NYT Reports On Harassment Against Pro-Marriage Equality NC Business

May 27, 2012 Full story: lezgetreal.com 96

The National Organization for Marriage constantly and consistently makes the argument that, if their donors are known to the public, then they will be harassed and lose business.

Full Story
Herb

Lacon, IL

#21 May 27, 2012
You homofascists are probably proud of your fellow homosexual fanatic who murdered a Mormon bishop in California after Prop 8, leaving little children without a father.
Pat Robertson s Fatwass

Souderton, PA

#22 May 27, 2012
Herb wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for reminding us....
Hey sexually sick filth, people all along the spectrum of sexual orientation who accept theirs ain't the sick ones.

It's the reparations therapy closet cases who protest way too much for eight hours a day who are.

Got it, you sick, buybull bigot?

smirk
Herb

Lacon, IL

#23 May 27, 2012
Pat Robertson s Fatwass wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey sexually sick filth, people all along the spectrum of sexual orientation who accept theirs ain't the sick ones.
It's the reparations therapy closet cases who protest way too much for eight hours a day who are.
Got it, you sick, buybull bigot?
smirk
We all know that you hate yourself and the horrible perversion that has ruined your life, disgraced your family, and separated you from God. Trying to project your perversion as an insult just make YOU look pathetic.

Neither you nor any of the other mindless homofascist clones has been able to refute any one of the following points: Homosexual 'marriage' is a cruel lie with no real basis in how homosexual live!

No significant percent of the homosexual population has 'married' in ANY country that allows it, and studies have shown that few such 'marriages' are even exclusive relationships.

The homosexual 'marriage' movement is a hate based political charade attacking what others hold sacred.

No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No economically or physically unequal genders are involve. No child is ever born as a direct result, and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Having both is one of the most accurate statistical predictions of a child's future success in life.

Homosexual themselves overwhelmingly reject 'marriage' as an actual practice in EVERY country that allows the concocted oxymoron.
Pat Robertson s Fatwass

Souderton, PA

#24 May 27, 2012
Herb wrote:
<quoted text>We all know....
Hey nutcase, you're in the process of becoming a ridiculed outlier.

The American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the World Health Organization, the American Counseling Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the National Association of Social Workers all agree variations in sexual orientation are perfectly normal.\\

Those with their homophobic panties in a wad for eight hours a day are far from normal.

That means you, you insane filth.

smirk

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

#25 May 28, 2012
Herb wrote:
Face reality. There is no logical argument for disenfranchising citizens in order to force the concocted failed philosophy .........
Your Anti-family clap-trap doesn't get any more logical with age, Dear.

Posting it on every thread for the last few years hasn't proved that gay couples and their kids are more secure without legal marriage, and certainly hasn't shown that society is better off with fewer married couples and more children without married parents.

So, why do it?

Obsession, perhaps? Because of your own failed marriage?

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

#26 May 28, 2012
Herb wrote:
You homofascists are probably proud of your fellow homosexual fanatic who murdered a Mormon bishop in California after Prop 8, leaving little children without a father.
No one is happy when anyone is harmed by others.

But, just as logic dictates that we do not hold all religious minded people accountable for every murder, molestation, or crime committed by one of them, it is no more sensible to assume that every person who is gay is collectively guilty for the crime of another.

But then, David, logic is not your strong point, is it?

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

#27 May 28, 2012
Herb wrote:
<quoted text>We all know that you hate yourself and the horrible perversion that has ruined your life, disgraced your family, and separated you from God. Trying to project your perversion as an insult just make YOU look pathetic.
..
But David, isn't that exactly what happened to you?

Anyone who has been to your pages on the internet understands you are a closeted gay man yourself, even though you toned down the sparkly and fluffy blue-eyed Jesus pictures.

We know that your marriage failed because of it, and the hatred you feel toward yourself consumes you. Your way of dealing with it it to pretend that others view you as a beacon of light and a mouthpiece for God, and your campaign against yourself is really all you have to prove your worth.

Grow up, David. It's not to late to walk with Christ as a mature adult, instead of a perpetually hurt child who strikes out at others for their own imagined flaws.

“Church | | State”

Since: Jun 07

Toby's Landing

#28 May 28, 2012
Herb wrote:
<quoted text>Are you living under a rock? North Carolina just joined the strong majority of states with constitutional amendments against your ridiculous political charade, with more states coming this fall.
You are of course lying about the Bible- or perhaps just ignorantly repeating lies from radical homosexual hate sites.
You know positively nothing about my marriage. Does making up lies and calling me a name other than my own make you feel better?
FIRST OF ALL, how DARE you get all self-righteous on me about calling you by the name everyone knows you by here. You change your post name virtually EVERY TIME you type something here. Are you so delusional you don't think anybody notices?!?

And North Carolina's amendment was voted on during a primary. Right-wing nut cases always bother to vote in primaries... especially in a year when only the Republicans have more than one person on the ballot. So most of North Carolina's people did not express an opinion. It's a pitfall of our political system. Besides, when the Supreme Court overturns all those amendments that were passed ONLY for the reason to enshrine theocratic-based discrimination into the state constitutions they will all be null and void anyway.

Have you ever really READ the bible??? I have. Go back and review all of the "marriages" spread throughout it. Marriages were arranged, men had entire concubines of women, and if you REALLY believe all that crap Eve was actually part of Adam so he essentially was "married" to himself. It's all there in print... I have never been to a "radical homosexual hate site" nor does anyone have to go to one to see through the fantasy that so many delusional people hold as truth.

And you are right... I know very little about your marriage. But it looks like I hit a nerve so there must be something about it that gets you razzed up when somebody mentions it. However, I really don't give two sh!ts about you or your marriage or divorce. You are just an annoying troll with all your copy-and-paste baloney you post here under 10 million different names. It's just fun sometimes to throw a rock at you and get you all flustered. I was successful!
Herb

Lacon, IL

#29 May 28, 2012
Lazlow wrote:
<quoted text>
FIRST OF ALL, how DARE you get all self-righteous on me about calling you by the name everyone knows you by here. You change your post name virtually EVERY TIME you type something here. Are you so delusional you don't think anybody notices?!?
And North Carolina's amendment was voted on during a primary. Right-wing nut cases always bother to vote in primaries... especially in a year when only the Republicans have more than one person on the ballot. So most of North Carolina's people did not express an opinion. It's a pitfall of our political system. Besides, when the Supreme Court overturns all those amendments that were passed ONLY for the reason to enshrine theocratic-based discrimination into the state constitutions they will all be null and void anyway.
Have you ever really READ the bible??? I have. Go back and review all of the "marriages" spread throughout it. Marriages were arranged, men had entire concubines of women, and if you REALLY believe all that crap Eve was actually part of Adam so he essentially was "married" to himself. It's all there in print... I have never been to a "radical homosexual hate site" nor does anyone have to go to one to see through the fantasy that so many delusional people hold as truth.
And you are right... I know very little about your marriage. But it looks like I hit a nerve so there must be something about it that gets you razzed up when somebody mentions it. However, I really don't give two sh!ts about you or your marriage or divorce. You are just an annoying troll with all your copy-and-paste baloney you post here under 10 million different names. It's just fun sometimes to throw a rock at you and get you all flustered. I was successful!
I've never been divorced, you liar.

You are quite out of touch with North Carolina. There were many hotly contested contests in both parties. The People of North Carolina strongly rejected homosexual 'marriage,' just as homosexuals themselves have rejected your ridiculous oxymoron as an actual practice in EVERY country that allows it.

It is ludicrous to claim that opposition to discriminatory benefits and subsidies for a homosexual lifestyle choice are 'theocratically based.' Leftwing atheist nations have actually been among the most ardent in opposition to homosexuality. Stalin tried to exterminate homosexuals. Fidel sent them to labor camps for generations. Beijing recently tried to purge their capitol of homosexual activity to clean up for the Olympics.

There is no rational basis for homosexual marriage. Homosexual 'marriage' is a cruel lie with no real basis in how homosexual live!

No significant percent of the homosexual population has 'married' in ANY country that allows it, and studies have shown that few such 'marriages' are even exclusive relationships.

The homosexual 'marriage' movement is a hate based political charade attacking what others hold sacred.

No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No economically or physically unequal genders are involve. No child is ever born as a direct result, and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Having both is one of the most accurate statistical predictions of a child's future success in life.

Homosexual themselves overwhelmingly reject 'marriage' as an actual practice in EVERY country that allows the concocted oxymoron.
hi hi

Lancaster, PA

#30 May 28, 2012
Herb wrote:
<quoted text>Nonsense. No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and if the Bush tax cuts expire as Demonrats wish, there will be a marriage penalty again and not a benefit.
If you want to marry and can find a partner, do so. If you want to do something homosexual, don't expect other Americans to pay for discriminatory benefits and subsidies for your sin.
What's amazing is that your lies and bullshit are never changing anyone's mind, yet you continue to spout them: In fact, you are *forcing your opinions down others' throats*, constantly and without the slightest concern for your lies and misinformation.

You can call being gay "sin" until you have collapsed forward and are choking to death on the ground, and no one who disagrees is going to react to ANYTHING but the fact that it is your own personal problem.

Everything you post is about your own personal problems. It is *your* problem that you call inborn orientation a "sin." It is *your* problem that you cannot force the pro-gay to cooperate with you. This is never, ever going to change.

The more you answer others back, the more you give them the right to answer you. None of them are interested in your personal problems or the sociopathic views of the antigay. Face it: You *cannot* change this and every. last. post. you. ever. make. confirms it, again and again and again.

NOTHING you say or do will ever stop anyone from seeing you as demonic, your words as vomit, and their own lives as worthy of every right any other person has.

Nothing.

But keep trying; you just keep harassing people for six months, a year, five years, and *see how many minds you ever change*.

Because in the past

SEVERAL YEARS,

on these boards,

you have converted zero persons.

Ever.

Congratulations for a success rate of zero, defective filth.

Congratulations, indeed.

How's that feel?

Hmmmm?
hi hi

Lancaster, PA

#31 May 28, 2012
Herb wrote:
<quoted text>I've never been divorced, you liar.
You lie about everyone here.

That doesn't give them the right to say *whatever they believe to be true* about you?

You state what you believe to be "true" about them.

They have *exactly* the same right.

Dumbass.
Herb wrote:
You are quite out of touch with North Carolina.(rest of post constitutes more crying; I didn't read it)
As soon as I got to the second sentence, I skipped the rest of the post.

You don't have some special right here that others don't have; by your own admission, everyone's rights are identical.

So why do you cry like a snot-stuffed pig every time people answer you back? Explain to the board why YOU personally act like they don't have the right to answer you back because you pretend being gay is a "sin" and is "wrong" and boo hoo hoo, all your other infected Nazi bullshit.

Christ, it's like you are having a hissy fit because you cannot force people to believe your lies.

They have a right to ignore your lies, you know.

They have a *literal god-given right* to identify your lies as lies, and to ignore them.

If that sucks for you, I can't IMAGINE on god's green earth why you would sit here amongst these people and cry about it. I have never seen *one whit* of concern from these people about your life or the crap you spew. Not once.

Christ, are you really that goddamned stupid? That's how you look from here, champ.
Herb

Lacon, IL

#32 May 28, 2012
hi hi wrote:
<quoted text>
You lie about everyone here.
That doesn't give them the right to say *whatever they believe to be true* about you?
You state what you believe to be "true" about them.
They have *exactly* the same right.
Dumbass.
<quoted text>
As soon as I got to the second sentence, I skipped the rest of the post.
You don't have some special right here that others don't have; by your own admission, everyone's rights are identical.
So why do you cry like a snot-stuffed pig every time people answer you back? Explain to the board why YOU personally act like they don't have the right to answer you back because you pretend being gay is a "sin" and is "wrong" and boo hoo hoo, all your other infected Nazi bullshit.
Christ, it's like you are having a hissy fit because you cannot force people to believe your lies.
They have a right to ignore your lies, you know.
They have a *literal god-given right* to identify your lies as lies, and to ignore them.
If that sucks for you, I can't IMAGINE on god's green earth why you would sit here amongst these people and cry about it. I have never seen *one whit* of concern from these people about your life or the crap you spew. Not once.
Christ, are you really that goddamned stupid? That's how you look from here, champ.
Thank you for confirming that you are completely unable to refute even one point that I've made.

That leaves homosexual 'marriage' exposed as a fraud and a lie.
Mormon Dead Jew Baptisms

Souderton, PA

#33 May 28, 2012
Herb wrote:
<quoted text>Thank you....
You're welcome, you sick freeek. Now stfu and die.

You buybull babble only about the homo .05% of the buybull because that's your sole fixation in life.

You're sick. Every single accredited psychiatric, social worker, psychological association agrees that homophobia is the sickness, not variations in sexual orientation.
Keith

Boston, MA

#34 May 28, 2012
&#61623; Long before it became a sacrament, marriage was a part of many human cultures, and some sense of the greatness of the matrimonial union existed in all of them. Married couples are mentioned in Scripture throughout both Old and New Testaments. And it is clear that Jesus&#8223; parents were married as were at least some of the Apostles.
&#61623; Before the 11th century, there were no uniform church regulations for marriage in the Latin (Roman) Church. For the first few centuries of Christianity, the community simply adopted familial customs of marriage in the home. Church leaders relied primarily on the civil government of Rome to regulate marriage and divorce between Christians and non-Christians alike. With the fall of the Roman Empire, the Church gradually began to take legal control over marriage and make it an official church function. In the Middle Ages, Augustine&#8223;s teaching led the Church to an explicit consciousness of the sacramentality of marriage among the baptized.
&#61623; In the twelfth century, the idea of marriage as a „sacrament&#8223;, i.e., as something fundamentally regulated by the Church, was established.
&#61623; The Council of Trent in the 16th c. capped a long development by declaring marriage as one of the seven sacraments of the Church.
Maybe the pseudo christians should research their own history before engaging other communication devices. But, then again, superstition has never been about anything but fear.
Austin

Lacon, IL

#35 May 28, 2012
Keith wrote:
&#61623; Long before it became a sacrament, marriage was a part of many human cultures, and some sense of the greatness of the matrimonial union existed in all of them. Married couples are mentioned in Scripture throughout both Old and New Testaments. And it is clear that Jesus&#8223; parents were married as were at least some of the Apostles.
&#61623; Before the 11th century, there were no uniform church regulations for marriage in the Latin (Roman) Church. For the first few centuries of Christianity, the community simply adopted familial customs of marriage in the home. Church leaders relied primarily on the civil government of Rome to regulate marriage and divorce between Christians and non-Christians alike. With the fall of the Roman Empire, the Church gradually began to take legal control over marriage and make it an official church function. In the Middle Ages, Augustine&#8223;s teaching led the Church to an explicit consciousness of the sacramentality of marriage among the baptized.
&#61623; In the twelfth century, the idea of marriage as a „sacrament&#8223;, i.e., as something fundamentally regulated by the Church, was established.
&#61623; The Council of Trent in the 16th c. capped a long development by declaring marriage as one of the seven sacraments of the Church.
Maybe the pseudo christians should research their own history before engaging other communication devices. But, then again, superstition has never been about anything but fear.
Homofascist hatred of Christianity doesn't justify disenfranchising citizens on the legal definition of marriage.

There is no logical justification for making anything homosexual a 'marriage.' Such relationships share none of the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No economically unequal genders are involved needing government protection. No child is ever born as a direct result. Homosexual 'marriage' isn't even the basis of homosexual 'society,' much less of society as a whole.

Americans overwhelmingly reject providing discriminatory benefits and subsidies to relationships based on sodomy.
Hoodathunkit

Mount Gilead, OH

#36 May 28, 2012
Herb wrote:
<quoted text>So why did that imaginary refutation disappear?
Hint: it never existed. Your ridiculous homofascist hate remains exposed as fraud.
Post 10 still remains intact and refutes everything that you have claimed. In fact, similar refutations exist on every thread that you post your concocted hate based drivel. Hint: you just aren't smart enough to face the reality that you have been exposed as a liar. You remain exposed as a fraud for your ridiculous concocted fascist hate-based bigotted lies.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#37 May 28, 2012
Keith wrote:
&#61623; Long before it became a sacrament, marriage was a part of many human cultures, and some sense of the greatness of the matrimonial union existed in all of them. Married couples are mentioned in Scripture throughout both Old and New Testaments. And it is clear that Jesus&#8223; parents were married as were at least some of the Apostles.
&#61623; Before the 11th century, there were no uniform church regulations for marriage in the Latin (Roman) Church. For the first few centuries of Christianity, the community simply adopted familial customs of marriage in the home. Church leaders relied primarily on the civil government of Rome to regulate marriage and divorce between Christians and non-Christians alike. With the fall of the Roman Empire, the Church gradually began to take legal control over marriage and make it an official church function. In the Middle Ages, Augustine&#8223;s teaching led the Church to an explicit consciousness of the sacramentality of marriage among the baptized.
&#61623; In the twelfth century, the idea of marriage as a „sacrament&#8223;, i.e., as something fundamentally regulated by the Church, was established.
&#61623; The Council of Trent in the 16th c. capped a long development by declaring marriage as one of the seven sacraments of the Church.
Maybe the pseudo christians should research their own history before engaging other communication devices. But, then again, superstition has never been about anything but fear.
You forgot the most important one
.
Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines. 1000 women all married to each other is the biggest gay marriage in the Bible
.
Solomon would need 25 Greyhound buses just to take his 1000 wives d!ldo shopping at Victoria's secret
Hoodathunkit

Mount Gilead, OH

#42 May 28, 2012
Herb wrote:
<quoted text>Thank you for confirming that you are completely unable to refute even one point that I've made.
That leaves homosexual 'marriage' exposed as a fraud and a lie.
Post 10 remains intact and refutes every lie you have posted. That leaves you exposed as a fraud and a lie.

“We are all atheists”

Since: May 11

Lewes, DE

#43 May 28, 2012
Keith wrote:
&#61623; Long before it became a sacrament, marriage was a part of many human cultures, and some sense of the greatness of the matrimonial union existed in all of them. Married couples are mentioned in Scripture throughout both Old and New Testaments. And it is clear that Jesus&#8223; parents were married as were at least some of the Apostles...
Just a reminder: Mary and Joseph may have been married, but if so, jesus' dad was an adulterer.
clem

Hamilton, Canada

#44 May 28, 2012
Gay And Proud wrote:
Give it up, David. Repeating the same failed arguments over and over doesn't transform them into correct statements.
The FACT is that in places, like Canada, where same-sex marriage has been legally recognized there has been absolutely no impact on heterosexual marriage. Straight people still go on with their lives like they always have, getting married, having kids, staying together if they're lucky and work hard at their relationships.
And despite the doom and gloom predictions from homophobes like you, Canada is actually doing just fine thank you very much almost ten years now after same-sex marriage was legalized across the country. And it's the same outcome everywhere else it's been legalized too.
I can't even remember the last time anybody i know even talked about it. Then again i don't go to church and listen to hate talk.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Household Products Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Lawsuits claims Aarons providing bed bug-infest... (Mar '12) Thu Sheritta Lawson 82
Activist pleads guilty in Ohio for P&G HQ protest Sep 8 Pops 1
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Home Depot, ... Sep 7 saL 1
Home Depot holds job fair for Brampton West store Aug 23 JAnet 1
Ecolab, 3M send medical supplies to West Africa Aug 21 Jessie 1
Sterilite steps up to the plate again, this tim... (Nov '10) Jul '14 flexmaster 9
Lowe's agrees to $500,000 settlement over EPA v... Jul '14 kep1979 14
•••

Household Products People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••