Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday 47,501
When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore. Full Story
Jeff

Beckley, WV

#41041 Nov 1, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
"deaf jeff" was unwilling(but mostly unable) to get mathematics & science degrees & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc in its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa. But here it is, egotistically believing it knows more science & mathematics than climate scientists do, who have 10 to 14 years more training than "deaf jeff".
Wow! Ok, we admit, you are another internet wunderkind. But show me anywhere I talked about my getting degrees, education, or even questioning scientific facts? I will wait on your response.

Another response I am still waiting on is yours, a simple one that even with all your "supposed" education, you cannot answer. I will ask it again. What did your wind generation setup cost you? You said solar was out of the question for you, but wind would be optimal, especially in your geographic area. Now you can keep up the childish taunts about education or lack of, trying to throw the discussion off track, but in my case, it will not work, intimidation is something I shrug off. Answering questions is something you do shrug off. Now you can answer why you only want others to do the hard work in as you like to say, mitigating global warming, while you do the preaching. Is it because it would cost you too much? Too much effort on your part? Or are you just not a real believer, an internet warrior? Put all that education, if you really have it, to some use.
litesong

Monroe, WA

#41042 Nov 1, 2013
deaf jeff wrote:
I will wait on your response. Another response I am still waiting on is yours,
First, "deaf jeff", without science & mathematics degrees, & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa, egotistically thinks it is smarter than climate scientists with 10 to 16 years more mathematics & science education than it has.

Second, without science & mathematics degrees, & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa, "deaf jeff" believes it is a teacher & deserves answers. Of course, "deaf jeff" doesn't deserve answers because......."deaf jeff" has no science & mathematics degrees, & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.
Jeff

Beckley, WV

#41043 Nov 1, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
First, "deaf jeff", without science & mathematics degrees, & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa, egotistically thinks it is smarter than climate scientists with 10 to 16 years more mathematics & science education than it has.
Second, without science & mathematics degrees, & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa, "deaf jeff" believes it is a teacher & deserves answers. Of course, "deaf jeff" doesn't deserve answers because......."deaf jeff" has no science & mathematics degrees, & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.
Ah, I see, because you think someone does not have degrees, you do not have to answer a simple question. Ok. I see another side to it. You are a simple coward. Maybe and educated one, that is debatable, you have provided no evidence you have any real education other than claiming it. That is real easy to do on the internet. Could you be lying? Sure. Are you lying, probably.

Are you to cowardly or scared to answer a simple question? Most definitely. Why? Probably because it would expose you as just another global warming alarmist and fraud like the majority of your kind, those who want others to pay and do the work, just don't ask the same of you.
Jay

United States

#41044 Nov 1, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow! Ok, we admit, you are another internet wunderkind. But show me anywhere I talked about my getting degrees, education, or even questioning scientific facts? I will wait on your response.
Another response I am still waiting on is yours, a simple one that even with all your "supposed" education, you cannot answer. I will ask it again. What did your wind generation setup cost you? You said solar was out of the question for you, but wind would be optimal, especially in your geographic area. Now you can keep up the childish taunts about education or lack of, trying to throw the discussion off track, but in my case, it will not work, intimidation is something I shrug off. Answering questions is something you do shrug off. Now you can answer why you only want others to do the hard work in as you like to say, mitigating global warming, while you do the preaching. Is it because it would cost you too much? Too much effort on your part? Or are you just not a real believer, an internet warrior? Put all that education, if you really have it, to some use.
He cannot build a wind generator due to the state law limiting structures on sasquatch protected land :-)
litesong

Monroe, WA

#41045 Nov 1, 2013
deaf jeff wrote:
......taunts about education or lack of........ intimidation is something.......
"deaf jeff" feels intimidated when people mention his lack of science & mathematics degrees & lack of science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra & pre-calc in its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa. That's curious, since "deaf jeff" is egotistical enough to think itself smarter than climate scientists, who have 10 to 16 years more education than itself.

Surely, egotistically puffed-up people don't feel intimidated.
Jeff

Beckley, WV

#41046 Nov 1, 2013
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
He cannot build a wind generator due to the state law limiting structures on sasquatch protected land :-)
You know, you may be on to something, maybe he is using AGW to cover for his research into bigfoot research!
Jeff

Beckley, WV

#41047 Nov 1, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
"deaf jeff" feels intimidated when people mention his lack of science & mathematics degrees & lack of science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra & pre-calc in its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa. That's curious, since "deaf jeff" is egotistical enough to think itself smarter than climate scientists, who have 10 to 16 years more education than itself.
Surely, egotistically puffed-up people don't feel intimidated.
You know litesong, you can keep repeating the same old words over and over, it just makes you look foolish and does not get you off the hook for answering a simple question. Or is simple things too hard for you? Maybe you are lying about all your education. Maybe even simple task are above your capabilities. What have you been doing all along, copy and pasting from others words and works? Sure sign of a weak mind.

This makes two things I have ask you to answer that you evidently are incapable of answering or even attempting to accomplish, showing me anywhere I talked about my getting degrees, education, or even questioning scientific facts, and showing us why you do not act on your global warming claims. Simple request. But it seems to be above your capabilities. Is there someone there that can help you? A parent, guardian?
litesong

Monroe, WA

#41048 Nov 1, 2013
deaf jeff wrote:
..... he is using AGW to cover for his research into bigfoot research!
Yeah, "deaf jeff" not only didn't get science & mathematics degrees, & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa, but its post proves "deaf jeff" could NOT get science & mathematics degrees, & science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.
Jeff

Beckley, WV

#41049 Nov 1, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, "deaf jeff" not only didn't get science & mathematics degrees, & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa, but its post proves "deaf jeff" could NOT get science & mathematics degrees, & science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.
Polly wanna cracker, polly wanna cracker, SQQWWWAAAAAAAACCCCKKKKKKK!!!

I swear son, you are a broken record, and a pathetic one at that. I guess getting a real answer out of you is out of the question. Ok, lets try this one, post the names of the institutions you graduated from and lets exchange email addresses. Prove your degrees. I am sure I will be highly impressed with your education. I know I am not impressed with your efforts to mitigate global warming.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#41050 Nov 1, 2013
NYT: Nov 1 2013

Climate change will pose sharp risks to the world’s food supply in coming decades, potentially undermining crop production and driving up prices at a time when the demand for food is expected to soar, scientists have found. In a departure from an earlier assessment, the scientists concluded that rising temperatures will have some beneficial effects on crops in some places, but that globally they will make it harder for crops to thrive — perhaps reducing production over all by as much as 2 percent each decade for the rest of this century, compared with what it would be without climate change.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/02/science/ear...
Jeff

Beckley, WV

#41051 Nov 1, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
NYT: Nov 1 2013
Climate change will pose sharp risks to the world’s food supply in coming decades, potentially undermining crop production and driving up prices at a time when the demand for food is expected to soar, scientists have found. In a departure from an earlier assessment, the scientists concluded that rising temperatures will have some beneficial effects on crops in some places, but that globally they will make it harder for crops to thrive — perhaps reducing production over all by as much as 2 percent each decade for the rest of this century, compared with what it would be without climate change.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/02/science/ear...
A newspaper reports this, while scientist like Columbia University’s George Kukla, Dr. Judith Curry, the chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Institute of Technology, Professor Cliff Ollier of the School of Earth and Environmental Studies at the University of Western Australia, and others say we are entering a cycle of cooling due to reduced solar activity.
litesong

Monroe, WA

#41052 Nov 2, 2013
deaf jeff wrote:
..... I know I am not impressed with.......
...... science & mathematics degrees & science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra & pre-calc in poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.
Retired Farmer

Paducah, KY

#41053 Nov 2, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure, ok, there litesong, but you still have not or cannot answer a simple question, so I guess education just made you educated, not smart. Why are you not actually doing something about warming instead of just whining? No solar, you did give a fair excuse for that, although I am sure along with your non-existent wind generator, it would go far in showing you stand behind your rhetoric. Drive an electric vehicle? I see Chevy Volt sales have dropped again. WHY? Seems all you warmist would be standing in line for them. Oh, that matter of all talk, little action.
You are assuming that supporting and using green energy means going "off the grid" with your own personal wind generator, solar panel, etc. It does not. The future of green energy will be its use by the public utilities. By your reasoning, no one who does not burn coal directly is using it.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#41054 Nov 2, 2013
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#41055 Nov 2, 2013
Hottest in the Arctic in quite a while:

http://www.climatecentral.org/news/the-arctic...
Jeff

Beckley, WV

#41056 Nov 2, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
...... science & mathematics degrees & science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra & pre-calc in poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaas.
And you still are incapable of answering simple questions. Degrees do not equate intelligence.
Jason

United States

#41057 Nov 2, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
And you still are incapable of answering simple questions. Degrees do not equate intelligence.
I refer to them as educated idiots. They have degrees but don't have the ability to apply them in a real setting. They spout ad nauseam what their progressive socialist professors told them is true. They don't have critical thinking skills so they can apply what knowledge they have that's correct to amplify their ability to understand applications of science, mathematics to reach a conclusion.

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

#41058 Nov 2, 2013
Jason wrote:
<quoted text>
I refer to them as educated idiots. They have degrees but don't have the ability to apply them in a real setting. They spout ad nauseam what their progressive socialist professors told them is true. They don't have critical thinking skills so they can apply what knowledge they have that's correct to amplify their ability to understand applications of science, mathematics to reach a conclusion.
How does an educated idiot compare with an uneducated idiot? I would guess the uneducatged one would be more dangerous.......

I assume that you are uneducated, so how do you know that all those professors are socialists? Did Limbaugh or Beck tell you?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#41059 Nov 2, 2013
Jason wrote:
<quoted text>
I refer to them as educated idiots. They have degrees but don't have the ability to apply them in a real setting. They spout ad nauseam what their progressive socialist professors told them is true. They don't have critical thinking skills so they can apply what knowledge they have that's correct to amplify their ability to understand applications of science, mathematics to reach a conclusion.
LOL. You certaily amplify what little you know .. to reach no conclusion..

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#41060 Nov 2, 2013
Retired Farmer wrote:
You are assuming that supporting and using green energy means going "off the grid" with your own personal wind generator, solar panel, etc. It does not. The future of green energy will be its use by the public utilities. By your reasoning, no one who does not burn coal directly is using it.
That means more expensive energy. The plan is to tax energy, especially from fossil fuel. I oppose climate change mitigation by taxing energy users and producers; if climate can be fixed with taxes it isn't broken.

If a company wants to use green energy, fine. Forcing taxpayers to support your billionaire crony pals with subsidies, government insured loans, buyouts, bailouts or executive mandate is wrong.

Congress has never authorized carbon limits or taxes. The courts might not like it, but the executive branch has no authority to regulate CO2 production.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Yeah 1,127,277
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 45 min Boy G 50,658
Amy 10-24 51 min RACE 16
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 51 min _Zoey_ 4,800
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 55 min WelbyMD 179,478
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 5 hr Wolverine33 654
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 6 hr Ratloder 68,672
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]