TSF

Kenly, NC

#22990 Oct 13, 2012
Welfare and socialism to the rich deadbeats who pay no taxes far exceeds that to the poor. The sense of entitlement possesed by todays royalty class far exceeds that of the babymommas. You tea bagger beckerheads are too stupid to understand that because you have never actually associated with the rich.
big tea party repub wrote:
I think I herd somebody say if you dont pay taxes you are going to hell poor and middle class this means you if you really beleave in gods goverment pay your taxes and stop getting these free bees I get nothing I just pay then you want me to pay more we cant pay every thing dumb shit your little free ride is why were in this hole just trying to witness to you bunch of fucking free loaders

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#22991 Oct 13, 2012
big tea party repub wrote:
Why is it everybody that dont pay any tax want to raise our taxes
The same reason that everybody who can afford to pay higher taxes fights not too. If you already have everything, what more do you really need? Why does their patriotism stop with the dollar? Is this not excessive greed? Is there no compassion for those whose needs are many?

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#22992 Oct 13, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I have no superstition that I could impose. Clearly you just have no argument to my point.
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Faith is not information, it is blind belief.
Do not impose your blind beliefs upon others. This is why we condemn Sharia law. Now apply that logic to your own superstitions.
Being a non believer is as superstitious as me being a believer.

So, again, you first Mike. I win.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#22993 Oct 13, 2012



What? You don't think that Jesus is coming back to live in Missouri? Sure the bible doesn't mention Missouri but Romney is leader of the republikan party. Which one will you believe?
Besides that, the 16 trillion dollar national debt will magically disappear once big bird is killed, 12 million new jobs will be created by Romney like he did heaven and earth, granny can take her voucher to the doctor's office and get an appointment to get an appointment for an appointment--with a doctor in Berzerkistan.
The Easter bunny is real and Romney will not hose the middle class and stick more arrows up their rears in order to zero out his capital gains taxes. Really, for real, you do believe don't you?.

Kim wrote:

After reading all the post sounds like everyone is voting for Obama and Biden.After learning what the Mormon belief.I don't

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#22994 Oct 13, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I will when Christians stop trying to make us all Christians.
I would be happy if they just stopped trying to force their superstitions into law.
I see you again just run from my points. Clearly you have no argument.
what did I run from or not address socialist? I addressed your points with my own counter points. It is your opinion that christians are forcing their views. If that truly were the case Mike, then you wouldn't be able to be a non believer, right?

Why are you not attacking fellow socialist and communist Az for his theologist beliefs? Oh, that's right, he's a fellow liberal. And agrees with your points of view on social issues.

When you guys meet up at the bar for the weekly commie meetings, do you recite the manifesto word for word?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#22995 Oct 13, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Being a non believer is as superstitious as me being a believer.
So, again, you first Mike. I win.
Please explain how being a non believer in superstitions is superstitious?
TSF

Kenly, NC

#22996 Oct 13, 2012
I do not want the rich to pay a higher rate than I pay. I just want them to pay the same rate that I pay,---without exemptions, breaks, subsidies, incentives,loopholes, capital gains breaks, etc. That within itself would return the USA to solvency. We just no longer afford givig the royalty class special tax treatment.
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>
The same reason that everybody who can afford to pay higher taxes fights not too. If you already have everything, what more do you really need? Why does their patriotism stop with the dollar? Is this not excessive greed? Is there no compassion for those whose needs are many?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#22997 Oct 13, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Being a non believer is as superstitious as me being a believer.
So, again, you first Mike. I win.
You voted against gay marriage in large part due to your superstition.
So you have to reverse that for me to stop bitching about your superstitions being imposed on all Americans.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#22998 Oct 13, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
what did I run from or not address socialist? I addressed your points with my own counter points. It is your opinion that christians are forcing their views. If that truly were the case Mike, then you wouldn't be able to be a non believer, right?
Why are you not attacking fellow socialist and communist Az for his theologist beliefs? Oh, that's right, he's a fellow liberal. And agrees with your points of view on social issues.
When you guys meet up at the bar for the weekly commie meetings, do you recite the manifesto word for word?
Arnold is not trying to make his superstitious law.
Christianity was forced until secularists fought them and won. Now having inquisitions and crusades to force Christianity is no longer. But you guys are still trying to force some of your superstitions upon all. Secularists like me and Arnold are still trying to stop your team from doing so.

I see you still do not understand the religious can be secularist. Clearly you do not understand the term 'secularism'.

Thanks for yet again showing your narrow black and white views.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#22999 Oct 13, 2012
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
what did I run from or not address socialist? I addressed your points with my own counter points. It is your opinion that christians are forcing their views. If that truly were the case Mike, then you wouldn't be able to be a non believer, right?
Why are you not attacking fellow socialist and communist Az for his theologist beliefs? Oh, that's right, he's a fellow liberal. And agrees with your points of view on social issues.
When you guys meet up at the bar for the weekly commie meetings, do you recite the manifesto word for word?
Here is one point you skipped.
Faith is not information, it is blind belief.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23000 Oct 13, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>You voted against gay marriage in large part due to your superstition.
So you have to reverse that for me to stop bitching about your superstitions being imposed on all Americans.
I like to hear you "bitch" Mike, it keeps letting me know and it reaffirms that I'm still in the land of freedom to bitch and freedom to believe my superstitions. I don't like the alternative. So I'll stay right here and listen to you bitch. I don't have to like it, I'm just glad you can do it.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#23001 Oct 13, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike, you can call me whatever you want to because I don't respect you. The fact you need to lie to defend or win over support for your political or lack of religious beliefs that you have to sacrifice whatever moral backbone you have is pathetic. I don't respect you because you're a liar with no moral backbone. If you're disagreeing with me, I'm doing something right.
Again you refuse to answer the question. I do not ask you respect me.

We know you said you do not believe black people should marry white people. Word it how you wish. Just tell us your stance on interracial marriage?
If you do not wish for us to misconstrue your words, then tell us in your own words? Tell us how you feel about interracial marriage?

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#23002 Oct 13, 2012
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
<quoted text>The same reason that everybody who can afford to pay higher taxes fights not too. If you already have everything, what more do you really need? Why does their patriotism stop with the dollar? Is this not excessive greed? Is there no compassion for those whose needs are many?
It has been said time and time again that the government does not have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem.

The government could confiscate 100% of all the revenue for incomes above $250K and it would only last months.

Politicians, news media people and leftists in general entertain what they like to call a "zero elasticity view of the world". That means they think that government can impose a tax and people will behave after the tax just as they behaved before the tax, and the only change is more government revenue. History has shown this not to be the case. Instead, whether taxes are high or low, people make adjustments in their economic behavior so as to keep the government tax take at 15 to 20 percent of the GDP regardless of what taxes the government implies.

So as "some" push Congress to prey on the rich, keep in mind that rich people didn't become rich by being stupid.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#23003 Oct 13, 2012
emlu wrote:
<quoted text>"We all" didn't know that, "Mormon religion IS full" "until the seventies", does that mean, still racist and just enduring it since the seventies or Mormon religion WAS full of racists UNTIL the seventies? To me, sounds contradictory.
I guess when you take my statement and move cherry pick parts of sentences and connect them to other sentences, you can make them sound contradictory.
But if you leave my statement as is, it does not contradict.
Now just were do you see me stating Mormons were racist until the seventies? It says they did not allow blacks to be in the higher ranks until the seventies.
Allowing them into the higher ranks does not mean the members suddenly became non racist overnight.
The official church position fell to pressures of our societal norms and view of morality.
Does this mean the members did?
I know some members of the Mormon religion are not racists.
I know this because my stepmother is Mormon and she is not racist.
I know this because when I was a child in the seventies, I asked her why we do not allow blacks in our church. She told me the story of what Mormons believe about blacks being cursed by god with black skin because of their ancestors warring with the good people in the days of the book of Mormon story.
She then explained she does not really agree with the official church position of condemning blacks due to what their ancestors did.
The times I lived with her, she raised me to not be racist.

She was not raised in the church, so I think her non Mormon upbringing kept her from the more typical racist views of Mormons.

I know from personal experience in the church, the members were racist.
Have they all changed? I cannot say for sure. I would hope and wish so, but knowing human nature and how traditions of family views go, many are likely still racist.

Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So now you are trying to tell us you are fine with interracial marriage?
And I see you still have not addressed the main point of my post.
We all know you object to interracial marriage. I know you are on a mission to blur that point by playing semantics.
Fact is, you are a racist. Your party is full of racists.
The Mormon religion is full of racists. They did not even allow blacks to hold any elevated positions in their church as a matter of policy until the seventies.
Now we know Ryan wants to make his religious superstitions law.
I wonder if Mitt wants to make his religious superstitions law.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#23004 Oct 13, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Again you refuse to answer the question. I do not ask you respect me.
We know you said you do not believe black people should marry white people. Word it how you wish. Just tell us your stance on interracial marriage?
If you do not wish for us to misconstrue your words, then tell us in your own words? Tell us how you feel about interracial marriage?
Asked and answered. Get "we" to help you find the post. In your words, "I'm not doing your research for you."

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#23005 Oct 13, 2012
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
It has been said time and time again that the government does not have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem.
The government could confiscate 100% of all the revenue for incomes above $250K and it would only last months.
Politicians, news media people and leftists in general entertain what they like to call a "zero elasticity view of the world". That means they think that government can impose a tax and people will behave after the tax just as they behaved before the tax, and the only change is more government revenue. History has shown this not to be the case. Instead, whether taxes are high or low, people make adjustments in their economic behavior so as to keep the government tax take at 15 to 20 percent of the GDP regardless of what taxes the government implies.
So as "some" push Congress to prey on the rich, keep in mind that rich people didn't become rich by being stupid.
Excellent point TEW, unfortunately this common sense thinking doesn't fit into the liberal's socialist/communist ideology.
Can't wait to hear the liberal spin though.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#23006 Oct 13, 2012
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
It has been said time and time again that the government does not have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem.
The government could confiscate 100% of all the revenue for incomes above $250K and it would only last months.
Politicians, news media people and leftists in general entertain what they like to call a "zero elasticity view of the world". That means they think that government can impose a tax and people will behave after the tax just as they behaved before the tax, and the only change is more government revenue. History has shown this not to be the case. Instead, whether taxes are high or low, people make adjustments in their economic behavior so as to keep the government tax take at 15 to 20 percent of the GDP regardless of what taxes the government implies.
So as "some" push Congress to prey on the rich, keep in mind that rich people didn't become rich by being stupid.
This is why Obama is for cutting taxes. Just not all taxes. He is also for cutting spending.
Republicans often block the spending cuts he wants like military cuts.
Yes, there is a spending problem. Both parties are guilty of it.
It is more of a problem when the economy is doing well and the spending is increased as in the case with Bush.
That is when the deficits could have been reduced as in the case with Clinton.

In a recession, spending needs to happen just to keep the recession from increasing. It has worked so far. It is not meant to end a recession, that is all on the free market.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#23007 Oct 13, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Asked and answered. Get "we" to help you find the post. In your words, "I'm not doing your research for you."
Bullshit. You have not answered the question. Keep running from your racists comments all you wish. It only makes you to be the liar.

You are against interracial marriage. You believe the bible says it is wrong.

Just answer the question and I will drop it.
What are your views on interracial marriage?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#23009 Oct 13, 2012
Let's get back to VP Joey's lies during his debate. He first referred to the wars as "your wars" ,(referring to Ryan/Republicans), then said he wasn't for the wars.
According to fact check, Joey voted to support the wars in '02! Doesn't that make it "our wars"? And lets see, he voted for them but he's not for them? WTF?
He said before the debate that he was going to expose the party of liars, I think he made the Republicans proud.
Poor Joey, he must be suffering from dementia.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#23010 Oct 13, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I guess when you take my statement and move cherry pick parts of sentences and connect them to other sentences, you can make them sound contradictory.
But if you leave my statement as is, it does not contradict.
Now just were do you see me stating Mormons were racist until the seventies? It says they did not allow blacks to be in the higher ranks until the seventies.
Allowing them into the higher ranks does not mean the members suddenly became non racist overnight.
The official church position fell to pressures of our societal norms and view of morality.
Does this mean the members did?
I know some members of the Mormon religion are not racists.
I know this because my stepmother is Mormon and she is not racist.
I know this because when I was a child in the seventies, I asked her why we do not allow blacks in our church. She told me the story of what Mormons believe about blacks being cursed by god with black skin because of their ancestors warring with the good people in the days of the book of Mormon story.
She then explained she does not really agree with the official church position of condemning blacks due to what their ancestors did.
The times I lived with her, she raised me to not be racist.
She was not raised in the church, so I think her non Mormon upbringing kept her from the more typical racist views of Mormons.
I know from personal experience in the church, the members were racist.
Have they all changed? I cannot say for sure. I would hope and wish so, but knowing human nature and how traditions of family views go, many are likely still racist.
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So now you are trying to tell us you are fine with interracial marriage?
And I see you still have not addressed the main point of my post.
We all know you object to interracial marriage. I know you are on a mission to blur that point by playing semantics.
Fact is, you are a racist. Your party is full of racists.
The Mormon religion is full of racists. They did not even allow blacks to hold any elevated positions in their church as a matter of policy until the seventies.
Now we know Ryan wants to make his religious superstitions law.
I wonder if Mitt wants to make his religious superstitions law.
You don't like answering questions do you? Let me put it another way, now that the Mormon church will allow "blacks" to hold elevated positions, as they have for the last thirty years, in their church, do you still regard the Mormon church as racist? Spin Mike, it's spin.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charlotte Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
DIRECTV Referral Code at Maximum savings (Costc... (Aug '12) 16 hr KathyM 71
Kyle Fleischmann (May '11) Mon BarbieWorld 8
What happened to Catherine Bilkey - WSOC-TV? Mon Woohoo 8
Loan shark needed (Jul '09) Mon Pauly wallnuts 18
May 2 Council to impose suffocating, depraved o... Feb 28 ursogay david 3
Dog food heroin smack? Feb 27 Sunny 15
dog food near the arboretum Feb 27 Sunny 9
Charlotte Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Charlotte People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 2:32 pm PST

NBC Sports 2:32PM
Falcons waive Jonathan Massaquoi
Bleacher Report 6:00 AM
NFL Draft 2015: 1st-Round Mock Draft and Top Potential Mid-Round Steals
NFL 6:49 AM
Dan Quinn wants Sean Weatherspoon back on Falcons
Bleacher Report 4:54 PM
What's Best Plan for Replacements for Falcons?
Yahoo! Sports 4:45 PM
Peterson just 1 of the players left in limbo by ruling