The ongoing shame of Benghazi cries o...

The ongoing shame of Benghazi cries out for deeper investigation

There are 2 comments on the Free Republic story from Jan 20, 2014, titled The ongoing shame of Benghazi cries out for deeper investigation. In it, Free Republic reports that:

When anything bipartisan comes out of a polarized Washington, one should be grateful.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Free Republic.

Penny Duff

Lakeland, FL

#1 Jan 21, 2014
Well, this is another Tea Bagger chest beater, short on real facts (ALL the facts) and long on polemic. What about the Republican Congress's refusal to increase embassy security spending? That request was denied, but I forgot, the Obama administration wanted to increase and improve security at our embassies, so it COULDN'T be approved--it would have violated their pact to vote against anything this administration wanted, good for the country or not. Extra emergency security help was offered to the embassy. They turned it down. It has been proven that the attack was retribution for an "anti-Muslim" YouTube video, but the Obama administration didn't attempt to set aside the first amendment so it wouldn't be shown. Oops. How is it that all of the above are never mentioned in the articles on Benghazi? Oh, I forgot, if you include facts, the Obama administration doesn't look so bad.
Ohh Em Gee

Webster, MA

#2 Jan 21, 2014
Penny Duff wrote:
Well, this is another Tea Bagger chest beater, short on real facts (ALL the facts) and long on polemic. What about the Republican Congress's refusal to increase embassy security spending? That request was denied, but I forgot, the Obama administration wanted to increase and improve security at our embassies, so it COULDN'T be approved--it would have violated their pact to vote against anything this administration wanted, good for the country or not. Extra emergency security help was offered to the embassy. They turned it down. It has been proven that the attack was retribution for an "anti-Muslim" YouTube video, but the Obama administration didn't attempt to set aside the first amendment so it wouldn't be shown. Oops. How is it that all of the above are never mentioned in the articles on Benghazi? Oh, I forgot, if you include facts, the Obama administration doesn't look so bad.
AHH yes, Repubs cut spending that somehow turned out ot be $25 MILLION more than the previous yr. but why let FACTs get in the way? It has been "proven" the attack was because of an anti-islam video? Have you been watching the news since Benghazi actually happened or have you been under a rock? IT WAS A LIE YOU FOOL. WOW. Do yourself a favor and never post again. Save yourself the utter embarrassment that you just shoveled upon yourself. Your ingorance of the facts is incredible.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Publishing Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Gillibrand: Bill Clinton should've resigned ove... 19 hr Trumps in the gutter 249
News Prominent 9th Circuit judge accused of sexual m... Dec 9 INVESTIGATE 1
News Prominent 9th Circuit judge accused of sexual m... Dec 9 anonymous 2
News Moore denies sexual misconduct, but GOP fears e... Dec 8 jimani_privac 230
News Replacing Tillerson Would Lead to More Hawkish ... Dec 8 jimani_privac 4
News Illegal immigrants lose jobs edge (Mar '09) Dec 6 Rico the King 461
News John Conyers just ducked out the back door to e... Dec 5 Hostis Publicus 1
More from around the web