Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
TSF

Kenly, NC

#25165 Oct 25, 2012
During the deregulation/no regulation days of Dubya Bush, BoA and Countrywide stuck the American taxpayers for over $1,000,000,000. That lawsuit against BoA is coming to trial soon.

Romney (Bush clone) says we don't need no stinking banking regulations.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#25166 Oct 25, 2012
So are you claiming Romney didn't say "Let Detroit go bankrupt"?

Or are you saying its a lie because Twitt flip flopped ----again?

So if the flip flopper was telling the truth then, now he is lying or vise versa. Geese. You trust that jellyfish?
Pro-American wrote:
Left leaning David Letterman, "The President is lying about Gov Romney.......I felt discouraged"
http://guardianlv.com/2012/10/even-staunch-ob...

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#25167 Oct 25, 2012
Anybody think a charity gonna get 5 million?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25168 Oct 25, 2012
TSF wrote:
During the deregulation/no regulation days of Dubya Bush, BoA and Countrywide stuck the American taxpayers for over $1,000,000,000. That lawsuit against BoA is coming to trial soon.
Romney (Bush clone) says we don't need no stinking banking regulations.
Congress, Frank and Dodd, were pushing these bad loans, encouraging them, then gladly used Fannie and Freddy to buy them up from Countrywide. The chickens havre come home to roost and now they're using BOA as the scapegoat. Typical Chicago thuggery!

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25169 Oct 25, 2012
TSF wrote:
So are you claiming Romney didn't say "Let Detroit go bankrupt"?
Or are you saying its a lie because Twitt flip flopped ----again?
So if the flip flopper was telling the truth then, now he is lying or vise versa. Geese. You trust that jellyfish?
<quoted text>
Yes he said let them go bankrupt, that's not the issue. Do your homework and quit watching BSNBC. Obama was lying and now your own constituents are seeing it.
Did you watch the episode or read the article?
TSF

Kenly, NC

#25170 Oct 25, 2012
We had a good system until people learn they could use the government to steal from their neighbors

I see no difference between the morality of the rich taking $1.3 trillion dollars per year from the US treasury and the morality of social programs taking 0.8 trillion per year.

If the rich would stop stealing trillions , then maybe the poor would stop stealing thousands..

We both oppose dead beats. I just don't want to let the most expensive ones off the hook.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#25171 Oct 25, 2012
TSF wrote:
<quoted text>Embassys? What about New York? Seems like I remember over 3000 people being killed by a terrorist attack while Dubya was president. Oh yes, now I remember. They call it 911 these days. Rember that one? Who was president? Also the president (Dubya) had been repeatedly warned about the coming attack and did nothing. In fact on the morning of the attack, Bush I was having breakfast with one of the Bin Laden family members. I guess you dont remember any of that ?
Or Pearl Harbor under FDR?
Allen

Penrose, NC

#25172 Oct 25, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
The NATURAL liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule. John Lecke.
We had a good system until people learn they could use the government to steal from their neighbors. I see you thing people that believe in indiviual freedom should go to another country.
Americans do not need to go to any other country to find freedom. We just need to have the courage to defend what is ours.
Let's take the romanticization of the native american indian for instance. They lived in harmony until the white man came to this country? They took form nature only what they could return, sure. But, did not each tribe have a chief, warriors, hunters, gathers, medicine men,etc. There were wars amoung tribes for one reason or another.
Are'nt we all in one way or another by human nature driven by greed, power and control to some extent? Can we assume that one could live in a mountain top cave and never depend on another for their survival? Is it not true that if there were but one family on the face of the earth someone would have to establish authority to ensure the survival of the majority?
I believe it is the manner in which authority is asserted that causes unrest and discontent amoung people.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#25173 Oct 25, 2012
Oh my goodness! Those poor honest bankers were being forced to make hundreds of thousands of bad loans by the wicked old congress.
I am sure it had nothing to do with getting paid by the loan to make them in the first place and giving kick backs to the wicked congress . By shifting those bad loans onto Fannie and Freddie, the poor innocent bankers made over $4 billion dollars, which they accepted only reluctantly after having hedged their bets and shifting the loan insurance to the Federal government (us taxpayers.) I'm just all broken up over the plight of those poor innocent scapegoated souls. I think we should just use another 830 billion dollars of tax payer money to give them more bonuses.
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text> Congress, Frank and Dodd, were pushing these bad loans, encouraging them, then gladly used Fannie and Freddy to buy them up from Countrywide. The chickens havre come home to roost and now they're using BOA as the scapegoat. Typical Chicago thuggery!
TSF

Kenly, NC

#25174 Oct 25, 2012
Was FDR having breakfast with one of the Bin Ladens that morning also?
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Or Pearl Harbor under FDR?

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#25175 Oct 25, 2012
TSF wrote:
<quoted text>Embassys? What about New York? Seems like I remember over 3000 people being killed by a terrorist attack while Dubya was president. Oh yes, now I remember. They call it 911 these days. Rember that one? Who was president? Also the president (Dubya) had been repeatedly warned about the coming attack and did nothing. In fact on the morning of the attack, Bush I was having breakfast with one of the Bin Laden family members. I guess you dont remember any of that ?
Again. You missed the point and twisted what Pro said to make an irrelavent point
TSF

Kenly, NC

#25176 Oct 25, 2012
BSNBC? Funny. Kind of like Faux News. My take on the situation is that the flip flopper is trying to lie out of what he said because Ohio is so important to the election.
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text> Yes he said let them go bankrupt, that's not the issue. Do your homework and quit watching BSNBC. Obama was lying and now your own constituents are seeing it.
Did you watch the episode or read the article?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25177 Oct 25, 2012
TSF wrote:
Embassys? What about New York? Seems like I remember over 3000 people being killed by a terrorist attack while Dubya was president. Oh yes, now I remember. They call it 911 these days. Rember that one? Who was president? Also the president (Dubya) had been repeatedly warned about the coming attack and did nothing. In fact on the morning of the attack, Bush I was having breakfast with one of the Bin Laden family members. I guess you dont remember any of that ?
<quoted text>
9/11 came on the heels of a weak democrat Clinton. How many embassys and Navy ships were attacked on Clinton's watch with NO response? Al-Qaeda learned real quick not to mess with America when a Republican is in the White House, haven't been attacked since......well, until this spineless president took office.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25178 Oct 25, 2012
TSF wrote:
BSNBC? Funny. Kind of like Faux News. My take on the situation is that the flip flopper is trying to lie out of what he said because Ohio is so important to the election.
<quoted text>
Have you actually read the op ed piece?
Ohio is important but not the end all be all, Romney can still win without Ohio. Of course, it's all irrelevant since he'll take Ohio & Mich.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#25179 Oct 25, 2012
Oh, we are back to the Clinton's fault again? Seems like Bush was president on 9.11.01. The terrorist were so afraid of AWOL chicken George that they just attacked New York City and killed 3000 US citizens? Yea, right.
So after the attack, when it was discovered that SAUDIS were responsible, Mr bottom of his class attacks Afghanistan and Iraq.
That will teach those SAUDIS we mean business.
So when the leader of that attack was discovered to be Osama Bin Laden, Dubya sends out troops to kill Saddam and declares that his friend Bin Laden is "no longer a person of interest". All that taught our enemies is that our president was too stupid to even know who the enemy is.
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>9/11 came on the heels of a weak democrat Clinton. How many embassys and Navy ships were attacked on Clinton's watch with NO response? Al-Qaeda learned real quick not to mess with America when a Republican is in the White House, haven't been attacked since......well, until this spineless president took office.

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#25180 Oct 25, 2012
TSF wrote:
Oh, we are back to the Clinton's fault again? Seems like Bush was president on 9.11.01. The terrorist were so afraid of AWOL chicken George that they just attacked New York City and killed 3000 US citizens? Yea, right.
So after the attack, when it was discovered that SAUDIS were responsible, Mr bottom of his class attacks Afghanistan and Iraq.
That will teach those SAUDIS we mean business.
So when the leader of that attack was discovered to be Osama Bin Laden, Dubya sends out troops to kill Saddam and declares that his friend Bin Laden is "no longer a person of interest". All that taught our enemies is that our president was too stupid to even know who the enemy is.
<quoted text>
I have to ask.....what exactly has Obama taught our enemies??
Allen

Penrose, NC

#25181 Oct 25, 2012
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>9/11 came on the heels of a weak democrat Clinton. How many embassys and Navy ships were attacked on Clinton's watch with NO response? Al-Qaeda learned real quick not to mess with America when a Republican is in the White House, haven't been attacked since......well, until this spineless president took office.
Was I in a state of delirium when Bush said and I quote, " Bring it on."? And if Romney is elected they will bring it to him also. Whom ever is elected I hope the assertion of authority is, "Get'r done."

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#25182 Oct 25, 2012
TSF wrote:
Oh, we are back to the Clinton's fault again? Seems like Bush was president on 9.11.01. The terrorist were so afraid of AWOL chicken George that they just attacked New York City and killed 3000 US citizens? Yea, right.
So after the attack, when it was discovered that SAUDIS were responsible, Mr bottom of his class attacks Afghanistan and Iraq.
That will teach those SAUDIS we mean business.
So when the leader of that attack was discovered to be Osama Bin Laden, Dubya sends out troops to kill Saddam and declares that his friend Bin Laden is "no longer a person of interest". All that taught our enemies is that our president was too stupid to even know who the enemy is.
<quoted text>
The killing of bin Laden has been depicted in the liberal media as some kind of act of courage by Obama. After bin Laden was located, why would any President not give the green light to get him?

That took no courage from Obama. Wouldnít it have political suicide for Obama not to have given the green light?
All Obama did was hedge his bets by authorizing the admiral in charge to proceed only under various conditions. This meant that success would be credited to Obama and failure could be blamed on the admiral.

Making Obama look good if there was success and the admiral the scapegoat if there was failure.

If the attacked would have failed then the admiral would have joined the list with George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton and other scapegoats for Obama's failures.
Allen

Penrose, NC

#25183 Oct 25, 2012
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
I have to ask.....what exactly has Obama taught our enemies??
I have to ask.....what exactly will Romney teach our enemies??
We may have to kill our way out of this! These people have been making war and fighting for thousands of years. Do we truly believe that they want and will accept our democracy?

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#25184 Oct 25, 2012
TSF wrote:
We had a good system until people learn they could use the government to steal from their neighbors
I see no difference between the morality of the rich taking $1.3 trillion dollars per year from the US treasury and the morality of social programs taking 0.8 trillion per year.
If the rich would stop stealing trillions , then maybe the poor would stop stealing thousands..
We both oppose dead beats. I just don't want to let the most expensive ones off the hook.
You continue to spew this rhetoric about the greed of the rich.

I find it fascinating when people attribute high incomes to greed.

Greed tells you what you want. If you have high income itís because someone else is willing to pay it. Furthermore it is quite ironic that the other people who are willing to pay it very often (in recent years) have been the politicians who are spending the taxpayersí money.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mount holly pop warner on the rise in 2013 (Oct '13) 7 hr Just curious 67
News Videos of drivers in Belmont uploaded to YouTube (Jun '14) 23 hr mw77698on youtube 112
Poll Do you think women with hairy armpits are ok (Jan '09) Fri NemO 545
Help wanted. Sales in Charlotte Fri NemO 2
Belmont City Council Aug 27 Derek Rumfelt 26
belmont food & beverage - q: what happened? Aug 27 Roger Higgins 4
Location questions. Aug 27 Abc 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Charlotte Mortgages