Ottawa looks into safety of school Wi-Fi networks
Dombrowsky says she is expecting an answer "within weeks" from the federal health minister, after sending a letter with parents complaints.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at CTV.ca.
#1 Aug 19, 2010
More information about the biological effects of non-ionizing radiation from wireless technology is coming out every day. Enough is not being done by cities, counties, states and the Federal Government to protect us from the potentially devastating health and environmental effects. Through the 1996 telecommunications act the telecoms are shielded from liability and oversight. Initially cell phones were released with no pre-market safety testing despite the fact the Government and the Military have known for over 50 years that radio frequency is harmful to all biological systems (inthesenewtimes dot com/2009/05/02/6458/.). Health studies were suppressed and the 4 trillion dollar a year industry was given what amounts to a license to kill.
On it's face, the 1996 telecommunications act is unconstitutional and a cover-up. Within the fine print city governments are not allowed to consider "environmental" effects from cell towers. They should anyway! It is the moral and legal obligation of our government to protect our health and welfare? Or is it? When did this become an obsolete concept? A cell tower is a microwave weapon capable of causing cancer, genetic damage & other biological problems. Bees, bats, humans, plants and trees are all affected by RF & EMF. Communities fight to keep cell towers away from schools yet they allow the school boards to install wi fi in all of our schools thereby irradiating our kids for 6-7 hours each day. Kids go home and the genetic assault continues with DECT portable phones, cell phones, wi fi and Wii's. A tsunami of cancers and early alzheimer's await our kids. Young people under the age of 20 are 420% more at risk of forming brain tumors (Swedish study, Dr. Lennart Hardell) because of their soft skulls, brain size and cell turn over time. Instead of teaching "safer" cell phone use and the dangers of wireless technology our schools mindlessly rush to wireless bending to industry pressure rather than informed decision making. We teach about alcohol, tobacco, drugs and safe sex but not about "safer" cell phone use. We are in a wireless trance, scientists are panicking while young brains, ovaries and sperm burns.
#2 Aug 20, 2010
Video from CBC News and pictures used to illustrate articles about this show it isn't WiFi related. Students are shown using computers while sitting in each other's peripheral vision. That's a problem called Subliminal Distraction exposure.
A clue is that teachers and staff don't have the problem. It isn't happening other places with WiFi. If students had brain damage to cause headaches and the other symptoms it wouldn't remit so quickly on weekends.
The office cubicle was designed to control the vision startle reflex when this appeared in offices forty years ago.
Schools hired someone without specialized training in Systems Furniture. They failed to provide Cubicle Level Protection for computer use areas. They ignorantly thought they could put computer users anywhere.
A privacy shield to block peripheral vision should be used on both sides of a computer user.The full cubicle is not needed.
Add your comments below
|Halton's Deputy Chief to join South Simcoe Poli...||Mar '15||pan||1|
|How pay parking came to Toronto||Feb '15||GTA||1|
|Crucial Ontario child welfare computer system y...||Jan '15||both much too late||1|
|Two Huntsville businesses shut doors, others lo... (Nov '14)||Nov '14||Norah||1|
|Ontario Farmer (Oct '14)||Oct '14||sign sign every w...||1|
|Police bust international drug ring based in so... (Sep '14)||Sep '14||Will||1|
|Terry Fox elevates holiday (Aug '14)||Aug '14||Where did Ebola s...||2|
Find what you want!
Search Simcoe Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC