Comments (Page 28)
|
“im the webstopper of topix” Since: Mar 10
a trbuite profile of HBK. |
oh ok now i know.
|
|
It is sure funny that a 25 year old EXTREME LIBERAL JEW KID can rise to be syndicated over 65 peanut whistle stations in 4 years! But since the JEWS control the media, it is easy to see how it can happen.
|
|
|
United States |
democrats control the media. and they're not all jewish. the ringleader seems against the jews.(obama)
|
|
“im the webstopper of topix” Since: Mar 10
a trbuite profile of HBK. |
Were good.
|
|
United States |
Well m really glad it exist. I can be racist as All I want. Finally get it out the chest. It's the truff white man. See your crime.
|
|
Since: Aug 09
Location hidden |
Judged: 1 1 1 And, even some of the Jewish Politicians are against the Jews.(Jan Schakowsky) |
|
Since: Aug 09
Location hidden |
Judged: 2 2 1 This is bull. Most of the trouble is caused by non registered trolls who post 24/7 |
this is a very strong comment, and I think you mean strongwilled persons, or those with strong character that forces their wills to return to topix, to not let certain persons get away with certain things, without challenge. I call the topix forum on topix topix hell. I have since learned that several other forums have similar characteristics. Others are not quite as bad. topix has changed its terms of service now, so that the rule is that there are no rules. there are no stated prohibitions about discourtesy and worse. there is the one warning, that topix would cooperate with a judge, if the judge in a lawsuit asks topix to provide the real names and contact addresses for topix commenters being sued for libel. Obviously it will cost someone more than twenty bucks to hire a lawyer and bring a lawsuit for libel. Thus it is even more a case that the poor will suffer abuse, and the rich can get away with abusing others, and can also get away with persecuting others who merely criticize them, by bringing a harassing lawsuit. The poor will very likely not be able to find attorneys willing to take a libel case on a contingency basis, where they get paid only out of the settlement once they win the case and damages are awarded. It would be too iffy to take such a case. An attorney would not feel so confident that a jury would decide in favor of the person who has been attacked, because there is an attitude among many persons that folks should not really mind what is being said about them, but should just ignore it. It is expressed in the old saying: sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me. I notice that the blogger uses the term bottom feeders. I would like to know where that term originated as applied to topix, and what it means as originally intended, and as others interpret it. I regard it as applying to hate speech, and to hostile and/or insulting obscenity or vulgarity or other vicious insults. I think that some folks do not mind vulgarity or obscenity, and may even use it casually themselves, so how would one find out whether a potential juror thought it was OK to use such language? So topix has deliberately opened the door wide to great abuse, by commenters who wish to be abusive. It certainly violates the spirit if not the letter of the topix so called agreement with the AGs. One can see how resentful Tolles was of having to reach some agreement with them, in the thread called something like: When Attorneys General Attack, on this forum, in the article it refers to. One can also learn more about his attitudes in a blog on the Hartford courant alumni association site. google those four words, and the name Chris tolles, and you will find it. |
|
By trouble he means folks who question or criticize him. that is what is meant by trolls when most folks use the word. it is a useless word. It is often merely an accusation against any commenter who criticizes the person who uses the word troll, whenever the person is not able to defend himself against the criticism itself. Those who often cry that they are being attacked or libelled, use it as an excuse to attack and libel others. Dupage is an example of this. And sometimes he does it first, and not merely in retaliation. |
|
|
Since: Nov 09
Smirk .. ;-) |
Judged: 1 1 1 |
|
“Pushing back logs and libs” Since: Jan 08
Location hidden |
What or whose "society" do you speak of? |
|
“There's enough for everyone” Since: Mar 07
USA |
because you are stupid. http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2012/11/24/bla... |
|
Wow smh...
|
|
|
“Pushing back logs and libs” Since: Jan 08
Location hidden |
The Nubian. |
|
Europe |
I neen waec 2013
|
|
United States |
I'm on Topix now, simply just because I like being here. Always will be too for that same reason. That's just it.
|
|
UK |
Me Too!
|
|
Since: Dec 12
Location hidden |
Topix is just an example of your everyday American.
|
|
“I'm better than you” Since: Apr 13
Location hidden |
Topix is a "right-wing" site that promotes propaganda. Half the trolls on here work for them. Slopix is a scam. I will be even surprised if they post this.
|
|
“Pushing back logs and libs” Since: Jan 08
Location hidden |
d news as wellIncorrect. Topix has the largest audience in the world whether silent or active participants and is also the best blog on the net with the most coverage of subject matter and news as well as the best format. IMO It is a very powerful tool when used right. |
|
Tell me when this thread is updated: |
|
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1 hr | Raj Lucknow | 762 |
|
|
4 hr | Ben | 1 |
|
|
8 hr | RICHARD ESTEPHAN | 9 |
|
|
8 hr | Ahmed Abdella muktar | 3 |
|
|
15 hr | ricoh | 162 |
|
|
16 hr | for the record | 5 |
|
|
20 hr | Eliza Taylor | 1 |