Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday 49,174
When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore. Full Story
milly

Richmond, IN

#39178 Sep 15, 2013
Me too!
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#39179 Sep 15, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>There you go again.
Something the matter, poor troll?
Do you have a comprehension problem, or are you unable to resist being a jackass?

True or False:
Global warming proponents would make more 'news' by proclaiming a weather event wasn't due to global warming.

Think hard -- I know that's painful for you.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39180 Sep 15, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
This would be news if the didn't attribute the flooding to global warming.
Hahahaha what's the problem?[its language sucks]
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have a comprehension problem, or are you unable to resist being a jackass?
True or False:
Global warming proponents would make more 'news' by proclaiming a weather event wasn't due to global warming.
Think hard -- I know that's painful for you.
hahaha the troll does not comprehend its problem.[its language sucks]

How funny!

It must be hard to be a denier plus a troll, LOL.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39181 Sep 15, 2013
milly wrote:
Me too!
Thanks for your support.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#39182 Sep 15, 2013
motheaten wrote:
Think hard -- I know that's painful for you.
Know you DIDN'T think painfully hard, NOT getting your science & mathematics degrees. Know you DIDN'T think painfully hard, NOT taking science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra, & pre-calc in your poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#39183 Sep 15, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
There you go again.
Don't start channeling Ronny Reagan!
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39184 Sep 15, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't start channeling Ronny Reagan!
LOL.

I feel my freedom, besides the troll has possibly dementia like Reagan.
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#39185 Sep 15, 2013
The world is looking at what is going on with this Obama talking about chemical weapons again.
The Internationals tend to feel awe as what would come from US by portraying and labeling others again?
If they are not North Korea, Iran, or Axis-of-evil, who will be those again?
Obama has demonstrated distasteful and bad results everywhere, in views and activation of dramatic incidental situations, from Libya and now to Syria.
Now, Obama's saying to strike Syria based on chemical weapons issue makes the whole world nervous.
Obama looks like another big terror on the planet, to create drama horror in the pursuance of destruction of chemical weapons in Syria, like Iraq horror again.
Obama is exhibiting the Bush molded puppet by doing the same old Bush psycho drama by converting Iraq to Syria of using the same scheme of chemical weapons matter..
The whole world is witnessing another psycho horror Obama at work.
Obama is doing and acting as the Bush clone robot in trying to make another bad drama of the same old thing on chemical weapons about Iraq from the previous psycho Bush, by checking to chemical weapons in pursuit for destroying them in Syria, as If is another Iraq and Bush drama.
But, every US pursuit of chemical weapons has suffered large damages, and only can be viewed as the psycho drama of never-ending chemical weapons kind cycle drum. As of those days, to beat up the drum of striking that said Iraq will strike the world with silos of WMD (but where were any long range Iraq missiles to fire silos first), that US must destroy those Iraq WMD.
That is the terror drama going on and on from US , that the whole world is seeing again.
Yet, it goes on and on for the psycho drum of drama on chemical weapons again.
But, Middle East had not been proven in the usage of chemical weapons by killing a lot of people.
US bombs and missiles had killed at least few hundreds of thousands people instead in the ME region, in the pursuance of chemical weapons issue, while ending up finding none of WMD in Iraq.
US gets many big damages today (including getting a bad name) in the checking and pursuit of attempting to destroy the WMD in Iraq, as it is doing the same thing to Syria now, like a repeated cycle.
As alike to Iraq case, there will be high doubts that US would end up with any good results about doing the same thing to Syria.
Obama has dug himself a big hole, by his exposition of dramatic psycho terror, by dong Bush drama deal.
Obama could not provide solid proof and prove concretely that ASSAD USED SARIN GAS ON THE 8/21 INCIDENT, as this may be another same Bush drama lie to strike Syria.
US does have a lot of psycho dramas---IT IS troublesome for Obama if he were to use ground troops, when Assad would not let US in to check, that people will be watching the tense drama again, like Iraq case.
Obama's policies are as Bush clone molded polices, as nothing is new but the drama kind of terror again.
Libya also had chemical weapons but hardly used them, yet it said it had destroyed them--the point is that chemical weapons had not been used much and killed much in recent times, but the missiles and bombs had killed lots instead, especially in the matters of chasing chemical weapons.
From what Obama had done so far in every policy, US already suffers damage in Libya in the Obama policy as US embassy was hit while there was another hit to Libya foreign ministry building on another 9/11, just a few days ago. Libya is still impregnated with lots of volatility of terror rebels like those in Syria,that could uprise to explode any time against US as well as the current Libya government.
US policies in the pursuit of chemical weapons ended up nothing good as all horrors and bad dramas, while this same thing again to Syria is trying to do it again by Obama, as if US has never learned by repeatedly doing the same thing, to want to have to take MORE DAMAGES--AND THAT is the way of Obama's in making terror dramas for getting more damages.
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#39186 Sep 15, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
<sigh>

Guess you need more reminders.

Take your meds... every day.

How to Remember to Take Medication
http://www.wikihow.com/Remember-to-Take-Medic...
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#39187 Sep 15, 2013
motheaten wrote:
Earth has gained 19,000 Manhattans of sea ice since this date last year, the largest increase on record.
Altho toxic topix AGW deniers seldom make comments on record shattering AGW enhanced events AT the time of those events, toxic topix AGW deniers love comparing those record shattering AGW enhanced events to "recovery" events, such as 1998-99, 2007-08 & now 2012-13. However, toxic topix AGW deniers seldom get the science & mathematics right, because they don't have science & mathematics degrees.
//////////

Sea ice VOLUME is a better measure of conditions than short climate events:

Arctic VOLUME as of September 1, 2013 is not quite 16% HIGHER(not 60%, like toxic topix AGW deniers report) than that of the "2010-to-current" time range. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for September 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~15,000 cubic kilometers. Present September 1, 2013 sea ice VOLUME is almost 3 times less,~5100 cubic kilometers,~10,000 cubic kilometers less than the 1980-89 period for September 1.

Put 10,000 cubic kilometers of 1980's ice minus present day ice on Manhattan....... & you'll have an ice depth of 14 miles. "motheaten" has a whole lot of Arctic sea ice, still to recover.
B as in B S as in S

Minneapolis, MN

#39188 Sep 15, 2013
B as in B S as in S wrote:
<quoted text>
"CMs forecasted drought yet it is likely that researchers will connect Anthropogenic CO2 as contributory to this weather (event)?"
gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Colorado has been in a drought. I guess the models were right.
Why don't you develop a model that can predict the weather on September 15th, 2020?.
Yes, the models that predicted drought were right. And the models that predicted flooding were right!
And the forecast of "Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up..." Is, well, "a Fact" in the minds of the true believers.

As far as my "predictions" record: it is 100% accurate and if I chose to forecast the "weather" for Sept. 15th, 2020 it too would be correct. But that would be pointless, for as the experts have learned, as long as the prognostication is far enough into the future there is no risk to one's credibility for being wrong.

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#39189 Sep 15, 2013
How is science agreeing for 28 years that a CO2 crisis only could happen, not WILL happen supposed to be a consensus of anything? No wonder we have deniers so why doesn't science end this costly debate now and agree it will be an inevitable crisis not just a possible and likely and potential crisis?

You must do as science says; never say a crisis will happen, only could happen.

Science has never agreed or said any crisis WILL actually happen, so why are you remaining believers saying it WILL happen? Who’s the fear mongering neocon now?

“EnvironMENTAList ”

Since: Feb 07

Near Detroit

#39190 Sep 15, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Read it again. Your mind is not trained on science. It is obvious.
Good luck.
What you write is that science says a crisis WILL happen when science has NEVER said that. You doomers lie.

“8 point Buck”

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#39191 Sep 15, 2013
Global warming ain't ever going to be done with. You folks need to visit your local library and research global warming and you to will see that it is never ending.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#39192 Sep 15, 2013
mememine69 wrote:
How is science agreeing for 28 years that a CO2 crisis only could happen, not WILL happen supposed to be a consensus of anything? No wonder we have deniers so why doesn't science end this costly debate now and agree it will be an inevitable crisis not just a possible and likely and potential crisis?
You must do as science says; never say a crisis will happen, only could happen.
Science has never agreed or said any crisis WILL actually happen, so why are you remaining believers saying it WILL happen? Who’s the fear mongering neocon now?
"remaining believers"

I love it! You're about as far removed from reality as a denierbot can get.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#39193 Sep 15, 2013
Mothra wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have a comprehension problem, or are you unable to resist being a jackass?
True or False:
Global warming proponents would make more 'news' by proclaiming a weather event wasn't due to global warming.
Think hard -- I know that's painful for you.
The problem with that is, your lot dismiss ANY event no matter how big or small as evidence that the effect of warming has already arrived. Floods in Europe, China, Australia etc all based on a huge amount of water (record breaking amounts) dropped in a small amount of time. Then if there is drought in a area where high rainfall is expected that's dismissed as well. So what will it take to admit there is a "enemy at the gates" which at the moment is you.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39194 Sep 15, 2013
mememine69 wrote:
<quoted text>What you write is that science says a crisis WILL happen when science has NEVER said that. You doomers lie.
LIAR. What are you quoting from me or science?

Your posts inform us of your lunacy.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#39195 Sep 15, 2013
Furthermore... Reefs in Florida and the Caribbean were once dominated by these beautiful, branching elkhorn and staghorn corals, but now the species face steep declines due to bleaching from increasing ocean temperatures, pressures from disease, fishing, and pollution, and impacts from ocean acidification.[summitcountyvoi ce]
Mothra

Phoenix, AZ

#39196 Sep 15, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem with that is, your lot dismiss ANY event no matter how big or small as evidence that the effect of warming has already arrived. Floods in Europe, China, Australia etc all based on a huge amount of water (record breaking amounts) dropped in a small amount of time. Then if there is drought in a area where high rainfall is expected that's dismissed as well. So what will it take to admit there is a "enemy at the gates" which at the moment is you.
Such hypocrisy.

During the winter warmists are quick to point out that 'weather' isn't 'climate', so record cold events aren't evidence of cooling.

But during the summer, they are.

btw, I notice you didn't answer my question. Warmists cannot concede any argument.

That just demonstrates how fragile their theory is, and that it's more a 'belief' than "science".
gcaveman1

Louin, MS

#39197 Sep 15, 2013
I had a denier try to tell me the Earth was cooling.

I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Some Valid Points 8 min Rest of the story 1
How to make a woman squirtting 30 min GuGu 1
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 54 min Guru 181,710
im single black hndsome 1 hr ligolyser 1
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 hr shinningelectr0n 1,153,060
women are so shallow these days (Nov '11) 2 hr Silk 81
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 6 hr JOEL 70,988
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:07 pm PST

Bleacher Report 5:07PM
Lions vs. Bears: Breaking Down Detroit's Game Plan
Bleacher Report 5:55 PM
Indianapolis Colts vs. Dallas Cowboys Betting Odds, Analysis, NFL Pick
NBC Sports 6:29 PM
Reports: Bears benching Cutler - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 7:26 PM
Trestman May Never Get 2nd Shot After Bears Meltdown
Bleacher Report 7:27 PM
What Are Experts Saying About Detroit?