Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Vote”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#25865 Oct 29, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a lie.
Yeah....like all your crap is true.
Allen

Robbins, NC

#25866 Oct 29, 2012
Allen wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you bacon and I do owe apology for my previous post. It was truly in bad taste. Sometimes I have to laugh just to keep from crying. Our kids used to be able to skip down the street, now they can't skip for having to look over their shoulders. Sad.


"Bacon":)

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25867 Oct 29, 2012
Allen wrote:
<quoted text>
Emlu, could'nt help but think of you as I pulled out Grandma's old oil lamp:) I am just south of Asheville, winds have been 60-65 mph. Went to the grocery store, the wind had picked up the buggy corrals and tossed them like tumble weeds. About 1500 here without power. Hope all of you are safe from harms way. My prayers go out to all in this storms path. This one is likely to make history!
Allen and Emlu, you guys stay safe. Looks like the ski resorts are getting an early and hopefully prosperous early snow. Keep us updated on the conditions for you guys.
Allen

Robbins, NC

#25868 Oct 29, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Allen and Emlu, you guys stay safe. Looks like the ski resorts are getting an early and hopefully prosperous early snow. Keep us updated on the conditions for you guys.
Will do Bacon, you too. Ski outlook good, airlines probably stand to suffer at least three or four days! Some may even be stranded until the weekend.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25869 Oct 29, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Cop out response.
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>In 06, the economy was not in the shitter yet. So Obama was speaking to why republicans were spending so much in the good times, and not saving for the hard times.
So if the republicans had saved in the good times, Obama could have spent in the hard times to keep the economy stable and yet keep the debt low.
So if Bush would've spent the money on the debt during the "good times", it would've allowed Obama to spend the money on other things. News flash, the United States has continuously held a public debt since the US Constitution legally went into effect on March 4, 1789. That being said, although the govt has a debt problem, more importantly, THE GOVT HAS A SPENDING PROBLEM!
So under your philosophy, when you pay out (debt) more than you take in (income), it's ok to still spend money that you don't have on frivolous things and eventually you'll pay off your debt? You can call it what you want, I call it bullshit!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25870 Oct 29, 2012
TSF wrote:
You demonstrate your ignorance in your belief that presidents can aurhorize spending or borrowing. Congress is responsible for all expenditures through departmental budgets. It is true that the National debt increased over 100% during the presidency of Dubya Bush, but it wasn't Bush that did that. It was congress. It is true that the national debt has increased 50% during the presidency of Obama, but Obama didnt do that either . It was congress. Congress passes the laws, authorizes spending and borrowing and has to authorize raising the debt limit.
<quoted text>
The buck stops at the White House! The President has the power to sign a bill into law or to veto.
Of Bush's eight years in office, the majority of his spending, minus the wars, were in the last two years of his second term....when the democrats controlled congress. Yes, he could've vetoed but he didn't. Why, who knows.
Why is it with you libs, when a Republican is in power, it's their fault but when a democrat is in power, it's congresses fault?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#25871 Oct 29, 2012
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>So if Bush would've spent the money on the debt during the "good times", it would've allowed Obama to spend the money on other things. News flash, the United States has continuously held a public debt since the US Constitution legally went into effect on March 4, 1789. That being said, although the govt has a debt problem, more importantly, THE GOVT HAS A SPENDING PROBLEM!
So under your philosophy, when you pay out (debt) more than you take in (income), it's ok to still spend money that you don't have on frivolous things and eventually you'll pay off your debt? You can call it what you want, I call it bullshit!
You are stupid.......Bush spent 2 trillion outside of the country on wars..ON CREDIT!!! When the most important resource....PEOPLE...are forgotton....a nation falls in decline. We are such a nation TOOOOOLLL...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25872 Oct 29, 2012
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text> I think this outsourcing of Sensata Technologies, smacks of greed...Over $500,000 in one quarters profit this year, yet still scheduled for China...Imagine a 180 employee plant, clearing over $2 million annually, but it's not enough? Those are some hungry stockholders....
How many stockholders are there of Sensata Technologies stock? Again, who are you to determine how much is to much for these stockholders? If you were a stockholder and this stock was part of your 401 portfolio, wouldn't you want as much profit as possible? Like Mitt pointed out to Obama in one of the debates, we all have stock in a company in China whether you know it or not.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25873 Oct 29, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
My bad Mike, I actually thought you had read the origin of why I posted the site. I'm sorry for assuming you had read why I had posted the site, but as usual you didn't and it's my fault. Does this blame game thing work well for you in the real world?
Bacon, now you know Mike requires us to provide a link in order to prove our facts. Then you must tell him what the link says. Then you must tell him what to look for in the link and how it relates to your point. Then, and only then, is when he MIGHT read your post and link. If you don't follow these three easy steps then your post is invalid!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25874 Oct 29, 2012
Allen wrote:
<quoted text>
Emlu, could'nt help but think of you as I pulled out Grandma's old oil lamp:) I am just south of Asheville, winds have been 60-65 mph. Went to the grocery store, the wind had picked up the buggy corrals and tossed them like tumble weeds. About 1500 here without power. Hope all of you are safe from harms way. My prayers go out to all in this storms path. This one is likely to make history!
I had to run up to Hendersonville this morning on buisness. I will agree, the wind on Saluda and the Green River Gorge was no joke! All I could do to keep the ole F-350 dually on the road!

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#25875 Oct 29, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Did that happen in Massachusetts? Nope, so why do you think it will happen now?
If you wish to see the results of Obama care, just look at the results of Romney care in Massachusetts.
Clearly you do not know how to look at history and learn from it. Common for republicans.
Make sure you are clear Mike. The house and senate of Mass was all democrat with Romney being the only repub. Romney veto'd quite a bit from the left with them only to override his veto.

That is how well it is working in Doucheachusetts.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#25876 Oct 29, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>There is no nation state that will surrender in the war on terror.
But in the case of Iraq, it is not so much about terrorism, but insurgents. Not exactly the same.
The failed strategy of attack Bush had in Iraq, created an insurgency right off the bat and thus it flourished to numbers that could not be eradicated.
Bush was told by some high level advisers to send more troops at first. He ignored the advisers. As you would say, Bush was in charge.
And as with any dynamic situation, strategy and tactics change to meet the needs. You do know we won the Iraq war, right?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25877 Oct 29, 2012
Allen wrote:
<quoted text>
Whether or not I beleive that abortion is murder is irrelevant. I did see part of the interview with Mourdock when he was ask about the rape of a 13 year old girl. It is very evident to me where he stands. We all know that rape is an act of violence. Rape is not God's will, we were given freewill. Barrbaric as it may sound but, hanging is to good for a bastard like that. How the hell could we possilbly ask that a 13 year old child become a mother after being violated in such a way?
What could we expect a young female's outlook to be on marriage, sex and family after such a traumatic experience?
Pro I seek feedback from you most of all because you have stated that you have three daughters!
I agree with Bacon, there would be one less scumbag allowed to breath on the taxpayer's dime! As far as my opinion on abortion, that's another topic completely.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#25878 Oct 29, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>OK I guess if you do not allow employees any vacation or holiday time ever, that would add up. I see you failed to dispute any of my points.
Well there is your first mistake. If you are an owner of a business, it has to remain that. Business. Trying to introduce the human element into business decisions is a mistake because it detracts from the primary goal. Profit.

"And again, I would love to see a statistic that shows your claim of workers refusing to work more hours."

You answered this question yourself with your above posting.

"Working someone more than that does not increase profits. Overtime cost the business more, not less."

The cost of goods sold includes labor costs. If a company increases production, it will incur other costs such as overtime for its current workers, as well as a cost to hire and train additional workers. The cost of each additional worker is higher than the cost of the company's current workers. Additional workers may get in the way of the current workers, reducing productivity. In laymon's terms, your staff has to be efficient and an increase of staff detracts from profits and revenue. Overtime is factored in but you can do more with less, given your employees are efficient and effective. If they are not, fire fire fire.

"quoted text>2080? What is that number from or for? Last I checked, a forty hour work week was the norm. Working someone more than that does not increase profits. Overtime cost the business more, not less.
And if you do find a way to explain working more hours increases profit, why is that good for America? Profit for a company if earned on decreasing money for workers does not equate to an increase of the economy. Workers spending money can increase the economy.
And again, I would love to see a statistic that shows your claim of workers refusing to work more hours.
I would like to see more money spent on education and sciences."
Robert B

Rathdrum, ID

#25879 Oct 29, 2012
Who ever brings work back to the us.
And its not Romney he is just another
Friend of NAFTA.Tsf like the rape nut idea
You would have to the hole republican
Party on the box.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#25880 Oct 29, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Was that the result in Massachusetts? Nope.
Many businesses already give health insurance. It pretty much comes out of the wages of the worker anyway. It makes for good business. That is why they do it without being forced.
True, the employee isn't forced, but his employer is. Unwise choice. The employer signs the paychecks. The employer hires and fires.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#25881 Oct 29, 2012
TSF wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what is the connection in your mind between diversity and outsourcing jobs?
<quoted text>
Oh come on man. What couldn't be more diverse than an American company creating jobs at a plant in Mexico or China or India to keep employee wages down and avoid the taxes back to America. That is just business. And in business you turn a profit for the stockholders and investors, not the employees.

Why am I telling you this, you already know it is about profit and revenue. Because your employees get what you get in the form of benefits. Just not the pay, right?

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#25882 Oct 29, 2012
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text> How many stockholders are there of Sensata Technologies stock? Again, who are you to determine how much is to much for these stockholders? If you were a stockholder and this stock was part of your 401 portfolio, wouldn't you want as much profit as possible? Like Mitt pointed out to Obama in one of the debates, we all have stock in a company in China whether you know it or not.
Obama and Biden all have private investments or problematic issues that the media dare not bring up because of leftist bias.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ready-hes-not...

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolu...

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#25883 Oct 29, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama and Biden all have private investments or problematic issues that the media dare not bring up because of leftist bias.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ready-hes-not...
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolu...
Iran or the Comunists have it right TOOL...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25884 Oct 29, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Well there is your first mistake. If you are an owner of a business, it has to remain that. Business. Trying to introduce the human element into business decisions is a mistake because it detracts from the primary goal. Profit.

The cost of goods sold includes labor costs. If a company increases production, it will incur other costs such as overtime for its current workers, as well as a cost to hire and train additional workers. The cost of each additional worker is higher than the cost of the company's current workers. Additional workers may get in the way of the current workers, reducing productivity. In laymon's terms, your staff has to be efficient and an increase of staff detracts from profits and revenue. Overtime is factored in but you can do more with less, given your employees are efficient and effective. If they are not, fire fire fire.
I couldn't agree more. I didn't start a buisness to make friends, provide others with jobs, to put food on others tables, etc....it was to make money! The rest are byproducts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
35 mph 7 hr PO PO 2
Ugly Building Downtown 10 hr Really 4
Where is Boy . 13 hr Fred Herbert 4
What's going on at Sammys (Mar '10) Thu ohplease 18
I have subs for anyone in need of help. (Jun '15) Thu IndianTrail75 2
Need a plug Jun 21 Smacked 7
News Suspect in hit-and-run was found at work (Jul '07) Jun 20 LawAndOrder611 35

Charlotte Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Charlotte Mortgages