Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#31504 Jan 1, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I bet you were supprised to find out you broke a law that intolerant people called a crime of nature.
I assume this because most everyone does not restrict themselves to the missionary position. That is the only way I could describe that without getting graphic.
What two peoples choices are that hurts no one should not be made illegal.
Talk about draconian.
This also may help you understand my confusion early on about different terms for crimes against nature:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_against_na...

It does include bestiality, which also I found quite often and shocking, children do try to nail the family dog or any farm animals. Pretty much I learned if there's an orifice a child experimenting will give it a whirl.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#31505 Jan 1, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Remember when Neil Cavuto of fox news spoke of this, then said we need to hurry and make babies.
God NO...No more children for Sean Hannity.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#31506 Jan 1, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Another racist conservative. Who would have guessed?
You haven't heard anything yet from this hate ridden lunatic fringe advocate. She is just getting started with her hatred for blacks. Of course, nothing she would say to their face. She likes to stay protected behind the security of a computer. Real brave.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31507 Jan 1, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Allen, you actually think one race of people worldwide would be a good thing? Hitler actually felt the same way. Hope you meant it's not a good thing to have one race of people. I think one race of people would take away from diversity. People from all ethnic backgrounds are proud of their heritage, what would be so good about everybody being "branch kin" to every Tom, Dick and Harry? Inbreeding is never a good thing. The only good I can see from everyone being of one race is that we won't hear all this pissing and moaning about discrimination.
Inbreading is not good? Tell that to Adam and Eve's kids. Tell that to Noah.
Inbreading is bad, if it is to closely related. We are all related though, so we are of one branch of kin. But it is not due to one set of parents as the ignorant ancients once believed.

No one is forcing the breeding that is going on these days. The mix is due to choice. Culture will exist in veriety no matter if we all look alike or not.

I do not forsee the human species to ever be of one race, but I do see the extreme gaps closing some, and I think that is a good thing.
It is human nature to be on guard to those who look very different from yourself. I and other civilized people can overcome that evolutionary instint with our will. But some chose not to use their cognative mind over their animal instincts. So the mix of races will likely make all feel less different on the extreme levels that often lead to racism.

The mixing of the races is the opposite of inbreeding BTW. Unlike what Hitler strove for, the mixing of races is healthier. Hitler's ideas lead to more inbreeding. Forcing the goal of a single race by exclusion, not inclusion.

So again Bacon, you have it quite backwards.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31508 Jan 1, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't heard anything yet from this hate ridden lunatic fringe advocate. She is just getting started with her hatred for blacks. Of course, nothing she would say to their face. She likes to stay protected behind the security of a computer. Real brave.
I note not a single conservative has condemned the words of this person.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#31509 Jan 1, 2013
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
But, my question was how the abuse of children was connected to homesexual marriage? Maybe I did miss something.
My question is how did me asking you what the terms red bone and high yellow and explaining I didn't understand those and also explaining I didn't understand the other term was showing I don't always know what these sayings mean become mixed up with gay marriage? We weren't discussing gay marriage at all. Maybe we both missed something?!?!

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31510 Jan 1, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
This also may help you understand my confusion early on about different terms for crimes against nature:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_against_na...
It does include bestiality, which also I found quite often and shocking, children do try to nail the family dog or any farm animals. Pretty much I learned if there's an orifice a child experimenting will give it a whirl.
I see on the list, interracial marriage,also known as miscegenation.

Again, I would bet you are guilty of at least on of these "crimes against nature".
I say this only to point out how draconian some of these laws are. Of course I do not think it draconian to outlaw sex with children, necrophilia, and bestiality.
I see incest is on the list. Seems Noah broke that crime against nature. Incest has very high likelyhood of abnormalities of offspring, so I think that is a problem also.

Sexual practices that have historically been considered by some to be "crimes" against nature include homosexual acts, anal sex, bestiality, incest, miscegenation and necrophilia. Other less common examples include heterosexual fellatio and cunnilingus, even between married couples. The term is sometimes also seen as a synonym for sodomy or buggery.[2]

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31511 Jan 1, 2013
Section 377A of the Singapore Penal Code prohibits any form of male to male sexual conduct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_against_na...

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#31512 Jan 1, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I note not a single conservative has condemned the words of this person.
Well..I did...but....i'm not a conservative.....not a liberal....hmmm....

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31513 Jan 1, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
This also may help you understand my confusion early on about different terms for crimes against nature:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_against_na...
It does include bestiality, which also I found quite often and shocking, children do try to nail the family dog or any farm animals. Pretty much I learned if there's an orifice a child experimenting will give it a whirl.
I see only eight states including NC have these laws on the books today. And I did not see anything about sex with children. I guess that is not a crime against nature?
Your whole argument was it being a crime against nature, but it is not listed here? Did I miss something?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#31514 Jan 1, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I see on the list, interracial marriage,also known as miscegenation.
Again, I would bet you are guilty of at least on of these "crimes against nature".
I say this only to point out how draconian some of these laws are. Of course I do not think it draconian to outlaw sex with children, necrophilia, and bestiality.
I see incest is on the list. Seems Noah broke that crime against nature. Incest has very high likelyhood of abnormalities of offspring, so I think that is a problem also.
Sexual practices that have historically been considered by some to be "crimes" against nature include homosexual acts, anal sex, bestiality, incest, miscegenation and necrophilia. Other less common examples include heterosexual fellatio and cunnilingus, even between married couples. The term is sometimes also seen as a synonym for sodomy or buggery.[2]
Don't kill the messenger. Just trying to show you that you don't know everything you think you know, draconian or not.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31515 Jan 1, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Allen, I spoke out against interracial marriage and there was only one Adam and Eve. With that being said, have you ever heard of people of middle eastern descent? Have you heard of Native American Indians? Have you heard of people of slavic descent, asian descent? Do you think all these people would like to forget their heritage? Would you not agree this would take away from the diversity of all peoples and their heritage if everyone were brown? What's wrong with saying everyone should look asian? Why does everyone have to look brown? Is brown now the color of diversity? As you said red, yellow, black and white You're confusing diversity with my stand on marriage. You're a woman and so am I, but in the work place many times they strive for diversity through equality of hiring practices of different sexes. Diversity is not always about race. IMO, it would be boring for everyone to look alike and I don't care what color or descent they are.
As usual, you did not answer any of the questions, and just nit picked for a diversion.
Diversity is not just about race, and neither is culture. So in answer to your question, it would not take away variety in culture.
DNA evidence can show we are all related.

In a country with a veriety of races, it is natural to interbreed. The only reason races should exist naturally is due to geographic distances.
Religion has often tried to artifically make for inbreeding of like race. Hitler carried on that tradition in an extreme way.
You are against interracial marriage, so it looks like you are more in line with Hitler on that subject.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31516 Jan 1, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Well..I did...but....i'm not a conservative.....not a liberal....hmmm....
Which is evidence the extreme conservatives are refusing to condemn this outrageous behavior.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31517 Jan 1, 2013
Allen wrote:
<quoted text>
A foreign land in those days may have been just a few miles down the road;) Depending on whether you believe the Garden of Eden was in Africa or the Middle East the first people were black or at least olive complected, as I believe Jesus was. So where would one think that white people came from. Maybe a group of people who just adapted to living in the dark (caves) for a long period of time, until they began to display traits of albinos?
White people evolved lighter skin due to the region they evolved in over time being of lower sun compared to the regions of high sun. Lighter skin has higher absorbtion rate of the sun, thus vitamin D.
Estimates are around twenty thousand years for a species to be in such a geographic area to change from black to white, or vice versa.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#31518 Jan 1, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I see only eight states including NC have these laws on the books today. And I did not see anything about sex with children. I guess that is not a crime against nature?
Your whole argument was it being a crime against nature, but it is not listed here? Did I miss something?
Mike, after this last explanation, let's drop this. In the brief I was preparing the term "crimes against nature" was used and not to specifics. As there were no animals mentioned, I went and asked to make sure I knew the correct definition. I was then given the language specific definition the attorney meant and was also given a short lesson on the other meanings. The child was forced to be an unwitting partner to such acts, thus it was child abuse, actually sex abuse.

Let's try this again, I was trying to explain to Arnold how I sometimes don't know some terms posters use and how when I first went to work I didn't understand the meaning of this term in its' fullness. I thought you would remember where I worked and would understand; however, doesn't seem to be the case. You brought up gay marriage and why I don't know and I brought up child abuse because I thought you would remember. It's over. I guess this is a case of to "assume" is to make an ass of u and me" on both our behalves. Done.

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#31519 Jan 1, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Which is evidence the extreme conservatives are refusing to condemn this outrageous behavior.
Who, besides Silvercoast, on this forum....would be considered..."extreme "?....on the conservative side....

“Seek Light”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#31520 Jan 1, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
Section 377A of the Singapore Penal Code prohibits any form of male to male sexual conduct.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_against_na...
Silvercoast probably loves that....being prohibited, that is...

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31521 Jan 1, 2013
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike, after this last explanation, let's drop this. In the brief I was preparing the term "crimes against nature" was used and not to specifics. As there were no animals mentioned, I went and asked to make sure I knew the correct definition. I was then given the language specific definition the attorney meant and was also given a short lesson on the other meanings. The child was forced to be an unwitting partner to such acts, thus it was child abuse, actually sex abuse.
Let's try this again, I was trying to explain to Arnold how I sometimes don't know some terms posters use and how when I first went to work I didn't understand the meaning of this term in its' fullness. I thought you would remember where I worked and would understand; however, doesn't seem to be the case. You brought up gay marriage and why I don't know and I brought up child abuse because I thought you would remember. It's over. I guess this is a case of to "assume" is to make an ass of u and me" on both our behalves. Done.
Reguardless if I remembered about your child abuse work, it does not mean crimes against nature was in reference to your work. And again, the site you posted did not call it a crime of nature, so you must think I can read minds.
You just failed to articulate your thoughts as you so often do. So you blame me for not reading your mind.

You have still failed to address any of my points. Many laws are archaic and need to go. Married couples have oral sex, and it being against the law in NC is just insane. It is draconian.
We are progressing as a people, and in that progress, we can understand oral sex is not a crime against nature. And we need to understand that if someone is homosexual, it is not a crime against nature for them to have sex. We need to progress and understand it is something one is born with, and not simply some perversion. We need to honor the freedoms America claims to be a champion of and allow equality in marriage.

You failed to grant that equality, thus I call you draconian.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31522 Jan 1, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Silvercoast probably loves that....being prohibited, that is...
I am sure he does. He flees a more free country while complaining he wants more freedom. He complains about socialism, then flees to a country with even more socialism.

I read that Singapore is extremely diverse ethnically.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#31523 Jan 1, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Who, besides Silvercoast, on this forum....would be considered..."extreme "?....on the conservative side....
Bacon, Pro, Taxpayer, Emlu.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mount holly pop warner on the rise in 2013 (Oct '13) 12 hr Hawk 54
News Is Gaston land still over-valued? 14 hr Teaed off 1
Friday Night Live - Drunk By 9:00 (Jun '11) 16 hr Mehavasu09 101
bggb (Aug '14) Tue gab 161
powpow May 25 Loki79 11
South Point Athletic Director resignation May 25 Corinthian 9
Loan shark needed (Jul '09) May 24 Donawa 22
More from around the web

Charlotte People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]