Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#35865 Feb 13, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>What happens when the greedy business owners do not pay their employees enough to live on even though they are working full time? The impoverished person gets help through the government. This is money the business owner is paying. So why not cut out the middleman(government) and just pay the man a living wage?
Most businesses do employees enough to make a living, most well above min wage. You, like Allen, act as if everyone earns min wage.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#35866 Feb 13, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>40 hours is what Obama spoke of last night. 32 or more hours may be technically considered full time, but that was not the point of the matter Obama was discussing.
Maybe you just heard Obama saying, spend spend spend?
When the govt determines 30 hrs to be full time, it doesnt matter if the Ruler implies 40 hrs.

Hey Arnold, another example of Mike playing Semantics!

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35867 Feb 13, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Agreed to an extent, the problem is the ideology of your party. With the way the Ruler is addressing the issue it isn't about bringing up the poor, it's about bringing down the rich and the middle class. It's been tried this way time and time again, it doesn't work. The poor stay poor, the middle class become poor, and the rich become middle class, leaving all of the wealth for the ones in control.....the govt!
Yet in America, since the socialist like policies have been put in place, we have grown to be quite rich.

None of this need bring down the rich. The theory is, the rich will still get richer, as they often always do. The difference is, there will be a stronger middle class and less in poverty.

Before America started these ideas, there was little middle class and massive poverty.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35868 Feb 13, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Most businesses do employees enough to make a living, most well above min wage. You, like Allen, act as if everyone earns min wage.
What?

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35869 Feb 13, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>When the govt determines 30 hrs to be full time, it doesnt matter if the Ruler implies 40 hrs.
Hey Arnold, another example of Mike playing Semantics!
Obama did not imply forty hours, he said forty hours.

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#35870 Feb 13, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>If a producer is already paying a living wage, no prices must need increase. Those who are screwing his employees might raise prices. Those who are not competitive may fail.

This debate has been argued for a hundred years in America. There are no absolutes here.
You don't run a business do you?

The cost of the employee is a black and white variable included in the overall cost of the product that is being manufactured. ANY change in that is and always will be passed on to the consumer.

That is an absolute.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#35871 Feb 13, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>It is putting Negroes and Mexicans to work in legitimate paying jobs and getting them off the Welfare roles. Just want you wanted.
What is the excuse when they don't apply?

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#35872 Feb 13, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>You greedy bastards always claim an increase will crush the economy. Keep crying wolf.
How many employees does your bar have?

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#35873 Feb 13, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>What happens when the greedy business owners do not pay their employees enough to live on even though they are working full time? The impoverished person gets help through the government. This is money the business owner is paying. So why not cut out the middleman(government) and just pay the man a living wage?
What do you consider a living wage? A cashier at Walmart doesn't deserve the salary of say, a bar manager?

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#35874 Feb 13, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>The little man getting a bit more cash goes instantly back into the economy. Unlike the cash made by the wealthy. They are notorious for hourding up cash thus stifling the economy.
The little man is the one buying the products being made. It keeps the wheels turning. This is a basic economic truth.
Through food stamps and welfare? Why not cut the middleman, the entitlement taker, and just save what I would if spent paying his or her entitlements by not employing them thus generating more revenue and profits for said company?

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#35875 Feb 13, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Most businesses do employees enough to make a living, most well above min wage. You, like Allen, act as if everyone earns min wage.
The key is to not live above your means...

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35876 Feb 13, 2013
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't run a business do you?
The cost of the employee is a black and white variable included in the overall cost of the product that is being manufactured. ANY change in that is and always will be passed on to the consumer.
That is an absolute.
If you are already paying your employees nine an hour, then no increases needed.
Also, there are other ways to cut costs thus keep prices competitive.
I know you black and white people only think there are only two answers to a situation, but in the real world, there is grey.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#35877 Feb 13, 2013
TSF wrote:
Specifically,for instance, I am talking about the CEO of Broyhill (FBI), Jeff Cook, who got $2,000,000 of the $4,000,000 given to Broyhill, compliments of taxpayers and their ass kissing commsssioners.
<quoted text>
Who gave it, why did it get given and how do you know?

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35878 Feb 13, 2013
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Through food stamps and welfare? Why not cut the middleman, the entitlement taker, and just save what I would if spent paying his or her entitlements by not employing them thus generating more revenue and profits for said company?
I have already answered this. Your income would go down due to a stagnant economy.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#35879 Feb 13, 2013
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you consider a living wage? A cashier at Walmart doesn't deserve the salary of say, a bar manager?
Who is asking for them to make the same? Straw man.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#35880 Feb 13, 2013
Swanson wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, fat ass. I understand why whales like you can't work, too busy stuffing your pie hole and sitting on your lazy nasty ugly fat ass by a computer all day. Some life, must be rough carrying all that tonnage around, that's a handicap. Your nitwit lain brain queer boyfriend working for 25 years? Damn fugly flabby, someone got ripped off allowing the idiot to loiter around for a quarter century. Hey fat bitch, the number 25 does match your retard's IQ and the amount of tons you weigh.
I'll have you know, I work approximantly 63.2 hours a week and still have time to stuff my pie hole. I get around just fine, thank you for caring though.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#35881 Feb 13, 2013
BTW people, I have asked a couple times and no answer......WHAT IS "FULL TIME" EMPLOYMENT. Anyone..please.
TSF

Fayetteville, NC

#35882 Feb 13, 2013
That is exactly what I'm talking about. Calling them dumbass commissioners is being kind.
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't this the story of when dumbass commissioners gave a total of $4 million to Broyhill when they threatened to move the company? After the money was received they laid workers off most of the workers and basically gutted the business.

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#35883 Feb 13, 2013
Mike Du wrote:
<quoted text>If you are already paying your employees nine an hour, then no increases needed.
Also, there are other ways to cut costs thus keep prices competitive.
I know you black and white people only think there are only two answers to a situation, but in the real world, there is grey.
Let me make this simpler for you and others

McDonalds (and many other fast food companies) hires many young employees at minimum wage.

What will a roughly $2 hourly increase do to the price of a Big Mac combo?

That's right, it will increase.

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#35884 Feb 13, 2013
TSF wrote:
<quoted text>That is exactly what I'm talking about. Calling them dumbass commissioners is being kind.
We're the same commissioners voted back in?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
EOS Spa on Eastway 15 hr South 5
Homeless women from Charlotte. 16 hr Fred Herbert 5
What the hell is wrong with blacks in charlotte? Sat ThomasA 7
Who smokes in charlotte Jul 22 Angie 1
Is pastor AMY Lambert in rehab? Jul 22 Angel at night 2
Looking for new subscribers Restarting YouTube ... Jul 21 Anonymous 1
Con Artist arrives in Charlotte Jul 21 Fred Herbert 8

Charlotte Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Charlotte Mortgages