Right move on citizen’s arrest wrong...

Right move on citizen’s arrest wrong move

Posted in the Georgetown Forum

what if he had a gun

North Bay, Canada

#1 Mar 16, 2013

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson and Lucky Moose owner David Chen in his Chinatown shop in Toronto Monday, March 11, 2013.(DAVE THOMAS/Toronto Sun) Change text size for the storyPrint this story Report an error
Toronto’s Chinatown grocer David Chen should never have been charged with assault and forcible confinement for defending his grocery store and livelihood from a habitual shoplifter.
What else was Chen supposed to do, given that when he called the police to deal with shoplifters he had apprehended, they often didn’t show up for hours and then let off the thieves with a warning?
It’s understandable police have to prioritize calls and shoplifting may be a low priority for them, but that wasn’t helping Chen.
In that context, it was absurd that when Chen and two store employees chased down a habitual shoplifter in 2009, tied him up and tossed him in a van, they were charged with assault and forcible confinement and put on trial. Talk about blaming the victims!
But at least Chen’s case — and the acquittal of all three men on all counts — sparked a long overdue rewrite of Canada’s citizen’s arrest law, which came into effect Monday.
This is the new Citizen’s Arrest and Self-Defence Act, a copy of which Justice Minister Rob Nicholson presented to Chen at his Lucky Moose Food Mart.
Previously, citizens could only arrest someone if they caught him or her in the act of committing a crime.
Under the new law, people committing crimes can be apprehended within a reasonable period of time following the commission of the offence.
Even with the change in the law, however, that doesn’t mean it’s open season on shoplifters, vandals and other criminals.
What constitutes a “reasonable” period of time to make an arrest following the offence will still be open to legal interpretation.
So will the issue of whether the amount of force used to capture and detain the suspect was reasonable under the circumstances.
And police still have to be called at the earliest opportunity to take the suspect into custody.
In other words, each case will be judged on its own merits, and store owners will be required to use good judgment and common sense. But at least the law now recognizes that when a store owner yells “Stop, thief,” there’s very little chance the thief is going to stop, or volunteer to hang around until the police get there.
That’s why this is a sensible reform of the law.
Reader's comments »By adding a comment on the site, you accept our terms and conditions and our netiquette rules.


Right move on citizen’s arrest
wake up you dumb ones

North Bay, Canada

#2 Mar 16, 2013
you would be put him in Obituaries if he had a gun stupit
USA gun laws no help

Toronto, Canada

#3 Mar 16, 2013

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Georgetown Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What's on this week (Jul '14) 1 hr sam 90
News MPP fails to offer solutions (Jul '09) 4 hr lotsa MPPs no help 16
criminal street gang in Hamilton (Feb '08) 4 hr OPP 52
News Orillia Kings swept away by hard-charging Halto... 5 hr weed-teen-use 1
big mess 14 hr what a mess 1
Fatal house explosion rocks Mississauga 14 hr what a mess 1
Conrad Black reaches settlement with CRA over t... 17 hr Looks good on him 1
More from around the web