Good one!<quoted text>
Yup, imagine a prestigious science journal basically admitting that they were deceptive ,stupid and just plain wrong about their position on AGW .
As they said in the "climate gate" email... will do whatever it takes to prevent such a paper from being published.
It is what climate scientists call their "scientific method".
Assuming scientific publications had personalities like yours.
Course, you guys always forget the whistle-blowers and turncoats.
And you'll never admit there's just no good science for your pet project.
Plus, Phil Jones doesn't really look like Satan to you, does he?