Once slow-moving threat, global warmi...

Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

There are 53893 comments on the Newsday story from Dec 14, 2008, titled Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt.... In it, Newsday reports that:

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“I Feel”

Since: Feb 09

Blest4it!

#39879 Sep 27, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>If you read the book by a Nobel-winning scientist, you would see that deniers like you repeat the same attacks while the science marches on.
LOL!!!!!!

Comfirmed liar!!

LOL!!!

“I Feel”

Since: Feb 09

Blest4it!

#39880 Sep 27, 2013
somebody got into the meth tonight. spaced blues, that shyt is bad for your inner global growth, ya know?

I'll accept your rants as a concession that YOU TRY TO CONTINUE AND LIE YOUR WAY OUT.

quick sand is unforgiving when you fight it....and so is rdtm. wipe your lip!

lol

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#39881 Sep 27, 2013
Jimmy B wrote:
Any of you "Globaloney" I D I O T S ever try the TRUTH? Naw....that's what I thought. So many born brain dead....:(
" Oh, and the scientists are 95 per cent convinced that human beings are responsible for climate change because of fossil fuel burning. "

Would you buy a lotto ticket if that was your predicted chance of winning or would you say I'm not 100% convinced!

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/09/27/...

“I Feel”

Since: Feb 09

Blest4it!

#39882 Sep 27, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>If you read the book by a Nobel-winning scientist,
no.....sure......you didn't make the claim. you just posted it last week and forgot what you posted, right, poodle?

“I Feel”

Since: Feb 09

Blest4it!

#39883 Sep 27, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
" Oh, and the scientists are 95 per cent convinced that human beings are responsible for climate change because of fossil fuel burning. "
Would you buy a lotto ticket if that was your predicted chance of winning or would you say I'm not 100% convinced!
http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/09/27/...
would you be gullible enough to buy a lotto ticket if someone told you the odds were that good?

LOL

“I Feel”

Since: Feb 09

Blest4it!

#39884 Sep 27, 2013
co2 escalating.....temps not so much.

what gives?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39885 Sep 27, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>LOL!!!!!!
Comfirmed liar!!
LOL!!!
LOL.. You have already conceded, LIAR.

Too late, grief.

BWAHAHAHA
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39886 Sep 27, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>no.....sure......you didn't make the claim. you just posted it last week and forgot what you posted, right, poodle?
No, LIAR. You changed it so I kept correcting you with evidence.

Your concession is over and done with!
B as in B S as in S

Minneapolis, MN

#39887 Sep 27, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
" Oh, and the scientists are 95 per cent convinced that human beings are responsible for climate change because of fossil fuel burning. "
Would you buy a lotto ticket if that was your predicted chance of winning or would you say I'm not 100% convinced!
http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/09/27/...
Those who believe the scientists in CAGW also believe that scientists forecast a >95% chance that the sun WILL rise in the East tomorrow morning. Well folks, someone should break the news to you; like CAGW... it Ain't gonna happen.
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

#39888 Sep 27, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
That's absurd if they were real liberals ..
You obviously don't understand liberals. Just as most liberals don't understand conservatives. As a 'centrist' I condemn you both.
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
That's absurd if they were real liberals they would "pay a fair wage"
How stupid of them. I gather that, as a 'true conservative' you promote slavery?
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
and give away most of their money
Lots of conservatives give away a lot of their money. Rupert Murdoch spends a lot to control and direct the media with nothing to show for it (except Faux News). The Koch Brothers spend a lot to try to influence the political response to AGW. He is unlikely to recoup any of that becuase the response is inevitable.
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
because "they didn't build it".
Well, that quote is accurate but no 'because'. We ALL benefit from the infrastructure that is built 'in common' and even when you inherit a lot of money, you are not 'building it' yourself when you organize a group of employees to do the work.

But your kind of tea party conservative uses demagoguery over reason, so I doubt if you will understand the role of 'cooperation' as well as 'competition'.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#39889 Sep 27, 2013
"In Washington, President Obama’s science adviser, John P. Holdren, cited increased scientific confidence “that the kinds of harm already being experienced from climate change will continue to worsen unless and until comprehensive and vigorous action to reduce emissions is undertaken worldwide.”

I thought the president's oath of office was to protect America's security above all else. Do you think he should ignore this one and take his advice from Sarah Palin instead

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/28/science/glo...
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39890 Sep 27, 2013
B as in B S as in S wrote:
<quoted text>
Those who believe the scientists in CAGW also believe that scientists forecast a >95% chance that the sun WILL rise in the East tomorrow morning. Well folks, someone should break the news to you; like CAGW... it Ain't gonna happen.
Well well, your ignorance is bleeding. Watch this for some easy learning:

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/...

“I Feel”

Since: Feb 09

Blest4it!

#39891 Sep 27, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>If you read the book by a Nobel-winning scientist, you would see that deniers like you repeat the same attacks while the science marches on.
How's your head? Are you medicated enough to drop off your chair again?
someone is a confirmed liar, hmmm, spacey?
LOL
keep puttin' your foot in your big mouth son.
you know you lied....and it's been proven over and over, son.

psssst. Mann is not Nobel winning scientist like you claim in this post. so, please, stop whining!

“I Feel”

Since: Feb 09

Blest4it!

#39892 Sep 27, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
"In Washington, President Obama’s science adviser, John P. Holdren, cited increased scientific confidence “that the kinds of harm already being experienced from climate change will continue to worsen unless and until comprehensive and vigorous action to reduce emissions is undertaken worldwide.”
I thought the president's oath of office was to protect America's security above all else. Do you think he should ignore this one and take his advice from Sarah Palin instead
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/28/science/glo...
what harm already being experienced? what scientist is on the record for saying that? what harmful event has been connected to good old co2?

“I Feel”

Since: Feb 09

Blest4it!

#39893 Sep 27, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
"In Washington, President Obama’s science adviser, John P. Holdren, cited increased scientific confidence “that the kinds of harm already being experienced from climate change will continue to worsen unless and until comprehensive and vigorous action to reduce emissions is undertaken worldwide.”
I thought the president's oath of office was to protect America's security above all else. Do you think he should ignore this one and take his advice from Sarah Palin instead
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/28/science/glo...
I personally don't care much for Palin, but she seems smarter than Gore. She probably has a much smaller personal carbon foot print, too, than that fat swine eating clod.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#39894 Sep 27, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
"In Washington, President Obama’s science adviser, John P. Holdren, cited increased scientific confidence “that the kinds of harm already being experienced from climate change will continue to worsen unless and until comprehensive and vigorous action to reduce emissions is undertaken worldwide.”
Did Holdren then turn to Obama and say, "Mr. President, you could do your part by keeping your family vacations to one plane.

And your little dog too."

No?

Didn't think so.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#39895 Sep 28, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>I personally don't care much for Palin, but she seems smarter than Gore. She probably has a much smaller personal carbon foot print, too, than that fat swine eating clod.
I don't care much for Palin either, but I did have a bit of admiration for her because she seemed uncontrollable by D.C. standards.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#39896 Sep 28, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
"In Washington, President Obama’s science adviser, John P. Holdren, cited increased scientific confidence “that the kinds of harm already being experienced from climate change will continue to worsen unless and until comprehensive and vigorous action to reduce emissions is undertaken worldwide.”
I thought the president's oath of office was to protect America's security above all else. Do you think he should ignore this one and take his advice from Sarah Palin instead
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/28/science/glo...
15 years of continued and increased fossil fuel use but no warming to match the models:

There's never been an experimental test of climate change mitigation or man made catastrophic climate change. That's how you can tell climate mitigation is a hoax and man made catastrophic climate change is pseudoscience.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39897 Sep 28, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>someone is a confirmed liar, hmmm, spacey[name calling]?
LOL
keep puttin' your foot in your big mouth son[name calling].
you know you lied[sic]....and it's been proven[sic] over and over, son[name calling].
psssst. Mann is not Nobel winning scientist like you claim in this post. so, please, stop whining!
Yes, you are a confirmed liar.

Whine denier, the AR5 is completed. What ya gonna do? Go lie some more.

Mann is still a Nobel-winning scientist, grief.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39898 Sep 28, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>15 years of continued and increased fossil fuel use but no warming to match the models:
There's never been an experimental test of climate change mitigation or man made catastrophic climate change. That's how you can tell climate mitigation is a hoax and man made catastrophic climate change is pseudoscience.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min Grey Ghost 1,249,972
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 11 min Learn to Read 191,809
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 59 min RJS 8,080
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr RACE 99,857
News Should we really be OK with the surgical remova... 1 hr TerryE 67
A-Php/DMT/ RCs International/USA/Au/UK Legit Ve... 1 hr kikikiki 1
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr White_Lightning 6,131
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages