Avoid the facts.<quoted text>
The website that posted the 1950-2009 graph said this about the graph:
“As the graph below indicates, the increase in disasters closely tracks the rise in global temperatures, which rose most sharply in the 1990s and continued to rise, but more gradually, in the past decade.”
So you and fairgame go ahead with your delusional thinking that somehow this is a “top ten” list that gets disasters added and subtracted if it makes you feel better.
Change the subject.
Forget that your original contention was that Munich Re had been juggling the graphs and, as evidence, you produced two different graphs and wondered why the numbers were different. The top ten list "supposed" delusion is your face-saving attempt, and you can't even understand that simple concept.
Your concession is accepted, as noted by all here.
You never had any credibility and now you've even lost that.