Who do you support for U.S. Senate in North Carolina in 2010?

[TSF]

What happened is that you and pro jumped from a mathematical principle to wealth redistribution simply because you associate the words and not because there is any real connection.
Actually, I oppose wealth redistribution, to the wealthy by tax breaks, subsidies, incentives, exemptions, exclusions, no bid contracts, political kickbacks , etc as well as to the poor through dependency generating programs. I have constantly advocated elimination of redistribution, starting with the most expensive welfare to the rich programs.

Silvercoastcorks wrote:

<quoted text>
Um...you used the mathmatical example. I expanded on YOUR example by showing where some flaws were and showed the fundementals of distribution or redistibution. Electrical power distribution has absolutely nothing to do with wealth redistibution, yes. But we were talking about wealth redistibution and I gave you card carrying, stamp US mail on them, critisms of economic policies of wealth distibution, which you cast a vote in favor of, with your support for Obama.

[TSF]

More republikan BS. Neither Iraq or Afghanistan were any threat to the US unless someone went there to make themselves available to being shot by someone riding a camel or donkey. The non existent WMD s were simply an excuse to award huge no bid logistics contracts to entities like KBR, which coincidentally belonged to the VP Cheany (who was the real president at the time). As it turned out, everything that W was telling the American public then were lies. Only republikans still believe that BS.

Silvercoastcorks wrote:

<quoted text>
Those wars also protected middle class and low class peeps as well, just not the well off.

[TSF]

I think you are seeing boogers behind every tree. Money examples are excellent tools for getting the attention of children because it lends relevancy to math which is but an abstraction .
Republikans want to destroy public education in order to further their agenda of poisoning childrens minds with ignorance, misinfomation and lock step agreement to tax breaks for the rich.

Pro-American wrote:

<quoted text>And if you can't see the Commucrats agenda in the math worksheet provided to teachers from Scholastic then you are either blind or you agree with the agenda.
http://teacherexpress.scholastic.com/subject/...

[Makin bacon]

TSF wrote:

More republikan BS. Neither Iraq or Afghanistan were any threat to the US unless someone went there to make themselves available to being shot by someone riding a camel or donkey. The non existent WMD s were simply an excuse to award huge no bid logistics contracts to entities like KBR, which coincidentally belonged to the VP Cheany (who was the real president at the time). As it turned out, everything that W was telling the American public then were lies. Only republikans still believe that BS.
<quoted text>

Kind of like only demokrats believe the spin Obama, Hillary and Rice tried to put on the attack in Benghazi. Their explanation about the killings being caused by a you tube video is about as believable as the excuse you say GW gave for attacking Iraq.

[Chapeau]

Mr Anderson wrote:

<quoted text>I hope you don't consider me a racist Gumby. I sure wouldn't want to be on your Negrocrat "Hate List", monkey boy. Gee, your whining and crying just breaks my heart when I read your pitiful black racist posts, redbone. And by the way, I hope some day, you'll find out what ni**er your white mammy fornicated to create such an abomination like you. Everyone knows, the most confusing day of the year for all Apefricans is Father's Day. Good luck Zebra!

Tellement tres vrai, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

[waco1909]

Here's one you may also find amusing,CHAPEAU/ANDERSON/GAIL! F@@K YOUR DUMB PSYCHO UGLY A@@! Haaaa! Come on now freak!

[The Enemy Within]

Arnold-Ziffel wrote:

<quoted text>Here is the answer. Cain and Sowell are two black fools.

Sowell a fool?.......wow AZ, you must pick and choose from those that support your agenda. Sowell has proven time and time again he is anything but a fool.

Here is an article that refers to the "Filtering of History" in regards to slavery by the United States and its educators.

[waco1909]

Poor Gail.Can't decide which one of her nutball aliases to use! She knows how unimportant she is, so she uses her aliases, because even an alias has more depth of character than this ranting shrill harridan!

[Silvercoastcorks]

TSF wrote:

<quoted text>More republikan BS. Neither Iraq or Afghanistan were any threat to the US unless someone went there to make themselves available to being shot by someone riding a camel or donkey. The non existent WMD s were simply an excuse to award huge no bid logistics contracts to entities like KBR, which coincidentally belonged to the VP Cheany (who was the real president at the time). As it turned out, everything that W was telling the American public then were lies. Only republikans still believe that BS.

Sure man, I hear what you are saying. America was owed 9/11, right?

I am quite certain there well over 3000 civilians that would disagree. I know there are hundreds of service men and women who would disagree. I know for a fact that over 300 emergency service workers disagree.

Talk your talk when your flight gets highjacked.

[The Enemy Within]

The Enemy Within wrote:

<quoted text>Sowell a fool?.......wow AZ, you must pick and choose from those that support your agenda. Sowell has proven time and time again he is anything but a fool.

Here is an article that refers to the "Filtering of History" in regards to slavery by the United States and its educators.

And it helps when I provide the link:
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/sunday-comm... .

[TSF]

There is a basic difference. W and Cheany initiated the Iraq attack for profit. The terrorist initiated the Benghazi attack ,. The republikan noise machine in reference to Benghazi was simply to draw attention off the fact that republikans had cut millions of dollars off the embassy security budget. I attribute responsibility for Bengahzi to republikans.

Makin bacon wrote:

<quoted text>
Kind of like only demokrats believe the spin Obama, Hillary and Rice tried to put on the attack in Benghazi. Their explanation about the killings being caused by a you tube video is about as believable as the excuse you say GW gave for attacking Iraq.

[TSF]

Amazing how you missed the fact that the terrorist who flew the planes into buildings on 911 were SAUDI nationals. Just to assist your limited reasoning, SAUDIs are not from Iraq or Afghanistan. Ben Laden was a SAUDI. W's bait and switch of Saddam for Ben Laden worked for the idiot republikans and when W said that "Ben Laden is no longer a person of interest", the sheeple republikans accepted that and still believe that Saddam did the entire 911 thing. In 7 and a half years, W did not devote resources necessary to kill Osama Ben Laden. You probably think it is just coincidental that W was friends with the Ben Laden family and was actually on TV KISSING one of the SOBs and walking around holding hands with a Saudi prince (on the traditional female side).

Silvercoastcorks wrote:

<quoted text>
Sure man, I hear what you are saying. America was owed 9/11, right?
I am quite certain there well over 3000 civilians that would disagree. I know there are hundreds of service men and women who would disagree. I know for a fact that over 300 emergency service workers disagree.
Talk your talk when your flight gets highjacked.

[TSF]

Laura thought the hand holding incident was "cute".
You call those antics conservatism? You gotta be $itting me.

[waco1909]

George had a thing for Putin as well.

[Silvercoastcorks]

TSF wrote:

<quoted text>Amazing how you missed the fact that the terrorist who flew the planes into buildings on 911 were SAUDI nationals. Just to assist your limited reasoning, SAUDIs are not from Iraq or Afghanistan. Ben Laden was a SAUDI. W's bait and switch of Saddam for Ben Laden worked for the idiot republikans and when W said that "Ben Laden is no longer a person of interest", the sheeple republikans accepted that and still believe that Saddam did the entire 911 thing. In 7 and a half years, W did not devote resources necessary to kill Osama Ben Laden. You probably think it is just coincidental that W was friends with the Ben Laden family and was actually on TV KISSING one of the SOBs and walking around holding hands with a Saudi prince (on the traditional female side).

If you need to be hit by the bullet to know when you are being shot at, that's on you. Forgive me, if I don't follow your lead.

[waco1909]

Negativity.Don't leave home without it.

[Silvercoastcorks]

TSF wrote:

<quoted text>Amazing how you missed the fact that the terrorist who flew the planes into buildings on 911 were SAUDI nationals. Just to assist your limited reasoning, SAUDIs are not from Iraq or Afghanistan. Ben Laden was a SAUDI. W's bait and switch of Saddam for Ben Laden worked for the idiot republikans and when W said that "Ben Laden is no longer a person of interest", the sheeple republikans accepted that and still believe that Saddam did the entire 911 thing. In 7 and a half years, W did not devote resources necessary to kill Osama Ben Laden. You probably think it is just coincidental that W was friends with the Ben Laden family and was actually on TV KISSING one of the SOBs and walking around holding hands with a Saudi prince (on the traditional female side).

Not to mention that their nationality is of no consequence while they are attacking. But it was made perfectly clear to ALL(the entire world) there would be a response, if you harbored terrorist you will be considered an enemy of the state and we were declaring a full on full fledged war against terrorism to protect Americans home or abroad by any and all means necessary.

If you want to keep beating the same dead horse, have a ball. I am moving on.

[Arnold-Ziffel]

Pro-American wrote:

<quoted text>Cop out

Not a cop out. I just don't subscribe to the analysis given by either Cain or Sowell. Neither have crediblitly in my book. Postering idiots.

[Arnold-Ziffel]

The Enemy Within wrote:

<quoted text>
Sowell a fool?.......wow AZ, you must pick and choose from those that support your agenda. Sowell has proven time and time again he is anything but a fool.
Here is an article that refers to the "Filtering of History" in regards to slavery by the United States and its educators.

Yes, you heard it right. Sowell is a fool. Of course, He doesn't support my agenda just like Michael Moore doesn't fit yours.

[Pro-American]

Arnold-Ziffel wrote:

<quoted text>
Not a cop out. I just don't subscribe to the analysis given by either Cain or Sowell. Neither have crediblitly in my book. Postering idiots.

The questions I was referring to had nothing to do with Cain or Sowell. I assume you conveniently overlooked post #33073......and you never elaborated on post #33008 either.