Science is self correcting. The theories were changed by scientist, not whackadoodles mouthing denials.
Those theories were changed by evidence, not by false data fed into a computer model formulated to produce a predetermined outcome.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48721 Jul 11, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>USA is only a fraction of the globe. Look up as percentage, LOL.
Global climate change is not uniform, duh.
wasn't it EWE citing above average rainfall at an airport somewhere in the midwest as proof of your hoax, son?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48722 Jul 11, 2014
mdbuilder wrote:
<quoted text>
Those theories were changed by evidence, not by false data fed into a computer model formulated to produce a predetermined outcome.
That is how science works. Didn't you know that? Whackadoodles mouthing denials didn't fix it.

“Amor patriae.”

Since: Feb 08

Eastern Oregon

#48723 Jul 11, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
That is how science works. Didn't you know that? Whackadoodles mouthing denials didn't fix it.
Which part, evidence or fake computer models?

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48724 Jul 11, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
That is how science works. Didn't you know that? Whackadoodles mouthing denials didn't fix it.
so you're basically admitting that climate models have a long long long way to go before catching up to reality and reliability.

your tacit concession is accepted.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#48725 Jul 11, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>You best do that because you are clueless and probably just a liberal artist anyways.
Simply put; The climate models that predict catastrophic global warming also result in a net heat flow from atmospheric greenhouse gasses to the warmer ground, which is in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. If heat were "trapped" from the sun an exponential heating rate would occur. It doesn't
Essentially, any machine which transfers heat from a low temperature reservoir to a high temperature reservoir without external work applied cannot exist. If it did it would be a “perpetual motion machine”– the realm of pure sci-fi.
Don't be afraid of science. Embrace it and learn from it. Don't profit off it like a cheap whore.
Your ways are not my ways, sockit.

You are utterly 100% sans science. Aren't you frustrated with yourself, huh?

Join the former deniers elsewhere, sockit.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#48726 Jul 11, 2014
SpaceBalls wrote:
<quoted text>Your ways are not my ways, sockit.
You are utterly 100% sans science. Aren't you frustrated with yourself, huh?
Join the former deniers elsewhere, sockit.
I love it! I use the scientific fact and this is what you say? Really?
You have yet to provide any concrete science to back up you preposterous falling sky hoax.

Because you can't change the laws of physics as easy as you can change computer models, eh?

look! Squirrel!

“Pass the sunscreen”

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#48727 Jul 11, 2014
Lord Hater wrote:
<quoted text> But But But all you warmies said the U.S. Would be in a heat wave by now Florida and California under water ice caps gone severe weather from one end of the globe to the other. Were your scientists modeling with play dough.
Cookie dough....it tastes a lot better when they are trying to get rid of their evidence.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#48728 Jul 11, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>I love it! I use the scientific fact and this is what you say? Really?
You have yet to provide any concrete science to back up you preposterous falling sky hoax.
Because you can't change the laws of physics as easy as you can change computer models, eh?
look! Squirrel!
You have no basis for your claims, LOL.

You are billions of lights years away from science, sockit. Why do you hate yourself so much? Because you deserve it for your lies, misrepresentations, hoaxes, etc.

Others like you, former deniers such as gord, funfacts, stevecase, kal, giblets, etc, did exactly what you do these days, copy/paste denier trash. Then they stopped without apology or goodbye.

See the end, sockit.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#48729 Jul 11, 2014
Maverick 808 wrote:
<quoted text>Cookie dough....it tastes a lot better when they are trying to get rid of their evidence.
You are speaking from experience, LOL.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#48730 Jul 11, 2014
mdbuilder wrote:
<quoted text>
Science, as late as two years ago, said it was virtually impossible that Neanderthas cross bred with Homo-sapiens. Now we know they were wrong, and you're living proof.
Actually, you, too.

I never heard such claims before. Of course, you can't even spell correctly, LOL.

Please provide evidence in a science paper. I personally know you lied.

“Pass the sunscreen”

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#48731 Jul 11, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>You are speaking from experience, LOL.
Empirical evidence indicates the more cookie dough I consume the more methane I produce.

Conclusion: Eat more cookie dough!
litesong

Everett, WA

#48732 Jul 11, 2014
maverick 808 wrote:
Empirical evidence indicates the more cookie dough I consume the more methane I produce.
Conclusion: Eat more cookie dough!
From the gov't:
......you should not consume raw cookie dough, regardless of who makes it, whether it's made at home or as a commercial product," Dr. Karen Neil, a medical epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.......

However, an exception can be made for "maverick 808" so it can become "maverick 000".

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48733 Jul 11, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>so you're basically admitting that climate models have a long long long way to go before catching up to reality and reliability.
your tacit concession is accepted.
I understand. You are basically another whackadoodle.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 13 min Reality Check 1,564,961
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 17 min Dr Guru 242,262
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr Mister Tonka 105,218
Cash me ouside 4 hr Ricardo montobomb 1
I Hate my life and mom (Aug '07) 4 hr thomas 2056 1,757
has anyone ever had sex with an animal? (Jul '12) 5 hr el grosso loco 24
Any hot guys in Chicago ? 20-29 yo 6 hr Black Knight 5

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages