Inside the Gay-Marriage Proposal at the White House

Dec 17, 2012 Full story: The Atlantic 20

Over the weekend, U.S. Marine Corps captain Matthew Phelps proposed to the love of his life, Ben Schock, at the White House.

Read more

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#1 Dec 17, 2012
YAY! Best wishes to the happy couple!

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#2 Dec 17, 2012
Congrats!

It would have been even better had he been in uniform.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#3 Dec 17, 2012
A jubilant congrats to the couple !!!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#4 Dec 17, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
Congrats!
It would have been even better had he been in uniform.
It certainly would have been prettier, and I'm glad that he didn't.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#5 Dec 17, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
It certainly would have been prettier, and I'm glad that he didn't.
Why not? He was there as part of a military function; it would have been totally appropraite for him to have been in uniform.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#6 Dec 17, 2012
btw: Who's the cretin who thinks jeans and a hoodie are appropriate attire for the White House.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#7 Dec 17, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not? He was there as part of a military function; it would have been totally appropraite for him to have been in uniform.
Think about how it would play.

It wasn't "a military function", but that of a private association of military personnel.
lolol

Albuquerque, NM

#8 Dec 17, 2012
snyper wrote:
btw: Who's the cretin who thinks jeans and a hoodie are appropriate attire for the White House.
.
trayvon obama

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#9 Dec 18, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Think about how it would play.
It wasn't "a military function", but that of a private association of military personnel.
It would play like any other time people see servicemembers in uniform. We don't only wear our uniforms while on duty you know.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#10 Dec 19, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
It would play like any other time people see servicemembers in uniform. We don't only wear our uniforms while on duty you know.
As long as DOMA stands, the uniform may not be used.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#11 Dec 19, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
As long as DOMA stands, the uniform may not be used.
Ummm, no.

Servicemembers can legally marry; they can even do so on base in states which allow same-sex couples to marry. That would include D.C.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#12 Dec 19, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummm, no.
Servicemembers can legally marry; they can even do so on base in states which allow same-sex couples to marry. That would include D.C.
It would be considered inappropriate for an active service person to wear the uniform.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#13 Dec 19, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
It would be considered inappropriate for an active service person to wear the uniform.
IN THE WHITE HOUSE??

I can't think of a more appropriate place to wear my uniform.

You haven't been around the military much, have you?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#14 Dec 19, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
IN THE WHITE HOUSE??
I can't think of a more appropriate place to wear my uniform.
You haven't been around the military much, have you?
Very, very much.

Protocol can be snicky.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#15 Dec 20, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Very, very much.
Protocol can be snicky.
There is no military protocol which would discourage a servicemember from wearing the uniform while visiting the White House. In fact it's highly ENCOURAGED.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#16 Dec 20, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no military protocol which would discourage a servicemember from wearing the uniform while visiting the White House. In fact it's highly ENCOURAGED.
That's one protocol compartment. The other one is an off-duty gathering of a civilian association for military personnel. A third is engaging in an activity which is not permitted by Federal Law and, as a result, the UCMJ.

In politics, when you have to explain you're actually defending.

He chose the wiser, less controversial course that focused not on a side issue of military propriety, but on the Marriage Equality issue itself ... alone ... all by itself ... with nothing else to distract.

Sniper rather than carpet bomb.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#17 Dec 20, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
That's one protocol compartment. The other one is an off-duty gathering of a civilian association for military personnel. A third is engaging in an activity which is not permitted by Federal Law and, as a result, the UCMJ.
In politics, when you have to explain you're actually defending.
He chose the wiser, less controversial course that focused not on a side issue of military propriety, but on the Marriage Equality issue itself ... alone ... all by itself ... with nothing else to distract.
Sniper rather than carpet bomb.
Nope, still wrong.

Getting married to someone of the same sex is NOT banned by federal law (or the UCMJ), it simply isn't recognized by the federal government. I would think you could understand the difference.

Sometimes it's necessary to carpet bomb to get the job done.
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#18 Dec 20, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
That's one protocol compartment. The other one is an off-duty gathering of a civilian association for military personnel. A third is engaging in an activity which is not permitted by Federal Law and, as a result, the UCMJ.
In politics, when you have to explain you're actually defending.
He chose the wiser, less controversial course that focused not on a side issue of military propriety, but on the Marriage Equality issue itself ... alone ... all by itself ... with nothing else to distract.
Sniper rather than carpet bomb.
Its fun to watch YOU have to dance with Sheeple for a bit...

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#19 Dec 20, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, still wrong.
Getting married to someone of the same sex is NOT banned by federal law (or the UCMJ), it simply isn't recognized by the federal government. I would think you could understand the difference.
Sometimes it's necessary to carpet bomb to get the job done.
You don't see it, so, whatever.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#20 Dec 20, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't see it, so, whatever.
Having spent 20+ years in the military, I know exactly when you can and can't wear the uniform.

There is ZERO reason Capt Phelps could not have been in uniform at the time in question.

ZERO.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Social Software Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Latest Cheap Trick: FB page plays up pic of Mus... 1 hr Thinking 5
News Kiev's new plan to avoid collapse? Ban Russian ... 10 hr NAZTY Ukraine 6
News UH Case Medical Center's Social Media Study of ... 17 hr humanspirit 1
News 'Flower power' to fight anti-Islam rally 19 hr Danger Alert 5
News Talk Angela App "Kidnapper Behind the Camera" (Feb '14) Mon jacyadams 122
News Opponents stepping up fight against proposed Ca... (Jun '14) Mon Brian 2
News Breast Milk Banks Proposed In Legislation To He... Mon Free Kwame 1
More from around the web