Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday 47,501
When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore. Full Story
litesong

Monroe, WA

#42089 Dec 17, 2013
[QUOTE who="ratdownthemiddle ", "middleofthedownwronggull y"]Is litesong the warmists best and brightest?[/QUOTE]

There is no question that toxic topix AGW deniers have no best & brightest, since they have no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc in the poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas. toxic topix AGW deniers DO have the worst slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pigs AND alleged & proud threateners.

Yeah, no question about it!!!
litesong

Monroe, WA

#42090 Dec 17, 2013
democrat wrote:
That rise in carbon emissions underscores the huge impact nuclear power can have in efforts to combat climate change.
Wee'll siround Democrat's home wit' a nuclar reacter. If'n sumpun goes rong, wee'll evakuate his child'en but "democrat" remanes too monater the radishn "impact".
litesong

Monroe, WA

#42091 Dec 17, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
Geez, litesong, OzRitz, seems we've really got them going now.
Must have been something we said.
Actually, its what toxic topix AGW deniers didn't do & did do. You see.....

...... toxic topix AGW deniers have no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc in the poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas. toxic topix AGW deniers DO have the worst slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pigs AND alleged & proud threateners.
litesong

Monroe, WA

#42092 Dec 17, 2013
false farts wrote:
Polar sea ice increased 50% over last year, growing from 6,000 to 9,000 cubic kilometers when compared to the same period in 2012.
First, usage of a dramatic, yet individual AGW swaying data point, is often used by toxic topix AGW deniers as a new AGW denier arguing point(see the Earth is recovering).....such years as 1998, 2008, & now 2012, are toxic topix AGW denier non-science jump-off points. Second, biasing the data in a direction that toxic topix AGW deniers want, the ~ 6000 number is not right. & the 9000 number is so far swayed, that the truer number is closer to 8000 than 9000. Both numbers used by toxic topix AGW deniers are meant to twist the double biased final number calculation to be as much as 15% from the 50% quoted mark.

Addressed below are more accurate, up-to-date, & truthful examinations of the true condition of Arctic sea ice volume.

Present December 1, 2013 Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 7% more than the December 1 date average, covering the "2010 to the present time". In addition, December 1, 2013 Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 9500 cubic kilometers LESS than the December 1 date average, covering the 1980-89 period.

Yes, many times mis-quoted toxic topix AGW denier copies, are published with no idea that they are wrong, biased, & wished to be misdirecting, because toxic topix AGW deniers have no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, or pre-calc for their poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#42094 Dec 17, 2013
I'm sure KingCoal has a few KY friends that post identical rants as his own. Mothballs was slammed dunked on Al Gore's homes yet posts keep appearing repeating the same stuff they hear from Rush even when its disproved. In fact Rush seems more of a fact source than science is, so if Obama puts his name on any emission measures then it's attacked by default regardless. Such is the wisdom of the baggers!
Mothra

Mesa, AZ

#42096 Dec 18, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I've looked at the science and the funding and found nothing questionable.
You have brought the charges of fraud. The burden of proof is upon you.
You're avoiding that because you can't find the proof to back your ridiculous claim.
Quit lying.

I've made no claims of fraud.

I said if funding sources is a legitimate argument against research, let's see the funding of the warmists.

Zealots are such pinheads.
Mothra

Mesa, AZ

#42097 Dec 18, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
Geez, litesong, OzRitz, seems we've really got them going now.
...
litesong must be so thrilled.

This is the closest anyone's ever come to a conversation with him.

Maybe he'll stop talking to himself.
litesong

Monroe, WA

#42098 Dec 18, 2013
motheaten wrote:
Zealots are such pinheads.
Pinhead toxic topix AGW deniers zealously avoid science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, & pre-calc in their poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.

It is good "motheaten" knows the characteristics of the group it has joined.
Mothra

Mesa, AZ

#42099 Dec 18, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
.
... and back to the loon you are.

Go troll elsewhere.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

#42100 Dec 18, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, its what toxic topix AGW deniers didn't do & did do. You see.....
...... toxic topix AGW deniers have no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc in the poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas. toxic topix AGW deniers DO have the worst slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pigs AND alleged & proud threateners.
lmao@u!!!

You use the same stupid cut and paste response even when one of your own tries to converse with your moronic azz!!

Lol

What a quack!!

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#42101 Dec 18, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
I'm sure KingCoal has a few KY friends that post identical rants as his own. Mothballs was slammed dunked on Al Gore's homes yet posts keep appearing repeating the same stuff they hear from Rush even when its disproved. In fact Rush seems more of a fact source than science is, so if Obama puts his name on any emission measures then it's attacked by default regardless. Such is the wisdom of the baggers!
Wolverine makes it official ‘project will cease’
Editor | December 17, 2013
by Richard Lamb–Advance Editor

This time the word is final. The plug has officially been pulled on the Wolverine Clean Energy project.

“It is with a great deal of sadness I need to tell this community that we are ceasing our development on the clean energy venture,” said Wolverine’s CEO Eric Baker to an invited group of community leaders this morning (Tuesday, Dec. 17)....
http://demo.piadvance.com/2013/12/wolverine-m...

Welcome to Obamaville.
New York

Los Angeles, CA

#42102 Dec 18, 2013
liteweight wrote:
<quoted text>
Pinhead toxic topix AGW deniers zealously avoid science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, & pre-calc in their poorly (or non-) earned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.
It is good "motheaten" knows the characteristics of the group it has joined.
Koo Koo
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#42103 Dec 18, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Wolverine makes it official ‘project will cease’
Editor | December 17, 2013
by Richard Lamb–Advance Editor
This time the word is final. The plug has officially been pulled on the Wolverine Clean Energy project.
“It is with a great deal of sadness I need to tell this community that we are ceasing our development on the clean energy venture,” said Wolverine’s CEO Eric Baker to an invited group of community leaders this morning (Tuesday, Dec. 17)....
http://demo.piadvance.com/2013/12/wolverine-m...
Welcome to Obamaville.
"after many delays at the state level"

I wonder what caused those?

Obama?

Maybe competition from natural gas is the cause, but deniers like to blame the government or....

OBAMA!
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#42104 Dec 18, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
I've made no claims of fraud.

.
Bullshit. That's exactly what you were implying. But YOU have no proof.

Deniers are such pinheads.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

#42105 Dec 18, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullshit. That's exactly what you were implying. But YOU have no proof.
Deniers are such pinheads.
is this another example of your debating skills and superior wit "lameman"???

LOL

what a dolt.

you and litesong belong in the same group.......no question about that, son.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#42106 Dec 18, 2013
Reddit also bans the deniers:

Instead of the reasoned and civil conversations that arise in most threads, when it came to climate change the comment sections became a battleground. Rather than making thoughtful arguments based on peer-reviewed science to refute man-made climate change, contrarians immediately resorted to aggressive behaviors. On one side, deniers accused any of the hard-working scientists whose research supported and furthered our understanding of man-made climate change of being bought by “Big Green.” On the other side, deniers were frequently insulted and accused of being paid to comment on reddit by “Big Oil.”

After some time interacting with the regular denier posters, it became clear that they could not or would not improve their demeanor. These problematic users were not the common “internet trolls” looking to have a little fun upsetting people. Such users are practically the norm on reddit. These people were true believers, blind to the fact that their arguments were hopelessly flawed, the result of cherry-picked data and conspiratorial thinking. They had no idea that the smart-sounding talking points from their preferred climate blog were, even to a casual climate science observer, plainly wrong. They were completely enamored by the emotionally charged and rhetoric-based arguments of pundits on talk radio and Fox News.

As a scientist myself, it became clear to me that the contrarians were not capable of providing the science to support their “skepticism” on climate change. The evidence simply does not exist to justify continued denial that climate change is caused by humans and will be bad. There is always legitimate debate around the cutting edge of research, something we see regularly. But with climate change, science that has been established, constantly tested, and reaffirmed for decades was routinely called into question.

Over and over, solid peer-reviewed science was insulted as corrupt, while blog posts from fossil-fuel-funded groups were cited as objective fact. Worst of all, they didn’t even get the irony of quoting oil-funded blogs that called university scientists biased.

We discovered that the disruptive faction that bombarded climate change posts was actually substantially smaller than it had seemed. Just a small handful of people ran all of the most offensive accounts. What looked like a substantial group of objective skeptics to the outside observer was actually just a few bitter and biased posters with more opinions then evidence.

http://grist.org/climate-energy/reddits-scien...
No Warming

Waverly, OH

#42107 Dec 18, 2013
Sounds like Reddit had a few cavemen seeking anal penetration.
Mothra

Mesa, AZ

#42108 Dec 19, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullshit. That's exactly what you were implying. But YOU have no proof.
Deniers are such pinheads.
Global warming zealots are so tedious.

The best kept secret of the warmists is where they get their funding, who gets it and how it's spent.
Mothra

Mesa, AZ

#42109 Dec 19, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text> is this another example of your debating skills and superior wit "lameman"???
LOL
what a dolt.
you and litesong belong in the same group.......no question about that, son.
All I said is that if funding sources is a reason to dismiss "science" on one side of the argument, then it's just as valid against the other.

Why is that such a controversial statement?

Because warmists hate having their "standards" applied to themselves.
Brad

Marlborough, CT

#42110 Dec 19, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
Global warming zealots are so tedious.
The best kept secret of the warmists is where they get their funding, who gets it and how it's spent.
The best kept secret is any real science to support the religion of global warming.

Now the buffoons want to seed the atmosphere with sulfuric acid to offset warming.

Hmmmm,,,,

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 min Mandela 68,666
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 min Dale 179,421
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 13 min WeWeWe 50,641
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 29 min Yeah 1,127,004
omnipods boxes for sale 29 min thanxlord 1
Amy 10-24 29 min Mister Tonka 12
Mrs. Bush: History will vindicate her husband (Jun '08) 1 hr Anonymous91 54,522
Abby 10-24 8 hr edogxxx 23
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]