Comments
28,201 - 28,220 of 58,935 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29303 Nov 30, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Nana nana Bo Bo Miley
Hey Silver, we can call Mike's team the nana nana boo boo team or "honey boo boo" team. In the words of honey boo boo, they like to be "redneckanized" and that way Mike can get the recognition he so deserves!!!!
WACO 1909

Bryan, TX

#29304 Nov 30, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Silver, we can call Mike's team the nana nana boo boo team or "honey boo boo" team. In the words of honey boo boo, they like to be "redneckanized" and that way Mike can get the recognition he so deserves!!!!
I guess Mike doesn't want an"intellectual"deba te Bacon.If that's the case, what kind of a"debate"is he actually looking for?
WACO 1909

Bryan, TX

#29305 Nov 30, 2012
Bacon this is starting to get me a bit on the downside.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#29306 Nov 30, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>Hey Silver, we can call Mike's team the nana nana boo boo team or "honey boo boo" team. In the words of honey boo boo, they like to be "redneckanized" and that way Mike can get the recognition he so deserves!!!!
No doubt
WACO 1909

Bryan, TX

#29307 Nov 30, 2012
Emlu I just got back from the firing range, my cousin let me shoot his"Ed Brown" 1911........it don't get no better than that...as we say down here...the only person who can't shoot with that thing...is the sucker with the money to buy it....

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#29308 Nov 30, 2012
WACO 1909 wrote:
Emlu I just got back from the firing range, my cousin let me shoot his"Ed Brown" 1911........it don't get no better than that...as we say down here...the only person who can't shoot with that thing...is the sucker with the money to buy it....
Here here.
Mitt Romney

Wake Forest, NC

#29309 Nov 30, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Silver, we can call Mike's team the nana nana boo boo team or "honey boo boo" team. In the words of honey boo boo, they like to be "redneckanized" and that way Mike can get the recognition he so deserves!!!!
Wonderfully mature. No wonder I lost.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29310 Nov 30, 2012
Mitt Romney wrote:
<quoted text>
Wonderfully mature. No wonder I lost.
I'll put you down for the "honey boo boo" team. Who's going to be "honey bear" you or Mike?!?!:) Prepare to be "redneckonized"!!!! I think that was wonderfully put, don't you???
police state

Kenly, NC

#29312 Nov 30, 2012
Because republikans have spent the last four years being purposefully obstructive and it pretty much cost them the election. Their oath of office to the USA takes a back seat to Grover Norquist and tax breaks to the rich. There is no reason to believe they will work for solutions now because they could give a hoot in hell about the USA and its working class citizens. The republikan house congressmen are simply money whores for the rich.
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Why?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29313 Nov 30, 2012
police state wrote:
Because republikans have spent the last four years being purposefully obstructive and it pretty much cost them the election. Their oath of office to the USA takes a back seat to Grover Norquist and tax breaks to the rich. There is no reason to believe they will work for solutions now because they could give a hoot in hell about the USA and its working class citizens. The republikan house congressmen are simply money whores for the rich.
<quoted text>
TSF, I think I've asked you this before, would you be better satisfied with our government if only democrats were in charge? You've never had anything positive to say about the republican party and it seems if it were up to you we would just have a one party government. I believe your moniker is "police state", so wouldn't that be to your liking if we had only a one party government with democrats who aren't money whores because they're all penniless (wink wink) and know what it's like for people like you and me?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29314 Nov 30, 2012
police state wrote:
Because republikans have spent the last four years being purposefully obstructive and it pretty much cost them the election. Their oath of office to the USA takes a back seat to Grover Norquist and tax breaks to the rich. There is no reason to believe they will work for solutions now because they could give a hoot in hell about the USA and its working class citizens. The republikan house congressmen are simply money whores for the rich.
<quoted text>
TSF, looks like you may get your "police state"

http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2012/11/30/democr...

Looks like your beloved dems want to start leading the way. Of course before you take Hank's statements too seriously, remember, he is the dem representative that stated the island of Guam could tip over!!!:)
TSF

Kenly, NC

#29316 Nov 30, 2012
Animosity toward the party of corruption and Norquist tax breaks for the rich is not an endorsement of individual democratic corruption. Hank is certainly far too stupid to have been sent to congress. He probably graduated from the same college as Murdock and Todd Aiken.
I believe that political parties have become more important to some people than the USA itself and therin lies most of our problem.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#29317 Nov 30, 2012
Positive statement about republicans:
The republican party was ONCE a great party that was lead by men of principle who protected the best interests of our nation in their own way.
The republikan party of today consist of money whores whose only interest is protecting the pampered rich from having to pay their fair share of taxes. I submit as evidence Speaker of the House of Representatives of the United States of America , John Boehner handing out PAC checks on the house floor. That act alone speaks loudly and clearly.
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
TSF, I think I've asked you this before, would you be better satisfied with our government if only democrats were in charge? You've never had anything positive to say about the republican party and it seems if it were up to you we would just have a one party government. I believe your moniker is "police state", so wouldn't that be to your liking if we had only a one party government with democrats who aren't money whores because they're all penniless (wink wink) and know what it's like for people like you and me?
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

#29318 Nov 30, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Brainwashing them with what specifically?
Deny self-independence and to warship the state.
Dick

Lenoir, NC

#29319 Nov 30, 2012
TSF wrote:
Positive statement about republicans:
The republican party was ONCE a great party that was lead by men of principle who protected the best interests of our nation in their own way.
The republikan party of today consist of money whores whose only interest is protecting the pampered rich from having to pay their fair share of taxes. I submit as evidence Speaker of the House of Representatives of the United States of America , John Boehner handing out PAC checks on the house floor. That act alone speaks loudly and clearly.
<quoted text>
WTF do you know, Twinkie?
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

#29320 Nov 30, 2012
police state wrote:
Because republikans have spent the last four years being purposefully obstructive and it pretty much cost them the election. Their oath of office to the USA takes a back seat to Grover Norquist and tax breaks to the rich. There is no reason to believe they will work for solutions now because they could give a hoot in hell about the USA and its working class citizens. The republikan house congressmen are simply money whores for the rich.
<quoted text>
When did anyone in the Federal government give a dam about anyone but themselves?
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

#29321 Nov 30, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Bravo.
Yes Bravo, that is why the United Socialist Authority is so far down on the stupide list with other nations.
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

#29322 Nov 30, 2012
I like these words.They fit.
America's social policy, with its unending bureaucratic programs to "help" the poor, the needy, the children, the disabled, the disenfranchised that benefits the authoritarian ruling class at the expense of productive citizens is the direct result of the Democrat Party adopting and implementing the old Socialist Party of America platform along with its class warfare under the now unpopular name "liberalism."
But anyone who calls socialism "socialism" will be called unhinged, deranged or simply stupid because we're all expected to use the euphemistic code word "progressivism" and pretend it isn't socialism.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29323 Nov 30, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike, if you don't like the content of this forum, don't post on it anymore. Move on to one that will better serve your intellectual debating skills. No one is making you stay on here. Maybe you can find one with "teams".
Mike, I've said in the past, I spent my days doing criminal background searches on people and to err is human. I don't know if your name is Thomas, if there was a photograph I still wouldn't know if it was you and quite frankly, I don't care if it was you. Let it go if it's not you. If it wasn't you good, and if it was you and you did your time, good too.
You are right, I need to find a new thread. This one is dead.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29324 Nov 30, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
TSF, I think I've asked you this before, would you be better satisfied with our government if only democrats were in charge? You've never had anything positive to say about the republican party and it seems if it were up to you we would just have a one party government. I believe your moniker is "police state", so wouldn't that be to your liking if we had only a one party government with democrats who aren't money whores because they're all penniless (wink wink) and know what it's like for people like you and me?
I only think we need two parties because history shows one ruling party leads to draconian rule.
Balance is always needed, but this does not mean the republicans should just be obstructionists. Compromise is needed.

There are many people who are far to the left of myself, so the republican party keeps them from taking America to far to the left.
And for the same reasons, having just republicans running the show would lead to the same problems of extremism.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Duke Energy's paperless billing is rediculous 12 hr James Taylor 1
I Love Black Women (May '11) 12 hr Bill Robinson 239
Where to buy spice? 14 hr Blah 1
Are Southerners Stupid or do they just sound th... (Oct '08) 18 hr MichaelL 4,839
hCG Weight Loss Doctors in Charlotte, NC Fri Jamie27 2
scat Fri deandrehayes1 1
Belmont man's art exhibit captures mill era's d... Fri Belmont Resident 2
•••
•••
•••

Charlotte Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Charlotte People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Charlotte News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Charlotte
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••