Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
NOT QUITE HERE

United States

#29152 Nov 26, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry, hard to be nice to the KKK. I see you failed to condemn the rule breaking of your new pal. I see you justified the rule breaking your pal did.
How ironic of you both.
Silvercoast and I agree on few things.I myself would not have given out your personal info.Of course, every time you get pissed at me you bring up the"mental"angle.Is that right? I brought it up myself so people would not throw it in my face.Didn't slow you down a bit.If its not you, then how can it be your personal info? But, let's make it official.I"condemn"a ny violation off personal info by posting it on Topix.Mike if you were more observant you would know that Silvercoast only accepts friends who share his personal political and/or moral views.I admire his relationship with his wife and family.I admire his brutal honesty.Because of his racial views you hate everything about him.You are shortsighted.If you weren't so myopic you would know that the caricature you have of Silvercoast is pathetically inaccurate.Mike if you want to be an enemy of Silvercoast that's fine.Don't expect Silvercoast to play by the"rules".Not the rules of Topix in any event.En Garde!
NOT QUITE HERE

United States

#29153 Nov 26, 2012
Ok mike I officially"condemned " the release of personal info on Topix.I also believe there is a record on Topix of my response to the use of the word"halfbreed". Remember i'm not a liberal Mike.I'm a moderate.There IS a difference.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29154 Nov 27, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
And you AZ, seven and TSF are as prejudice as I am. Republicans who are well off. Haven't seen any of you guys strike off to go help hurricane relief efforts in New Jersey like good little democrat socialist. Thought democrats were all about helping the common man and those who were less fortunate?
And I am the asshole? Ha.
Please explain in some detail how I am as prejudice as you are?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29155 Nov 27, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Not personal when it is public record.
Yes it is personal information. Topix has rules. It does not say if the information is available to the public through snooping, it is ok to post it. The point of the Topix rule is to keep people from stalking. You are on the line of a stalker. Not to mention this is the legal definition of slander, as it is not even true, because it is not me, but someone with a 'similar' name. My name is not Thomas.
And it just really shows you cannot handle the heat of debate, so you resort to personal attacks. That is in low form.
You might wish to consult a lawyer.
Taxpayer

Rougemont, NC

#29157 Nov 27, 2012
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
Worked in a grocery store in high school, in a mill while paying for my own college education, and have worked in education full time for 35 years....all the while not taking one dime from the government...Yea, Taxpayer, I am one hell of a freeloader. You just judge and don't know shit about what you are talking about in your paranoid little world.
So are you one of the overpaid state employees that is wasting my tax money and then asking for more? You and people like you have taken millions from the government and returned nothing.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29158 Nov 27, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Ok, so just what does it say about reverse racism? You have yet to show me why I should read it. I understand reverse racism exists. I have said this many times here. So why would I need to read this book on it? Just what is it going to convince me of that I do not already know?
I have never read a book because someone told me to do so, but could not articulate why I should read it, and I likely never will. So if you want me to read it, articulate a thought more so than 'reverse racism'.
Mike, I've never read any posts from you about reverse racism or its existence, so how am I suppose to know what you already know about the subject? Is that the best you have? You think I should know your thoughts about a subject and you get all pissy when I don't and won't read a book I suggest? Forget you, you're too lazy intellectually and your underwhelming excuses for not reading are pathetic.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29159 Nov 27, 2012
NOT QUITE HERE wrote:
<quoted text> Silvercoast and I agree on few things.I myself would not have given out your personal info.Of course, every time you get pissed at me you bring up the"mental"angle.Is that right? I brought it up myself so people would not throw it in my face.Didn't slow you down a bit.If its not you, then how can it be your personal info? But, let's make it official.I"condemn"a ny violation off personal info by posting it on Topix.Mike if you were more observant you would know that Silvercoast only accepts friends who share his personal political and/or moral views.I admire his relationship with his wife and family.I admire his brutal honesty.Because of his racial views you hate everything about him.You are shortsighted.If you weren't so myopic you would know that the caricature you have of Silvercoast is pathetically inaccurate.Mike if you want to be an enemy of Silvercoast that's fine.Don't expect Silvercoast to play by the"rules".Not the rules of Topix in any event.En Garde!
You did not actually condemn what Silver did.
And I hate Silver because of so many things, besides his racism.

Just because he posted someone else' record, does not mean he was not trying to post personal information about me.

I do not make fun of your illness, I just point it out when appropriate. Like when you make violent threats. Of course you take half the things I post incorrectly. Very typical of the conservative posters here.

So I see your criteria of friends. You are fine with how poorly they treat others, as long as it is consistent and they must treat family well.
Sorry, but that is just sad morality.
Silver openly discriminates.
Would Hitler be your pal if he treated family well? Hitler was consistent. Seems he meets your criteria.

Clearly you are on this tread to find pals instead of debating issues. You actually said something to this effect at one time as I recall. So I am assuming you are so friendly to Silver and Bacon because you are just befriending them.

I am not here to make friends. I am here to honestly debate issues that are important to me. Brutal honesty is not that conducive to making friends. That is why I debate here and get it out of my system, instead of pissing off my actual friends.

So when you say some stupid thing, I am going to call it out, no matter if you are a Democrat or a republican.
Note, Silver has openly stated he protects his team. Not exactly being honest, or being of integrity. But again, I see your standards are low.

My prediction still holds true, not a single conservative has condemned Silver for violating Topix rules.
Waco, you are to conservative for me. I do recall you said you have many conservative views. So I suppose you and Silver have some things in common. One of them is attacking the person instead of debating the issue.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29160 Nov 27, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike, I've never read any posts from you about reverse racism or its existence, so how am I suppose to know what you already know about the subject? Is that the best you have? You think I should know your thoughts about a subject and you get all pissy when I don't and won't read a book I suggest? Forget you, you're too lazy intellectually and your underwhelming excuses for not reading are pathetic.
I wonder if you even read the book you are pushing. You seem unable to say more about it other than it addresses reverse racism.
I looked it up and it sounds as if that is not the main topic. Sounds as if normal racism is the main topic. But who knows? You refuse to say, and I am not going to read it until you surmise it enough to show why I should be motivated to read it.
I get pissy because you and all conservatives here refuse to actually debate any substance. You post a book for your argument instead of arguing the point.
You see, I come to Topix to debate the posters, not the books they recommend.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29161 Nov 27, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
I also haven't see you sign up to move a few economically challenged blacks in with you miley. What's a matter, racist or something?
Again, that is a stupid straw man argument. It is not what I propose for solutions, so why do you expect me to do this? Actually, it is more like what republicans propose, so why are you not doing it?
Republicans keep saying, let individual altruism be the mechanism for helping the poor and needy. The democrats say let government help.
Of course democrats do not suggest individuals not help, but it is not the main solution to the problem.

BTW, you have not seen what I do, nor do you know what I do. Your continual guesses are almost always wrong.
Debate the issue, if you can. So far, it looks as if you have no argument so you resort to personal attacks. I guess I win by default.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29162 Nov 27, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike, I've never read any posts from you about reverse racism or its existence, so how am I suppose to know what you already know about the subject? Is that the best you have? You think I should know your thoughts about a subject and you get all pissy when I don't and won't read a book I suggest? Forget you, you're too lazy intellectually and your underwhelming excuses for not reading are pathetic.
Have not read my points on reverse racism? No surprise, as you often miss half of what I actually say, and usually debate what you wish me to say instead of what I actually say. Maybe you should get tested for dyslexia.
I am pretty sure I spoke on it just yesterday, but I will repeat myself.
I acknowledge there is reverse racism. I feel much of it is due to the massive racism the minority gets first, but two wrongs do not make a right.
I continually hear from the right wingers that they are racist due to reverse racism. So they are claiming they are racist for the same reasons that reverse racism is likely. So I suppose racism will keep chasing this tail.

Racism is racism. It is wrong no matter who is the racist.
You are wrong for your racism.
I understand your racism stems from your interpretation of the bible. And yet you feel your blind faith is harmless. Yet you feel your blind beliefs are none of my business.
Well I think it is my business, because it causes your racism. Racism is always harmful, no matter if you take note of it or not. I am aware you feel your racism is harmless. That is typical ignorance.

If you god condones racism, or encourages racism, it is just more evidence your god is immoral. Just seems to me, a god would be more moral than all humans. So when the god of the bible is overtly immoral, it is proof to me the god is of myth and of mans imagination.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29163 Nov 27, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
So are you one of the overpaid state employees that is wasting my tax money and then asking for more? You and people like you have taken millions from the government and returned nothing.
Oh look, another republican who is against public education.

It was just one or two weeks ago all the republicans whined about me stating how republicans are against public education. They claimed it was not true. Thanks for evidence my statement is true.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29164 Nov 27, 2012
NOT QUITE HERE wrote:
Ok mike I officially"condemned " the release of personal info on Topix.I also believe there is a record on Topix of my response to the use of the word"halfbreed". Remember i'm not a liberal Mike.I'm a moderate.There IS a difference.
You have yet to acknowledge Silver tried to do this and did not thus condemn him.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29165 Nov 27, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I wonder if you even read the book you are pushing. You seem unable to say more about it other than it addresses reverse racism.
I looked it up and it sounds as if that is not the main topic. Sounds as if normal racism is the main topic. But who knows? You refuse to say, and I am not going to read it until you surmise it enough to show why I should be motivated to read it.
I get pissy because you and all conservatives here refuse to actually debate any substance. You post a book for your argument instead of arguing the point.
You see, I come to Topix to debate the posters, not the books they recommend.
Mike, the online summaries really don't tell the full story, but you did look to make sure you wouldn't read it, so don't. Settled.

Mike, you don't come to Topix to debate, you come to Topix to argue. I think you have a twisted addiction to arguing and it sounds more socially acceptable to say "I like to debate" rather than "I like to argue." Whatever floats your boat.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29166 Nov 27, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Democrats are the entitlement benefactors.
Got a stat to back that claim up? I am sure you do not. I am quite sure it is just your biased perception. Racists often have poor perception.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29167 Nov 27, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike, the online summaries really don't tell the full story, but you did look to make sure you wouldn't read it, so don't. Settled.
Mike, you don't come to Topix to debate, you come to Topix to argue. I think you have a twisted addiction to arguing and it sounds more socially acceptable to say "I like to debate" rather than "I like to argue." Whatever floats your boat.
The sort description of the book I read made the book sound much more fun to read than anything you said. Again, tell me why I need to read this book?

Someone on Topix likes to debate or argue? Crazy. Do you also condemn people for eating turkey and stuffing on thanksgiving?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29168 Nov 27, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
And you AZ, seven and TSF are as prejudice as I am. Republicans who are well off. Haven't seen any of you guys strike off to go help hurricane relief efforts in New Jersey like good little democrat socialist. Thought democrats were all about helping the common man and those who were less fortunate?
And I am the asshole? Ha.
So because I did not go to Jersey, I am a racist?
NOT QUITE HERE

United States

#29169 Nov 27, 2012
Mike I will always be"too conservative"for you.You seem to think conservatives are"bad".People are more complicated than that.To me Mike it will always be sad that you and I can't get along better.I'm not unaware of your good qualities.But you see things in black and white.I'll not play the insult game with you anymore Mike Duquette.I'm going to remember how you like music, instead of how you misapprehend half the things I've said to you. Quite assuming the worst about me Mike.I'm going to do the same for you.Yes folks, I support OBAMA, and I like Silvercoast.Ironic is it not?
TSF

Fayetteville, NC

#29170 Nov 27, 2012
The tax breaks to the rich republikans are opposing a tax break for middle clss workers. That middle class working republikans would fight to raise their own taxes and give the rich a free ride defies logic. But then ,republikans have never been accused of being logical.
TSF

Fayetteville, NC

#29171 Nov 27, 2012
In the case of TSF, you are correct with the exception that my prejudice is against stupidity and ignorance rather than a race of people.
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
And you AZ, seven and TSF are as prejudice as I am. Republicans who are well off. Haven't seen any of you guys strike off to go help hurricane relief efforts in New Jersey like good little democrat socialist. Thought democrats were all about helping the common man and those who were less fortunate?
And I am the asshole? Ha.
NOT QUITE HERE

United States

#29172 Nov 27, 2012
Mike"debating"and or"argueing" with you never accomplishes anything but always leaves me feeling like all that has been done is to harden opinions and attitudes.In other words,make things worse.Things change, people change.Responding to you further would be fruitless, only serve to inflame emotions.I'll bet you can't wait to post a nice sarcastic counterpoint Michael Duquette.Don't waste your time.Our communication is at an end.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Police in riot-hit Charlotte say shooting victi... 20 min Ronald 675
He should of stopped and held his hands up 56 min Blm 31
News Keith Scott's wife has filed multiple restraini... 1 hr Animal blacks 9
Charlotte Chimps Out 2 hr Travler 150
Indian Trail 2 hr Africa 5
Latest Chimp Out ➡ El Cajon (San Diego a... 3 hr loot and scoot 2
Epicenter Beating 4 hr BLM 6

Charlotte Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Charlotte Mortgages