DAVID SUZUKI: A silver bullet for cli...

DAVID SUZUKI: A silver bullet for climate change?

Posted in the Georgetown Forum

tim

Georgetown, Canada

#1 Aug 29, 2013
DAVID SUZUKI: A silver bullet for climate change?
News For You
•Athens: Enjoy the olives, the sunset, and the Acropolis
•Huge tree falls victim to Nelson storm
•Selina Natasha Joe killed by car at the TCH and Boys Road intersection 3 a.m. Monday
•VIHA helps patch Lake doctor crisis with a nurse
•UPDATE: Missing Abbotsford man located
Share this story
By David Suzuki - Victoria News
Published: August 27, 2013 4:00 PM
Altering environments to suit our needs is not new.
From clearing land to building dams, we’ve done it throughout history. When our technologies and populations were limited, our actions affected small areas – though with some cascading effects on interconnected ecosystems.
We’ve now entered an era in which humans are a geological force.
According to the website, Welcome to the Anthropocene,“There are now so many of us, using so many resources, that we’re disrupting the grand cycles of biology, chemistry and geology by which elements like carbon and nitrogen circulate between land, sea and atmosphere. We’re changing the way water moves around the globe as never before. Almost all the planet’s ecosystems bear the marks of our presence.”
One of our greatest impacts is global warming, fuelled by massive increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide from burning oil, coal and gas. Thanks in part to self-preserving industrialists, complicit governments and deluded deniers, we’ve failed to take meaningful action to address the problem, even though we’ve known about it for decades.
Many now argue the best way to protect humanity from the worst effects is to further alter Earth’s natural systems through geoengineering. Geoengineering to combat climate change is largely untested. Because we’ve stalled so long on reducing carbon emissions and still aren’t doing enough, we may have to consider it. What will that mean? As it relates to climate change, geoengineering falls into two categories: solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal.
The former involves reflecting solar radiation back into space. The latter is aimed at removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it. Solar radiation management includes schemes such as releasing sulphur aerosols into the atmosphere to scatter sunlight and reduce radiation, creating or whitening clouds by spraying seawater or other materials into the air, and even installing giant reflectors in space.
These methods don’t affect CO2 levels and so don’t address issues like ocean acidification, but they offer possible quick fixes to reduce warming.
An example of carbon removal is fertilizing oceans with iron. Iron stimulates growth of small algae called phytoplankton, which remove carbon dioxide from the sea and release oxygen through photosynthesis. This allows the oceans to absorb additional CO2 from the atmosphere. When the plankton die and sink to the ocean floor, they become buried under other materials, storing the carbon within them.
The Alberta and federal governments have spent billions on their favoured carbon-reduction method, carbon capture and storage – trapping CO2 released by burning fossil fuels and pumping it into the ground – but this method has yet to be perfected.
Many schemes are controversial and have shown mixed results in tests, and the danger of unintended consequences is real, including further catastrophic, irreversible damage to the climate system.
One major drawback with geoengineering is the mistaken idea that it can be a substitute for reducing greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. That many geoengineering projects are fraught with danger and would not resolve the problem quickly enough or even effectively – and would do little or nothing to resolve other fossil fuel problems such as pollution – makes this a critical concern.
A U.K. Royal Society study concludes that geoengineering “should only be considered as part of a wider package of options for addressing climate change” and carbon dioxide reduction methods should

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Georgetown Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Spend an hour for the Earth (Mar '10) 6 hr Halton Hills News 7
News Is Acton Really Worth the Drive when we read Ac... (Oct '10) 6 hr Halton Hills News 13
do you want them in court with you (Jan '10) 7 hr Small Claims Court 36
Was Facebook right to ban this picture (Mar '13) 7 hr Why we post here 3
News Province kicks in nearly $800K for Georgetown b... 8 hr Gtown will get 3
News Georgetown Ethel Gardiner Public School student... 8 hr Vid 11
News Homes needed for cats removed from house (Sep '13) 10 hr Homes needed 4 pe... 2
More from around the web