Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#32613 Jan 17, 2013
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly. That is my point. Instead of looking at the existing laws that "protect" a person's mental health rights, the flip side, is to limit another persons rights. To give full disclosure here, I had to be "evaluated" to get a NC driver's license because of DUI. Had to have a mental health official sign off on it, because of prior behavior. I didn't have to do that to get my NCCHP. It's a tough issue and it will be an intense issue.
Bristol is fastest, only a forty minute wait at Atlanta,293 bucks.ZOOOOM!!!

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#32614 Jan 17, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Bristol is fastest, only a forty minute wait at Atlanta,293 bucks.ZOOOOM!!!
ZOOOM?! That's funny and it's a nice drive from TN.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#32615 Jan 17, 2013
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>ZOOOM?! That's funny and it's a nice drive from TN.
Closer than Charlotte.My drill sergeant said I was a funny guy, as he was removing his foot.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#32616 Jan 17, 2013
No. I didn't even suggest that. Mass shootings are extremely rare but wildly publicized and sensationalized. On the link you provided, I count 513 victims of mass shootings over 29 years. Taking 29 years times the average deaths from gun assults per year of 12,000, that comes to 348,000 victims, so mass shootings accounted for less tan 0.14%. What I am saying is that no evidence indicates that identified mentally ill persons commit murder at a higher rate than others. So, expending huge amounts of resoures toward something that hasnt even been identified as a significant problem doesn' make sense. Add in the confiscation of constituional rights of large numbers of people who have committed no crime but have been mistakenly identifyed a "dangerous". That is a high price to pay for somethng that isnt even proven to be useful.
Also I am saying that a majority of persons identified as "health care professionas" have little or even no training in psychology or psychiatry and are completely and totally unable to correctly identify the mentaly ill or the dangerously mentally ill.
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>So TSF, are you telling me the last several "mass shooting" were committed by perfectly sound minded people?
TSF

Kenly, NC

#32617 Jan 17, 2013
Uhh oh. You have been judged mentally suspect and you could be a danger to yourself and or others. Certainly, no guns for you. I am surpised that they gave you a license. Drunk drivers kill far more persons each year than people using guns.
But doctors are far more dangerous than traffic accidents and guns combined. Medical malpracice and mistakes kill over 130,000 people each year. Your figues show that an average of 17.8 persons are killed per year in mass shootings, so you are 7647 times more likely to be killed by a doctor than during a mass shooting. How many people out thee want to ban doctors?
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly. That is my point. Instead of looking at the existing laws that "protect" a person's mental health rights, the flip side, is to limit another persons rights. To give full disclosure here, I had to be "evaluated" to get a NC driver's license because of DUI. Had to have a mental health official sign off on it, because of prior behavior. I didn't have to do that to get my NCCHP. It's a tough issue and it will be an intense issue.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#32618 Jan 17, 2013
TSF wrote:
No. I didn't even suggest that. Mass shootings are extremely rare but wildly publicized and sensationalized. On the link you provided, I count 513 victims of mass shootings over 29 years. Taking 29 years times the average deaths from gun assults per year of 12,000, that comes to 348,000 victims, so mass shootings accounted for less tan 0.14%. What I am saying is that no evidence indicates that identified mentally ill persons commit murder at a higher rate than others. So, expending huge amounts of resoures toward something that hasnt even been identified as a significant problem doesn' make sense. Add in the confiscation of constituional rights of large numbers of people who have committed no crime but have been mistakenly identifyed a "dangerous". That is a high price to pay for somethng that isnt even proven to be useful.
Also I am saying that a majority of persons identified as "health care professionas" have little or even no training in psychology or psychiatry and are completely and totally unable to correctly identify the mentaly ill or the dangerously mentally ill.
<quoted text>
513 victims in how many events? Do you think it would be important to "expand" the mental health field? Do you think it fair for me to be evaluated for prior behavior and someone removed form campus, not allowed to return until evaluated? Yet, they can buy a firearm but I couldn't drive. Is a car more dangerous that a firearm? Remember, on the purchase form, there is a question on a persons mental health.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#32619 Jan 17, 2013
TSF wrote:
Uhh oh. You have been judged mentally suspect and you could be a danger to yourself and or others. Certainly, no guns for you. I am surpised that they gave you a license. Drunk drivers kill far more persons each year than people using guns.
But doctors are far more dangerous than traffic accidents and guns combined. Medical malpracice and mistakes kill over 130,000 people each year. Your figues show that an average of 17.8 persons are killed per year in mass shootings, so you are 7647 times more likely to be killed by a doctor than during a mass shooting. How many people out thee want to ban doctors?
<quoted text>
How did "they" know? Which "they" are you speaking of, DMV or mental health? BTY, the mental health thing cost me a couple bucks.
Allen

Penrose, NC

#32620 Jan 17, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm doing just fine and the family is ok. Will know later on this week how things are for my dad. Thanks for asking.
Lu, I have no doubt you've learned without giving much thought how to control your weight and that's not a problem for you anymore. Getting weight off and keeping it off is the problem for most people and I'd say if you've kept if off for 16 years, you're doing just fine.
You're right people are getting leaner and meaner and the fact they're pissed off about all these gun laws the president thinks is going to keep the guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill isn't going to show up on a background check.
I'll tell you what I thought was a new low for the president today was when he read letters from children (when's the last time we got input from elementary school children about laws being passed) and announced his plans in front of the parents of children killed at CT and parents of children that still attended there. Talk about stacking the deck and using people as pawns to score the sympathy points made me sick. If he's against assault weapons and the such, then his children shouldn't be protected by bodyguards using them and neither should he. Hey, let him lead by example and be protected by BB guns and see how that works out for him.
I'm sure this did make you sick. Yet, not as sick as it made the hearts, souls, minds and stomachs of the parents and family members when they learned their children would never return home from school. They need to take that knuckle dragging, neanderthal, moron, Rush Limbaugh off the air and replace him with these children.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#32621 Jan 17, 2013
Allen wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure this did make you sick. Yet, not as sick as it made the hearts, souls, minds and stomachs of the parents and family members when they learned their children would never return home from school. They need to take that knuckle dragging, neanderthal, moron, Rush Limbaugh off the air and replace him with these children.
Allen , I can't stand Rush.But, these kids have been on TV CONSTANTLY since the murders.Here are some facts though,14 democrats SAY they won't vote for an assault rifle ban, in the Senate.That means, it won't pass the Senate, let alone the republican controlled House.Let's talk.What kind of steps do you think you want?
TSF

Kenly, NC

#32622 Jan 17, 2013
Main Outcome Measures Actual causes of death.

Results The leading causes of death in 2000 were tobacco (435 000 deaths; 18.1% of total US deaths), poor diet and physical inactivity (400 000 deaths; 16.6%), and alcohol consumption (85 000 deaths; 3.5%). Other actual causes of death were microbial agents (75 000), toxic agents (55 000), motor vehicle crashes (43 000), incidents involving firearms (29 000), sexual behaviors
20,000
TSF

Kenly, NC

#32623 Jan 17, 2013
Looks like we need to ban tobacco and hire cigarette police, enbact laws forcing everyon to eata balanced low calorie diet and hire diet police, force everyone to exercise and hie exercise police, ban alcohol and hire breathalizer police, ban toxic substances, ban biologicals. ban cars and risky sexual behavior and hire sex police .
TSF

Kenly, NC

#32624 Jan 17, 2013
It sounds like you have been victimized by the so called "health care professionals" ( which includes nurse practioners for instance). ANY health care "professional" can report that you are a potential danger to yourself and/or others and armed LE will show up and take you into custody for competency evaluation.
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>513 victims in how many events? Do you think it would be important to "expand" the mental health field? Do you think it fair for me to be evaluated for prior behavior and someone removed form campus, not allowed to return until evaluated? Yet, they can buy a firearm but I couldn't drive. Is a car more dangerous that a firearm? Remember, on the purchase form, there is a question on a persons mental health.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#32625 Jan 17, 2013
Yes, you can see that cars are more dangerous than firearms by 148% in the year 2000. Actually, it is worse than that because around 40% of the firearm deaths were suicide (self inflicted), others were accidents and a surprising number of the firearm deaths were caused by legitimate actions of homeowners and business owners defending their own life and property from criminals in the act of invading someone's home or business with rape, robbery, or other mischief as the objective.
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>513 victims in how many events? Do you think it would be important to "expand" the mental health field? Do you think it fair for me to be evaluated for prior behavior and someone removed form campus, not allowed to return until evaluated? Yet, they can buy a firearm but I couldn't drive. Is a car more dangerous that a firearm? Remember, on the purchase form, there is a question on a persons mental health.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#32626 Jan 17, 2013
Americans are buried in, laws, tariffs, fees, regulations,ALL designed for our alleged safety.The future of all peoples in the industrialized world, seems to be a future of tightly monitored activity.Slavery to the"state", which will watch everyone CLOSELY with new technologies as they come on line.Better watch what you say, and how you say it, the "mental"police will have informers everywhere, and the governments will easily track the movements of it's citizen/slaves.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#32627 Jan 17, 2013
Allen wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure this did make you sick. Yet, not as sick as it made the hearts, souls, minds and stomachs of the parents and family members when they learned their children would never return home from school. They need to take that knuckle dragging, neanderthal, moron, Rush Limbaugh off the air and replace him with these children.
I don't know about Rush Limbaugh as I've never listened to him, so what he has to do with this, I don't know. What I do know and let me preface by saying IMO, it's wrong to exploit grieving parents and scared children who have been told how bad guns are for political gain. The exploitation of children is sickening to me and to further exploit grieving parents who are fragile, heartbroken and at a loss this soon after the death of their children is wrong. I didn't see people at the movie theater that were victims trotted around by the president to make a point about gun control. Obama is the leader of the strongest nation to date and if he can't make a clear and cogent argument without the use of victims or families of victims, he needs to move on. Funny thing about his handling of situations, he and this administration ran from the families of the victims in Libya. He and his administration screwed up in Libya, then lied about it and then tried to sweep it under the rug. I guess he couldn't get any good PR coverage about those killed over there. His apathy toward these families make me sick too.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#32628 Jan 17, 2013
Boys, we got the South Texas PIG wrasslin'championships down here near Trinity, Texas.There are two categories,1.whoever wrassles the biggest boar to the ground, and 2.whoever wrassles the biggest sow away from her litter of piglets.Winners get a free trip to the ER., AND a years supply of Bactine.YOU boys are welcome to compete!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#32629 Jan 18, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
Boys, we got the South Texas PIG wrasslin'championships down here near Trinity, Texas.There are two categories,1.whoever wrassles the biggest boar to the ground, and 2.whoever wrassles the biggest sow away from her litter of piglets.Winners get a free trip to the ER., AND a years supply of Bactine.YOU boys are welcome to compete!
Isn't that about the same as wrassling with Gail and Taxpayer?
TSF

Kenly, NC

#32631 Jan 18, 2013
DMV specifically. A DUI could easily be construed as evidence of mental illness.
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>How did "they" know? Which "they" are you speaking of, DMV or mental health? BTY, the mental health thing cost me a couple bucks.
Allen

Penrose, NC

#32632 Jan 18, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know about Rush Limbaugh as I've never listened to him, so what he has to do with this, I don't know. What I do know and let me preface by saying IMO, it's wrong to exploit grieving parents and scared children who have been told how bad guns are for political gain. The exploitation of children is sickening to me and to further exploit grieving parents who are fragile, heartbroken and at a loss this soon after the death of their children is wrong. I didn't see people at the movie theater that were victims trotted around by the president to make a point about gun control. Obama is the leader of the strongest nation to date and if he can't make a clear and cogent argument without the use of victims or families of victims, he needs to move on. Funny thing about his handling of situations, he and this administration ran from the families of the victims in Libya. He and his administration screwed up in Libya, then lied about it and then tried to sweep it under the rug. I guess he couldn't get any good PR coverage about those killed over there. His apathy toward these families make me sick too.
Exploitation? I don't think that he dragged them there kicking and screaming. They were there in support of him and his proposal. Personally I don,t see anything wrong with his proposal. At least he is making an effort. Had he done nothing I'm sure you would be here posting as to his lack of leadership, lack of empathy, lack of guts, etc. What makes me sick is, in one of your previous posts, you plead with healthy topix posters to donate bone marrow to save lives but, yet you seem to oppose gun regulation in order to save lives.

The NRA would have us believe that our BLACK POTUS is coming to take all our guns. They are purposly creating a fear factor among the people to expand on thier bottom line.

Let's talk immigration for a second. We have over 12 million Latinos in this country and the number is growing by the day. What percent do you think will be granted amnesty? Those active in Civil Rights will come out of the wood work. So hey, let's not ban any gun at all, let's do away with all background checks. Welcome to the next civil war just not the one the GOP would have you think.
Allen

Penrose, NC

#32633 Jan 18, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> I no longer own guns.Please be coherent Allen.
These were quotes that I took from a letter that I recently received from the NRA. Just trying to help you out. Sorry, may have missed a post where you stated that you were not a gun owner. I do believe that my questions were valid, whether or not you are an owner.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
If Belmont world have stayed away from selling ... 1 hr just sayin 33
Belmont City Council 3 hr Lucky Lucy 31
News Jonas Brothers' restaurant on simmer for now 12 hr The Truth 18
What are the Pro & Cons of AYF vs Pop Warner Fo... (Dec '08) Thu footballmommabear 169
So when is the ground breaking on the Harris Te... (Sep '14) Thu Transplant 25
Adios Michael Waltrip Racing Thu Into The Wall 1
Why Mount Holly Will Never Be Anything Special (Apr '14) Thu Orville 24
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Charlotte Mortgages