The ongoing shame of Benghazi cries out for deeper investigation

Jan 20, 2014 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Free Republic

When anything bipartisan comes out of a polarized Washington, one should be grateful.

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 2 of2
Penny Duff

Saint Petersburg, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jan 21, 2014
 
Well, this is another Tea Bagger chest beater, short on real facts (ALL the facts) and long on polemic. What about the Republican Congress's refusal to increase embassy security spending? That request was denied, but I forgot, the Obama administration wanted to increase and improve security at our embassies, so it COULDN'T be approved--it would have violated their pact to vote against anything this administration wanted, good for the country or not. Extra emergency security help was offered to the embassy. They turned it down. It has been proven that the attack was retribution for an "anti-Muslim" YouTube video, but the Obama administration didn't attempt to set aside the first amendment so it wouldn't be shown. Oops. How is it that all of the above are never mentioned in the articles on Benghazi? Oh, I forgot, if you include facts, the Obama administration doesn't look so bad.
Ohh Em Gee

Charlton, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jan 21, 2014
 
Penny Duff wrote:
Well, this is another Tea Bagger chest beater, short on real facts (ALL the facts) and long on polemic. What about the Republican Congress's refusal to increase embassy security spending? That request was denied, but I forgot, the Obama administration wanted to increase and improve security at our embassies, so it COULDN'T be approved--it would have violated their pact to vote against anything this administration wanted, good for the country or not. Extra emergency security help was offered to the embassy. They turned it down. It has been proven that the attack was retribution for an "anti-Muslim" YouTube video, but the Obama administration didn't attempt to set aside the first amendment so it wouldn't be shown. Oops. How is it that all of the above are never mentioned in the articles on Benghazi? Oh, I forgot, if you include facts, the Obama administration doesn't look so bad.
AHH yes, Repubs cut spending that somehow turned out ot be $25 MILLION more than the previous yr. but why let FACTs get in the way? It has been "proven" the attack was because of an anti-islam video? Have you been watching the news since Benghazi actually happened or have you been under a rock? IT WAS A LIE YOU FOOL. WOW. Do yourself a favor and never post again. Save yourself the utter embarrassment that you just shoveled upon yourself. Your ingorance of the facts is incredible.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 2 of2
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••