9NEWS - Top News Article - FBI questions ex-wife of Federal Chi...

[Too Scared to Sign Name]

anon
AOL ~I was being facetious. I also don't click on dating web sites.

[Kay Sieverding]

I saw one lawsuit that was kicked around through the courts for 11 years and then the plaintiffs won $3 million. I saw an injunction that the 10th Circuit reversed after 13 years. I saw a defamation lawsuit that was re-filed 13 times and then the plaintiff won. So I hang in here because we need the $400,000 in direct economic damages that we sustained for our retirement and our children need damages for remedial education for the interruption to their lives and education. Also almost every day I suffer new damages do to the ongoing defamation. Almost every night I have nightmares about men with guns coming to take me because it happened before without a valid warrant. These matters should have been resolved in 2003 but Judge Nottingham wouldn't allow facts to be admitted and wouldn't issue a judgment that stated facts and laws.

[Kay Sieverding]

Furthermore Kevin Bennett is a public figure because he was in public office and he used his authority to build in violation of the zoning. I suggest that you look him up on Princeton Ave in Steamboat on the Routt County public assessor's data base--a public data base--and look at his property at 701 Princeton Ave. Then compare the numbers of buildings on the assessor's database (1) with the number of buildings you can see from the street (4). Compare the age of the building on the assessor's data base (1950) with the age of the buildings at the building department (2000). Compare the number of residential buildings allowed for the low density residential zone (1) with the number of buildings on the property with central heating, multi rooms and plumbing (3).

[anon]

Too Scared to Sign Name wrote:

anon
AOL ~I was being facetious. I also don't click on dating web sites.

Kind of thought I saw "sarcasm alert" flash in the background of your post. Mine was more of a subtle hint to K.S.

[Ralph]

Kay Sieverding wrote:

I saw one lawsuit that was kicked around through the courts for 11 years and then the plaintiffs won $3 million. I saw an injunction that the 10th Circuit reversed after 13 years. I saw a defamation lawsuit that was re-filed 13 times and then the plaintiff won. So I hang in here because we need the $400,000 in direct economic damages that we sustained for our retirement and our children need damages for remedial education for the interruption to their lives and education. Also almost every day I suffer new damages do to the ongoing defamation. Almost every night I have nightmares about men with guns coming to take me because it happened before without a valid warrant. These matters should have been resolved in 2003 but Judge Nottingham wouldn't allow facts to be admitted and wouldn't issue a judgment that stated facts and laws.

You are "defamed" every time you open your mouth or, in this case, type anything on this site. Your own words and behavior is the most detrimental and damaging to "Kay Siverding". Man, do I ever feel sorry for your children and husband unless, of course, they are as whacked out as you are yourself.

[Kay Sieverding]

And just what did I say or write that I should be ashamed of or that is untrue in any way? I claimed recognized causes of action, causes that have been recognized for a thousand years and that are recognized in every country that recognizes rule of law--defamation, malicious injunction, and malicious prosecution. They didn't contest the truth of any thing that I proposed as a fact, they just said they didn't want to talk about it in court. If my defendants thought that I was asking too much money they should have gone to a jury and argued that I should get less. The reason that they didn't want to, I guess, is that to admit what happened would be to admit that there was criminal activity by my defendants. What I don't understand is why an honest judge would participate in a coverup of crime. When I read the descriptions of crimes in the federal and state law--extortion, witness intimidation, deprivation of rights etc. and compare them with what Judge Nottingham did, I don't see how what he did could possibly be legal. So for those of you who know that Judge Nottingham put me in jail to delay and deter my presenting in another court, if you know why that would be legal and not a crime, tell me, because no one else has. Maybe old JN will log on and say "it was legal because of law number xyz"

[Kay Sieverding]

Two weeks has passed and even with all the paid bloggers, no one has claimed that using force and intimidation to delay and deter presentment in an official proceeding as Judge Nottingham did to me, at the request of Chris Beall, David Brougham, Brett Huff, and Traci Van Pelt, is legal. So why can't I get them put in jail to deter other lawyers from using force and threats to avoid paying insurance claims?

[Kay Sieverding]

You may have seen the new media on the attempt to blackmail on of the British royals with an alleged sex tape video. Why couldn't that happen to Judge Nottingham or maybe it did?

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i0P9lyc8yB...

[mrinternet]

RM in AZ wrote:

<quoted text>
Now that's what I call fustration!
The press is BS. Smart people know this, dumb people don't. They really think that Britney running into a car in a parking lot is newsworthy. The internet is the ultimate key that unlocks the truth for all of us, we just need to remember the damn combination to open it!! Keep typing, keep thinking, we will figure all this out together!

Well stated ... and lets remember that the allegations were under oath.

The network server will have the evidence and if guilty should be removed from office ASAP just like you or I would be if caught do the same thing.

Another important observation - since there is no Justice D3epartment left in the Bush Administration and Under the U.S. Constitution, federal judges are appointed for life by the president of the United States, and answer only to the president and Congress.

That is what really is at stake here for all you casual observers.

"The court records also show that Judge Nottingham said he was too drunk to remember how he spent more than $3,000 at a strip club in two consecutive days." should be more than enough to alert most rational people that there will be an attempt to cover up a much bigger story if we (like RM in Arizona) says - just keep digging.

Dig on ...

[Pineguy]

Wait. What? Britney ran into a car in a parking lot?

I spent $3,000 at a strip club once, but luckily I remember it all.

[Kay Sieverding]

Judge Nottingham held a hearing on 12/14/07. At that hearing he said that
"That was one isolated instance, if it’s taken at face value, with a call to Magistrate Judge Schlatter. There is nothing in here that indicates that the conference call would have been prohibited….It doesn’t indicate in any way what was discussed. And the Court is unable to conclude by a preponderance of the evidence that this sole stray entry constitutes an improper ex parte communication.” So Judge Nottingham's policy is apparently that a single unrecorded oral conference with only one side is not improper. However, the local rules say:“No attorney or party shall contact orally a judicial officer regarding any case by telephone, in person, or through any other means, unless all other parties in the matter, or their attorneys, are present or on the telephone.” D.C.COLO.LCivR 77.2 It doesn't say anything to the effect that one oral conference is allowed but two are not. So apparently you can have one unrecorded oral conference without the other side with Judge Nottingham without him thinking that any rules were violated as long as there is no record of what was discussed.

How can it be legal for Judge N to suspend Local Rule 77.2? Does anyone know how a judge can suspend a local rule prohibiting oral conferences with only one side being notified of the conference?

[Mr know it all]

New online dating site doesn't gurantee love but instead gurantees some action

needsexbuddy.com

[Kay Sieverding]

We filed a petition for the S.C. to find our defendants in default because they engaged in ex parte, solicited ex parte, made threats, carried out threats, and represented Underwriters at Lloyds London, TIG Insurance, and Mutual Insurance, none of whom had papers on file with Colorado Insurance Division. The S.C. docketed that on 1/9/2008 as 07-884
http://www.rightscase.com/ David Brougham has waived appearance even though the complaint charges him having confessed to ex part and representing Lloyd in Colorado for errors and omissions insurance coverage without Lloyds filing annual reports or a statement that the insurance was not available or competitive from admitted carriers.

[Kay Sieverding]

We have a pending petition in the U.S. Supreme Court related to obstruction of justice in the court of Judge Edward Nottingham. see
http://www.rightscase.com . Even though our petiton alleges felonies within the court system and asks for $48 million as a default judgment, it is unopposed. As discussed in my earlier posts, Judge Nottingham put me in jail to pressure me to dismiss cases in other courts. The FBI categorized this as general civil contempt. However, there is no general civil contempt authority to jail. We filed a petition to have a special prosecutor appointed by the S.C. This is posted at
http://www.special-prosecutor.com/

[kay sieverding]

I was googling on my name and saw this old thread. so I thought I would update it.
1) Edward Nottingham resigned from the bench after the 10th Circuit reported that a prostitute filed an affidavit saying that he asked her to lie to investigators about their relationship. Sean Harrington filed a complaint with the Colorado Office of Attorney Regulation on Nottingham saying he engaged in conduct unbecoming to an attorney. They never ruled on it and Nottingham is currently offering his legal services as a lawyer in good standing.
2) In 2004, I was ordered to pay $100 K because Magistrate Schlatter recommended that saying that I had accused City of Steamboat Springs officials of being corrupt. In 2009, the ex neighbor who I sued Kevin Bennett admitted publicly that he is a convicted felon but didn't disclose that when he was in public office.
3) Anthony Lettunich was identified by Lawyers.com as an attorney at Lettunich & Vanderbloemen in Steamboat Springs, Colorado whose practice area is “zoning and planning law, land use, municipal law, real estate, business law” and as simulatenously since 1994 being the city attorney of the City of Steamboat Springs. My impression at the time was that if you wanted an illegal action from the city the best way was to hire Lettunich's law practice.
4) An article from the Steamboat Springs Pilot about a fire death in Steamboat says “County and city officials also haven’t found any records indicating the small apartment had the proper permits for occupancy.... officials don’t yet know when the apartment was built [he had lived in the apartment that used to be a garage for 10 years][the structure was divided into two apartments and was purchased for $612,000] According to the Routt County Assessor’s online database, the home... has two bedrooms, one bathroom and a garage. However there is no garage on the property....Searches of records at the Routt County Assessor’s Office, the Routt County Building Department, and the Steamboat Springs Department of Planning and Community Development did not produce any documents that indicate the required permits were filed to convert the garage into a residence..... To legally turn a garage into an apartment, Kerrigan said the plans would need to be submitted and put through a review process. There are no records to show that process took place. Kerrigan also said that although there are many illegal buildings in Steamboat, enforcement of the regulations is lax. Enforcement of city codes falls to the Department of Planning and Community Development. Bob Keenan, senior planner for the Planning Department, said they had no records of a secondary unit on the lot and that the address of 705 Pine Street was never issued. Keenan said that the department does not routinely search for illegal units and typically issues only one or two citations per year after complaints are made.”
4) I also sued Wendy Schulenburg AKA Wendie Roonie.. There is a transcript in which while under oath Schulenburg stated “I work for the City, City of Steamboat Springs...I’m the planning services director..... she [meaning Kay Sieverding] threatened to report me to my professional societies, American Planning Association and American Institute of Certified Planners … she was going to report me because of ethics violations.... American Institute of Certified Planners has a brochure “taking the AICP exam is first step to become a certified planner. To qualify, one must be a current APA member, submit an online application meeting certain education and experience criteria, and pass an examination”. Despite the fact that Schulenburg claimed while under oath to be a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners, plaintiffs provided an email they claim is from the American Institute of Certified Planners saying ‘According to our record files, Wendie Schulenburg is not an AICP member’.

So, probably if I had got a hearing on my claims Engle wouldn't be dead.