Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 61519 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Leahe

Madison, WI

#40544 Oct 9, 2013
Mothra wrote:
The Big Lie Becomes Official At NOAA
I’ve been warning for months that NOAA was going to claim that 2012 was the hottest year ever, regardless of the actual temperatures. They did it today.
"The year 2012 was the warmest on record for the contiguous United States, beating the previous record by a full degree in temperature, a government climate agency said on Tuesday. Scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said the average temperature in 2012 in the contiguous United States was 55.3 degrees Fahrenheit (12.94 degrees Celsius), 3.2 degrees above the average recorded during the 20th century and 1.0 degree above 1998, until now the hottest on record."
2012 was hottest year on record in U.S., climate agency says | Reuters
I will do a more complete analysis later, but for now I want you to focus on the bold sentence above, which claims that 1998 used to be the hottest year in the US.
In an article which NASA published in 1999, Hansen showed that 1998 was only the fifth warmest year, after 1934, 1921, 1931 and 1953. In fact, 1998 was 0.6C cooler than 1934.
Over the past decade, NASA and NOAA have continuously altered the temperature record to cool the past and warm the present. Their claims are straight out of Orwell’s 1984, and have nothing to do with science.
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/01/08...
Yes, Wisconsin also had 100 plus record breaking temperatures that summer as well. Just like summers in Arizona and Texas. That is why I would avoid those places from June through September. However, the best time to go to these places would be February and March.
Retired Farmer

Paducah, KY

#40545 Oct 9, 2013
Leahe wrote:
I don't know if I buy into the theory of global warming. There certainly is no global warming in Wisconsin as we have the worst winters. Ironically it has been a warm October. We had no frost yet as we normaly would by now. However, I work at a farm supply store and farmers predicted a very brutal winter which I am not looking forward to. What farmers predict, usually comes true.
Global warming is only common sense. CO2 is the key greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. That has been in science textbooks for well over 100 years. Scientists have been able to measure it in the atmosphere for about 200 years. It can be measured in ice cores and in other ways for thousands of years. Humans have greatly increased the amount of CO2 over the last 250 or so years, mostly from burning coal. The increase has gotten much steeper as the amount of coal burned increased.

Strange as it seems, harsh winters can be an effect of global warming. Ordinarily the Gulf of Mexico is cool in the winter, so not much moisture evaporates. But as the ocean temperature increases, it evaporates more, and summer like weather systems with a lot of water in them develop. Those systems move north and collide with cold, dry air from the Arctic. The result is bad blizzards and ice storms.
Leahe

Madison, WI

#40546 Oct 9, 2013
Retired Farmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Global warming is only common sense. CO2 is the key greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. That has been in science textbooks for well over 100 years. Scientists have been able to measure it in the atmosphere for about 200 years. It can be measured in ice cores and in other ways for thousands of years. Humans have greatly increased the amount of CO2 over the last 250 or so years, mostly from burning coal. The increase has gotten much steeper as the amount of coal burned increased.
Strange as it seems, harsh winters can be an effect of global warming. Ordinarily the Gulf of Mexico is cool in the winter, so not much moisture evaporates. But as the ocean temperature increases, it evaporates more, and summer like weather systems with a lot of water in them develop. Those systems move north and collide with cold, dry air from the Arctic. The result is bad blizzards and ice storms.
I am sorry, I am not trying to be selfish. I am not looking forward to next winter at all. The farmers said it is going to have record snowfall and record low temperatures which could mean minus 40 windchill not included. When the farmer speaks, you better listen.
SpaceBlues

United States

#40547 Oct 9, 2013
Leahe wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sorry, I am not trying to be selfish. I am not looking forward to next winter at all. The farmers said it is going to have record snowfall and record low temperatures which could mean minus 40 windchill not included. When the farmer speaks, you better listen.
Hahahaha what would they do in Alaska or Hawaii or in other territories without the Almanac?

What about the rest of the world outside the USA? No Almanac.. LOL.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#40548 Oct 9, 2013
I'M BACK!!!!!!!!!!

Did I miss anything aside from the usual leftist (and let's just call it for what it is) ridiculous stupiditty.

You people are totally anti-scientific, aren't you?

I want to see some predictions backed up with real evidence!!!

Sort of like....where is Mann's Nobel Prize?

Somebody can't seem to find it!!!

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#40549 Oct 9, 2013
Leahe wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sorry, I am not trying to be selfish. I am not looking forward to next winter at all. The farmers said it is going to have record snowfall and record low temperatures which could mean minus 40 windchill not included. When the farmer speaks, you better listen.
As mothball is quoting record temps in the 1920's Australia as some significant spike in the scheme of things. A record winter in your Area has no bearing either. It's all about the global averages and if you look at the site mothball linked Sydney today is going to be 39c with extreme fire danger thats over 100 deg F and its only first week of spring in the southern hemisphere so the summer should be a cracker. So yes global warming is here and with that comes extreme weather INCLUDING extreme winters or no winters at all.
cynthia

Europe

#40553 Oct 9, 2013
I want to thank prince owan for bringing joy and happiness to my relationship and my family. I lost my boyfriend, and i required help until i found prince owan, And she assured me that I will get my boyfriend back in two days after the spell has been casted. two days later, my phone rang, and so shockingly, it was my boyfriend who has not called me for long, and made an apology for the heart break, and told me that he is ready to devote the rest of his life with me. prince owan released him up to know how much i loved and wanted him.. right now me and my fiancé is living a happy life and our love is now stronger than how it were even before our break up..All thanks goes to prince for the excessive work that she has done for me. Below is her email address in situation you are undergoing a heart break, and I assure you that as she has done mine for me, she will definitely help you too. Email: [email protected]

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#40555 Oct 10, 2013
Retired Farmer wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. They, who call themselves "Republicans" use the word "Progressive" as an insult, but who was the best known turn of the 20th century Progressive? Answer: Theodore Roosevelt!
I have actually run some T.R. quotes by some Tea Party types without telling them that it was his words and they instantly labeled it "socialist" or "communist" or "Marxist".
More on the Big Warmup that I posted stuff about earlier. This one is USA specific and has a nice map.
That was when the Party had some sense. TR was one of the great Presidents. While some of the ideals of the TP are good, many are regressive.

It is amazing how many of the conservatives have rejected science to promote their regressive agenda.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#40556 Oct 10, 2013
Mothra wrote:
Marble Bar heatwave, 1923-24
The world record for the longest sequence of days above 100°Fahrenheit (or 37.8° on the Celsius scale) is held by Marble Bar in the inland Pilbara district of Western Australia. The temperature, measured under standard exposure conditions, reached or exceeded the century mark every day from 31 October 1923 to 7 April 1924, a total of 160 days.
http://www.bom.gov.au/lam/climate/levelthree/...
What's your point?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#40557 Oct 10, 2013
Mothra wrote:
The Big Lie Becomes Official At NOAA
I’ve been warning for months that NOAA was going to claim that 2012 was the hottest year ever, regardless of the actual temperatures. They did it today.
"The year 2012 was the warmest on record for the contiguous United States, beating the previous record by a full degree in temperature, a government climate agency said on Tuesday. Scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said the average temperature in 2012 in the contiguous United States was 55.3 degrees Fahrenheit (12.94 degrees Celsius), 3.2 degrees above the average recorded during the 20th century and 1.0 degree above 1998, until now the hottest on record."
2012 was hottest year on record in U.S., climate agency says | Reuters
I will do a more complete analysis later, but for now I want you to focus on the bold sentence above, which claims that 1998 used to be the hottest year in the US.
In an article which NASA published in 1999, Hansen showed that 1998 was only the fifth warmest year, after 1934, 1921, 1931 and 1953. In fact, 1998 was 0.6C cooler than 1934.
Over the past decade, NASA and NOAA have continuously altered the temperature record to cool the past and warm the present. Their claims are straight out of Orwell’s 1984, and have nothing to do with science.
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/01/08...
Is Steve your new god? What a lot of baseless propaganda. 1934 may have been the warmest in the continental USA, but that is irrelevant to the discussion. Globally, 1998 was warmer and the past decade is the warmest ever recorded globally.
Mothra

United States

#40558 Oct 10, 2013
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>What's your point?
Check the dates. What was CO2 then and now?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#40559 Oct 10, 2013
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Is Steve your new god? What a lot of baseless propaganda. 1934 may have been the warmest in the continental USA, but that is irrelevant to the discussion. Globally, 1998 was warmer and the past decade is the warmest ever recorded globally.
Come on... that record in 1934 was broken in 2012.

A denier is a liar..
Mothra

United States

#40560 Oct 10, 2013
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Is Steve your new god? What a lot of baseless propaganda. 1934 may have been the warmest in the continental USA, but that is irrelevant to the discussion. Globally, 1998 was warmer and the past decade is the warmest ever recorded globally.
Irrelevant?

So you have no objection to doctoring data?
Mothra

United States

#40561 Oct 10, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Come on... that record in 1934 was broken in 2012.
A denier is a liar..
What a crank.

IF you change the data, you can make any year the hottest.
NobodyYouKnow

Etobicoke, Canada

#40562 Oct 10, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
What a crank.
IF you change the data, you can make any year the hottest.
Not happening in legitimate science, where there are too many competing to find flaws in any OTHER scientists work.

But sure. You can make any year look cooler if you manipulate the data which is what most of the denial sites do. And there is NO professional competence or checks on their work. They make it up on the spot..
LessHypeMoreFact

Etobicoke, Canada

#40563 Oct 10, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
What a crank.
IF you change the data, you can make any year the hottest.
You could all right. Or the coolest. But that is because you are an idiot and don't have any principles. Also you don't have hundreds of other scientists looking at your papers and correcting any obvious flaws. i.e. you are not a climate researcher. For YOU, anything is possible. And irrelevant.
Mothra

United States

#40564 Oct 10, 2013
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
You could all right. Or the coolest.
Thanks, and I agree.
Mothra

United States

#40565 Oct 10, 2013
NobodyYouKnow wrote:
<quoted text>
Not happening in legitimate science, where there are too many competing to find flaws in any OTHER scientists work.
But sure. You can make any year look cooler if you manipulate the data which is what most of the denial sites do. And there is NO professional competence or checks on their work. They make it up on the spot..
So tell me, what "legitimate" sites list all their 'corrections' alongside their modified data.
Mothra

United States

#40566 Oct 10, 2013
(add to previous post)
... and the original data.
LessHypeMoreFact

Etobicoke, Canada

#40567 Oct 10, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
So tell me, what "legitimate" sites list all their 'corrections' alongside their modified data.
Any leading peer reviewed science journal will lead you to the papers describing the methodology applied. If they aren't on the website, then write a letter. They will be HAPPY to provide the reference.

ohh, cute. GISTEMP is down because of the Republican political coup so you can't get at their webpage.

Well, when the right wing craters as the moderates get tired of the hooliganism of the extremists, perhaps the website will come back.
data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/sources_v3/gistemp... ;

Well, maybe HADCRUT
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature...
"How are the hemispheric and global anomaly series calculated?
Values for the hemisphere are the weighted average of all the non-missing, grid-box anomalies in each hemisphere. The weights used are the cosines of the central latitudes of each grid box. The global average for CRUTEM4 and CRUTEM4v is a weighted average of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and Southern Hemisphere (SH). The weights are 2 for the NH and one for the SH. For CRUTEM3 and CRUTEM3v, the global average is the average of the NH and SH values. For HadCRUT4, HadCRUT3 and HadCRUT3v the global average is the average of the NH and SH values. In the time series files, the second row of integers is the percentage of the surface area covered for each month from 1850."
and check out the "Answers to Frequently-asked Questions"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Henry 1,433,574
last post wins! (Apr '13) 4 min Retired SOF 1,718
last post wins! (Dec '10) 7 min Red_Forman 2,565
News Trump, Clinton and that murder at Millennium Park 23 min Go Blue Forever 1
News Donald Trump meets with the Polish-American com... 25 min Go Blue Forever 1
Marine Joint Chiefs Chairman Rejects Obama Plan 26 min Go Blue Forever 2
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 28 min Abandonment Papers 225,445
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr Dejuan 103,648

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages