|
Far Away
Anchorage, AK
|
WeTheSheeple wrote: <quoted text> Which means they don't need additional taxpayer welfare. Are you aware that a great deal of oil company profits are paid out in dividends to stockholders, much of it in middle-class Americans' 401(k)'s and other retirement plans, including unions?
|
|
Since: Oct 08
Pooler, GA
|
Please wait...
Far Away wrote: <quoted text> Are you aware that a great deal of oil company profits are paid out in dividends to stockholders, much of it in middle-class Americans' 401(k)'s and other retirement plans, including unions? Al Gore must be aware, he sold out to an oil company....thereby throwing his former fellow huggers under the bus
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Since: Nov 07
Tawas City, Michigan
|
Please wait...
Far Away wrote: <quoted text> This is one of the big lies. You--and the rest of the ignorant masses--seem to believe that the government is sending checks from the government to oil companies when, in fact, these so-called subsidies are monies the government never had. IT'S A BIG LIE; it isn't any more welfare than your home mortgage interest deduction, which is money the government never had, either. And the home mortgage welfare deduction needs to go away as well. They are getting out of paying taxes they would normally have to pay without those special deductions. Guess who has to make up for that? The rest of us.
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Since: Nov 07
Tawas City, Michigan
|
Please wait...
Far Away wrote: <quoted text> Are you aware that a great deal of oil company profits are paid out in dividends to stockholders, much of it in middle-class Americans' 401(k)'s and other retirement plans, including unions? Yes, I get dividends every month from one of my oil or gas stocks. That's just more proof they are so profitable they don't need any taxpayer welfare.
|
|
“Forever Is Promised To No One”
Since: Nov 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
WeTheSheeple wrote: <quoted text> Which means they don't need additional taxpayer welfare. Fine with me. Stop all welfare while we are at it. Course then the real battle for the blights begans. Without slums, Jarrett would go broke.
|
|
“Forever Is Promised To No One”
Since: Nov 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
WeTheSheeple wrote: <quoted text> And the home mortgage welfare deduction needs to go away as well. They are getting out of paying taxes they would normally have to pay without those special deductions. Guess who has to make up for that? The rest of us. Why didn't Obama spend time on the tax code instead of a year of coersion for ObamaScare.
|
|
conservative crapola
Bethlehem, PA
|
au contraire wrote: <quoted text> When will hypocrit teabaggers offer a bill pledging that their red states won't accept $1. more than the amount in tax they sent to DC? Okiehomo grabs $1.64 for every $1. they send. So, while guys like coburn prance around outraged at spending, he continues to get his palms greased at taxpayers expense.
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Since: Nov 07
Tawas City, Michigan
|
Please wait...
au contraire wrote: <quoted text>Why didn't Obama spend time on the tax code instead of a year of coersion for ObamaScare. Because the healthcare reform was more important at the time.
|
|
|
|
“Forever Is Promised To No One”
Since: Nov 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
conservative crapola wrote: <quoted text> When will hypocrit teabaggers offer a bill pledging that their red states won't accept $1. more than the amount in tax they sent to DC? Okiehomo grabs $1.64 for every $1. they send. So, while guys like coburn prance around outraged at spending, he continues to get his palms greased at taxpayers expense. When will the Blue states quit giving american jobs to illegals and paying others to set on their ass.
|
|
conservative crapola
Bethlehem, PA
|
au contraire wrote: <quoted text> Deflection noted, pookster. Afraid of losing your candy? hahahahahahahahahahaha
|
|
“Forever Is Promised To No One”
Since: Nov 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
conservative crapola wrote: <quoted text> Deflection noted, pookster. Afraid of losing your candy? hahahahahahahahahahaha Well, ask your boy Obama or Geitner. They are the ones controlling the tax revenues.
|
|
“Obama's YouTubeGate”
Since: Mar 09
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
|
Please wait...
How about we tax them to death until they go bankrupt then we can all live by candlelit and take cold showers every night. WOOHOO, thanks Obama!!
|
|
“Forever Is Promised To No One”
Since: Nov 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
WeTheSheeple wrote: <quoted text> Who cares? They still make hundreds of billions in profit every year. There is no reason for the taxpayer further subsidizing them. They already screw us over at the pump every day. If you don't like companies that make a profit and create jobs, I suggest you move to North Korea or Cuba. They welcome american traitors they can use for propaganda.
|
|
“Voters elect Big Bird”
Since: Jan 07
Dump American Eagle
|
Please wait...
celticwarriors wrote: Make all the Kochsuckers pay aLL the taxes they owe with no loopholes. Pay for climate destruction, too! Prsonally,I'm waiting for the demoncraps to propose curbing big welfare's entitlement benifits......
|
|
“Voters elect Big Bird”
Since: Jan 07
Dump American Eagle
|
Please wait...
tha Professor wrote: <quoted text> Why do Republicans give away our tax dollars to the most profitable companies on Earth, then whine that we'll "hurt" them if we take away some of their tax breaks? You love corporate welfare, don't you bitches?:) Why does Obama give our tax dollars to the least likely (green_?_energy) companies to succeed,then deny any political donation ties to his campaign? You love crony capitalism,don't you sh1theel?
|
|
“Voters elect Big Bird”
Since: Jan 07
Dump American Eagle
|
Please wait...
tha Professor wrote: let's see if the GOPee will fight this one to protect their wealthy Big Energy buddies...and what that would do to further damage their election chances! Heh...good move by Dems. These filthy rich scum should NEVER get any kind of tax break. Wonder how Obama is gonna spin his justification for giving even MORE tax dollars to his green energy political cronies to set up front companies and rob the funds to line their collective pockets? The House must insure that Obama corruption is halted by denying ANY funding he directs to ANY "green" energy company he denotes.
|
|
“Obama's YouTubeGate”
Since: Mar 09
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
|
Please wait...
An attack on BigOil is an attack on our economy...America cannot survive without BigOil and the contributions it makes which is why Obama hates them.
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Since: Nov 07
Tawas City, Michigan
|
Please wait...
au contraire wrote: <quoted text>If you don't like companies that make a profit and create jobs, I suggest you move to North Korea or Cuba. They welcome american traitors they can use for propaganda. I have no problem with them making a profit and creating jobs; in fact I've make thousands in profits off their stock. That said, they shouldn't be getting taxpayer welfare.
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Since: Nov 07
Tawas City, Michigan
|
Please wait...
okimar wrote: <quoted text>Prsonally,I'm waiting for the demoncraps to propose curbing big welfare's entitlement benifits...... The Dems ARE trying to get rid of the big welfare entitlement payments to Big Pharma, Big Oil, and Big Coal, but the GOPasaurs keep fighting them.
|
|
“Headed toward the cliff”
Since: Nov 07
Tawas City, Michigan
|
Please wait...
American_Infidel wrote: How about we tax them to death until they go bankrupt then we can all live by candlelit and take cold showers every night. WOOHOO, thanks Obama!! Wow, you're quite the drama queen for someone who's so anti-gay. Who ever said they wanted to bankrupt the oil & gas companies? We just expect them to pay their fair share of taxes instead of taking more taxpayer financed welfare.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|