Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25520 Oct 26, 2012
Obama's new controversial ad

&fe ature=youtube_gdata_player

I can remember the first time Obama screwed me.........he needed a stimulus package!
Answers

Gastonia, NC

#25521 Oct 26, 2012
4 simple questions that should make us think before we vote in November.

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time?

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right ? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in " Kenya , East Africa". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya

3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home," respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978? http://http/www.kapiolani.org/ women-and-children/about-us/de fault.aspx ;

Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media ?

4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when he was born. That should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936-if my math holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!!!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals-to verify that WWII was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9.

Is it just me, or does anyone else see something in this that isn't disturbing?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25522 Oct 26, 2012
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text> Thank you AZ, I stand corrected. The article I read at nymag.com made it appear as if it were the same interview. None the less, he went on to say.... Are you saying people aren't allowed to admit when they're wrong?
<quoted text> Silence everyone? I think the recent polls show differently.
Certainly we have all done wrong, but sometimes people only admit they were wrong when they have been admonished by the boss. I don't know, but I bet Boss Romney got on Sununu's ass and demanded he make a retraction. Doesn't that seem logical to you?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25523 Oct 26, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Arnold, here's just a little sampling:
http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/07/05/welfare...
Oh, I agree with you 100% in that those on government assistance should not be purchasing tobacco and alcohol with food stamps. I also think that large corporate executives who receive huge subsidies from the government should not be taking extravagant vacations costing hundreds of thousands on the government dime either. Would you agree with that assessment? The abuse goes both ways.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25524 Oct 26, 2012
Answers wrote:
4 simple questions that should make us think before we vote in November.
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right ? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in " Kenya , East Africa". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home," respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978? http://http/www.kapiolani.org/ women-and-children/about-us/de fault.aspx ;
Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media ?
4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when he was born. That should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936-if my math holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!!!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals-to verify that WWII was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9.
Is it just me, or does anyone else see something in this that isn't disturbing?
I think he was really born in South Carolina and is the illegitimate son of Strom Thurmond. But, that's just a hunch.
Waco 1909

League City, TX

#25525 Oct 26, 2012
Answers wrote:
4 simple questions that should make us think before we vote in November.
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right ? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in " Kenya , East Africa". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home," respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978? http://http/www.kapiolani.org/ women-and-children/about-us/de fault.aspx ;
Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media ?
4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when he was born. That should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936-if my math holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!!!) Now we need a non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the author's goals-to verify that WWII was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9.
Is it just me, or does anyone else see something in this that isn't disturbing?
oh give it up LOSER! ROMNEYS'certain to win anyway mr. paranoid! What a psycho! what a complete and utter imbecile!(with all due respect).
Answers

Gastonia, NC

#25526 Oct 26, 2012
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
Certainly we have all done wrong, but sometimes people only admit they were wrong when they have been admonished by the boss. I don't know, but I bet Boss Romney got on Sununu's ass and demanded he make a retraction. Doesn't that seem logical to you?
To think I admitted fault because I was admonished by the boss, you, then no, that wouldn't be logical. As far as Sununu and Romney, it's possible, but I can't speak for either.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#25527 Oct 26, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text> I would hardly call a National Security Adviser or a Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, just a military adviser.
"The Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) is a body of senior uniformed leaders in the United States Department of Defense who advise the Secretary of Defense, the Homeland Security Council, the National Security Council and the President on military matters.
Following the Goldwater-Nichols Act in 1986 the Joint Chiefs of Staff do not have operational command authority, neither individually nor collectively, as the chain of command goes from the President to the Secretary of Defense, and from the Secretary of Defense to the Commanders of the Combatant Commands. Goldwater-Nichols also created the office of Vice Chairman, and the Chairman is now designated as the principal military adviser to the Secretary of Defense, the Homeland Security Council, the National Security Council and to the President."

Just so we are all clear on what exactly the Joint Chiefs do. Key words for you to pay attention to is NO OPERATIONAL COMMAND AUTHORITY. Which means, they are in charge of jack shit and are solely act in advisory capacity respectively.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#25528 Oct 26, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike, all the above is your opinion and you can argue it all you wish. The military isn't the problem in our country right now, the economy is. Do you know of any experience Mr. Powell has in that area? Either way, his endorsement matters little to me.
I think all the democrats seem to forget that Obama had limited foreign policy experience when he took office in 2009. Obama has gained all his foreign policy on the job and as a result of being ineffective as a leader there has been a lack of a responsible propotional response to the attacks on American sovereignty in Lybia. Should I remind you Mike, there was mainstream media embedded with our troops when we went into Afghanistan and Iraq? So, where is the documented response to the attacks on our consulate in Benghazi? Oh that's right, there hasn't been any.

The evidence is mounting against Obama and team. And it doesn't matter which cabinet members fall on their sword. Obama is the commander in chief and the loss of American lives falls squarely on his shoulders as did 9/11 for Bush. Former president Bush declared war on terrorism, not just Afghanistan or Iraq. We are still fighting that battle today as we have seen in Benghazi.

True Mike, I am not in charge and I wasn't there. But I am a vote and I disagree with Obama's inaction and lack of leadership on how he handled the Benghazi terrorist attack just as much as I disagree with Powell's perspective and opinion on Obama.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25529 Oct 26, 2012
Answers wrote:
<quoted text> To think I admitted fault because I was admonished by the boss, you, then no, that wouldn't be logical. As far as Sununu and Romney, it's possible, but I can't speak for either.
And of course, neither can I speak for Romney and Sununu, but isn't is strange that Sununu would make another statement within hours of the show that looks to be backpeddling and to 'clear the air' so to speak? What would motivate him to do that if he weren't getting a negative reaction from the boss?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#25530 Oct 26, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Bill learned how wonderful Obama is over the past four years.
Obama will win, bet all of your money on him. Romney changes positions weekly. TOOL

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25531 Oct 26, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
I think all the democrats seem to forget that Obama had limited foreign policy experience when he took office in 2009. Obama has gained all his foreign policy on the job and as a result of being ineffective as a leader there has been a lack of a responsible propotional response to the attacks on American sovereignty in Lybia. Should I remind you Mike, there was mainstream media embedded with our troops when we went into Afghanistan and Iraq? So, where is the documented response to the attacks on our consulate in Benghazi? Oh that's right, there hasn't been any.
The evidence is mounting against Obama and team. And it doesn't matter which cabinet members fall on their sword. Obama is the commander in chief and the loss of American lives falls squarely on his shoulders as did 9/11 for Bush. Former president Bush declared war on terrorism, not just Afghanistan or Iraq. We are still fighting that battle today as we have seen in Benghazi.
True Mike, I am not in charge and I wasn't there. But I am a vote and I disagree with Obama's inaction and lack of leadership on how he handled the Benghazi terrorist attack just as much as I disagree with Powell's perspective and opinion on Obama.
Silver, allow me to compliment you on such a civil response. I do not agree with it, however, I think it is very well expressed. Assuming that you feel that Sununu's original statement is true about Colin Powell favoring Obama because he is the same race, would you think that the same is true of Condalisa Rice defending Obama by saying not to pass judgement on Libya until all the facts have been established on the incident? Would this also be a case of blacks sticking together out of loyalty to the race?
Virgil tibbs

United States

#25532 Oct 27, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
The New Obama Party, ACORN, and the Arab American Action Network are political or social organizations. They are radical anti-capitalist, pro-Marxist, and in the case of the AAAN a group supporting the terrorist activities of the Palestinians. The New Party is an unabashed Marxist "fusion" party from which Barack Obama actively sought out and received an endorsement for his state senate candidacy.
Did Obama let 4 Americans die do to his incompetent leadership or did he just not care?
shit I be a member of acorn I got five bitches working for me baby and there all white

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#25533 Oct 27, 2012
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
I think he was really born in South Carolina and is the illegitimate son of Strom Thurmond. But, that's just a hunch.
God, I just choked on my coffee!!!!!!!!!That's funny.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#25534 Oct 27, 2012
Waco 1909 wrote:
<quoted text> oh give it up LOSER! ROMNEYS'certain to win anyway mr. paranoid! What a psycho! what a complete and utter imbecile!(with all due respect).
Tell us how you really feel:)

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#25535 Oct 27, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
"The Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) is a body of senior uniformed leaders in the United States Department of Defense who advise the Secretary of Defense, the Homeland Security Council, the National Security Council and the President on military matters.
Following the Goldwater-Nichols Act in 1986 the Joint Chiefs of Staff do not have operational command authority, neither individually nor collectively, as the chain of command goes from the President to the Secretary of Defense, and from the Secretary of Defense to the Commanders of the Combatant Commands. Goldwater-Nichols also created the office of Vice Chairman, and the Chairman is now designated as the principal military adviser to the Secretary of Defense, the Homeland Security Council, the National Security Council and to the President."
Just so we are all clear on what exactly the Joint Chiefs do. Key words for you to pay attention to is NO OPERATIONAL COMMAND AUTHORITY. Which means, they are in charge of jack shit and are solely act in advisory capacity respectively.
Thank you Silver, you articulate better than I do.
Taxpayer

Camden, NC

#25536 Oct 27, 2012
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>I support our troops for what they do as a military. I couldn't give a fat rat's ass who they endorse! The rest of your post is just more spin.
I am with you but the troops in our help.You might want to rethink who the military support. Or they may be turned against us. Mike is the type that would love that.
I know of only few who are in the military that believed in the ideals of liberty and freedom. Most were there for a job and have no concept of these ideals. They can easily be convinced the government has the authority to suspend the constitution and use their force against us. Especially with the Patriot Act and the anti-American propaganda they are being indoctrinated with 24/7. Even government employees are subjected to this hatred of Americas.

April 19, 1775

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#25537 Oct 27, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
I am with you but the troops in our help.You might want to rethink who the military support. Or they may be turned against us. Mike is the type that would love that.
I know of only few who are in the military that believed in the ideals of liberty and freedom. Most were there for a job and have no concept of these ideals. They can easily be convinced the government has the authority to suspend the constitution and use their force against us. Especially with the Patriot Act and the anti-American propaganda they are being indoctrinated with 24/7. Even government employees are subjected to this hatred of Americas.
April 19, 1775
Use their force against us? I hope all the military personal you are speaking of are orphans. Otherwise, the force you are speaking of will be going against their own family and friends. If that scenario happens, this country will be beyond repair.
Allen

Robbins, NC

#25538 Oct 27, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
America was founded as a Christian country. Anyone who denies that has not studied enough history or has been sadly misled.
The way Communist minded people are who want to destory America.
No one denies that this country was founded on christianity. We have become a melting pot of all relgions. So we have two choices either take the word God away or add the names of all gods that are worshiped in this country. This has nothing to do with being communist. I believe in God. I am not a communist. My argument all along has been since we have taken prayer out of schools and the tem commandments from court houses we should also take bibles out of court rooms, the word God off our money and take the word GOD from our pledge. To leave the word God would be to show favoritism.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#25539 Oct 27, 2012
Allen wrote:
<quoted text>
No one denies that this country was founded on christianity. We have become a melting pot of all relgions. So we have two choices either take the word God away or add the names of all gods that are worshiped in this country. This has nothing to do with being communist. I believe in God. I am not a communist. My argument all along has been since we have taken prayer out of schools and the tem commandments from court houses we should also take bibles out of court rooms, the word God off our money and take the word GOD from our pledge. To leave the word God would be to show favoritism.
If that is done, does it not change the foundation of this country? Why not go the other way? Add the names of all gods?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
justin david upton (Jan '15) 27 min GastoniaResident 14
Closed Church?! 2 hr driveby 1
Ace TJ (Jan '14) Tue saucey Pan 6
Why was pastor Amy lambert arrested? Mon Angel at night 68
Ric Flair sucks ! (Jun '14) Apr 23 Moose Knuckle 14
Nickname "Quick"? Apr 23 Rhett Butler 4
Before January 14th, had anyone spoken to Gaige... Apr 22 Michellebanks 2

Charlotte Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Charlotte Mortgages