Kincardine should be part of nuclear ...

Kincardine should be part of nuclear fuel discussion

There are 4 comments on the The Kincardine News story from Dec 13, 2011, titled Kincardine should be part of nuclear fuel discussion. In it, The Kincardine News reports that:

Is it time for us to sit out or hop right into the barrel of radioactive monkeys our neighbours in both Saugeen Shores and Brockton have opened, in their initial consideration of permanently storing used nuclear fuel? With a 10-year Memorandum of Understanding with Ontario Power Generation outlining our community's disregard towards the thought of ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Kincardine News.


Milton, Canada

#1 Dec 25, 2011

Toronto, Canada

#2 Feb 2, 2012

Toronto, Canada

#3 Feb 15, 2012

Gatineau, Canada

#4 Feb 16, 2012

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Kincardine Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bruce Power Bruce Power and partners raise $125... Dec '17 How 1
News Town divided over plan to store nuclear waste n... Dec '17 maybe not 4 long 1
News Kincardine named one of top places in Canada to... Dec '17 Not 4 long 1
News Nuclear waste bunker decision not about 'money ... Nov '17 next 1
News Feds accept new info on planned nuclear-waste b... (Jun '17) Jun '17 HealthRanger 2
News Still snowin' (Jun '17) Jun '17 will Bruce tell u 1
News Moving planned nuclear-waste bunker would cost ... (Jan '17) Jan '17 Glowing Reports 3
More from around the web