Black churchgoers break with leading ...

Black churchgoers break with leading Democrats on marriage amendment

There are 1925 comments on the WCNC-TV Charlotte story from Apr 21, 2012, titled Black churchgoers break with leading Democrats on marriage amendment. In it, WCNC-TV Charlotte reports that:

Bishop Phillip Davis had not planned to talk about marriage and politics, but five minutes into his sermon at Nations Ford Community Church in Charlotte he changed his mind.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WCNC-TV Charlotte.

hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#1765 Jun 6, 2012
In fact, you just behaved like a *typical* republican actually *does*. You act like "the fight is over" because of a victory *NOW*. ONLY republicans do that; democrats almost NEVER do (except in cases of settled case law, and even then not so much).

You're acting like the unions won't spend the next *five or ten or twenty years* fighting this by every means they can find.

But ya know what? I'll say it softly, so no one hears:

I know you know they will fight for decades, if need be. Because that's what *your ilk* would do, and they are no different. They're literally doing something which YOU can be proud of.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#1766 Jun 6, 2012
hi hi wrote:
<quoted text>
This post appears to be nonsensical trolling, but it does contain threats of violence and murder against gay people.
Fool, it impliesenforcing the law against low life scum and petty criminals who want to bully people for having a brain in their head to thinks without some white man pumping ideas into their minds constantly.
hi hi wrote:
<quoted text>Moreover, these endless, endless, endless antigay threats that your ilk are (basically) going to silence the gay and pro-gay would painfully obviously lead to mass arrests of the antigay; they come off as a bunch of sociopaths so savagely enraged that they're actually being unwise now. I cannot imagine that you thought it wise to commit threats of violence and murder against gay people to a public message board.
Get lost fool amd go straight to hellfire.

“Your Gods' Rules not mine.”

Since: Apr 07

Indianapolis

#1767 Jun 6, 2012
I Hate Syracuse wrote:
<quoted text>I have to believe you lack the capacity, becasue we continue to go over the same matter. I have answered your question(s), but not loaded ones. You are not in a position to tell me what I do, should, or shouldn't believe.
Do you believe the Bible is the word of God?
Sadly, you turn out to be no better than any of the other xtians when it comes to doublespeak and obfuscation.

So answers to my questions: Zip
Abe

Pekin, IL

#1768 Jun 7, 2012
lndychick wrote:
<quoted text>
Sadly, you turn out to be no better than any of the other xtians when it comes to doublespeak and obfuscation.
So answers to my questions: Zip
It seems that all of you homofascists are hateful anti-Christian bigots.

That's strange, since all of the countries most tolerant of your perversion share a strong Christian heritage, while leftwing atheists have been among the most ardent in trying to repress your perversion.

Stalin tried to exterminate you. Fidel sent you to labor camps for generations. China recently tried to purge Beijing of homosexual activity to clean up for the Olympics.

Your hate is directed toward the wrong people.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#1770 Jun 8, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Fool, it impliesenforcing the law against low life scum and petty criminals who want to bully people for having a brain in their head to thinks without some white man pumping ideas into their minds constantly.
<quoted text>
Get lost fool amd go straight to hellfire.
Do not attempt to indoctrinate me with your amorality. I want *nothing* to do with you and the goddamned filth you spew.

I stand for morality and goodness toward others. Get the fuck away from me with your utterly satanic filth. I will never, never side with this kind of worthless, hateful, literally evil filth. Never.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#1772 Jun 9, 2012
If anyone antigay ever attempted mass murders of that sort, I have this weird, nagging little hunch in the back of my mind that extraordinarily violent riots would erupt all over the nation, leading to untold property damage and a huge death toll. Just a hunch. I have this weird feeling that lots and lots of Americans would never for a *n-a-n-o-s-e-c-o-n-d* put up with the notion that it was right to murder people who are -- literally -- as innocent as children, and that they would take to the streets to save the lives of their loved ones as well as other utter innocents -- by any means necessary.

I think the pussification of liberals would be only a temporary problem, followed by a resolve of such ferocity that it would basically trash the country as we know it.

Just a hunch.

It's hard to envision because too many people are far, far more sensible than to advocate death to an entire minority.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#1773 Jun 9, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
This is what I would do
If I was ruler of this Land
Is like the Ayatollah Khomeini did in Iran
Take all the perverts, "gays" and prostitutes
Line them up against the wall
And shoot the sons of bytches
One and all
Death threat reported - here's hoping you get banned, terrorist.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#1774 Jun 9, 2012
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
Death threat reported - here's hoping you get banned, terrorist.
The guy claimed he was not meaning to make a threat, and I took him at his word. However, I was highly suspicious as well. The "religious"-based rhetoric against gays is getting *EXTREMELY*,*EXTREMELY* violent among the antigay. The hatred is so pathological and strange; nothing about it is traceable to anything sensible or logical. Literally nothing.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#1775 Jun 11, 2012
There is nothing wrong with homosexuals or homosexuality, that's no reason to redefine marriage for everyone.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#1776 Jun 11, 2012
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
Death threat reported - here's hoping you get banned, terrorist.
You fools should not have asked me if I agree with the Iranian Revolution. I already told yopu that I do agree with it. And nobody will change my political persuasian. Some fool asked me if I agree with the Iranians executing homosexuals. That poem proves beyond any reasonable doubt that I agree with it as I said: They have the sovereign right to run their country any kind of way they want to. You do not have the right to dicate to Iran or any other country in the world. As soon as you learn this, we can have some peace in the world and not so many stupid and un-necessary wars. No decent country is going to allow you to force "gay marriage" on them, or any other form of homosexuality. Get over it.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#1777 Jun 11, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
There is nothing wrong with homosexuals or homosexuality, that's no reason to redefine marriage for everyone.
And there is nothing wrong with me and the Iranians and Zimbabweans and just about every country in the civilized world diasgreeing with your liberal attitude.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#1778 Jun 11, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
And there is nothing wrong with me and the Iranians and Zimbabweans and just about every country in the civilized world diasgreeing with your liberal attitude.
I do have a problem with prosecuting sexual misbehavior tends toward political suppression, humiliation and hate based political ends, more than justice. Even the most high minded regime becomes corrupt when it can prosecute based on 'private' relationships; I don't understand how any freedom minded person can defend criminal prosecution of consensual private association.

There's something very wrong with people promoting hate. Don't let your emotions overcome reason. I don't care about disagreement, I care about the way human beings are treated.

No special favors to mascot victim groups; we're not trying to set them up.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#1779 Jun 11, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I do have a problem with prosecuting sexual misbehavior tends toward political suppression, humiliation and hate based political ends, more than justice. Even the most high minded regime becomes corrupt when it can prosecute based on 'private' relationships; I don't understand how any freedom minded person can defend criminal prosecution of consensual private association.
There's something very wrong with people promoting hate. Don't let your emotions overcome reason. I don't care about disagreement, I care about the way human beings are treated.
No special favors to mascot victim groups; we're not trying to set them up.
Let me remind you of the history of this whole thing. The Iranian people rose up, kicked out western powers and installed an Islamic Republic. For rerasons that have never been clear to me, but I suspect they were sent by the CIA, a bunch of homosexuals appeared on the Iranian. They were gived due process under islamic Law and executed. I agree with that. I do not care if it had to do with homosexuality or not. The bottom line is heterosexuals will also be punished if they do certain things in public. If those people had kep[t their sex lives private, nobody would have arrested them, presecuted them and executed them.

A similar thing happened in Somalia. A couple of lesbians were caught and punished. They too were from the USA. Another indcient involved a married porn star in Somalia. He received four y ears in jail. I think he should have been shot or hung. Four years is far too lenient.

The reason I say this is because these happens happened under Islamic law where any reasonably intelligent person knows they will not be tolerated. Keep sex lives private, especially in Muslim countries. Is that too much to ask?

So, those are open provocations. They thought that the USA government would rescue them. But that did not happen. So may they roast in hellfire. They will not receive one crocodile tear from me. I am sick of this nonsense.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#1780 Jun 11, 2012
I have less faith in Iranian law; how did they "appeared on the Iranian"? What "certain things" did they do in public? How did they not keep their sex lives private? Isn't public prosecution of consensual sexual relationships the most vile breach of privacy?

I cry for injustice and violence against people for sexual orientation or political affiliation. Violence for political gain is evil.

I believe Abdurratin is an extremist, just as those willing to redefine marriage for everyone are extremists. I'm a marriage moderate; let's keep marriage law as is, between husband and wife.
That_Dude

New Castle, DE

#1781 Jun 11, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me remind you of the history of this whole thing. The Iranian people rose up, kicked out western powers and installed an Islamic Republic. For rerasons that have never been clear to me, but I suspect they were sent by the CIA, a bunch of homosexuals appeared on the Iranian. They were gived due process under islamic Law and executed. I agree with that. I do not care if it had to do with homosexuality or not. The bottom line is heterosexuals will also be punished if they do certain things in public. If those people had kep[t their sex lives private, nobody would have arrested them, presecuted them and executed them.
A similar thing happened in Somalia. A couple of lesbians were caught and punished. They too were from the USA. Another indcient involved a married porn star in Somalia. He received four y ears in jail. I think he should have been shot or hung. Four years is far too lenient.
The reason I say this is because these happens happened under Islamic law where any reasonably intelligent person knows they will not be tolerated. Keep sex lives private, especially in Muslim countries. Is that too much to ask?
So, those are open provocations. They thought that the USA government would rescue them. But that did not happen. So may they roast in hellfire. They will not receive one crocodile tear from me. I am sick of this nonsense.
You're sick? I am sick of your horse sh*t. It's been tolerated for far too long. I'm tired of these holy rollers pushing their weight around, telling everyone else what is right and wrong even though they have the bloodiest of hands. SHUT UP.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#1783 Jun 11, 2012
This is what happened on Obama’s watch. Now tell me that it is “unfair” to remember how he betrayed his own blackness to please the whites such as KKKLinton in the Dummycrat Party? Do you really think we the African people do not see this?


http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/verify_age...

Hey, I am willing to be “fair” to Obama. All I ask is that YOU show me one solitary time that Obama uttered one solitary word against this racial abuse right under his nose. Send it to me at [email protected]

“Your Gods' Rules not mine.”

Since: Apr 07

Indianapolis

#1785 Jun 12, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
There is nothing wrong with homosexuals or homosexuality, that's no reason to redefine marriage for everyone.
Since you don't have to pay the father of the virgin you raped nor do you get to marry her; marriage has already been redefined from biblical times. Get over it.

“Your Gods' Rules not mine.”

Since: Apr 07

Indianapolis

#1786 Jun 12, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
And there is nothing wrong with me and the Iranians and Zimbabweans and just about every country in the civilized world diasgreeing with your liberal attitude.
Calling Zimbabwe or Iran or Uganda civilized is like calling your conception a fortuitous event.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#1787 Jun 12, 2012
Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House: http://shop.newsmax.com/shop/index.cfm...

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#1788 Jun 12, 2012
lndychick wrote:
<quoted text>
Calling Zimbabwe or Iran or Uganda civilized is like calling your conception a fortuitous event.
I did not call Uganda civilized. But, I will call both Iran and Zimbabwe civilized. I know both countries reasonably well. I have friends in both countries. And I would gladly live in either country. Zimbabwe not only has one of the most civilized people in all the world, it has a flourishing economy that will attract huge numbers of immigrants in the years ahead. I am seriously considering going there myself to live out the rest of my life. Right now, the only thing that holds me back is the fact that it is a Christian country and it would be next to impossible for me to complete my Islamic Studies there. I would not go to Iran because it is Shiite and I am a Sunni. But, the country is one of the more civilized anywhere in the world.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Gaston County teacher accused of soliciting min... (May '15) 37 min TIMandCINDY 5
A dead pool on who the next school administrato... 9 hr Substitute 6
Sex Offenders will be brought to light very soon 9 hr Substitute 5
New to charlotte, looking for boy what's good? Mon Doris 12
Any CPP on here? Want to talk? Mon Doris 1
Are Southerners Stupid or do they just sound th... (Oct '08) Mon twicetime2lady 4,882
News Jonas Brothers patriarch to open Belmont restau... (Sep '15) Sun Young Voter 11
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Charlotte Mortgages