“physics is your friend”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#29797 Dec 5, 2012
emlu wrote:
Someone sent me this today in reference to Christmas feasts, I like it....
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather
to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand and wine in the other,
body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what
a ride!"
Nice!

“physics is your friend”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#29798 Dec 5, 2012
Snore wrote:
<quoted text>Imo, it's pointless to "debate" with Mike on any front, ESPECIALLY religion. You're wasting your valuable energy on that subject matter. I wonder what the "course" of conversation is during CHRISTMAS feasts are like? I believe Mike is simply addicted to his prejudices period.
Profound observation.
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

#29799 Dec 6, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Again, look up the word 'communism'. Yes, we have some socialism, thus some of our system has some things in common with communism, but it ends there. And the socialism in communism is far more broad than what we have here.
Just try to have an honest debate. It might make your concerns look legitimate.

comēmuēnism (kmy-nzm)
1. A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.
2. Communism
a. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
b. The Marxist-Leninist version of Communist doctrine that advocates the overthrow of capitalism by the revolution of the proletariat.
With central government control of business, with the takeover and management of companies by the government. What part of this definition do you not understand?
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

#29800 Dec 6, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Again, have an honest debate, or all your concerns look suspect. You ignored his point and went for the personal attack. Evidently you have no rebuttal.
So TSF is too much of a coward to stand up for itís self? There is not one thing honest with your debate if that is what you call the junk you put out.
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

#29801 Dec 6, 2012
TSF wrote:
I favor a flat tax on all income with no loopholes, no subsidies, no incentives,no sweetheart deals , no kickbacks or bid rigging, no exemptions, no exclusions.
<quoted text>
Really! That's good but what happen to the get the rich scam?
TSF

Kenly, NC

#29802 Dec 6, 2012
I have never advocated soaking the rich. All I want is for them to pay the same tax RATE that everyone else pays. We just can no longer afford welfare/socialism for the rich. I know republikans want to cut social security (which is still self sustaining) so that they can give tax breaks to the rich. That reverse socialism just isn't going to continue because the public is starting to pay attention to what happens their money.
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Really! That's good but what happen to the get the rich scam?
TSF

Kenly, NC

#29803 Dec 6, 2012
Republikans can't lead, cant follow and can't get out of the way. Republikans are so accustomed to obstructing that they are now refusing to raise taxes on the rich to avoid raising taxes even more on the rich --and everyone else. Does anyone see a disconnect in that logic?
This is kind of a parallel the the pre election decision by republikans to present a presidential candidate who would force their prejudicial evangelical Christians to chose between voting for a Christian or the white guy.
But then , no one has actually accused republicans of being logical.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#29804 Dec 6, 2012
TSF wrote:
I have never advocated soaking the rich. All I want is for them to pay the same tax RATE that everyone else pays. We just can no longer afford welfare/socialism for the rich. I know republikans want to cut social security (which is still self sustaining) so that they can give tax breaks to the rich. That reverse socialism just isn't going to continue because the public is starting to pay attention to what happens their money.
<quoted text>
So, is it that you think the public has not been paying attention to what has been happening to their money? Please explain "welfare/socialism for the rich".

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#29805 Dec 6, 2012
TSF wrote:
Republikans can't lead, cant follow and can't get out of the way. Republikans are so accustomed to obstructing that they are now refusing to raise taxes on the rich to avoid raising taxes even more on the rich --and everyone else. Does anyone see a disconnect in that logic?
This is kind of a parallel the the pre election decision by republikans to present a presidential candidate who would force their prejudicial evangelical Christians to chose between voting for a Christian or the white guy.
But then , no one has actually accused republicans of being logical.
Are you opposed to first cutting wasteful programs, shrimp on treadmills, so to speak, and then raising taxes. I, think there are "wasteful" programs out there that have been funded for so long that they may be outdated.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#29806 Dec 6, 2012
Yes. I ,TSF , am very afraid--- that republikans will perpetuate ignorance and limit our future by destroying public education,---that republikans will destroy religious freedom in the USA by codifying their religion into law,--that republikans will continue to crush working people with taxes that the rich escape,-- that republikans will continue allow foreign corporate owners to buy our elections,-- that republikans will continue giving away our natural resources (oil, coal, timber, gas etc),---that the republikan party's corruption will so weaken the party that they become unable to balance and oppose some of the democrat party's left wind nut ideas.
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
So TSF is too much of a coward to stand up for itís self? There is not one thing honest with your debate if that is what you call the junk you put out.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#29807 Dec 6, 2012
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>Are you opposed to first cutting wasteful programs, shrimp on treadmills, so to speak, and then raising taxes. I, think there are "wasteful" programs out there that have been funded for so long that they may be outdated.
Sorry about replying to my own post, but this link is outdated, it's from 2005, but it shows some funded programs that are just stupid. Maybe Washington should start here and the look at raising taxes.

http://funding-programs.idilogic.aidpage.com/
TSF

Kenly, NC

#29808 Dec 6, 2012
Unfortunately, the public and congress has been unable to comprehend the enormity of our debt problem. I see congressmen speaking with obvious ignorance of the difference between debt and deficit. I see continued blind faith trust in the discredited "voodoo economics" idea that cutting taxes raises tax revenues. Our members of congress are too old to still believe in the tooth fairy. Now we are at the point that we either work together to right the ship or all sink with it.
Welfare/socialism to the rich? We are giving away 1.3 trillion dollars annually to the rich in loopholes, subsidies, exemptions, exclusions, incentives, no bid contracts, etc. By contrast, the total cost of all the payout to baby mommas, all the unemployed, all the WIC, all the food stamps, etc (all social programs combined) is less than 0.8 trillion dollars.
It doesn't matter if I oppose it or not, the reality is that socialism to the rich and poor has to stop in order to get our house in order. It would be nice if the tooth fairy was right and we could get out by just starving the poor or by soaking the rich. Unfortunately, we have to do both. Taking monetary policy away from the federal reserve bank will also be necessary but very politically messy. The last president to attempt that was JFK. We would not be in this present mess if he had been sucessful.
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>So, is it that you think the public has not been paying attention to what has been happening to their money? Please explain "welfare/socialism for the rich".
TSF

Kenly, NC

#29809 Dec 6, 2012
Those are astoundingly stupid but represent only a drop in an ocean of theft fraud, subsidies, loopholes, exemptions, incentives, etc.

For example: In NC state government, 3 cents of every tax dollar goes to corporate incentives with no assurance that jobs will be creatd.
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry about replying to my own post, but this link is outdated, it's from 2005, but it shows some funded programs that are just stupid. Maybe Washington should start here and the look at raising taxes.
http://funding-programs.idilogic.aidpage.com/

“physics is your friend”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#29810 Dec 6, 2012
TSF you are very intelligent.Too smart to run for office...

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

#29811 Dec 6, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Number three, if Bacon spoke for you, you would know how to spell the number, "two".
o my fking god bacon, your so clever. Like I give a damn about my grammar after working on a thesis for 2 hrs.

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

#29812 Dec 6, 2012
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Religion flew those planes into the WTC? Thought it was a bunch of fanatical Saudis...People always gonna find a reason to justify their evil....
fanatical and extremist muslims declaring holy war on America and believing that their martydom was justified.

“physics is your friend”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#29813 Dec 6, 2012
sevenSecrets wrote:
<quoted text>fanatical and extremist muslims declaring holy war on America and believing that their martydom was justified.
Hate always finds a way there seven....free flow of information is the biggest enemy for muslims....their women are saying hmmmm....why can't I GO TO SCHOOL? WHY CAN'T I DRIVE? Why can't I be a DOCTOR?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29814 Dec 6, 2012
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>It's OK waco, before the election, I was told to post links to support my opinion, now it's give an opinion on my links. So, I have decided to post links that support my opinion. I find it less repetitive.
To hard to do both? I do not ask for a link to all opinions,mostly if you make a firm claim that sounds false.
Clearly you cannot even comprehend what the hell I am talking about. This is not that complicated.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29815 Dec 6, 2012
sevenSecrets wrote:
<quoted text>o my fking god bacon, your so clever. Like I give a damn about my grammar after working on a thesis for 2 hrs.
Work two more years and you may learn the difference in grammar and spelling. I questioned your spelling, not your grammar.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29816 Dec 6, 2012
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> I'm rebutting your ignorant claim! I SAID it was because DEMARK doesn't put all their citizens in jail for BULLSHIT drug offenses! Got it?
That is not exactly rebutting my claim, it is another claim.
If you were actually rebutting my claim, you would be giving reasons my claim is incorrect.
I know debating is really complicated.

So please clarify your claim. Are the drug laws more lax there, or are they just not putting people in jail for breaking the law?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Help me Find this song! 29 min toof teller 5
Charlotte mayor on trans gender homosexual rest... 1 hr kneel 4
bggb (Aug '14) 4 hr gab 120
Buh Bye All You IBM Employees (Oct '10) Wed Kicked2Curb 269
dog food near the arboretum Wed ethyl 7
Charlotte marks Transgender Day of Remembrance Tue minister warning 10
subs Feb 24 South charlotte 5
Charlotte Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Charlotte People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:39 pm PST

NFL 4:39PM
Steven Jackson released by Falcons after two seasons
Bleacher Report 4:43 PM
Steven Jackson Cut by Falcons: Latest Details, Comments and Reaction
ESPN 4:52 PM
Falcons part ways with veteran RB Jackson
Yahoo! Sports 5:26 PM
Atlanta Falcons cut RB Steven Jackson
Yahoo! Sports 5:36 PM
Falcons release veteran running back Steven Jackson