Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Comments (Page 1,722)

Showing posts 34,421 - 34,440 of42,984
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36461
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>now now, spacey, spacey, be nice to people you can't prove wrong.
Oh rogue, alas, you are wrong by definition.

Regrets only.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36462
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
Without real facts and observation, scientific reasoning is not possible. Get the facts, pops. All the great science academies and institutions do not agree with your reasoning. How do you account for this? Some great worldwide conspiracy????
none of them agree with your conclusions either. granted, many may say "could", "might" "possibly" yadayada....but they don't know anything yet. they're looking at one driver out of many. pseudoscientists run with factoids to conclude what they want to 'discover'.
get it?

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36463
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Oh rogue, alas, you are wrong by definition.
Regrets only.
i regret that you're a needy little troll who doesn't, or can't, provide interesting posts.:-/
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36464
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>i regret that you're a needy little troll who doesn't, or can't, provide interesting posts.:-/
Ocean acidification is the reason, in addition to climate change, for reducing global CO2 emissions.

Regrets only that deniers like you are piddling away facts.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36465
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Ocean acidification is the reason, in addition to climate change, for reducing global CO2 emissions.
Regrets only that deniers like you are piddling away facts.
ask a scientist if they've ruled out other drivers of pH fluctuations. If so, why!?!?
Acidification in itself is misleading. The oceans are still very basic. In fact a lower pH is easier on marine life.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/12/27/the-oce...
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36466
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>
Acidification in itself is misleading. The oceans are still very basic. In fact a lower pH is easier on marine life.
Alas, it's not up to science deniers like you to object to science terms.

Ocean acidification is a specific term. You can't kill it by denial.

It's incorrect that "a lower pH is easier on marine life." Do you care to defend your claim?
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36467
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Alas, it's not up to science deniers like you to object to science terms.
Ocean acidification is a specific term. You can't kill it by denial.
It's incorrect that "a lower pH is easier on marine life." Do you care to defend your claim?
But you can confuse it, like 'coral bleaching' and household bleach. Denialists with so little grasp on even simple terms can reach around just about any fact.. One has to wonder if he misread 'bletch' in one of his graphic novels for 'bleech'..

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36468
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>ask a scientist if they've ruled out other drivers of pH fluctuations. If so, why!?!?
Acidification in itself is misleading. The oceans are still very basic. In fact a lower pH is easier on marine life.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/12/27/the-oce...
What an attempt at distorting the facts. If the ocean is getting less alkaline then it is getting more acidic. Science 101, pops.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36469
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Alas, it's not up to science deniers like you to object to science terms.
Ocean acidification is a specific term. You can't kill it by denial.
It's incorrect that "a lower pH is easier on marine life." Do you care to defend your claim?
yes, it is a specific term and one that is misused in the vernacular of 'climate change.'
Water in an alkaline state, which is the case for seawater (7.8-8.4 for the most part), that has a drop in ph level is said to become more neutral pr less basic. Water doesn't become acidified until pH drops below 7. It sounds frightening....so the alarmists misuse the term for the scare factor.
With many ocean readings with pH levels over 8.6 it worries me that a spike up to 9 is a concern. A reading that high would destroy many organisms and aquatic animals. High alkalinity is just as dangerous as acidity. Anyone knows that....well almost anyone. But to your question....the ammonia toxicity is 10 higher in water that has a pH of 8.4 than a pH of 7.4, for example. Less toxicity equals less stress on marine life. That's a fact you can't deny now that you were taught a few facts.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36470
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
But you can confuse it, like 'coral bleaching' and household bleach. Denialists with so little grasp on even simple terms can reach around just about any fact.. One has to wonder if he misread 'bletch' in one of his graphic novels for 'bleech'..
May be you can, but I never never have confused matters of pH since elementary school.

I did see b_gone did all that confusion with pH of 13 etc. It also spelled bleach as "bleech," lol, in a clever cover up, perhaps.

Did you reply to it instead of me?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coral_bleaching

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36471
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>none of them agree with your conclusions either. granted, many may say "could", "might" "possibly" yadayada....but they don't know anything yet. they're looking at one driver out of many. pseudoscientists run with factoids to conclude what they want to 'discover'.
get it?
I have formed no conclusions for them to agree with. I, however am intelligent enough to understand that climate scientists have studied the data and find that CO2 is one of the drivers of the climate. They know a whole lot more than I and I am more likely to follow their conclusions than some radical RW denier blog.

Science is not absolute. It is always open to further clarification. Pseudoscience seems to be your forte. You reject the finding of scientists and hang your hat upon whatever denier blog that suits you.

You concluded that scientists follow only one driver of the climate. Where did you obtain that misconception?

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36472
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
I have formed no conclusions for them to agree with. I, however am intelligent enough to understand that climate scientists have studied the data and find that CO2 is one of the drivers of the climate. They know a whole lot more than I and I am more likely to follow their conclusions than some radical RW denier blog.
Science is not absolute. It is always open to further clarification. Pseudoscience seems to be your forte. You reject the finding of scientists and hang your hat upon whatever denier blog that suits you.
You concluded that scientists follow only one driver of the climate. Where did you obtain that misconception?
did you just call me a radical right wing denier?!?! Lol
There is no scientific consensus as the pseudoscientific activists want you to believe.
I don't deny the scientific studies. They offer good information, but nothing has been determined that climate is doing anything aside from what it always has... Change. Sure, people can make connections to co2 just as they can make connections to someone like me who actually is doing what the real scientist are doing......gathering more facts! Because right now we just don't know. Because we don't know we can start legislating "remedies". Don't follow the lemmings!
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36473
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>yes, it is a specific term and one that is misused in the vernacular of 'climate change.'
Water in an alkaline state, which is the case for seawater (7.8-8.4 for the most part), that has a drop in ph level is said to become more neutral pr less basic. Water doesn't become acidified until pH drops below 7. It sounds frightening....so the alarmists misuse the term for the scare factor.
With many ocean readings with pH levels over 8.6 it worries me that a spike up to 9 is a concern. A reading that high would destroy many organisms and aquatic animals. High alkalinity is just as dangerous as acidity. Anyone knows that....well almost anyone. But to your question....the ammonia toxicity is 10 higher in water that has a pH of 8.4 than a pH of 7.4, for example. Less toxicity equals less stress on marine life. That's a fact you can't deny now that you were taught a few facts.
First paragraph: No, we don't say more neutral. Neutral by definition is pH=7. Read my previous replies.

Second paragraph: Nonsense makes no sense to me. Try it again. Be relevant, please.

FYI:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coral_bleaching

Also;

http://coralreef.noaa.gov/aboutcrcp/strategy/...
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36474
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>To another poster:
..
You concluded that scientists follow only one driver of the climate. Where did you obtain that misconception?
It was their denier training that loaded them with misconceptions about science and scientists.

Deniers come in a mold. LOL.

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36475
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>yes, it is a specific term and one that is misused in the vernacular of 'climate change.'
Water in an alkaline state, which is the case for seawater (7.8-8.4 for the most part), that has a drop in ph level is said to become more neutral pr less basic. Water doesn't become acidified until pH drops below 7. It sounds frightening....so the alarmists misuse the term for the scare factor.
With many ocean readings with pH levels over 8.6 it worries me that a spike up to 9 is a concern. A reading that high would destroy many organisms and aquatic animals. High alkalinity is just as dangerous as acidity. Anyone knows that....well almost anyone. But to your question....the ammonia toxicity is 10 higher in water that has a pH of 8.4 than a pH of 7.4, for example. Less toxicity equals less stress on marine life. That's a fact you can't deny now that you were taught a few facts.
Anyone can look up the definition of acids and bases. You will find that pure water is neutral with an equal number of hydronium ions (H+) and hydroxyl ions (OH-). When the number of H+ and OH- ions are equal the solution is neutral and is defined an having a pH of 7. pH =-log[H+],[H+]= hydrogen ion concentration. If the solution gains H+ ions, it becomes more acidic. If it gains OH- ions it becomes more alkaline. Of course it is not called an acid solution until the pH drops below 7 nor an alkaline solution until it increases above 7. However any time the hydronium ion concentration increases, the solution is said to become more acidic. It may still be an alkaline solution but it is more acidic or if you wish less basic. Try to understand this simple concept. It is science 101.

The ocean has maintained a very narrow pH range for tens of thousands of years. Any move from this near constant range spells catastrophic changes in the ocean ecosystem. Life is able to adjust to slow changes, but organisms are unable to adjust to abrupt changes such as seem to be occurring in the ocean pH today. One apparent change is the dissolving of calcium carbonates by lowering the pH, or if you wish, a less alkaline solution.

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36476
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>did you just call me a radical right wing denier?!?! Lol
There is no scientific consensus as the pseudoscientific activists want you to believe.
I don't deny the scientific studies. They offer good information, but nothing has been determined that climate is doing anything aside from what it always has... Change. Sure, people can make connections to co2 just as they can make connections to someone like me who actually is doing what the real scientist are doing......gathering more facts! Because right now we just don't know. Because we don't know we can start legislating "remedies". Don't follow the lemmings!
Oh, do you have a blog?

I see, you deny the science that has determined that CO2 absorbs in discrete IR wavelengths. You deny the science that concludes that CO2 is instrumental in making our planet warmer than it would be otherwise. You deny that the man is adding CO2 to the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels. You deny that the ocean is absorbing more CO2 because of increased CO2 in the atmosphere. You deny that the ocean is becoming more acedic (less basic in your understanding). You deny, deny, deny, deny. Why? What do you really base your denial upon? Show me the hard evidence that shows the scientists wrong. Good solid science, nor some rdical RW denier blog but real science. If you cannot, you are just a waste of time.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36477
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>First paragraph: No, we don't say more neutral. Neutral by definition is pH=7.
yes, 7 is pH neutral. Water isn't acidic unless below 7. The oceans are more basic. They aren't acidifying! Lol
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36478
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

No, pH is not neutral. The solution whose pH is 7 is neutral by definition. Read Patriot's post also.

Since: Mar 09

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36479
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>yes, 7 is pH neutral. Water isn't acidic unless below 7. The oceans are more basic. They aren't acidifying! Lol
You really are a waste of time....

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36480
Jun 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
I have formed no conclusions for them to agree with. I, however am intelligent enough to understand that climate scientists have studied the data and find that CO2 is one of the drivers of the climate. They know a whole lot more than I and I am more likely to follow their conclusions than some radical RW denier blog.
..........
Correct, and when the President make up his mind on causes of climate change do you really think he weighs up that decision on the basis of information from NASA and other leading agencies around the world or some deniers blog with crap on volcanoes and a temperature graph from their weather station mounted on the garage roof.

For the 5% of the science who oppose the other 95% who agree man has shifted the balance in nature. It also happens that 90% of them come from the USA, so go figure. Is it a culture or is it science.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 34,421 - 34,440 of42,984
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••