Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.
Comments
38,481 - 38,500 of 46,326 Comments Last updated 14 hrs ago
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#40997 Oct 30, 2013
Aww kal is hurting in the middle..

Most at risk cities Dhaka, Mumbai, Manila, Kolkata, Bangkok – lowest risk in London, Paris

With commercial activity and the middle classes predominantly based in urban centres, Maplecroft has also calculated the risks to the world’s largest cities to pinpoint where the economic exposure will be highest over the next 30 years.

According to the CCVI’s sub-national calculations, of the 50 cities studied, five present an ‘extreme risk’– Dhaka in Bangladesh; Mumbai and Kolkata in India; Manila in the Philippines and Thailand’s Bangkok – while only two London and Paris were classified as ‘low risk.’ Shenzhen and the Pearl River Delta, which encompasses the cities of Guangzhou, Dongguan and Foshan and make up China’s manufacturing heartland, are among the most exposed to physical risks from extreme climate-related events.

P.S. No shoreline is risk-free, though..
heavy tune

Seattle, WA

#40998 Oct 30, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
Aww kal is hurting in the middle..
Most at risk cities Dhaka, Mumbai, Manila, Kolkata, Bangkok – lowest risk in London, Paris
With commercial activity and the middle classes predominantly based in urban centres, Maplecroft has also calculated the risks to the world’s largest cities to pinpoint where the economic exposure will be highest over the next 30 years.
According to the CCVI’s sub-national calculations, of the 50 cities studied, five present an ‘extreme risk’– Dhaka in Bangladesh; Mumbai and Kolkata in India; Manila in the Philippines and Thailand’s Bangkok – while only two London and Paris were classified as ‘low risk.’ Shenzhen and the Pearl River Delta, which encompasses the cities of Guangzhou, Dongguan and Foshan and make up China’s manufacturing heartland, are among the most exposed to physical risks from extreme climate-related events.
P.S. No shoreline is risk-free, though..
wtf?
Hey now

Los Angeles, CA

#40999 Oct 30, 2013
Global warming is not real. Deal with it.
heavy tune

Seattle, WA

#41000 Oct 30, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
Aww kal is hurting in the middle..
Most at risk cities Dhaka, Mumbai, Manila, Kolkata, Bangkok – lowest risk in London, Paris
With commercial activity and the middle classes predominantly based in urban centres, Maplecroft has also calculated the risks to the world’s largest cities to pinpoint where the economic exposure will be highest over the next 30 years.
According to the CCVI’s sub-national calculations, of the 50 cities studied, five present an ‘extreme risk’– Dhaka in Bangladesh; Mumbai and Kolkata in India; Manila in the Philippines and Thailand’s Bangkok – while only two London and Paris were classified as ‘low risk.’ Shenzhen and the Pearl River Delta, which encompasses the cities of Guangzhou, Dongguan and Foshan and make up China’s manufacturing heartland, are among the most exposed to physical risks from extreme climate-related events.
P.S. No shoreline is risk-free, though..
gee wizz 'space', the biggest city at risk is earth. stand next to a mox fuel rod, better yet pick one up and show it to us. dumbass. and you think the weather is scary, what a dumbass.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#41001 Oct 30, 2013
.. by PCROBERTS .. The Fukushima catastrophe has hardly begun. Yet already the radioactive water pouring into the Pacific Ocean has made fish dangerous to eat unless a person is willing to accept a higher risk of cancer.

Fukushima has the potential of making Japan uninhabitable and of polluting the air, water, and soil of the US with radioactivity. Yet the crisis is seldom mentioned in the US media. In Japan the government just passed a law that could be used to imprison Japanese journalists who report truthfully on the dire situation.

Take the time to familiarize yourself with the online information about Fukushima.. According to the presstitute media, Americans face threats from Iran and Syria and from whistleblowers such as Edward Snowden. The real threats are simply not in the news.

If you search Fukushima, you will find information that the presstitute media hides from you. See for example, http://www.globalresearch.ca/28-signs-that-th... .
heavy tune

Seattle, WA

#41002 Oct 30, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
.. by PCROBERTS .. The Fukushima catastrophe has hardly begun. Yet already the radioactive water pouring into the Pacific Ocean has made fish dangerous to eat unless a person is willing to accept a higher risk of cancer.
Fukushima has the potential of making Japan uninhabitable and of polluting the air, water, and soil of the US with radioactivity. Yet the crisis is seldom mentioned in the US media. In Japan the government just passed a law that could be used to imprison Japanese journalists who report truthfully on the dire situation.
Take the time to familiarize yourself with the online information about Fukushima.. According to the presstitute media, Americans face threats from Iran and Syria and from whistleblowers such as Edward Snowden. The real threats are simply not in the news.
If you search Fukushima, you will find information that the presstitute media hides from you. See for example, http://www.globalresearch.ca/28-signs-that-th... .
oh my 'space' thankyou. we can get along afterall. just so you know snowden is the biggest hero america has had since paul what's his name. enjoy it while you can. life is life, and weather is just weather. hope you are asleep when the fuel pool falls.
litesong

Monroe, WA

#41003 Oct 30, 2013
deaf jeff wrote:
how much did your wind setup cost?
A good aerodynamicist knows its far more efficient to tap the airs 300 to 500 feet off the ground with large & business owned wind turbines. "deaf jeff" doesn't have science & mathematics degrees to know this, tho.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#41005 Oct 30, 2013
What's the most compelling experimental test you've found for climate change mitigation? Does it seem to indicate a carbon tax is better than cap and trade? Is investment in carbon sinks more productive than CO2 emission restrictions? Just what does the experimental science say?

So far, not one publication of climate change mitigation experimentation. Man made catastrophic climate change theory is also untested.

Don't buy a pig in a poke. Wait for the science to catch up with the hype. Now isn't the time to cut off your head for cryopreservation, either.
Jeff

Beckley, WV

#41006 Oct 31, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
A good aerodynamicist knows its far more efficient to tap the airs 300 to 500 feet off the ground with large & business owned wind turbines. "deaf jeff" doesn't have science & mathematics degrees to know this, tho.
Thanks for confirming you just want to act like a child with your name calling and also like to whine about global warming while personally doing nothing about it.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#41007 Oct 31, 2013
About 400 metric tons of contaminated groundwater flows into the ocean from the Fukushima site every day. Tepco is scheduled next month to begin extracting spent fuel rods from one of the reactors buildings, a task that precedes the removal of melted uranium cores in three other reactors.[Tepco Can’t Manage Fukushima Cleanup Alone, Ruling Party Says]
Coal is King

La Fayette, KY

#41008 Oct 31, 2013
More voices from the coalfields:
From Pikeville, KY:
“Obama promised to Kill Coal and Kill jobs in KY.That is ONE promise even Obama will keep.
Middle Class KY Dem voters will gladly increase their own families Tax payments to the State by at least 30% to cover the loss in State Revenue.
All Hail THE Obama!!”
From Winchester, KY:
“But what the hell good does it do for us to keep harping about it. It is a lead pipe cinch that OBAMA and the EPA destroyed the Eastern Ky. Coal industry and will destroy the rest of the coal regions over the next 10 years. OK, we are in agreement on that so lets move on.
Now we need to make him and congress fix it, they broke it they should have to fix it.
You might say steel was destroyed by competition "subsidized by governments to dump it here lower than we could produce it". You might say the Automotive industry in Detroit was destroyed by competition "corporate lobbyist pushing for outsourcing every damn living wage automotive Mfg. job" plus the influx of Japanese and Korean cars.
Coal is unique in that coal was not destroyed by competition, coal was destroyed by the Federal Government, first by our government signing on to the U.N. Kyoto Protocol to reduce carbon emissions, then by the E.P.A. raising air standards beyond what the burning of coal for power production can meet, now by actively trying to kill the export of coal to China and India also.
I'm not talking welfare or even direct job creation because not the Federal, State or local government is responsible for job creation but they are responsible for creating conditions for job creation and the economy to transition from coal which they killed to non coal jobs.
The Federal Government should declare the Eastern Ky. Coal Fields an Economic Disaster area because they are the ones that created this disaster and then congress should vote funds for projects to help the area transition from coal.
If Obama likes renewables let them convert every flood control dam we have to hydroelectric. If he likes solar let them fund Solar Powered Power Generation Projects across the coal fields on abandoned strip mine property. Let them fund displaced miner and worker training to work in these industries plus plant maintenance if we can attract any in here with cheaper power and lower taxes. They can help with the tax subsidy for new industry into Eastern Ky.
OK, so Obama killed the Coal Industry, he broke it, make him fix it. Our Gov. that carried water for his Obamacare needs to call in a favor. Our state senators need to get him to declare the place he broke an Economic Disaster Area and congress needs to pass legislation to fund projects in Eastern Ky. that will help us transition from a coal to a non coal economy.”
Coal is King

La Fayette, KY

#41009 Oct 31, 2013
From Pikeville, KY:
“The 500 Billion that Obama gave just one solar panel company Sylndra would have converted every flood control dam we have in Eastern Ky. to Hydroelecric Power generating stations. It would have built several large Solar Generating stations across Eastern Ky. on the tops of abandoned Strip Job plateaus. It could have finished and built more interstate Highways into the region. It could have aid for the retraining of our workforce to be qualified for the non coal industry that cheap power and tax subsidy would create. It would have the immediate effect from the construction and new jobs created by the renewable projects construction. Millions of dollars pumped into the local economy just from the construction phase of the renewable energy projects. This would be Obama's shinning moment to prove the viability of his push for renewable energy sources as he helps an area's economy he destroyed to transition from coal that he destroyed to Hydro and Solar.
500 Billion wasted on a corporation that was set up just to skim off the money. Not one watt of solar electric power created and he can't spend just one hundred billion here to save an area he helped destroy? This is what we need to be telling the Gov., Mitch, Rogers, Rand Paul and everybody that has Obama's ear. He broke it, he needs to help fix it.”
Joe

United States

#41010 Oct 31, 2013
He doesn't care if you loose everything it's part of his design to destroy America. He's well on his way to making your family in Kentucky bankrupt and homeless.

His ally is Terry McAuliffe and he plans to tax to death the people of Virginia and the people are so blind they will probably vote for him as their governor. Terry is a scam artist has been all his adult life. He business partner was convicted recently did anyone there report this? Probably not. Terry was involved in a business venture which was responsible for scamming terminally ill Americans out of their money soon if elected he'll be doing that in Virginia.
litesong

Monroe, WA

#41011 Oct 31, 2013
deaf jeff wrote:
Thanks for confirming........
I confirmed "deaf jeff" is deaf, dumb, & has no science or mathematics degrees, & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#41012 Nov 1, 2013
Coal is King wrote:
From Pikeville, KY:
“The 500 Billion that Obama gave just one solar panel company Sylndra would have converted every flood control dam we have in Eastern Ky. to Hydroelecric Power generating stations. It would have built several large Solar Generating stations across Eastern Ky. on the tops of abandoned Strip Job plateaus. It could have finished and built more interstate Highways into the region. It could have aid for the retraining of our workforce to be qualified for the non coal industry that cheap power and tax subsidy would create. It would have the immediate effect from the construction and new jobs created by the renewable projects construction. Millions of dollars pumped into the local economy just from the construction phase of the renewable energy projects. This would be Obama's shinning moment to prove the viability of his push for renewable energy sources as he helps an area's economy he destroyed to transition from coal that he destroyed to Hydro and Solar.
500 Billion wasted on a corporation that was set up just to skim off the money. Not one watt of solar electric power created and he can't spend just one hundred billion here to save an area he helped destroy? This is what we need to be telling the Gov., Mitch, Rogers, Rand Paul and everybody that has Obama's ear. He broke it, he needs to help fix it.”
First of all never spoil a good story with facts. For a start Solyndra was not given 500 billion it was $525 million. That's quite a big difference when comparing apples with apples.
The fossil fuel industry gets subsidies globally $1.9 Trillion a year. That would cover every American home with solar panels and have lots of change left over. Promoting constant carbon emissions without clean up is no different than dumping toxic waste into a river. The effect is the same. Remember the Romans who had lead water pipes and vessels. Half of them went nuts which is often speculated playing a contributing factor to the fall of the Roman empire. There is a lot of analogies here with the defence of coal as all gain with no pain. In a hundred years the history books will be highlighting those who ignored all the warnings and the price they paid.
Carrah

United States

#41013 Nov 1, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all never spoil a good story with facts. For a start Solyndra was not given 500 billion it was $525 million. That's quite a big difference when comparing apples with apples.
The fossil fuel industry gets subsidies globally $1.9 Trillion a year. That would cover every American home with solar panels and have lots of change left over. Promoting constant carbon emissions without clean up is no different than dumping toxic waste into a river. The effect is the same. Remember the Romans who had lead water pipes and vessels. Half of them went nuts which is often speculated playing a contributing factor to the fall of the Roman empire. There is a lot of analogies here with the defence of coal as all gain with no pain. In a hundred years the history books will be highlighting those who ignored all the warnings and the price they paid.
Since we're comparing apples to apples let's consider all the different solar energy companies Obama Administration gave money too. They are bankrupt and no viable product or research for American companies to benefit from the last I heard. Abound in Longmont, Colorado not only took taxpayers money and went bankrupt they also left behind over 3 million dollars in hazardous waste. The building they were using cannot be leased out because of toxic waste which was left behind. All these wonderful 'green' companies which were supposed to be better for our environment are now a toxic waste dump by people who skimmed the money and ran.

If the money had been used to upgrade coal technologies, invest in our bridges and highways, upgraded and improved our school buildings, maybe pay our debt to our veterans who have been waiting to have benefits they are owed to them and their families...the list is long and if we had a president who wasn't a disengaged ideologue and took his job seriously for the betterment of Americans then these would have been priorities. What I believe he was doing is paying back through grants his political backers. Everything Obama does is through the lens of political leverage.

Then now we have the boondoggle of ACA which is just the worse rollout of a new product I've ever seen! How many hundreds of millions wasted on that joke? Website is a bust. But to another screw up, what about the company which was contracted to process the applications for ACA who was given 1 billion dollars and we just now find out they are under investigation for FRAUD in the UK.
The company has a dubious reputation but somehow we trusted them with a billion dollars of taxpayer's money.

According to Forbes by the time employers and individuals receive all the cancellations on existing policies which no longer conform to ACA requirements the number of people uninsured will be 93 million. Before ACA we had 85% covered Americans who were happy with their health insurance. After ACA implementation it looks like just under 100 million individual and employer insurance will be cancelled. How is that a improvement? Please don't tell me their plans will be grandfathered I read section 1521 and it's clear that the regulations will terminate existing policies. Forcing millions into a government one size fits all plan.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#41014 Nov 1, 2013
Carrah wrote:
<quoted text>
Since we're comparing apples to apples let's consider all the different solar energy companies Obama Administration gave money too..........
According to Forbes by the time employers and individuals receive all the cancellations on existing policies which no longer conform to ACA requirements the number of people uninsured will be 93 million. Before ACA we had 85% covered Americans who were happy with their health insurance. After ACA implementation it looks like just under 100 million individual and employer insurance will be cancelled. How is that a improvement? Please don't tell me their plans will be grandfathered I read section 1521 and it's clear that the regulations will terminate existing policies. Forcing millions into a government one size fits all plan.
First of all in a market stall if you were buying $2 organic apples against the stall next door that sold for .50c but used tonnes of sprays and fertiliser to grow them who would you buy from ??? It's the same with alternative energy, unless the price goes up to its real value and a tax on it's emissions for generation then the poor ole solar panel doesn't have a chance. It needs sky high energy prices to become viable, not compete in a lop-sided market. People will not change their habits on a "feel good" basis you have to hit them in the pocket to do it.

As for AHC, to every other country on the planet it is viewed as a fundamental human right. That is, in a civilised world we look after each other when we are sick. The irony of that is everywhere even in the redneck states where they won't execute a criminal who is sick, they have to get them well first then kill them. I mean what is the point of paying for a Military in the terms of billion$ of dollars to protect American interests. Yet on the other hand saying if you get sick, well f...k you! look after yourself. There is not an ounce of logic in that sort of thinking. Wether it be laws of the land or road rules those things exist to protect the population as a whole. Not just those who can afford to drive a car. Health care in the USA is more expensive by a factor of one third than anywhere else in the world. That is NOT because its the best, the French have a far more healthier population than the US, so go figure. Something is wrong with that system. The whole point of universal health care is to make sure EVERYONE is covered. So to keep premiums down all the healthy 20 somethings are paying their share of health as well. That's how it works, sure it costs more because we all live longer these days so unless they make it mandatory to die at 75 it will keep going up. Why because birth rates are in negative territory which will also hit China hard in the next decade or so with its one child policy. So there are BIG problems to solve on a global basis besides climate and health. One of the US biggest problems is a non functioning congress which is not as easy to fix as a broken web site. Just think if you owned a business and half the employees were on a sole mission to make that business fail. How successful would it be ?????? Well that is congress in a nutshell.
Jeff

Beckley, WV

#41016 Nov 1, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
I confirmed "deaf jeff" is deaf, dumb, & has no science or mathematics degrees, & no science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc for its poorly or unearned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.
Hello litesong, is it your 13th birthday yet? Thanks for confirming you are just another warmist who has done nothing but cry about warming while expecting others to do something about it.
Now, when you decide you actually want to do something personally about warming, then you can be taken seriously. Until then, you are just an internet warrior. I wish you the best, and hope you grow up and make your parents proud.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#41017 Nov 1, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
... It's the same with alternative energy, unless the price goes up to its real value and a tax on it's emissions for generation then the poor ole solar panel doesn't have a chance....
Here we agree, climate change mitigation is about raising the price of energy and fuel. Oddly enough, that's the same goal OPEC has for oil, higher prices.

I oppose new taxes on energy and fuel.
C Spackler

Brooklyn, NY

#41018 Nov 1, 2013
No

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Stu Rumsfeld 1,100,620
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 57 min Deserve 49,537
ISIS Plans to Blow Up an Entire American City a... 1 hr Retired SOF 45
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr LRS 177,412
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr andet1987 4,658
who here likes pooping themself either in a dia... 2 hr poopforluck 1
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr Yumpin Yimminy 68,380
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 8 hr edogxxx 97,938
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••