Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.
Comments
38,201 - 38,220 of 45,857 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago
heavy tune

Portland, OR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40623
Oct 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

gcaveman1 wrote:
Denialists made this issue political.
Rational people would have recognized the problem and started working on a solution.
And, in fact, rational people have. But not denialists. Denialists discount the science because they feel it threatens them or their lifestyle, and oppose mitigation because of their political philosophy.
that is real funny,'caveman'. a rational person would know that the earth has been warming since the last ice age. hence there is no longer a mile and a half of ice over much of north America. a rational person would realize that. a rational person would not believe the fairytale of global warming caused by man, promoted by a failed political pos. rational people do not fall for such b.s.
heavy tune

Portland, OR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40624
Oct 12, 2013
 
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
<yawn>
Tell me, what is the 'holy' day for the truly devoted global warmists?
gee whizz 'mothra', that would be any day the power goes off.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40625
Oct 12, 2013
 
Slow moving? That defines volcanoes rising above the oceans, being eroded as coral reefs form around them and sinking to become atolls like the Maldives. They've been sinking for hundreds of millions of years - don't panic.

BTW, Coral needs CO2 to secrete calcium carbonate.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40626
Oct 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

These deniers are out touch with reality.. crazy people are posting in topix..

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40627
Oct 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>I suppose we all have different views on how big and reaching government can/should be.
I don't know what the Tea Party platform actually stands for other than 'smaller government' in general. I assume they don't want to pay most of the tab for other countries, who generally resent the US, rather it be infrastructure...or the UN...or whatever.
I think there's plenty of blame to go around for where the nation is with its debt problem. When do both sides come together and make hard choices? Why even have a debt ceiling.....if it really is meaningless and always lifted?
All I know is that the US isn't what it used to be.....and probably never will be again. Maybe it's time the country realizes the future damage caused by kicking the can down the road while government spending remains "business as usual"? Isn't that pretty much the same argument warmists hold about co2 emissions?
With Places like Antarctica there are few countries that have aircraft capable of bringing stuff in & out. There is only a small window in the southern summer to do it so lots of researchers hitch a ride with the US. In other words there will be a year of data lost on tea party BS and in the end what do they achieve ? Not a damn thing except drive those positive growth numbers backwards.

http://www.livescience.com/40237-antarctic-re...
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40628
Oct 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Wonder how Professor Curry is handling the government uncertainty.. like it is "so hard" to predict!!!!!
Cut n Paste

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40630
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

heavy tune wrote:
<quoted text>that is real funny,'caveman'. a rational person would know that the earth has been warming since the last ice age. hence there is no longer a mile and a half of ice over much of north America. a rational person would realize that. a rational person would not believe the fairytale of global warming caused by man, promoted by a failed political pos. rational people do not fall for such b.s.
5 years ago climate prophets claimed:
"Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt..."

Today, the same climate experts will concede that the title of this thread is NOT true.

These climate scientists are now saying their historic data indicates global warming has slowed down over the better part of 2 decades!

A rational person would not be in denial about the current state of 'climate reality'.
Cut n Paste

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40631
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
These deniers are out touch with reality.. crazy people are posting in topix..
LOL...

Experts will now concede it is not true that:
"Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt..."

A rational person would not be in denial about this current state of 'climate reality'.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40632
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Cut n Paste wrote:
<quoted text>
5 years ago climate prophets claimed:
"Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt..."
Today, the same climate experts will concede that the title of this thread is NOT true.
These climate scientists are now saying their historic data indicates global warming has slowed down over the better part of 2 decades!
A rational person would not be in denial about the current state of 'climate reality'.
A new study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters says that in the past 15 years we've undergone "the most sustained warming trend."

The researchers attribute this "missing heat" phenomena to the fact that about 90% of overall global warming goes into heating the oceans, and the oceans have been cooking.

The myth that global warming has slowed—which is frequently cited by climate deniers and perpetuated by "fundamentally flawed" studies that do not account for the warming of deep ocean waters—has had the dangerous effect of "lull[ing] many people into a false and unwarranted sense of security," writes Skeptical Science, "with many people wrongly believing global warming has paused when in reality it has accelerated."

https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/03...
Cut n Paste

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40633
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

"Without the IPCC assessment, the public would have no idea that our fossil-fuel usage is heating up the planet."

Without the IPCC people would just be enjoying the pleasant Autumn weather.
Cut n Paste

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40634
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
A new study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters says that in the past 15 years we've undergone "the most sustained warming trend."
The researchers attribute this "missing heat" phenomena to the fact that about 90% of overall global warming goes into heating the oceans, and the oceans have been cooking.
The myth that global warming has slowed—which is frequently cited by climate deniers and perpetuated by "fundamentally flawed" studies that do not account for the warming of deep ocean waters...
https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/03...
Glad we now realize that the past climate studies were "fundamentally flawed"!
The old models did not account for the ~90% of the heat going into the oceans and that their programmed heat budget only looked at the <10% that was going into the air.
Cut n Paste

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40635
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
A new study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters says that in the past 15 years we've undergone "the most sustained warming trend."
The researchers attribute this "missing heat" phenomena to the fact that about 90% of overall global warming goes into heating the oceans, and the oceans have been cooking.
The myth that global warming has slowed—which is frequently cited by climate deniers and perpetuated by "fundamentally flawed" studies that do not account for the warming of deep ocean waters—has had the dangerous effect of "lull[ing] many people into a false and unwarranted sense of security," writes Skeptical Science, "with many people wrongly believing global warming has paused when in reality it has accelerated."
https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/03...
One of the researchers (Trenberth) states the uptake of heat in the deep oceans will result in a rise in sea level beyond that which occurs from ice melt. This logically means that melt rate estimates are likely in error due to the failure of incorporating thermal expansion resulting from the assumed deep ocean heating.

Yes, there is no denying that past models, studies, and projections are "fundamentally flawed".

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40636
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Cut n Paste wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad we now realize that the past climate studies were "fundamentally flawed"!
The old models did not account for the ~90% of the heat going into the oyceans and that their programmed heat budget only looked at the <10% that was going
into the air.
Failed reading skills: the quote does not refer to "the old models".

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40637
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cut n Paste wrote:
This logically means that melt rate estimates are likely in error due to the failure of incorporating thermal expansion resulting from the assumed deep ocean heating.
This sentence doesn't make any sense.

Not only are your reading skills fatally flawed, so are your skills in logic.

In other words you are a moron with nothing of any value to say on this complex subject.
Cut n Paste

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40639
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Failed reading skills: the quote does not refer to "the old models".
Yes, failed indeed:
"[4] A key question is how recent and robust is the role of deep ocean in the heat uptake, because the advent of the Argo ocean observing system is known to have a profound impact in ocean state estimations [Balmaseda et al., 2007]. Another question is how much disruption there is of the warming trends by natural variability and from the volcanic eruptions, which contributed to the TOA imbalance but have not been factored into most analyses of OHC variations. Several decadal hiatus periods of the upper ocean warming associated with natural decadal and interannual variability, such as La Niña events, have been found in a model [Meehl et al., 2011]. Recently, the 2001–2010 interannual variations of TOA radiation and OHC have been associated with El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)[Loeb et al., 2012]."
Your welcome.
Cut n Paste

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40640
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
This sentence doesn't make any sense.
Not only are your reading skills fatally flawed, so are your skills in logic.
In other words you are a moron with nothing of any value to say on this complex subject.
Really??: "In other words you are a moron with nothing of any value to say on this complex subject." That's your summation of contribution to this topic of thermal expansion and it's relationship to ice melt estimates?

Not sure of your "moron" point... I was speaking of rates of "sea level" rise.
Trenberth suggests "missing" heat goes into the ocean causing sea levels to rise due to thermal expansion.
So how much of the past 17 years of sea level rise is from thermal expansion and how much is due to ice melt and glacial calving?

Logically; old estimates of ice melt (and subsequent sea level rise) could not be correct if the "missing" heat was not a factor in their calculations.

Your thoughts?

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40641
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Cut n Paste wrote:
<quoted text>
Really??: "In other words you are a moron with nothing of any value to say on this complex subject." That's your summation of contribution to this topic of thermal expansion and it's relationship to ice melt estimates?
No, that's my summation of your understanding. Please prove me wrong and explain clearly and concisely how you think thermal expansion influences ice melt estimates.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40642
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cut n Paste wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, failed indeed:
"[4] A key question is how recent and robust is the role of deep ocean in the heat uptake, because the advent of the Argo ocean observing system is known to have a profound impact in ocean state estimations [Balmaseda et al., 2007]. Another question is how much disruption there is of the warming trends by natural variability and from the volcanic eruptions, which contributed to the TOA imbalance but have not been factored into most analyses of OHC variations. Several decadal hiatus periods of the upper ocean warming associated with natural decadal and interannual variability, such as La Niña events, have been found in a model [Meehl et al., 2011]. Recently, the 2001–2010 interannual variations of TOA radiation and OHC have been associated with El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)[Loeb et al., 2012]."
Your welcome.
You still don't have any idea what the quote refers to.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40643
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cut n Paste wrote:
"Without the IPCC assessment, the public would have no idea that our fossil-fuel usage is heating up the planet."
Without the IPCC people would just be enjoying the pleasant Autumn weather.
This proves you prefer a know-nothing public like yourself..
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40645
Oct 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cut n Paste wrote:
<quoted text>
Really??: "In other words you are a moron with nothing of any value to say on this complex subject." That's your summation of contribution to this topic of thermal expansion and it's relationship to ice melt estimates?
Not sure of your "moron" point... I was speaking of rates of "sea level" rise.
Trenberth suggests "missing" heat goes into the ocean causing sea levels to rise due to thermal expansion.
So how much of the past 17 years of sea level rise is from thermal expansion and how much is due to ice melt and glacial calving?
Logically; old estimates of ice melt (and subsequent sea level rise) could not be correct if the "missing" heat was not a factor in their calculations.
Your thoughts?
You think words analyze climate phenomena.. hahahahaha

How come they don't hire you to teach climate science?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

102 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 min Learn to Read 175,015
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 13 min DEAR ABBY 7 29 97,569
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 13 min DEM Idiots 1,082,722
Adult Nursing Relationships (May '11) 17 min Jimkirk 132
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 59 min raphael 3,839
Six-year-old girl watches in horror as police '... 1 hr LuckyGirlDidnt BARE Teeth 6
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr CDC 48,966
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••