Sealed Cases To Be Reviewed

Sealed Cases To Be Reviewed

There are 30 comments on the Hartford Courant story from May 4, 2007, titled Sealed Cases To Be Reviewed. In it, Hartford Courant reports that:

Some `Level 2s' Involve Prominent Corporate Leaders, Judges May 5, 2007 By DAVE ALTIMARI , Courant Staff Writer The state's judicial branch will review about 500 sealed civil and family cases, some involving ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hartford Courant.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Mac

Higganum, CT

#22 May 5, 2007
Susan Gaines wrote:
It's not right that individuals with wealth and power can have access to sealing cases where other individuals can't have the same right to privacy.
This has the appearance of being favortism/doing favors ext.
For the most part you only had to make the motion. No wealth or power required. Whose business is it anyhow what is contained in indviduals' divorce. Everyone wants to be a vouyer.
Mac

Higganum, CT

#23 May 5, 2007
Steven_G_Erickson wrote:
Maybe more than just the sealed cases should be looked at.
Supreme Court Justice William J. Sullivan proved that he can and will pull a fast one. If he was the head of the Judiciary and it is run like an Organized Crime Syndicate, there have been grave injustices.
What about victims of judicial misconduct, I know many.
There are many sociopaths that are judges.
Judge Scheinblum would tell minority and poor whites to shut and take a deal with no lawyer present, guilty or not. He would use a violin in chambers to decide how harsh to punish a defendant. A bad note, a harsh sentence. Scheinblum has been overtly racist allegedly commenting on minorities from the bench.
Judge Jonathan Kaplan will expound on someone's racial background that use that to sentence someone or take away their kids. Kaplan will follow someone around the court house and block their exit with a car if the person has complained against him. Judge Jonathan Kaplan may have aligned himself with former Connecticut State Police Commissioner Arthur L. Spada to railroad citizens that proposed legislation to elected officials, police didn't like and that had got "mouthy" in newspapers about police or the courts.
I sent a registered letter regarding felonies being committed by judges and police in Connecticut to Judge William J. Sullivan.
I went up to Sullivan when he was in the hallway outside the Judicial hearings deciding his fate and asked him about whether or not the felonies that I had informed him of, made him guilty of felonies if he did not pass it on to proper investigative channels.
http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/20...
It's time for your medication.
No Name Please

Litchfield, CT

#24 May 5, 2007
As an ex-wife of a Connecticut State Attorney, I can vouch first hand for the special privledges, favoritism and abuse of authority and power that takes place within our court system. It amazes me that when a Prosecutor is charged with contempt of court, he can get his court room cleared and his court records sealed. Would the court give the same privacy to a janitor, a sales person, a teacher or a nurse?

I work in a hospital - and we provide the best possible care to anyone who comes through our doors. Preferential treatment is not given to other healthcare workers. We even treat lawyers! So why are a certain privledged few given special treatment in the court system?

I am pleased to hear that the Chief Justice is attempting to finally bring "justice" back into the judicial system. Our First Amendment was never written to exclude a privledged few.
JOHN

Bridgeport, CT

#25 May 5, 2007
what does that mean? Bringing justice back into the judicial system. Where did go?? I think the former chief justice was the first to unseal these types of cases. But I agree good for chief justice rogers to continue. That is great news.
Ray Spruance

New Canaan, CT

#26 May 6, 2007
Mac wrote:
<quoted text> Hey Ray get a life.
Huh? What's your problem you nutless anonymous troll?
Mac

Ashford, CT

#27 May 6, 2007
Ray Spruance wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? What's your problem you nutless anonymous troll?
No I'm sorry I'm not a relative of yours>
Steven_G_Erickso n

Westfield, MA

#28 May 6, 2007
No Name Please wrote:
As an ex-wife of a Connecticut State Attorney, I can vouch first hand for the special privledges, favoritism and abuse of authority and power that takes place within our court system. It amazes me that when a Prosecutor is charged with contempt of court, he can get his court room cleared and his court records sealed. Would the court give the same privacy to a janitor, a sales person, a teacher or a nurse?
I work in a hospital - and we provide the best possible care to anyone who comes through our doors. Preferential treatment is not given to other healthcare workers. We even treat lawyers! So why are a certain privledged few given special treatment in the court system?
I am pleased to hear that the Chief Justice is attempting to finally bring "justice" back into the judicial system. Our First Amendment was never written to exclude a privledged few.
Court cases are fixed in Connecticut.

Rowland just assumed the judges and others he appointed would never break ranks.

Rowland should have gotten life behind bars.

Until Judges, prosecutors, police, other law enforcement, and defense attorneys have to face regular arrests and processing, the abuse will only continue.

Ray Spruance

New Canaan, CT

#29 May 6, 2007
Mac wrote:
<quoted text>
No I'm sorry I'm not a relative of yours>
Speaking of nutless anonymous trolls ...
Oklahoma Observer

United States

#30 May 7, 2007
What are all you Yankees attacking each other about? Closed government IS corrupt government. Bring the sunlight in, always! As in every profession, a large percent in the legal profession are grossly incompetent and must be watched by the public it serves. The Courant and the other publisher have got to be thanked for making the effort to help sunlight in. Thank you.
Felicita Luna

Largo, FL

#32 Jun 19, 2012
"Supreme Court Justice William J. Sullivan proved that he can and will pull a fast one." This judge deprived me of every right to be heard on the merit of my case Luna vs.Dobson then goes and dismisses my case with prejudice. Evidence goes missing and I wasn't given access to my files. He did this over and again!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Financial Services Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Man charged in Hinsdale slaying wants speedy tr... Fri maureen 1
News Trump holds campaign-style rally in Iowa Thu Denizen_Kate 5
News Newt Gingrich's Freddie Mac Fees: Received At L... (Nov '11) Jun 20 Merchant of Alzhe... 53
News General Electric Pursues Spinoff, Sale of Consu... (Jul '08) Jun 20 ratboy 5,495
News Senator Warren urges U.S. Fed to fire Wells Far... Jun 19 fingers mcgurke 2
News To boycott, or not to boycott over Trumpian 'Ju... Jun 13 Anita Bryant s Jihad 2
News General Electric Announces Jeff Immelt Will Ste... Jun 12 Fred 1
More from around the web