I edited out everything after your false claim about predictive modelling, since it was obvious you were a liar and I saw no reason to reprint your lies, even while answering them.<quoted text>Tha Professor edited my arguments; what's up with that? Maybe, I don't use insults or defame my political opponents, not used to reason?
Predictive modeling works great when experiments reconcile model forces against real world forces. Where there are no experimental tests, you've only got a theory rendered into algorithm.
Your watch is a good model for measuring time, because it's been experimentally tested. There's no experiments supporting climate predictive modeling.
I like the new version of your trolling classic, though -
"There's no experiments supporting climate predictive modeling."
Will we be seeing this new bit of disingenuousness in more of your posts, or was it a one-off troll intended only for me?