Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#42992 Oct 8, 2013
Taxpayer wrote:
While the US Park Service is permitting pro-illegal immigration rallies at closed memorials, and 'Nam vets were arrested.
I read yesterday that was supposed to take place today and Nancy P herself was scheduled to attend.

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#42993 Oct 8, 2013
TSF wrote:
<quoted text>I don't mind anyone getting rich. I would like to be rich. What I do mind is them getting rich stealing from me.
Social Security isn't welfare. Workers paid in 7% of their lifetime earnings into that system while their employers paid in another 7%. There would be no problem had CONGRESS not taken all the cash out of the "lockbox" and replaced it with IOUs. Its part of the national debt. If we default, Social security should be the last payment of the last dime from the treasury. If we are going to start chinching out on our debt, our seniors should be the last ones we cheat. Republikans are ok with dishonesty by government. I am not.
Another thing republikans have not thought of: If OUR government defaults, anarchy will soon follow. Marshall law will have be declared. Guess who is commander in chief of the military?
I am not anxious to see that happen because of idiots.
Conservatives have said PRIVATIZE it.

I can take 3% of the 15% I pay the government for SS and invest it into a mutual fund and get 200% more return on my money. The math doesn't lie.

As the system stands now I will get a negative return if anything at all.
TSF

Rocky Mount, NC

#42994 Oct 8, 2013
I do not call the GENERAL public idiots. I am calling the radical right tea party republicans in congress idiots. I will extend that identity to those of the public who are so stupid as to support stupid, specifically the party of stupid--republikans..
I notice Boehner now says this isn't about the AHCA. I have been saying that all along. Boehner now says it is about the budget and saving money---by wasting 256,000,000 per day on 800,000 federal workers who are being paid to sit home. According to CBS this evening, the shutdown has already cost the USA $8 Billion dollars. This is how republikans plan to save money?
State of Denial wrote:
<quoted text>
Mr. Commander in Chief of the military really drives a hard bargain. He showed Syria what a tough guy he is. RIGHT!!!
If you're calling the general public "idiots", my money is on them before it would be community organizer in the WH. At least they know what they're fighting for. A lost virtue with Obama. He's only fighting for his agenda, and I don't believe it's the welfare of this country.
TSF

Rocky Mount, NC

#42995 Oct 8, 2013
You are so right. conservative have been saying that. They were saying that and actually attempting to make it happen during the Dubya Bush years. So what happened just after that effort (fortunately) failed? Ever heard of Enron? What about WorldCom? What about the stock market crash of 2007 and 2008, where retirement funds invested in those failed securities lost 90% of their value? Individual retirement savings were consumed entirely by Wall Street fraud. How could anyone forget? Maybe republican voters never knew about that. Turns out that voters were so sick of the republican crash that they elected Obama, a black democrat.
That is what chaps their chops now, that it took a black democrat to begin to straighten out the financial disaster republikans had created. What is even more stupid is that republikans are now trying to creat another financial crisis even larger than that one in 07-08.
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
Conservatives have said PRIVATIZE it.
I can take 3% of the 15% I pay the government for SS and invest it into a mutual fund and get 200% more return on my money. The math doesn't lie.
As the system stands now I will get a negative return if anything at all.
State of Denial

Charlotte, NC

#42996 Oct 8, 2013
TSF wrote:
I do not call the GENERAL public idiots. I am calling the radical right tea party republicans in congress idiots. I will extend that identity to those of the public who are so stupid as to support stupid, specifically the party of stupid--republikans..
I notice Boehner now says this isn't about the AHCA. I have been saying that all along. Boehner now says it is about the budget and saving money---by wasting 256,000,000 per day on 800,000 federal workers who are being paid to sit home. According to CBS this evening, the shutdown has already cost the USA $8 Billion dollars. This is how republikans plan to save money?
<quoted text>
I must be out of the loop. How many radical right tea party republicans are in office? I think the dems probably have plenty of radical way out in left field loonies to equal out the tea party. Nancy Pelosi comes to mind as looney in chief for the radical lefties.

I will extend to you that you are stupid if you buy everything, which you seem to, that comes from the dems. Why do you label people because of party affiliation or being independents as stupid? None of us can control every person voted in Congress but you act as if we all had a vote for every member of Congress.

Speaking of looney, you guys have the old dude that thinks Guam will tip over if too many Marines are put on a base there.

Stop bashing everyone on here because we don't kiss Obama's fanny or think that because Harry Reid or even John Boehner says it makes it so. You haven't cornered the market on intelligence, just name calling.
State of Denial

Charlotte, NC

#42997 Oct 8, 2013
TSF wrote:
You are so right. conservative have been saying that. They were saying that and actually attempting to make it happen during the Dubya Bush years. So what happened just after that effort (fortunately) failed? Ever heard of Enron? What about WorldCom? What about the stock market crash of 2007 and 2008, where retirement funds invested in those failed securities lost 90% of their value? Individual retirement savings were consumed entirely by Wall Street fraud. How could anyone forget? Maybe republican voters never knew about that. Turns out that voters were so sick of the republican crash that they elected Obama, a black democrat.
That is what chaps their chops now, that it took a black democrat to begin to straighten out the financial disaster republikans had created. What is even more stupid is that republikans are now trying to creat another financial crisis even larger than that one in 07-08.
<quoted text>
Oh playing the race card. That chaps my chops. He's a black, arrogant, democrat that has divided this nation as much as it has been in many a year. It's not his race or party I have a problem with, it's his ideology.
TSF

Rocky Mount, NC

#42998 Oct 8, 2013
I do not agree with everything Obama does. The division was done purposefully,---by republikans-- who were meeting as he was being inaugurated to set an agenda to try to make the USA fail while he was in office. The republikans had crashed the economy. They think if they can make it worse now, that the public will be stupid enough to re elect them. Obama is black, he is arrogant and he is much nicer to the republicans by far than I would be if I were president. Obama has presided over a partial economic recover in spite of the constant obstruction from republikans. Having failed at crashing the economy again, now republikans have decided to shut down the government by holding the government hostage . It isn't about Obamacare. Boehner has admitted that. It isn't about anything other than republican belly aching, pissing, moaning, obstructing because they are devoid of ideas and devoid of leadership. Republikans cannon lead, they cannot follow, they cannot get out of the way. Obama is right to oppose this, rigidly.
State of Denial wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh playing the race card. That chaps my chops. He's a black, arrogant, democrat that has divided this nation as much as it has been in many a year. It's not his race or party I have a problem with, it's his ideology.
TSF

Rocky Mount, NC

#42999 Oct 8, 2013
I don't think you even know the definition of ideology. You are only opposed to the imaginary things you have been lead to believe by the beckerheads. Give some examples of his ideology that you oppose.
State of Denial wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh playing the race card. That chaps my chops. He's a black, arrogant, democrat that has divided this nation as much as it has been in many a year. It's not his race or party I have a problem with, it's his ideology.
TSF

Rocky Mount, NC

#43000 Oct 8, 2013
The costly funding battle could be settled tomorrow if Boehner would allow the house to vote.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#43001 Oct 8, 2013
TSF wrote:
You are so right. conservative have been saying that. They were saying that and actually attempting to make it happen during the Dubya Bush years. So what happened just after that effort (fortunately) failed? Ever heard of Enron? What about WorldCom? What about the stock market crash of 2007 and 2008, where retirement funds invested in those failed securities lost 90% of their value? Individual retirement savings were consumed entirely by Wall Street fraud. How could anyone forget? Maybe republican voters never knew about that. Turns out that voters were so sick of the republican crash that they elected Obama, a black democrat.
That is what chaps their chops now, that it took a black democrat to begin to straighten out the financial disaster republikans had created. What is even more stupid is that republikans are now trying to creat another financial crisis even larger than that one in 07-08.
<quoted text>
Yet Galveston Tx is the only U.S. city that was able to opt out of SS before Congress changed the law in 1983 that prevented other cities from following suit and they invest the resident's retirement in the stock market rather than the govt program. The result is the retired citizens of Galveston are enjoying a lot better retirement portfolio than the rest of the nation regardless of the ups and downs of the stock market!
As far as the market crash, EVERYONE except the Commucrats realize it was Carter/Clinton and their Community Reivestment Act that forced banks to give loans to unqualified borrowers.
"To enforce the statute, federal regulatory agencies are to examine banking institutions for CRA compliance, and take this information into consideration when approving applications for new bank branches or for mergers or acquisitions (Section 804.)"
It was this practice of forcing the banks to give loans to people who couldn't afford the homes in the first place in exchange for new branches or mergers which caused the housing bubble to burst which led to the economy crashing. Of course the Commucrats, along with the state run media, placed the blame on the predatory lenders and Wall Street to which the "dumbmasses" bought hook, line, and sinker!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#43002 Oct 8, 2013
TSF wrote:
The costly funding battle could be settled tomorrow if Boehner would allow the house to vote.
That's just another one of the Ruler's lies! Just like when he called the Speaker at 10:45 this morning and said he would NOT negotiate or compromise under any circumstances and then he gave a speech around 2:30 this afternoon saying he's tried to sit down and negotiate!
Typical Commucrats, speaking from both faces!

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#43003 Oct 8, 2013
TSF wrote:
The costly funding battle could be settled tomorrow if Boehner would allow the house to vote.
I keep reading your post just to see how much further out of touch with reality you can go!!

You never cease to surprise me.

You truly are a complete moron!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#43004 Oct 8, 2013
TSF wrote:
Oh yes. The republican shut down is inconsequential --except for the $256,000,000 dollars per day we are wasting paying 800,000 federal employees to stay home. The damage to the economy doesn't matter to republikans either because "we have to get something out of this and I not sure what that even is".
The 100% shut down should be interesting when grandma doesn't get her social security , the military doesn't get paid, T bills and government bonds become worthless, retirement plans invested in the former fail, the government employees don't get paid after all , credit is completely cut off , the government cannot borrow even if they wanted to and the world economy fails. None of that matters as long as the tea party idiots get to hold the USA hostage. The republikans crashed the economy in 2008 and now we have the same drunk drivers demanding to take the stearing wheel again. No thanks. Let it happen.
<quoted text>
Is that the same 800,000 non-essential employees that Grandma Nancy spoke of? You know, the 17% of govt employees that aren't getting paid. Like TEW pointed out, if they're non-essential, why are they being paid in the first place?
Typical Commucrat demagoguery! When you don't get your way, you claim the sky is falling and the poor and elderly are going to starve and die! Boo freaking hoo! Nobody is buying it....except the "dumbmasses" that are drinking the Commucrats kool-aid. News flash, you've already got their vote!
The cold hard facts are that the Ruler has no clue as to what's going on! He stood in front of the teleprompter today and claimed if the House doesn't raise the debt ceiling then we will default on our bills. He obviously has no clue of what "default" means!
According to the public records, the Federal Govt rakes in $225 Billion a month in tax revenue and our financial obligations (our bills) total $18 Billion a month. If the debt ceiling ISN'T raised, that leaves, according to basic arithmetic,$207 Billion to operate the federal govt per month! WE WILL NOT DEFAULT! Yes, there will be some programs that will lose or see a reduction in funding but that's what you get when you fail to propose a budget, the budget is now forced upon you! The Ruler and his cronies can't stand the fact that they'll have to operate within a budget, something he's NEVER done since taking office!
The ONLY purpose of raising the debt ceiling is so that he can fund Obamacare, you know, that bill that was passed in the middle of the night on Christmas Eve that had to be passed so we could see what was in it! Thanks but no thanks!
State of Denial

Charlotte, NC

#43005 Oct 8, 2013
TSF wrote:
I don't think you even know the definition of ideology. You are only opposed to the imaginary things you have been lead to believe by the beckerheads. Give some examples of his ideology that you oppose.
<quoted text>
Still name calling. You're getting more pathetic daily.

I happen to know that Obama's "ideology" or what's the definition of "ideology", his idea or beliefs that guide him about social issues and forms his skewed thinking that's sinking this country is terribly off track.

He believes in Robin Hood and fairy tales. He doesn't have the right to take from one class and give to another to ensure equality amongst all. He has forgotten he was not elected to personally make sure everyone is "happy" and everyone is a "winner."

He also believes he's judge and jury and can kill citizens of his own country without a jury of their peers. On many occasions you have even pointed out this fact. Do you not think this might be overstepping his boundaries just a tick too much.

His administration has no problem with targeting groups of people that disagree with him i.e. IRS audits unfairly, to which you have admitted.

You tried playing the race card earlier. Mr. Obama has shown on occasions he will just outright play race baiter. Why did he interject himself into the case of the professor, that happened to be black, being arrested and then had some stupid beer summit to cover the ass he made of himself. My favorite is if he had a son he would like Trayvon Martin. He's just like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, he never lets a good racial crisis go to waste.

Didn't he do a swell job with the Benghazi debacle? Sent Susan Rice out to lie, she got caught and everyone knew he sent her out to do damage control and the sad thing is, she needed control. Then he calls in Hillary, same outcome. He couldn't go out and defend what happened he was hanging with Beyonce raising some cash for his re-election.

You tell me, are any of these stories imaginary? No and you know they're not. Are they not a reflection of his ideology? BTW, I don't even know what a beckerhead is.
Allen

Robbins, NC

#43006 Oct 9, 2013
TSF wrote:
The costly funding battle could be settled tomorrow if Boehner would allow the house to vote.
Boehner what a joke. Boehner doesn't really want this shut down nor does he want to default. What he is really afraid of is loosing his speaker of the house job. The teaparty has a firm grip on his begonias. If the house were allowed to vote, there would be enough votes to pass a clean CR and Boehner knows it.

Speaking of Boehner, doesn't he look alot like "The Grinch That Stole Christmas"? That's it, Ted Cruz should have read from this Dr. Seuss book during his faux filibuster instead of "Green Eggs and Ham". I believe it would have been more fitting of the situation. Lol.
TSF

Rocky Mount, NC

#43007 Oct 9, 2013
I have a few bridges I will sell at a bargain price after you FORCE any bank to do anything NOT in their own financial interest.
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Yet Galveston Tx is the only U.S. city that was able to opt out of SS before Congress changed the law in 1983 that prevented other cities from following suit and they invest the resident's retirement in the stock market rather than the govt program. The result is the retired citizens of Galveston are enjoying a lot better retirement portfolio than the rest of the nation regardless of the ups and downs of the stock market!
As far as the market crash, EVERYONE except the Commucrats realize it was Carter/Clinton and their Community Reivestment Act that forced banks to give loans to unqualified borrowers.
"To enforce the statute, federal regulatory agencies are to examine banking institutions for CRA compliance, and take this information into consideration when approving applications for new bank branches or for mergers or acquisitions (Section 804.)"
It was this practice of forcing the banks to give loans to people who couldn't afford the homes in the first place in exchange for new branches or mergers which caused the housing bubble to burst which led to the economy crashing. Of course the Commucrats, along with the state run media, placed the blame on the predatory lenders and Wall Street to which the "dumbmasses" bought hook, line, and sinker!
TSF

Rocky Mount, NC

#43008 Oct 9, 2013
One's perspective is the sum total of their collective associations. For instance: You continue to believe that babymommas, drug addicts, slackers and disabled persons are causing the financial woes of the USA because, evidently, you have or have had extensive social contact with hordes of these undesirables and resent the fact that you work while they do not.. Having little or no association with the beautiful people who might even drop a crumb that you could use, you fail to see that as a class , they are consuming over 150% more public welfare than the less fortunate. Therefore you want to blame the poor and defenseless because they are defenseless and available. But at the same time you fiercely defend the more expensive deadbeats because they are more powerful than you and because they are pretty much unavailable to suffer your wrath. You hate Obama because he has the spine to see the entire picture and isn't a narrow minded jellyfish focused entirely on tax breaks for the rich.
State of Denial wrote:
<quoted text>
Still name calling. You're getting more pathetic daily.
I happen to know that Obama's "ideology" or what's the definition of "ideology", his idea or beliefs that guide him about social issues and forms his skewed thinking that's sinking this country is terribly off track.
He believes in Robin Hood and fairy tales. He doesn't have the right to take from one class and give to another to ensure equality amongst all. He has forgotten he was not elected to personally make sure everyone is "happy" and everyone is a "winner."
He also believes he's judge and jury and can kill citizens of his own country without a jury of their peers. On many occasions you have even pointed out this fact. Do you not think this might be overstepping his boundaries just a tick too much.
His administration has no problem with targeting groups of people that disagree with him i.e. IRS audits unfairly, to which you have admitted.
You tried playing the race card earlier. Mr. Obama has shown on occasions he will just outright play race baiter. Why did he interject himself into the case of the professor, that happened to be black, being arrested and then had some stupid beer summit to cover the ass he made of himself. My favorite is if he had a son he would like Trayvon Martin. He's just like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, he never lets a good racial crisis go to waste.
Didn't he do a swell job with the Benghazi debacle? Sent Susan Rice out to lie, she got caught and everyone knew he sent her out to do damage control and the sad thing is, she needed control. Then he calls in Hillary, same outcome. He couldn't go out and defend what happened he was hanging with Beyonce raising some cash for his re-election.
You tell me, are any of these stories imaginary? No and you know they're not. Are they not a reflection of his ideology? BTW, I don't even know what a beckerhead is.
TSF

Rocky Mount, NC

#43009 Oct 9, 2013
Now before you start, let me say that I agree that Obama and Eric Holder have wandered entirely outside the legitimate bounds of their office with respect to exerting undue influence on the judicial branch of government.
TSF

Rocky Mount, NC

#43010 Oct 9, 2013
Beckerhead- a person listening to and believing Glenn Beck --- I closely associate that definition with the definition of a very similarly spelled word describing an ignorant , gullible , stupid, opinionated person of low morals, usually having a long rap sheet

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#43011 Oct 9, 2013
TSF wrote:
One's perspective is the sum total of their collective associations. For instance: You continue to believe that babymommas, drug addicts, slackers and disabled persons are causing the financial woes of the USA because, evidently, you have or have had extensive social contact with hordes of these undesirables and resent the fact that you work while they do not.. Having little or no association with the beautiful people who might even drop a crumb that you could use, you fail to see that as a class , they are consuming over 150% more public welfare than the less fortunate. Therefore you want to blame the poor and defenseless because they are defenseless and available. But at the same time you fiercely defend the more expensive deadbeats because they are more powerful than you and because they are pretty much unavailable to suffer your wrath. You hate Obama because he has the spine to see the entire picture and isn't a narrow minded jellyfish focused entirely on tax breaks for the rich.
<quoted text>
Hello TSF. It's me Bacon. You are so correct for quite a few years I worked with this group of what you describe as undesirables. Not all, but the majority are slackers, druggies, and promiscuous leeches on society. Why should the working class have to take care of their poor choices in life?

As far as crumbs from the beautiful, I happen to think anyone with a job keeping a roof over their head, food on the table. parenting their children, instilling values of working for the their needs and wants and respecting their bodies and mind is a beautiful person.

As you seem to, I don't resent anyone that has more financially than I, nor do look down on anyone that doesn't have as much financially as I.

I abhor slothful, lazy people, that want someone to clean up their messes perpetually. The disabled and the elderly, yes, they need a hand, but a healthy young man and woman that sit and wait for government assistance every month because they think they're too good to work at McDonalds or anywhere gets my goat.

I may not hang around with what you call the beautiful people and beg for crumbs, but apparently we have different views of beautiful people as I stated earlier. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and mine is people that are honest, hard working and clean up their own messes made by poor choices.

Heading back today away from people like you that enjoy a simpler way of life.

You remember, this country needs the wealthy whether you like it or not.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Humans in HAZMAT Suits Dumping Orange Liquid in... Fri Nixum479 3
Aldi Expansion (Apr '16) Thu Fred 20
Women Raped NC Feb 23 MAGA2016 1
Are Southerners Stupid or do they just sound th... (Oct '08) Feb 23 Hickey Bobbie 4,935
Thank God 4 TRUMP Feb 22 MarkJ- 20
Poll Why are yankees so rude? (Dec '11) Feb 21 AmericanRider1776 130
www.lowesceo.com (Feb '09) Feb 20 curious 2

Charlotte Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Charlotte Mortgages