Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.
Comments
40,941 - 40,960 of 46,300 Comments Last updated 57 min ago
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#43625 Feb 17, 2014
WeatherMan wrote:
<quoted text>
The winter storm this year reminded me of the 1978 winter blizzard. Somethings going on. We're getting these giant blizzards now every 36 years.
Are you studying weather?
WeatherMan

Los Angeles, CA

#43626 Feb 17, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Are you studying weather?
Yes, second year meteorology student in a accredited community college. Look at this about the floods in Britain:

For what it's worth, though, Mat Collins - a professor in climate systems at the University of Exeter and co-ordinating lead author to the IPCC - said at the weekend that the recent storms were not caused by climate change but by the jet stream being stuck further south than usual.
He said: "There is no evidence that global warming can cause the jet stream to get stuck in the way it has this winter. If this is due to climate change, it is outside our knowledge."

He says "no evidence".
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#43627 Feb 17, 2014
weatherMan wrote:
Mat Collins - a professor in climate systems..... recent storms were not caused by climate change....
AGW energy enhanced warm fronts are shoving hard into the high Arctic North Pole region, causing AVERAGE temperatures above the 80th parallel, as high as 16degC.(29degF) over normal. Simultaneously, AGW energy enhanced warm fronts are readily shoving Arctic cold fronts southward, with numerous areas in the low Arctic & further south, to reach below -40degC. At times the rapidly moving Arctic cold fronts can reach southern China, India, Iran, Iraq, northern Africa, Mexico, & Central America, setting cold temperature records.

At their greatest extent, AGW energy enhanced warm fronts have severely shoved Arctic cold fronts rapidly enough to set ALL TIME recorded southern low temperatures in some areas. In January 2009 AGW energy enhanced warm fronts poured into the Arctic, STOPPING ARCTIC SEA ICE FREEZING for 11 days & even reducing total Arctic sea ice. Simultaneously, the AGW energy enhanced warm fronts pushed Arctic cold south, such that Maine recorded its all time recorded low temperature of -50degF.

You can fund your professor, so he can get more schooling in AGW energy enhanced warm fronts & their effects.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#43628 Feb 17, 2014
Ah...... weatherman, at the Mission, knows "prof sneeritus raunchy fellow", who we now know is Mat Collins.

weatherman & "prof sneeritus raunchy fellow" sound the same soundings, fer sure.

SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#43629 Feb 17, 2014
WeatherMan wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, second year meteorology student in a accredited community college. Look at this about the floods in Britain:
For what it's worth, though, Mat Collins - a professor in climate systems at the University of Exeter and co-ordinating lead author to the IPCC - said at the weekend that the recent storms were not caused by climate change but by the jet stream being stuck further south than usual.
He said: "There is no evidence that global warming can cause the jet stream to get stuck in the way it has this winter. If this is due to climate change, it is outside our knowledge."
He says "no evidence".
Well, others disagree with him and he does not resolve the difference.

OTOH,

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/11/08/3...

.. it is during ‘calmer’ climatic periods, when the climate system is influenced by external processes, that the researchers can see that the climate signals in the archives show similar trends in both the northern and southern hemispheres.
“This could be, for example, at the time of a meteorite crash, when an asteroid hits the earth or after a violent volcanic eruption when ash is spread across the globe. In these cases we can see similar effects around the world simultaneously”, says Svante Björck.

Professor Björck draws parallels to today’s situation. The levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are currently changing very rapidly. At the same time, global warming is occurring.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#43630 Feb 17, 2014
litesong wrote:
Ah...... weatherman, at the Mission, knows "prof sneeritus raunchy fellow", who we now know is Mat Collins.
weatherman & "prof sneeritus raunchy fellow" sound the same soundings, fer sure.
Aww remember the fellow departed to teach the student.. now they are on the same page. hahahaha

They, erm, it is one, LOL.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

#43631 Feb 17, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Typically of vacuous trolls on this thread, when you can't defend one point you made, you make five more, equally vacuous.
go right ahead and call me a troll, son!
lol
it's clearly an admission you couldn't deny my facts.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#43632 Feb 17, 2014
WeatherMan wrote:
<quoted text>
The winter storm this year reminded me of the 1978 winter blizzard. Somethings going on. We're getting these giant blizzards now every 36 years.
The stuck jet stream this year reminds me of the stuck jet stream.... last year. It 's getting to be a regular thing.

“Guts over Fear”

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#43633 Feb 17, 2014
Well new yorkers, the teenages mutant ninja turtles are getting cold..

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#43634 Feb 17, 2014
WeatherMan wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, second year meteorology student in a accredited community college. Look at this about the floods in Britain:
For what it's worth, though, Mat Collins - a professor in climate systems at the University of Exeter and co-ordinating lead author to the IPCC - said at the weekend that the recent storms were not caused by climate change but by the jet stream being stuck further south than usual.
He said: "There is no evidence that global warming can cause the jet stream to get stuck in the way it has this winter. If this is due to climate change, it is outside our knowledge."
He says "no evidence".
This is a misrepresentation of the science. Nobody is saying global warming caused the storms.
Don't believe me? Let's listen to one of the MET office scientists:
Climate change is likely to be a factor in the extreme weather that has hit much of the UK in recent months, the Met Office's chief scientist has said.
Dame Julia Slingo said the variable UK climate meant there was "no definitive answer" to what caused the storms.
"But all the evidence suggests there is a link to climate change," she added.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-2608462...

The link with climate change is uncontroversial:
"There is an increasing body of evidence that extreme daily rainfall rates are becoming more intense, and that the rate of increase is consistent with what is expected from fundamental physics."
In short, it is unlikely to be a coincidence that four of the five wettest years and the seven warmest years on record in the UK have occurred from 2000 onwards.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/f...

It is not true to say there is no evidence to suggest climate change can cause the jet stream to get stuck. This is a current theory in climate science. Not the consensus yet, but there is evidence for it.
The main system that helps determine the weather over Northern Europe and North America may be changing, research suggests.
The study shows that the so-called jet stream has increasingly taken a longer, meandering path.
This has resulted in weather remaining the same for more prolonged periods.
The work was presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Chicago.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment...

As a meteorology student, this is a theory you will need to be aware of.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#43635 Feb 17, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>go right ahead and call me a troll, son!
lol
it's clearly an admission you couldn't deny my facts.
You're a troll, pops, and you wouldn't know a fact if I smacked you in the face with one.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#43636 Feb 17, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a misrepresentation of the science. Nobody is saying global warming caused the storms.
Don't believe me? Let's listen to one of the MET office scientists:
<quoted text>
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-2608462...
The link with climate change is uncontroversial:
<quoted text>
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/f...
It is not true to say there is no evidence to suggest climate change can cause the jet stream to get stuck. This is a current theory in climate science. Not the consensus yet, but there is evidence for it.
<quoted text>
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment...
As a meteorology student, this is a theory you will need to be aware of.
Professor Collins himself is clear that global warming made the storms worse.
Prof Collins made clear that he believes it is likely global warming could lead to higher rainfall totals, because a warmer atmosphere can hold more water. But he said this has nothing to do with the storm conveyor belt.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-25603...
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#43637 Feb 17, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
... you wouldn't know a fact if I smacked you in the face with one.
But "rat down the middle" & "middleofthedownwronggull y" would know a fart if you smacked him in the face with one.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#43638 Feb 17, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
This is a misrepresentation of the science.
Fair Game......don't be redundant. Of course, touched, touchy, toxic, topix AGW deniers misrepresent science. It goes with their territory, which doesn't include science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, or pre-calc in their poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.
gcaveman1

Laurel, MS

#43639 Feb 17, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>some are saying the opposite. are you a left winger? just wondering.....i see a pattern with you people.....and you could care less about science.
HA! You should talk!

I haven't seen any science from you, just bullshit gum-flapping. It's become a very identifiable pattern.

I don't even have to ask your political persuasion. All you give are the ignorant right-wing talking points.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#43640 Feb 17, 2014
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a misrepresentation of the science. Nobody is saying global warming caused the storms.
Don't believe me? Let's listen to one of the MET office scientists:
<quoted text>
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-2608462...
The link with climate change is uncontroversial:
<quoted text>
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/f...
It is not true to say there is no evidence to suggest climate change can cause the jet stream to get stuck. This is a current theory in climate science. Not the consensus yet, but there is evidence for it.
<quoted text>
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment...
As a meteorology student, this is a theory you will need to be aware of.
And when you think about it-that theory-it makes perfect sense. There is already evidence. All that is needed is more evidence to confirm it as a workable theory.

Anyone have a better explanation?

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#43641 Feb 17, 2014
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>but there's money in taxing co2!!! they want us to believe fossil fuels are the evil doers to climate. funny that the religious zealots don't complain about agricultural irrigation.
very telling isn't it!!
I'll tell you where this whole argument is flawed. There are 3 things that are the driving force working against our environment and our climate. First is man himself , second is Capitalism, third is Globalisation.

On the first point, man who does not give a stuff about their waste, what they consume or what it takes to meet his needs. Secondly Capitalism driven by man's desire to accumulate more takes no prisoners either. Thirdly globalisation driven by the second has made man grossly inefficient in meeting those needs. It starts with local factories closing to food producing farms all in the name of lower costs but totally ignores the energy used to get the imported product to the door. From clothing to apples. The energy consumed to grow an apple in China to be consumed in the US is about a 100 times that of one grown locally & transported to store. Pricing carbon is one way to address this major short sighted issue that goes with globalisation. If the focus shifted from energy consumed and the pollution it creates rather than the cost of the end product then that would be a quantum shift in thinking.

If that apple grown in China had to factor in it's environmental damage then it's cost might rise by 10c - 15cents. Therefore making a locally grown product competitive on price for consumers to totally ignore the imported one. That's one example of what pricing carbon worldwide can do for you!
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#43642 Feb 17, 2014
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Well, others disagree with him and he does not resolve the difference.
So... the science isn't settled?
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#43643 Feb 17, 2014
Put up or shut up!

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014...

Like, bring it on!

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#43644 Feb 17, 2014
On the Road: The Food Miles Question

And what about the distance food travels to get to our plates? Despite all the attention to food miles, emissions from food transport are not the biggest component of the sector’s impact on climate change.

While total emissions from transportation contribute to 13.1 percent of the global warming effect, this includes emissions from toting around all kinds of things—from people to pork chops. FTransport emissions specifically from food are just a sliver of these emissions.

Nonetheless, reducing food miles can still make a meaningful dent in our foods' emissions toll. Consider the fossil fuels wasted carting fresh tomatoes to New Jersey, a state with ample farmland that exports tons of tomatoes every year. Researchers at Rutgers University estimated that meeting the New Jersey demand for just one year’s supply of out-of-state tomatoes used up enough fossil fuel to drive an 18-wheeler around the world 249 times.

Food miles matter because so much of our food transport is unnecessary. Local food is also a better choice because it is fresher and therefore healthier for us. Buying local also supports our local economies. Purchasing local foods means supporting small-scale businesses and protecting green space in our communities.

Of course, direct trade with small-scale farmers in far away places can be a critical way to support economic development in other parts of the world. But most of the global food trade isn’t benefiting small-scale farmers — it’s benefiting the biggest grain traders at the cost of the climate. FAnd most of this global food trade is completely unnecessary, or redundant. Consider, for example, the fish caught off the coast of Maine, flash frozen, shipped to China for processing into filets, and shipped back to our mega-markets in the United States. Or, consider the business of beef. In 2007, the US exported 1.431 billion pounds of beef and veal (5.4 percent of our total beef production) Fand imported 3.052 billion pounds of the same, measured by commercial carcass weight. FThis cross-continent transport of food makes economic sense only because the true costs of such transport, including the big bill for its contribution to climate change, are not counted on the balance sheets of food corporations.

http://www.sustainabletable.org/982/agricultu...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Incognito4Ever 1,099,998
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 4 min JOEL 68,960
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 min Stina2 97,922
Music Artists A to Z (Feb '14) 8 min SLY WEST 297
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 10 min Dick Topick 49,472
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 11 min SLY WEST 7,746
Abby 8-29 28 min Stina2 8
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr LRS 177,361
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••