Comments
28,081 - 28,100 of 55,803 Comments Last updated 16 min ago

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29176
Nov 27, 2012
 
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Got a stat to back that claim up? I am sure you do not. I am quite sure it is just your biased perception. Racists often have poor perception.
Obamacare, food stamps, welfare. Pick one.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29177
Nov 27, 2012
 
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So because I did not go to Jersey, I am a racist?
If you made that connection, sure.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29178
Nov 27, 2012
 
TSF wrote:
<quoted text>In the case of TSF, you are correct with the exception that my prejudice is against stupidity and ignorance rather than a race of people.
Still don't see you on ny or nj
NOT QUITE HERE

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29180
Nov 27, 2012
 
NOT QUITE HERE wrote:
<quoted text>I would like to add yours to my personal collection Mike>>>>>> >
www.borderlandbeat.com/2012/03/10-decapitated...
Why are you avoiding me Mike? Can't debate the subject with me? It's not worth losing your HEAD over or is it? I'm game!lol

“Anasasis Xenophontis.”

Since: Dec 08

over there.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29181
Nov 27, 2012
 
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Obamacare, food stamps, welfare. Pick one.
your so fking stupid I'm about to look this up. How the hell can you say that democrats are the only ones that receive these things? Drive to marion take a good long look at the lowerclass of that county, whiich are 99 percent white trash republican, and tell me whose the majority. Poor/rich republicans revieve more entitlements than anyone based on my personal experience alone. I know way more rich democrats than I do republicans and I'm in a red state. Spin that one corks.
NOT QUITE HERE

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29182
Nov 27, 2012
 
NOT QUITE HERE wrote:
Mike"debating"and or"argueing" with you never accomplishes anything but always leaves me feeling like all that has been done is to harden opinions and attitudes.In other words,make things worse.Things change, people change.Responding to you further would be fruitless, only serve to inflame emotions.I'll bet you can't wait to post a nice sarcastic counterpoint Michael Duquette.Don't waste your time.Our communication is at an end.
And by the way Michael Duquette, the guy in this photo must have really pissed off some psychopath on Topix. You've been doing that a lot lately haven't you Mike? I'm kind of feeling a little crazy Mike. Maybe you better watch your BACK!

www.everwonder.com/david/worldofdeath/acciden...

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29183
Nov 27, 2012
 
sevenSecrets wrote:
<quoted text>your so fking stupid I'm about to look this up. How the hell can you say that democrats are the only ones that receive these things? Drive to marion take a good long look at the lowerclass of that county, whiich are 99 percent white trash republican, and tell me whose the majority. Poor/rich republicans revieve more entitlements than anyone based on my personal experience alone. I know way more rich democrats than I do republicans and I'm in a red state. Spin that one corks.
Good, tax your rich democrat friends. Not all democrats take entitlments, but all who take entitlements are democrat.
TSF

Dunn, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29184
Nov 27, 2012
 
Correct. Don't hold you breath. I didn't see one of them or anyone else helping me after Hugo and my place was just as bad.
I believe in letting people help themselves. I just do not see giving royalty status to the rich by allowing them to pay a lower tax rate than I pay.
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Still don't see you on ny or nj
TSF

Dunn, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29185
Nov 27, 2012
 
You are so FOS. I hear pods of fat republikans bitching every day about socialism and half of them are are "on the draw" whether it would be social security, disability , veterans benefits, food stamps, unemployment, medicare, medicaid , reinvestment tax incentives, loopholes, subsidies, or prescription drug benefits. To a stupid a$$ed republikan, its only socalism when someone beside them get benefits.
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Good, tax your rich democrat friends. Not all democrats take entitlments, but all who take entitlements are democrat.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29186
Nov 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

TSF wrote:
<quoted text>Correct. Don't hold you breath. I didn't see one of them or anyone else helping me after Hugo and my place was just as bad.
I believe in letting people help themselves. I just do not see giving royalty status to the rich by allowing them to pay a lower tax rate than I pay.
Make more money and you could pay those same rates.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29187
Nov 27, 2012
 
TSF wrote:
<quoted text>You are so FOS. I hear pods of fat republikans bitching every day about socialism and half of them are are "on the draw" whether it would be social security, disability , veterans benefits, food stamps, unemployment, medicare, medicaid , reinvestment tax incentives, loopholes, subsidies, or prescription drug benefits. To a stupid a$$ed republikan, its only socalism when someone beside them get benefits.
And you're a self made millionaire?

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29188
Nov 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Yes it is personal information. Topix has rules. It does not say if the information is available to the public through snooping, it is ok to post it. The point of the Topix rule is to keep people from stalking. You are on the line of a stalker. Not to mention this is the legal definition of slander, as it is not even true, because it is not me, but someone with a 'similar' name. My name is not Thomas.
And it just really shows you cannot handle the heat of debate, so you resort to personal attacks. That is in low form.
You might wish to consult a lawyer.
You subject yourself to your own punishment when you put your own personal info on the Internet. IE facebook, myspace, twitter are just a few. Secondly, the link I posted is a matter of public record laws and rules, as maintained by the state of North Carolina Department of Corrections. Don't like the law or rules, move. Moreover, as I told you before, I study my adversaries. I research. Part of my job is doing backgrounds on people. I use all available legal means, including the Internet, to gather "intelligence" on someone, friend or foe. It helps when making decisions on whether or not, they are someone the firm wants to do business with or if it is someone they would rather avoid. Since Topix doesn't charge a fee, and I pay for my internet bill, I will continue to post in manner that suits me. Don't like be subject to persecution or ridicule for YOU putting YOUR personal info on the web, don't post it. All I did was let technology work for me.

Now, had I posted pedigree info, like SSN, phone numbers, addresses etc, then you and Topix would be well within your means to whine and cry.
TSF

Dunn, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29189
Nov 27, 2012
 
Your self admitted voyeurism certainly fits the description of a staker.
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
You subject yourself to your own punishment when you put your own personal info on the Internet. IE facebook, myspace, twitter are just a few. Secondly, the link I posted is a matter of public record laws and rules, as maintained by the state of North Carolina Department of Corrections. Don't like the law or rules, move. Moreover, as I told you before, I study my adversaries. I research. Part of my job is doing backgrounds on people. I use all available legal means, including the Internet, to gather "intelligence" on someone, friend or foe. It helps when making decisions on whether or not, they are someone the firm wants to do business with or if it is someone they would rather avoid. Since Topix doesn't charge a fee, and I pay for my internet bill, I will continue to post in manner that suits me. Don't like be subject to persecution or ridicule for YOU putting YOUR personal info on the web, don't post it. All I did was let technology work for me.
Now, had I posted pedigree info, like SSN, phone numbers, addresses etc, then you and Topix would be well within your means to whine and cry.
NOT QUITE HERE

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29190
Nov 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Mike that last poster was one of the local jerks.It wasn't me.I don't do violence to other people.Just myself.....since the punk is hiding behind"not quite here"my guess is the little Bitch doesn't have enough guts to bother you for real.Making threats on Topix is bad enough...using my moniker just makes it worse.
NOT QUITE HERE

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29191
Nov 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Mike we have three fake posts in my name thus far.GUESS someone wants to kill two birds with one stone.Mike in all the time I've been on Topix I've never posted a"link".Period.The dirty little coward who did this vile crap is too scared to do it on his own.
WACO 1909

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29192
Nov 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Well Mike these scum on Topix can have it.You can contact me if you like.
WACO 1909

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29193
Nov 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Silvercoast one final thing. Its not necessary to take everything to the"MAX".That's....T HE TRUTH!

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29194
Nov 27, 2012
 
TSF wrote:
Your self admitted voyeurism certainly fits the description of a staker.
<quoted text>
Once again and as usual, you're wrong.

Check out NC Generl Statutes.

14&#8209;277.3.&#65533 ; Stalking.

(a)&#65533;&#65533; &#65533;&#65533;&# 65533;&#65533; Offense. &#65533; A person commits the offense of stalking if the person willfully on more than one occasion follows or is in the presence of, or otherwise harasses, another person without legal purpose and with the intent to do any of the following:

(1)&#65533;&#65533; &#65533;&#65533;&# 65533;&#65533; Place that person in reasonable fear either for the person's safety or the safety of the person's immediate family or close personal associates.

(2)&#65533;&#65533; &#65533;&#65533;&# 65533;&#65533; Cause that person to suffer substantial emotional distress by placing that person in fear of death, bodily injury, or continued harassment, and that in fact causes that person substantial emotional distress.

(b)&#65533;&#65533; &#65533;&#65533;&# 65533;&#65533; Classification. &#65533; A violation of this section is a Class A1 misdemeanor. A person convicted of a Class A1 misdemeanor under this section, who is sentenced to a community punishment, shall be placed on supervised probation in addition to any other punishment imposed by the court. A person who commits the offense of stalking when there is a court order in effect prohibiting similar behavior by that person is guilty of a Class H felony. A person who commits the offense of stalking after having been previously convicted of a stalking offense is guilty of a Class F felony.

(c)&#65533;&#65533; &#65533;&#65533;&# 65533;&#65533; Definition. &#65533; For the purposes of this section, the term "harasses" or "harassment" means knowing conduct, including written or printed communication or transmission, telephone or cellular or other wireless telephonic communication, facsimile transmission, pager messages or transmissions, answering machine or voice mail messages or transmissions, and electronic mail messages or other computerized or electronic transmissions, directed at a specific person that torments, terrorizes, or terrifies that person and that serves no legitimate purpose.(1991 (Reg. Sess., 1992), c. 804, s. 1; 1993, c. 539, s. 173; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 1997&#8209;306, s. 1; 2001&#8209;518, s. 1; 2003&#8209;181, s. 1.)

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29195
Nov 27, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

TSF wrote:
Your self admitted voyeurism certainly fits the description of a staker.
<quoted text>
And it does not fall underneath the cyberstalking umbrella...

North Carolina
Last updated: September 4, 2011

S 14-196.3
Cyberstalking

The following definitions apply in this section:
Electronic communication.- Any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature, transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, computer, electromagnetic, photoelectric, or photo-optical system.
Electronic mail.- The transmission of information or communication by the use of the Internet, a computer, a facsimile machine, a pager, a cellular telephone, a video recorder, or other electronic means sent to a person identified by a unique address or address number and received by that person.
It is unlawful for a person to:
Use in electronic mail or electronic communication any words or language threatening to inflict bodily harm to any person or to that person's child, sibling, spouse, or dependent, or physical injury to the property of any person, or for the purpose of extorting money or other things of value from any person.
Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another repeatedly, whether or not conversation ensues, for the purpose of abusing, annoying, threatening, terrifying, harassing, or embarrassing any person.
Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another and to knowingly make any false statement concerning death, injury, illness, disfigurement, indecent conduct, or criminal conduct of the person electronically mailed or of any member of the person's family or household with the intent to abuse, annoy, threaten, terrify, harass, or embarrass.
Knowingly permit an electronic communication device under the person's control to be used for any purpose prohibited by this section.
Any offense under this section committed by the use of electronic mail or electronic communication may be deemed to have been committed where the electronic mail or electronic communication was originally sent, originally received in this State, or first viewed by any person in this State.
Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor.
This section does not apply to any peaceable, nonviolent, or nonthreatening activity intended to express political views or to provide lawful information to others. This section shall not be construed to impair any constitutionally protected activity, including speech, protest, or assembly.(2000-125, s. 1; 2000-140, s. 91.)
Gunter

Hamburg, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29197
Nov 27, 2012
 
NOT QUITE HERE wrote:
<quoted text>And by the way Michael Duquette, the guy in this photo must have really pissed off some psychopath on Topix. You've been doing that a lot lately haven't you Mike? I'm kind of feeling a little crazy Mike. Maybe you better watch your BACK!
www.everwonder.com/david/worldofdeath/acciden...
This is not a good thing to promote anywhere. If you can't resolve ineffectual debates then cease the agenda. You can't debate a topic with no substance. Maybe you need to debate your problem with a psychiatrist.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

17 Users are viewing the Charlotte Forum right now

Search the Charlotte Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Why are Southerners rude in action, but pretend... (Jan '13) 4 hr I Hate Syracuse 227
Belmont poised to extend bike trails at Rocky B... Tue JLo 2
Dog food and meds Tue bulldog 2
Are Southerners Stupid or do they just sound th... (Oct '08) Tue Timmy_ 4,826
Pastor accused of abuse (Mar '12) Tue Concerned 8
Welcome To The End Of The World Tue WebPreach 1
Trolls posting "Southerner" threads Jul 21 north 1
•••
•••
•••
•••

Charlotte Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Charlotte People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Charlotte News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Charlotte
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••