Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#33100 Jan 22, 2013
TSF wrote:
<quoted text>Amazing how you missed the fact that the terrorist who flew the planes into buildings on 911 were SAUDI nationals. Just to assist your limited reasoning, SAUDIs are not from Iraq or Afghanistan. Ben Laden was a SAUDI. W's bait and switch of Saddam for Ben Laden worked for the idiot republikans and when W said that "Ben Laden is no longer a person of interest", the sheeple republikans accepted that and still believe that Saddam did the entire 911 thing. In 7 and a half years, W did not devote resources necessary to kill Osama Ben Laden. You probably think it is just coincidental that W was friends with the Ben Laden family and was actually on TV KISSING one of the SOBs and walking around holding hands with a Saudi prince (on the traditional female side).
Not to mention that their nationality is of no consequence while they are attacking. But it was made perfectly clear to ALL(the entire world) there would be a response, if you harbored terrorist you will be considered an enemy of the state and we were declaring a full on full fledged war against terrorism to protect Americans home or abroad by any and all means necessary.

If you want to keep beating the same dead horse, have a ball. I am moving on.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33101 Jan 22, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Cop out
Not a cop out. I just don't subscribe to the analysis given by either Cain or Sowell. Neither have crediblitly in my book. Postering idiots.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33102 Jan 22, 2013
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
Sowell a fool?.......wow AZ, you must pick and choose from those that support your agenda. Sowell has proven time and time again he is anything but a fool.
Here is an article that refers to the "Filtering of History" in regards to slavery by the United States and its educators.
Yes, you heard it right. Sowell is a fool. Of course, He doesn't support my agenda just like Michael Moore doesn't fit yours.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33104 Jan 22, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
Not a cop out. I just don't subscribe to the analysis given by either Cain or Sowell. Neither have crediblitly in my book. Postering idiots.
The questions I was referring to had nothing to do with Cain or Sowell. I assume you conveniently overlooked post #33073......and you never elaborated on post #33008 either.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33105 Jan 22, 2013
TSF wrote:
What happened is that you and pro jumped from a mathematical principle to wealth redistribution simply because you associate the words and not because there is any real connection.
Actually, I oppose wealth redistribution, to the wealthy by tax breaks, subsidies, incentives, exemptions, exclusions, no bid contracts, political kickbacks , etc as well as to the poor through dependency generating programs. I have constantly advocated elimination of redistribution, starting with the most expensive welfare to the rich programs.
<quoted text>
It has nothing to do with the math per say, it's the message on the worksheet that the picture depicts as well as the title! I see you also overlooked post #33006 that was addressed to your failed attempt of a ligitamate response.

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#33106 Jan 22, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, you heard it right. Sowell is a fool. Of course, He doesn't support my agenda just like Michael Moore doesn't fit yours.
You are comparing Thomas Sowell to Michael Moore? Really.

That's like comparing the intellect of Einstein to Mickey Mouse. Moore being Mickey of course. That fat ass doesn't offer any thing to individuals willing to think for themselves.

Come to think of it, this may be why he has garnered your support.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33107 Jan 22, 2013
TSF wrote:
More republikan BS. Neither Iraq or Afghanistan were any threat to the US unless someone went there to make themselves available to being shot by someone riding a camel or donkey. The non existent WMD s were simply an excuse to award huge no bid logistics contracts to entities like KBR, which coincidentally belonged to the VP Cheany (who was the real president at the time). As it turned out, everything that W was telling the American public then were lies. Only republikans still believe that BS.
<quoted text>
Any nation that is willing to harbour terrorist is a threat to the US. Yes, Bin Laden was a Saudi national but he resided in Afghanistan.
I guess it's ok though for VP Biden's son's company to be awarded a contract worth millions to rebuild homes in Iraq?

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#33108 Jan 22, 2013
There has just been a mass shooting at Lone Star college in Houston.All I know is multiple casualties.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33109 Jan 22, 2013
TSF wrote:
There is a basic difference. W and Cheany initiated the Iraq attack for profit. The terrorist initiated the Benghazi attack ,. The republikan noise machine in reference to Benghazi was simply to draw attention off the fact that republikans had cut millions of dollars off the embassy security budget. I attribute responsibility for Bengahzi to republikans.
<quoted text>
They may have cut spending, but they didn't cut it out completely. A Ms. Charlene Lamb managed the money that wasn't cut. You can't spend even if the repubs cut what you don't have and she didn't see fit to hand over the funds. Here is a portion of the hearing from C-Span.

"But when questioned, Lamb denied that budgetary concerns had influenced her decision. committee It has been suggested that budget cuts are responsible for a lack of security in Benghazi, and Id like to ask Miss Lamb, said Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.).You made this decision personally. Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which lead you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?

No, sir, said Lamb."

Here's another link:

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/congressiona...

I don't think the Republican noise machine made Ms. Lamb's decision about funding. She clearly states the funding was there.

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#33110 Jan 22, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>Not a cop out. I just don't subscribe to the analysis given by either Cain or Sowell. Neither have crediblitly in my book. Postering idiots.
So if you don't subscribe to the analysis of Sowell then who is it that you do subscribe to.

This will be interesting......if you answer.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#33111 Jan 22, 2013
Preliminary info says two students were shooting at each other, others injured in crossfire.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33112 Jan 22, 2013
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
You are comparing Thomas Sowell to Michael Moore? Really.
That's like comparing the intellect of Einstein to Mickey Mouse. Moore being Mickey of course. That fat ass doesn't offer any thing to individuals willing to think for themselves.
Come to think of it, this may be why he has garnered your support.
Good one, Enemy. That's just a matter of opinion. I am glad that you like at least one black person. That's encouraging. That means ALL OF US are not sucking the government.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#33113 Jan 22, 2013
Did Biden start a war in Iraq based on lies so he could make money, or was that W and Cheany? People making money off war is an old game.
We blew up the same bridge 3 times in Nam so that Lady Byrd Johnson's company could rebuild it 3 times.
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Any nation that is willing to harbour terrorist is a threat to the US. Yes, Bin Laden was a Saudi national but he resided in Afghanistan.
I guess it's ok though for VP Biden's son's company to be awarded a contract worth millions to rebuild homes in Iraq?
TSF

Kenly, NC

#33114 Jan 22, 2013
And I suppose this horrific manifestation of evil in math was brought to you by the same sinister forces who installed digital power meters on your home to spy on you?
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>No need for the math lesson, I fully understand distributive properties. The problem lies with the Commucrats agenda through govt education of planting the seed into the minds of our youth with the title, "Re-Distribution of Wealth" and the picture of a "little, happy, well dressed, white girl",(racism) instead of a black or hispanic, running around with a "bag full of money" ,(which represents the evil rich) instead of a purse or change purse,(and I personally don't know of any little white girls who run around with bags of money), while throwing out "paper money",(that the evil rich obtained through the hard work of the poor) instead of coins, all of which has nothing to do with distributive properties, so why put it on the paper? Again, it's to plant the seeds of the Commucrats agenda into govt education!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33115 Jan 22, 2013
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
So if you don't subscribe to the analysis of Sowell then who is it that you do subscribe to.
This will be interesting......if you answer.
Taxpayer.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#33116 Jan 22, 2013
OK. The title of the worksheet is "Distribute the money " not Common core and the (Re) Distribution of Wealth as it is presented on the link and probably mistakenly by you..
Also, this material is NOT produced by public schools but is printed and sold by a private company traded on NASDAQ called Scholastic, which sells printed material and books for the home and schools. It looks like the cost of this worksheet is $.99, which in most schools would have to be paid for by the individual teacher who might have the time, expertise and the desire to teach subliminal communism through the distributive property in math.
I have found no evidence that this particular worksheet has been adopted by ANY school district in the country. So , once again, your presentation of this paper printed by an independent company as evidence of communism being taught in math is pure un adultrated bull shit.
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>It has nothing to do with the math per say, it's the message on the worksheet that the picture depicts as well as the title! I see you also overlooked post #33006 that was addressed to your failed attempt of a ligitamate response.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33117 Jan 22, 2013
TSF wrote:
Did Biden start a war in Iraq based on lies so he could make money, or was that W and Cheany? People making money off war is an old game.
We blew up the same bridge 3 times in Nam so that Lady Byrd Johnson's company could rebuild it 3 times.
<quoted text>
You never answered my post about what happened to the money that was "supposed" to be used to protect the embassy in Benghazi. Which story are you going with: the you tube video, Ms. Lamb withheld the funds although they were there, or let's just blame it on the Republicans although they cut funding which clearly had nothing to do with the lack of protection for this embassy or did we kill these people so Lady Byrd Johnson's company could rebuild it?

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#33118 Jan 22, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>Taxpayer.
Pro may be onto something. You hound others if they sidestep or avoid questions but you do the very thing you protest against.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33119 Jan 22, 2013
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
Pro may be onto something. You hound others if they sidestep or avoid questions but you do the very thing you protest against.
Pro may be right. None of my protests in the past has resulted in responses. Mike would probably agree. Maybe I am just getting more conservative in my older age. Also, I am watching probably way too much Fox News. You do learn a lot from the masters of deceit.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#33120 Jan 22, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
You never answered my post about what happened to the money that was "supposed" to be used to protect the embassy in Benghazi. Which story are you going with: the you tube video, Ms. Lamb withheld the funds although they were there, or let's just blame it on the Republicans although they cut funding which clearly had nothing to do with the lack of protection for this embassy or did we kill these people so Lady Byrd Johnson's company could rebuild it?
Lady Bird died.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Billy Graham's son supports gay pride parade 6 hr Rev DoGoode 6
barbara costello/megann moore 10 hr Bitsynav 7
What is the best little town in North Carolina? (May '08) 11 hr SlickWilie 156
Rt 74 Independence Blvd. Idlewild and Sharon Am... Jul 5 PimpDaddy 2
bggb (Aug '14) Jul 4 PimpDaddy 168
Are All Yankee's Jerks or do the just ACT that ... (Jul '09) Jul 4 PimpDaddy 274
News No Sign of Arson Yet in Latest Black Church Fire Jul 4 PimpDaddy 7
More from around the web

Charlotte People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Charlotte Mortgages