Review of 5,500 Irs E-Mails Found No Political Targeting

Jul 12, 2013 Full story: www.bloomberg.com 9

An inspector general's review of 5,500 e-mails among Internal Revenue Service employees found "no indication" that their scrutiny of Tea Party groups was politically motivated, according to documents being released today by Democrats.

Full Story
radiofreeamerica

Tarpon Springs, FL

#1 Jul 12, 2013
If the biased targeting of conservative groups was done by only a couple of employees working in the Cinncinati office-like obamas administration has claimed- I would think you could review thousands of emails done by hundreds of employees and find nothing since the vast majority was left out of it-as they say.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#2 Jul 12, 2013
radiofreeamerica wrote:
If the biased targeting of conservative groups was done by only a couple of employees working in the Cinncinati office-like obamas administration has claimed- I would think you could review thousands of emails done by hundreds of employees and find nothing since the vast majority was left out of it-as they say.
So you don't think they reviewed the emails of the people at that Cincinnati office?
Water for ducks

United States

#3 Jul 12, 2013
More laughable BS. So Lois Lerner took the fifth for no reason at all? Right.
How desperate are the Dems to cover their corruption of the IRS?

“KONA, baby!”

Since: Jul 08

Jacksonville, FL

#6 Jul 13, 2013
If not political, what was the motivation to target TEA party groups?

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#11 Jul 13, 2013
It's gratifying to know that the IRS treats everyone with equal shabbiness.

“KONA, baby!”

Since: Jul 08

Jacksonville, FL

#13 Jul 13, 2013
Pasadena Handyman wrote:
<quoted text>Same sex marriage and gays. It was to stop the funding and support from religious groups and conservatives
Sure sounds political to me.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#14 Jul 13, 2013
Pappa wrote:
If not political, what was the motivation to target TEA party groups?
easy...the tea party says they have no social agenda, so any group with a tea party name should have to show that the vast majority of their work is social, as that would be against the tea party name...

this is just common sense...

“KONA, baby!”

Since: Jul 08

Jacksonville, FL

#15 Jul 14, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>easy...the tea party says they have no social agenda, so any group with a tea party name should have to show that the vast majority of their work is social, as that would be against the tea party name...
this is just common sense...
So, you admit it WAS political. Did the moveon groups garner the same scrutiny? How about acorn?
Sheik Yerbouti

Furlong, PA

#16 Jul 14, 2013
The investigations into teabagger groups should continue. They are posing as non profit 'social welfare' groups which they are not! All of these fraudulent groups should be targeted both liberal and conservatard!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Non-Profit Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
California bars judges from Boy Scouts membership Tue Evilgelicalling 46
Inspiring youth Jan 25 Lying to Youth 1
Michael Jackson Accuser Wade Robson -- I Can He... (Jul '13) Jan 22 Zeus 239
Local Gay Rights Advocates Fight Controversial ... Jan 20 DNF 15
You Don't Need Wearable Tech If You Pay Attenti... Jan 20 Kid_Tomorrow 2
Panel calls for bold action to fill critical sh... Jan 17 humanspirit 2
Noah's Ark park in Ky. could sue to get back ta... Jan 4 sheilach 1
More from around the web