Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 64570 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#48459 Jul 1, 2014
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yawn, you fakes are all alike. Nitwits.
You deniers are all the same.. liars.

You got caught again.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#48460 Jul 1, 2014
scirocco wrote:
Water shortages leading right back to corn and ethanol
The central plains have seen some relief this spring with bands of heavy rains moving through, but the 2014 season has been the exception rather than the norm. The 2012 – 2013 drought season saw more and more people having trouble accessing potable ground water, or even sufficient moisture for agriculture. It’s long been known that this problem is exacerbated by expanding corn production, driven by a need to feed the government mandated ethanol market. But a recent study from an unusual source sheds some new light on this situation.
The source for this study actually is the interesting part, as it comes from Ceres, a group self-described as “a non-profit organization advocating for sustainability leadership.” Among their key issues, they list climate change and the need to move away from fossil based fuels. In other words, this isn’t exactly a right wing think tank. But now they’ve released a lengthy study on the subject of aggressive corn production to meet ethanol demands and the effect it is having on water supplies.
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/06/28/water-s...
Fracking is worse.

Ethanol should be made from plant wastes.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#48461 Jul 1, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>You deniers are all the same.. liars.
You got caught again.
Still not into using the scientific method, eh? And you call US the "deniers". LOL SMH

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48462 Jul 1, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>
Ethanol should be made from plant wastes.
i always knew you and litethong really had a love for each other.... and ethanol!!
SpaceBlues

United States

#48463 Jul 1, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>Still not into using the scientific method, eh? And you call US the "deniers". LOL SMH
Scientific method is based on evidence. You got caught via the evidence.

IOW, you don't know it. FIRED!

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#48464 Jul 1, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Scientific method is based on evidence. You got caught via the evidence.
IOW, you don't know it. FIRED!
Sadly, but not surprisingly, you are incorrect. I shall hold your hand, k?

The scientific method is the process used to understand phenomena through developing a hypothesis, experimentation, and learning, so that we are able to predict the phenomena again. This means the phenomena is understood and established as fact only after the theory is proven and verified after repeatable experiments with the same results.

Therefore, Global Warming, Climate Change, or what ever other clever term you put on it has not and can not be proven through the scientific method. Computer models have been found faulty because it is fed input by biased humans. You climate clowns and grant seekers need to bone up on real science and stop manipulating data. Data manipulation is highly frowned upon when using the scientific method. If you loved science you would know this.

The laws of physics are the LAWS of physics because it has been proven through repetition to be true. These same laws cannot be violated just so you can scare governments for more grant money.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48465 Jul 1, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>Sadly, but not surprisingly, you are incorrect. I shall hold your hand, k?
The scientific method is the process used to understand phenomena through developing a hypothesis, experimentation, and learning, so that we are able to predict the phenomena again. This means the phenomena is understood and established as fact only after the theory is proven and verified after repeatable experiments with the same results.
Therefore, Global Warming, Climate Change, or what ever other clever term you put on it has not and can not be proven through the scientific method. Computer models have been found faulty because it is fed input by biased humans. You climate clowns and grant seekers need to bone up on real science and stop manipulating data. Data manipulation is highly frowned upon when using the scientific method. If you loved science you would know this.
The laws of physics are the LAWS of physics because it has been proven through repetition to be true. These same laws cannot be violated just so you can scare governments for more grant money.
AMEN!!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#48466 Jul 1, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>Sadly, but not surprisingly, you are incorrect. I shall hold your hand, k?
The scientific method is the process used to understand phenomena through developing a hypothesis, experimentation, and learning, so that we are able to predict the phenomena again. This means the phenomena is understood and established as fact only after the theory is proven and verified after repeatable experiments with the same results.
Therefore, Global Warming, Climate Change, or what ever other clever term you put on it has not and can not be proven through the scientific method. Computer models have been found faulty because it is fed input by biased humans. You climate clowns and grant seekers need to bone up on real science and stop manipulating data. Data manipulation is highly frowned upon when using the scientific method. If you loved science you would know this.
The laws of physics are the LAWS of physics because it has been proven through repetition to be true. These same laws cannot be violated just so you can scare governments for more grant money.
It is you who has no understanding of the scientific method. You denier idiots do not know that science does not prove things. Theories are not proven and are not facts. However they must be disprovable and if they ever are disproved they are not viable and are abandoned.
No one has disproved the theory of agw.
Sammy

London, KY

#48467 Jul 1, 2014
In September of 2007, I was at Walmart using the pay phone. I then noticed his piece of paper folded up. I got it, unfolded it. Guess what it said, "D**n the Holy Spirit God!!!". You fill in the ** with am!. That's bad ain't it?.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#48468 Jul 1, 2014
A creationist wrote:
The scientific method is the process used to understand phenomena through developing a hypothesis, experimentation, and learning, so that we are able to predict the phenomena again. This means the phenomena is understood and established as fact only after the theory is proven and verified after repeatable experiments with the same results.
Therefore, Global Warming, Climate Change, or what ever other clever term you put on it has not and can not be proven through the scientific method.
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
The scientific method traditionally has required experimental observation and replication. The fact that macroevolution (as distinct from microevolution) has never been observed would seem to exclude it from the domain of true science.
http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_t...
silly me

Newark, NJ

#48469 Jul 1, 2014
It was hot that I saw a squirrel blowing on his nuts today.

And the only noticeable breeze was when grandma let out a fart.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48470 Jul 1, 2014
silly me wrote:
It was hot that I saw a squirrel blowing on his nuts today.
And the only noticeable breeze was when grandma let out a fart.
evolution will help the rodent grow a solar powered fan on its tail to keep the jewels cool in a few millennia. tell that squirrel....'don't sweat it'.
litesong

Everett, WA

#48471 Jul 1, 2014
social miisses wrote:
All those border crossers are drinking all the water.
Sleepy sleazy slimy steenking toxic topix AGW denier liars volunteer to take the canteens of water away the kids coming across the border.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#48472 Jul 1, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>AMEN!!
An appropriate response to Bible class science.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48473 Jul 1, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
An appropriate response to Bible class science.
your labels don't stick to me, shug, and your pseudoscience doesn't pass the 'method'.

figure out that air doesn't 'hold' water yet, sweet cheeks?

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#48474 Jul 1, 2014
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Sleepy sleazy slimy steenking toxic topix AGW denier liars volunteer to take the canteens of water away the kids coming across the border.
the kids who were handed over to drug lords by their parents because of the ineptitude of obama's immigration policies?

“Amor patriae.”

Since: Feb 08

Eastern Oregon

#48475 Jul 1, 2014
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Sleepy sleazy slimy steenking toxic topix AGW denier liars volunteer to take the canteens of water away the kids coming across the border.
Dangit. Now the polar ice is calling you a liar. http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-s...

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#48476 Jul 2, 2014
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
It is you who has no understanding of the scientific method. You denier idiots do not know that science does not prove things. Theories are not proven and are not facts. However they must be disprovable and if they ever are disproved they are not viable and are abandoned.
No one has disproved the theory of agw.
What a stupid thing to say.
The laws of the conservation of energy alone disproves global warming. Jeezzzzz, are you really that daft? NASA just launched a satellite that is going to DISPROVE the global warming hoax.
If you disagree with the WHOLE scientific community as to the definition of scientific method as I posted you best get busy with your thesis and correct them.

“Sharia, NOT!”

Since: Jul 10

Suffolk, VA

#48477 Jul 2, 2014
Fart Game wrote:
Off topic, skippy.
But I'll play.

DNA
SpaceBlues

Desoto, TX

#48478 Jul 2, 2014
Socialism is for Sissies wrote:
<quoted text>To another poster:

What a stupid thing to say.
The laws of the conservation of energy alone disproves global warming. Jeezzzzz, are you really that daft? NASA just launched a satellite that is going to DISPROVE the global warming hoax.
If you disagree with the WHOLE scientific community as to the definition of scientific method as I posted you best get busy with your thesis and correct them.
Gosh how can you be wrong every time!

Clearly you don't have science or mathematics to speak of thermodynamics or physics or the scientific method.

You can't even follow news. That NASA launch was scrubbed on Tuesday. The mission is to measure atmospheric columns for CO2 content... after the satellite gets launched, flies, and gets calibrated, etc

Oh also you have no concept of a thesis research..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 20 min Julia 1,744,869
Trump is A 6 hr Retired SOF 574
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 7 hr Anonymous 72,073
last post wins! (Dec '10) 7 hr They cannot kill ... 3,265
last post wins! (Apr '13) 8 hr They cannot kill ... 2,838
ms 13 8 hr DEAD SERIOUS 7
Narcississtic Pissant Teens Wanna Ban the AR-15 10 hr Libertarian 16

Chicago Jobs

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages