Was nuclear the right decision for SC...

Was nuclear the right decision for SCE&G?

There are 2 comments on the Post and Courier story from Jul 7, 2013, titled Was nuclear the right decision for SCE&G?. In it, Post and Courier reports that:

The blue heavy-lift derrick, one of the two largest cranes in the world, sits between Nuclear Unit No.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Post and Courier.


Humble, TX

#1 Jul 7, 2013
No, nuclear probably would not have been a real option were it not for South Carolina's law shifting the up-front costs to customers. Without it, Marsh said,“we probably would not have undertaken construction.”

There you go.

Etobicoke, Canada

#2 Jul 7, 2013
Nuclear is certainly like renewables in terms that most costs are 'front loaded'. This makes government loan guarantees a way to encourage or discourage investment.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Latest: Analyst: Refinery fire unlikely to affe... Oct 18 wichita-rick 2
News Utility scrutinized as California wildfire vict... Oct 18 Cordwainer Trout 2
News Wildfires, now up to 100 miles wide, threaten m... Oct 18 OneWomynRiot 3
News Power generating station beginning to take shape (Jan '08) Oct 17 same went on here 133
News Inside The Herald - If a community is only wort... (Jan '08) Oct 17 2 late eh 57
News Arnold Schneider's Best-Performing Stocks (Oct '16) Oct 14 Flint MI 4
News Westport Filmmaker Harvey Weinstein Accused Of ... Oct 10 WATCHING LIVONIA 2
More from around the web