Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds up, leaving litt...

Full story: Newsday

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, global warming was a slow-moving environmental problem that was easy to ignore.

Comments (Page 1,612)

Showing posts 32,221 - 32,240 of45,601
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34083
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

3

Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
I think LargeLanguage said he was just gay.
I know there was something about "gay" in one of his posts.
LOL.
So Wallop11 returned did he? We thought you were dead!
gcaveman1

Louin, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34084
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

1

Big Guy wrote:
Global warming is bs
Like I said, bullshit is their language.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34085
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Global warming cooling climate change is scientific science fiction.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34087
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

HomoSapiensLaptopicus wrote:
<quoted text>
Science "proven wrong"? That's what YOU WISH, not what's happened. If you believe this, then you're blinded by the radical right wing media nutteria.
Yes, there was an "oops" about Himalayan glaciers in ONE SMALL PART of the IPCC report, while other, more important, parts of the report did NOT make the Himalayan mistake. Climatologists are human. They occasionally make mistakes.
Those things don't invalidate the theory, which has proven to be incredibly powerful in making predictions. Depending on how you count them, the theory has made between 17 & 20 predictions. That's pretty darn good IYAM.
http://bartonpaullevenson.com/ModelsReliable....
Did you ever bother to check out who wrote your link. It turns out that he is a science fiction writer who writes macabre stories about the future. Not one you would consider to be knowledgable about climate models. He claimed that the models are accurate without saying which. Funny thing is if he had said which then we could check them out and discover if they are still as accurate. Most of the models (the IPCC's for example) went from accurate to inaccurate within five years. So many claims that models are accurate have since been dropped.

The real issue is politics and always has been. Even your own post with it's remarks about "radical right wing media nutteria" is proof. Funny how people like you talk about radical RW while never mentioning radical LW. In that it tends to point out that where you stand is where some would refer to as the radical LW and to you anything that isn't to the left of the issue is radical RW.

Which only is further proof that it is nothing more than politics and this has little to do with science.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34089
Jan 31, 2013
 
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you ever bother to check out who wrote your link. It turns out that he is a science fiction writer who writes macabre stories about the future. Not one you would consider to be knowledgable about climate models. He claimed that the models are accurate without saying which. Funny thing is if he had said which then we could check them out and discover if they are still as accurate. Most of the models (the IPCC's for example) went from accurate to inaccurate within five years. So many claims that models are accurate have since been dropped.
The real issue is politics and always has been. Even your own post with it's remarks about "radical right wing media nutteria" is proof. Funny how people like you talk about radical RW while never mentioning radical LW. In that it tends to point out that where you stand is where some would refer to as the radical LW and to you anything that isn't to the left of the issue is radical RW.
Which only is further proof that it is nothing more than politics and this has little to do with science.
I'm perfectly aware that BPL writes science fiction. He's also a physicist who's been published in peer-reviewed scientific literature on AGW/CC.

He knows the difference between fact & fiction, unlike you deniers. Yes, you reside in the radical right wing media denying nutteria.

The models have been remarkably accurate; the predictions that are INaccurate are the ones made by the handful of scientist who are still trying to deny reality. BPL's site has references to all the papers that prove what he's saying.

You say
"Most of the models (the IPCC's for example) went from accurate to inaccurate within five years. So many claims that models are accurate have since been dropped."

Only a deluded right wing fool would even consider saying such a thing. Since the IPCC made its correction for aerosols in 1995, actual temps have been very close to their mid-range predictions.

The scientists' correct predictions are facts. You should try to familiarize yourself with them instead of reading your right wing fantasies. Go to the original articles if you really want to learn something.

Of course, there are exceptions. Remember when the Arctic Ocean icepack would be gone in September (peak melt) by 2050? Then it was 2040, then 2030. Now it's 2020, & if you look at the raw volume data, it looks like it'll be gone by 2016 or 2017:

https://sites.google.com/site/arctischepingui...

Yes, right wing deniers are ALL about politics, while we are all about science. Your progeny will understand how selfish & WRONG you are.

If you're buried within 75 meters of sea level, maybe they'll move your remains to higher ground. Or not. Maybe they'll just let them wash out to sea.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34091
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Large lying language wrote:
Boring!
'large lying language', is a kkk(ALWAYS SMALL LETTERS) member, & doesn't get excited except for cross burnings, ETC.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34093
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
'large lying language', is a kkk(ALWAYS SMALL LETTERS) member, & doesn't get excited except for cross burnings, ETC.
And you think topix doesn’t know what you publish? Attacks on me won't delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34094
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Large lying language wrote:
oisdkufhjksla\kjikldfm,ksclzk\ am,ieofr12IJQWEMIDSOCLZX;
Misspelling, as usual.
AnonyArch

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34095
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Likely Voter wrote:
From the article: " The 10 hottest years on record have occurred since Clinton's second inauguration."
The hottest year on record was 1934.
How did Seth get to be "AP Science Writer?"
Do a little bit of research. 1934 was the 4th hottest year in the US. Globally, 1934 is something like 49th hottest. The 10 hottest years on record globally all occurred since 1998.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34096
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
Misspelling, as usual.
And you think topix doesn’t know what you publish? Attacks on me won't delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34100
Jan 31, 2013
 
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Give me proof foolish child!
Go find it for yourself. That way you can learn for yourself.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34101
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

HomoSapiensLaptopicus wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm perfectly aware that BPL writes science fiction. He's also a physicist who's been published in peer-reviewed scientific literature on AGW/CC.
He knows the difference between fact & fiction, unlike you deniers. Yes, you reside in the radical right wing media denying nutteria.
The models have been remarkably accurate; the predictions that are INaccurate are the ones made by the handful of scientist who are still trying to deny reality. BPL's site has references to all the papers that prove what he's saying.
You say
"Most of the models (the IPCC's for example) went from accurate to inaccurate within five years. So many claims that models are accurate have since been dropped."
Only a deluded right wing fool would even consider saying such a thing. Since the IPCC made its correction for aerosols in 1995, actual temps have been very close to their mid-range predictions.
The scientists' correct predictions are facts. You should try to familiarize yourself with them instead of reading your right wing fantasies. Go to the original articles if you really want to learn something.
Of course, there are exceptions. Remember when the Arctic Ocean icepack would be gone in September (peak melt) by 2050? Then it was 2040, then 2030. Now it's 2020, & if you look at the raw volume data, it looks like it'll be gone by 2016 or 2017:
https://sites.google.com/site/arctischepingui...
Yes, right wing deniers are ALL about politics, while we are all about science. Your progeny will understand how selfish & WRONG you are.
If you're buried within 75 meters of sea level, maybe they'll move your remains to higher ground. Or not. Maybe they'll just let them wash out to sea.
Published peer reviewed material on AGW. Funny thing is in 2008 they started publishing studies that disproved AGW and now they now have thousands of peer reviewed studies that disproved AGW. Hence the reason why it has disappeared from the media and the reputable sources and are only found on a few of the more loony sites.

As for the models, the fact is that is that in five years the models departed from reality is a well documented fact. As for the handful of scientist. I bet if you were to try and prove that claim you would run into a problem The majority of scientist

As for what my progeny will understand. Using history as a guide they will look at the claims made by those like you and will have a very good laugh. There are century old New York Times articles making similar claims and claiming we needed to act and act quickly. Some even blamed what happened to the Titanic on that.

The lesson that history teaches is that this all about politics and not about science. The fact that you feel the need to toss ouot the RW label for those who disagree with you and your political based opinions is additional proof.

Also, given that the oceans are rising at 3.2mm and 75 meters equates to 75,000 mm will mean that someone buried 75 meters above sea level would have salt water lapping at thier grave in 23,437.5 years. Which by then will have seen the next ice age arrive and may have an expanding ice sheet moving the land where that grave was. Of course if every last bit of ice on the planet was to melt it would still not be able to push sea levels that high. So the real question is where would you come up the water to cause the oceans to rise that high.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34102
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
What sums can traitor deniers prove are lining the pockets of climatologists? Have they produced any pictures of Mann's mansions or Cook's Cobra GT?
Doubt is their product, bullshit is their language.
Great post.

Of course SUXOBAMA and his aliases are active on this thread.

I think there are more of them than all the people actively posting.
Wonder how long it takes him to sign off and keep revoting dishonestly.
gcaveman1

Louin, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34103
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Published peer reviewed material on AGW. Funny thing is in 2008 they started publishing studies that disproved AGW and now they now have thousands of peer reviewed studies that disproved AGW. Hence the reason why it has disappeared from the media and the reputable sources and are only found on a few of the more loony sites.
As for the models, the fact is that is that in five years the models departed from reality is a well documented fact. As for the handful of scientist. I bet if you were to try and prove that claim you would run into a problem The majority of scientist
As for what my progeny will understand. Using history as a guide they will look at the claims made by those like you and will have a very good laugh. There are century old New York Times articles making similar claims and claiming we needed to act and act quickly. Some even blamed what happened to the Titanic on that.
The lesson that history teaches is that this all about politics and not about science. The fact that you feel the need to toss ouot the RW label for those who disagree with you and your political based opinions is additional proof.
Also, given that the oceans are rising at 3.2mm and 75 meters equates to 75,000 mm will mean that someone buried 75 meters above sea level would have salt water lapping at thier grave in 23,437.5 years. Which by then will have seen the next ice age arrive and may have an expanding ice sheet moving the land where that grave was. Of course if every last bit of ice on the planet was to melt it would still not be able to push sea levels that high. So the real question is where would you come up the water to cause the oceans to rise that high.
Funny thing is, you always make the same old claims and always produce the same old amount of evidence..........0.

Zero.

Zilch.

Nada.

actually, after all.
gcaveman1

Louin, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34104
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Great post.
Of course SUXOBAMA and his aliases are active on this thread.
I think there are more of them than all the people actively posting.
Wonder how long it takes him to sign off and keep revoting dishonestly.
Thanks.

But the minions of the devil are legion....

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34105
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks.
But the minions of the devil are legion....
Especially... WHEN THEY ARE THE SAME PERSON.

This site must not be very reputable to allow that.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34106
Jan 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Science fiction!
TINY language:

Prove it. PROVE it's "science fiction."

Try to refute it with scientificd facts & logical arguments instead of your typical name-calling.

I'm waiting with baited breath.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34108
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Great post.
Of course SUXOBAMA and his aliases are active on this thread.
I think there are more of them than all the people actively posting.
Wonder how long it takes him to sign off and keep revoting dishonestly.
Well tell all commander Troll it fits you exactly. Walloped, walloped, walloped all day long. How are those walloped tires working for you?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34110
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

Wallop10 wrote:
<quoted text>
Especially... WHEN THEY ARE THE SAME PERSON.
This site must not be very reputable to allow that.
Thanks for bringing this up.

We had been ignoring it before you. There was also a digititap[?] doing the same. I also figured tina acting up because I had observed the instant icon-multiplication related to her posting. Couple of ex-posters engaged in it as well.
PHD

Bertram, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34112
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for bringing this up.
We had been ignoring it before you. There was also a digititap[?] doing the same. I also figured tina acting up because I had observed the instant icon-multiplication related to her posting. Couple of ex-posters engaged in it as well.
So would that be any different from the cut and paste same scientific science fiction you three post everyday? Your issue and your butt buddies have nothing better to do than run your scare tactics to extract more tax dollars from the real tax payers. You don't ignore anything you respond directly and indirectly but you do respond. So, do show all your peer reviewed published work do come back.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 32,221 - 32,240 of45,601
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

22 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 14 min shinningelectr0n 1,073,275
St. Vincent DePaul Store Thrift Store Moving to... 2 hr IsBerkotsCheaperthanJewel 4
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Jacques from Ottawa 173,782
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr Norton 48,701
This is a great ad. 4 hr Harold B Alls 1
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 8 hr voice of peace 67,553
A kid-friendly guide to the Windy City 8 hr Tgloaded 1
•••
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••